Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "Kyle Kulinski: Democrats Picked Wrong Argument for Impeachment" video.

  1. This guy's full of shit. I watched his debate with Charlie Kirk. He completely failed to provide any evidence that Trump was going after Joe Biden specifically, despite Charlie asking him repeatedly to show where that was said in the transcript. All he could say was shit like "Everybody knows he's guilty". That's when you know it's all BS. Charlie also shut this silly claim up that Trump is guilty of corruption concerning the Saudi Arabian weapons deal. Charlie countered with the point that 300,000 dollars probably wouldn't be any sort of incentive for someone with 3.8 billion dollars and an organization making hundreds of millions of dollars, and Kyle had nothing but scoffs to respond with. But maybe an illustration where we remove some zeros would help us understand the point better. Suppose you own 38,000 dollars and your organization makes thousands of dollars every day... Could I convince you to do something shady that might get you in legal trouble... for 3 bucks? Could I convince you to do anything for that amount? Probably not. As for the made-up moral obligation to sell all of your international assets when you become president, this seems to be more about trying to avoid the allegation of corruption than corruption itself, because there's nothing corrupt at all about simply keeping what you've built up or earned before being elected. These are no better grounds for impeachment than the nonsense they went with. They dropped the claim of bribery because of lack of evidence; they would have had to drop these sorts of claims for the same reason. The challenge to people like Kyle to find evidence of corruption remains unmet.
    1