Comments by "黑龍 - Hắc Long" (@-haclong2366) on "The Anthropology of the Right" video.

  1. 36:36 After 9/11 I remember seeing a lot of left-wing Western cartoons saying that Islamic fundamentalism and Christian fundamentalism were identical. The only difference is that since Wokeism replaced the Feminist Left of the late 1980's and early 2010's that Islam has been seen as a "left-wing" issue in the West, being basically a weapon to use against the right.
    4
  2. Conservatism has only existed since the 1790's and only as a reaction against the French Revolution, it is not a coherent political ideology and royalists are only "conservative" in that they seek to conserve the power of a current monarch, a power which could be challenged because the monarch is a reformist.
    3
  3. Conservatism by itself is a losing ideology, one of the worst ideological contributions of the Anglosphere is exporting the French ideas of "Conservatism Vs. Liberalism" and the synonymisation of the right-wing with "Conservatism". Conservatives by definition don't have a vision for the future, their idea of political change is preventing change. A right-wing that is Conservative will always lose. Conservatism also changes every generation to conserve whatever existed only a generation prior. I already see U.S. American Conservatives these days romanticising the 1990's as "an ideal time" like Baby Boomer Conservatives do for the 1950's. You need a competing vision for the future. The best answer to Wokeism and other "left-wing" Power-seekers is a pro-technology pro-progress ideology, Progressivism defined by human wealth and well-being and not "progressivism" as defined by Marxists who are too ashamed to call themselves Marxists.
    2
  4. 26:10 Read anything that any German Conservative during the 1930's to 1945 wrote about the National Socialists, they all hated them, they were basically tricked into an alliance with them by Communists who kept telling them "y'all are essentially the same, yikes". Communists see everyone who disagrees with them as "right-wing" (including other Communists), I've often seen Anarcho-Communists and Communists argue with each other than "the other can't be on the Left" because their definition of "Leftism" is literally themselves and nobody else. ¿What kind of Conservative wants a perpetual revolution? That is literally the National Socialist ideology, remember that both the Fascists and the Nazi's referred to Conservatives as "reactionaries", a term they also used for Communists. The term "late stage Capitalism" was literally coined by a National Socialist. The idea thet they are right-wing is literally Marxist propaganda.
    1
  5. 34:18 Name 1 modern nation that wasn't a warrior nation. Literally each and every one of them, even the standard examples of "not warriors" like Athens, Venice, and Florence were all countries that were constantly WINNING in warfare. There isn't a single country in the world without a strong warrior tradition, even countries that abolished their militaries like Costa Rica have plenty of bloodshed in their histories.
    1
  6. 26:26 Under this definition Stalinism was also "very clearly Rightist", as are China and North Korea today.
    1