Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "USA TODAY" channel.

We don't even know what's going to happen to those who get the vaccine, long-term. For that reason alone, pressuring and especially requiring people to get it is extremely irresponsible.
28
Roughly translated, it means "We're stupid".
19
What's wrong, did no one bring a "Black Lives Matter" flag?
12
"I don't even know what a woman is, but please defer to my wisdom as I help lead this country."
12
Mr. "White people don't know what it's like to be poor" himself.
4
Until it doesn't. Meanwhile, they admitted to reporting on Covid (both cases and deaths) with fake numbers over a year ago.
4
Most of the time, Trump's telling an exaggerated truth. Before the coronavirus (or more specifically, the panic over the virus), we were seeing record-low unemployment rates (lower than before the recession), increased wages, prison reform, Right to Try, lower prescription drug prices, etc. And even not things are improving again. Besides, I couldn't in good conscience vote for Biden who is currently bailing out the rioters so they can get back to killing innocent people in the streets.
3
All of the top comments are critical of the video. Yet I'm to believe there are 10 times as many likes as dislikes.
3
@usnasi4439 Nor is that what I said. It's a moral question: should I pressure/require people to do something I don't even know is safe? I would say no, even if they chose to put me in charge of that decision (directly or indirectly).
3
It's almost like when he isn't thinking about groping them, he's thinking about killing them.
2
Well, close. A woman is an adult human female, with "female" being someone whose body is structured toward the purpose of producing large gametes (ova). This would include women who, by whatever defect or aging process, etc., cannot quite produce ova as well. But notice, even if the definition for "woman" given by conservatives is inadequate, the other side can't seem to give an objective definition at all. Yet they pretend it makes sense to call us incorrect on this issue.
2
@KatieRaeRae Oh the horror.
2
@c-rexintellect9722 What's "silly" about not pushing a vaccine you don't even know is safe?
2
stopthecrazyguy Actually, they admitted to reporting on Covid with fake numbers (both cases and deaths) over a year ago. So we're not sure about even that. But the point remains that it's up to each and every individual to choose for themselves, what risks they want to assume. Because there are risks either way, and it's neither my place nor yours to choose which risks other people should take.
2
Democrats: We are fighting against fascism! Also Democrats: The government really should be in control of what we say, you know.
2
I don't care if he brags so long as he keeps doing a great job. It's time to stop freaking out about every little thing.
2
@kaijsadragonborn119 Well, we Trump supporters don't believe that BLM is a sophisticated terrorist organization, no...
1
Not at all, the statements have a clear meaning, they're just not very specific. When he says, "We're seeing massive job growth, the best job growth", shit like that, he means we're seeing job growth and he thinks of it as "massive" and "the best". The numbers don't lie, though. He's telling the truth.
1
@MuffinsAPlenty "What's interesting is that the "adult human female" definition mixes law with biology. You use a biological definition for both "human" and "female", but eschew the biological definition of "adult" for a legal definition of "adult"." Because the legal definition for "adult" is at least coherent and workable. The definitions offered for "gender", "man" or "woman", on your worldview, are not. "Otherwise, most 13 year-old girls would be women - exactly the age Matt Walsh likes them!" Unfounded accusation, especially about someone who specifically says all the time that children cannot consent. "This, obviously, raises the question, then, why "woman" can't have a legal definition separate from the biological definition, if "adult" also does." I don't think it does. But again, the reason the proposed change to how we define "woman" is being rejected is because it's incoherent. "After all, women aren't discriminated against on the basis of having a body structured toward the purpose of producing large gametes of based on their chromosomal composition; rather, they're discriminated against by their appearance." Nonsense. It is very much the assumption of sexists that because women are different biologically they should be discriminated against. A woman might be able to trick these people into thinking she's a man, to avoid discrimination, but from their perspective they're not discriminating against that person because she's one of them.
1
Exactly.
1
@Stargazer1800 Of course we do, there are vaccines that have been around and widely distributed for well over a year. But this one's new, and to fight a virus they had to lie to us about just to get us amply scared of. Not to mention that they're pushing it with some creepy desperation.
1
@soulofhonor7945 Nonsense, you're only making assumptions about what's going to happen (probably because you've taken the vaccine and you don't want to think of anything bad coming of it). But the fact stands that we don't know, and taken together with how they've been lying to us about just how dangerous Covid really is and how desperate they've been to have everyone take this experimental vaccine, choosing to not assume that risk is perfectly reasonable.
1
@kylandterrell1691 Well recently he's taken action to try and get some of these riots under control. Meanwhile, Joe Biden is bailing the rioters out so they can get back to killing innocent people (including blacks). But before that, Trump was doing great. Record-low unemployment rates (lower than before the recession), increased wages, prison reform, Right to Try, lower prescription drug prices, the list goes on and on.
1