Comments by "黑龍 - Hắc Long" (@-haclong2366) on "Pete Judo" channel.

  1. Exactly, it is that process that is problematic. If we want better academics we would have to create a more honest system that doesn't just reward quantity over quality and social networking over disruption.
    35
  2. Some of the blame is external, publish-or-perish comes from university rankings, something pioneered by newspapers and magazines.
    7
  3. The issue is that there's this culture of acceptance of papers simply because nobody wants to make enemies. Remember that pissing off the wrong professor is a career-ending move.
    3
  4. Yeah, in many cases the only people who can access these papers are people associated with a university that is paying large sums of money for access to these. Often these studies are paid for by tax money and then private for-profit journals lock them behind paywalls.
    2
  5. 12:45 It just sounds like she wanted to give herself a compliment.
    1