General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Vic 2.0
RattlesnakeTV
comments
Comments by "Vic 2.0" (@Vic2point0) on "RattlesnakeTV" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Can't be surprised when someone who doesn't know the difference between men and women, also doesn't know what a life or a baby is.
77
"libertarian socialism" You are FREE to be forced to gimme all your money!
45
David Pakman: "If you're libertarian, you'll be more likely to vote Republican." And there it is. Pakman won this for Trump in those few seconds, lol.
29
Agreed for the most part, but the attack on Debra Lea doesn't work logically. If we're talking from a Christian point of view, women were never called to submit to all men, just their husbands. In a debate setting, it's perfectly fine for them to not submit to some random debate opponent.
8
I am not going to like this video. I am going to respect it.
6
Jesus. Flipped. Tables. And telling people that setting and enforcing limits is excluding or hating them is extremely irresponsible. Whose feet did Jesus wash? His disciples, because they weren't all just buddies; they acknowledged they were living wrong and agreed to change first. So you love everyone, sure, but you don't accept bad behavior from anyone. Period.
5
These people can never give an objective, workable definition for "gender", "man", "woman", etc. Yet they think it's logically possible for anyone to ever be misgendered, on their worldview. It's also funny when they claim that gender is a social construct, which just means they've confused gender itself with gender roles and norms.
3
These people sure know an awful lot about these so-called "neo-nazis", whereas I as a conservative had never heard of them beforehand.
2
Transgenderism remains a wholly incoherent worldview. And until those who subscribe to it can provide workable definitions for terms like "gender", "man" or "woman", we've no reason to take it seriously.
2
There is a mountain of evidence, coincidences, first times, abnormalities, etc. to explain regarding the 2020 election. That it was rigged is the explanation with most explanatory power, scope, and is less ad hoc. And frankly if you don't even know what weighted race distribution is, you've no business even engaging in that debate.
2
"The law's the law." Yes, Democrats, but still I think it's okay to free the slaves- wait, what year is it again?
2
"My friend's in her 20s and can't get pregnant." Probably "girl-bossing" it up so much that her cortisol is through the roof. That can affect your fertility at any age.
2
Well, it does take effort on both the men and women's part, to be attractive (they still have to watch their weight, learn what styles look good in terms of clothing, hair, skin care, etc.). But yes, women are considered valuable so long as they're attractive, while men have to also be earning a decent income at very least.
2
Let's just be honest, Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh carrying the fuck out of the Daily Wire.
2
That "No no no no" and "Wait wait wait wait" sort of tell can also be seen in Vaush's debate with Saanvi and more recently when Destiny debated Lila Rose & Kristan Hawkins. It's an epidemic, really.
2
Why am I not surprised he doesn't realize they rigged 2020?
2
I don't typically agree with jumping right to calling someone a "covert feminist" (I usually just say that most people still have some of that feminist influence that was pushed on practically all of us from birth). But when you start your argument with "I think it's good for women to be empowered and independent", there's no denying that's a feminist through and through.
2
Yes, it's "because there's not enough sex education in the schools". I take it she thinks there were... more abortions in the 50s than there are now?
2
Transgenderism remains a wholly incoherent worldview. And until those who subscribe to it can give workable definitions for terms like "gender", "man" or "woman" to begin with, we've no reason to take it seriously. Also, they can keep pretending to care about trans-identifying people's suicide rates all they want. If they really cared, they wouldn't be telling them that everyone fears them or hates their guts, when in reality most of us just disagree with their beliefs.
2
It was warmer 1,000 years ago than it is today.
2
@ Agreed.
1
@ Probably not on a regular basis, but that same criticism would go against Mrs. Wilson too.
1
@OrthoLou Well, yes. Men will have to be more masculine if they want to be in charge. That goes for running society at large as well as attracting high-value women.
1
@ Well Andrew does act like that's what he thinks. Like with Debra Lea, he accused her of "rebelling against the patriarchy" just because she was arguing with him in particular.
1
@OrthoLou I didn't suggest it was his full argument. But it is one of the things he said, and it isn't the first time he's said something like that either.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All