Hybrid Forces of The GDL
Jabzy
comments
Comments by "Hybrid Forces of The GDL" (@hybridforcesofthegdl3313) on "Ukraine's First War against Russia | Cossacks, Khmelnytsky Uprising, Zaporozhia #ProjectUkraine" video.
13
K. Marx: The Mongolian Origins of Muscovite Power. The policy of the first Ruriks is completely distinguished from that of modern Russia ... The Gothic period constitutes for Russia only a chapter of Germanic invasions ...
Thus the Russia of the Normans disappeared completely from the scene and those feeble vestiges which persisted were obliterated by the terrifying apparition of Genghis Khan. The origin of Moscovy lies in the bloody degradation of Mongolian slavery and not in the rude heroism of the Norman epoch. Modern Russia is nothing but a transfigured Moscovy ...
Ivan Kalita, the First [4], and Ivan III, called the Great, incarnate, [in] the one, the growth of Moscow under Tartar domination; [in] the other, Moscow becoming an independent power, thanks to the disappearance of Tartar domination. In the history of these two individuals is summarized the entire Moscovite policy from the moment of its entry upon the historic arena.
Ivan Kalita’s whole system may be expressed in a few words: the Machiavellism of the slave who wants to usurp power. His very weakness, his servitude, became for him the driving principle of his strength.
Ivan III delivered Moscow from the Tartar yoke, not by a bold and decisive blow, but by the patient work of twenty years. He did not break it, but surreptitiously extricated himself from it. Thus this deliverance bears more resemblance to a natural phenomenon than to a human act. When the Tartar monster was on the point of uttering its last death-rattle, Ivan appeared at its death-bed as a doctor who makes the diagnosis and announces the end, and not a warrior who strikes the coup de grace.
Every people appears to have grown in stature when it shakes off a foreign yoke. From Ivan’s hands, Moscovy emerged still more debased. To be convinced of this, it suffices to compare Spain and its struggle against the Arabs with Moscovy and its struggle against the Tartars.
It is still interesting today to note to what extent Moscovy endeavored – just like modern Russia – to conduct attacks upon the republics. Novgorod and its colonies open up the cycle, the Cossack Republic follows suit, and Poland closes it ... Ivan seems to have wrested from the Mongols the chains which crushed Moscovy only to impose them upon the Russian republics.
12
8
Stаy strong Ukrаine 👏💪🇺🇦🇵🇹 Google translate : After the 2nd World War, 10-million Belarus was missing about 3 million of its inhabitants, but about 2 million were killed even before the war by the communist NKVD. In Belarus, 70 percent of all Belarusian writers were physically destroyed, scientists and artists were killed. (The troupe of the Third Belarusian State Theater of Vladislav Golubok was arrested in its entirety. Almost everyone was shot.) They were killed on a national basis. For the sake of this, the label "Natsdem" was coined (it means national democrat, although such a party did not exist). This label was attached to all Belarusians whom the Stalinists planned to exterminate. In the bowels of the NKVD, a non-existent anti-communist organization SVB ("Union for the Liberation of Belarus") was invented. Under the invented phantom, the NKVD carried out arrests, conducted an imaginary investigation, interrogated, tortured, tried, then exiled to Russia and shot innocent people. After the Riga agreement in 1921, Belarus was divided between Poland and Russia. The dividing line was drawn near Mensk. There was a secret order from the NKVD to exterminate the entire Belarusian population along the border. Russian invaders wanted to make a deserted zone here. The destruction was carried out by border troops. Trusted persons were given a rifle and a shovel. When such a border guard met in a deserted place (on a road, in a field, in a forest) a lonely Belarusian or Belarusian, or a child, he shot a person, immediately dug a hole with a shovel and covered up the corpse.
That was the instruction. People in the villages were not so afraid of the "man with a gun" as they were of a soldier with a shovel. (These facts were published in the Belarusian press in the early 1990s.) In the 1930s, 95-99 percent (almost completely) were destroyed (exiled and shot) by the Belarusian communist-party and Soviet administration. They even destroyed the directorate and economic leaders. Russians from Russia were sent to the positions of murdered administrators and communist bosses-Belarusians. Russians (the so-called "nominees") came to Belarus, occupied vacant positions, received benefits, property, apartments, and the first thing they did was to close Belarusian schools, translate them into Russian, so that their children could study without burdening themselves with studying , as they said, "unnecessary" Belarusian language. Thus, the occupiers created a "Russian-speaking population" in Belarus. Ethnocide, linguacid, mnemacid and genocide were carried out by the Bolsheviks at the same time.
The destruction of Belarusians by the Russian NKVD continued during the German occupation. In June 1941, during the first days of the war, the communists shot thousands of prisoners in prisons and on stages. Only in the Brest Fortress, where there was a terrible prison of the NKVD, they did not have time to liquidate all those arrested, some of them fled. Meanwhile, a large group of overseers and functionaries of the NKVD was blocked in the fortress by the Germans. They sat there for about a month until they died out. About 20 years after the war, the communists came up with a legend about the "heroic defense" of the Brest Fortress. It is noteworthy that a broad Soviet partisan movement was organized only in Belarus and partly in the ethnic Belarusian lands that were part of Russia (Smolensk, Bryansk). There was no partisan movement in occupied Russia. Why? Yes, because the plan for the destruction of the Belarusian nation continued to operate. Moscow, using the organs of the NKVD, dragged the masses of the Belarusian civilian population into the war against the Germans, and thus exposed the Belarusians to the German attack.
The necessary work of struggle proceeded from an insidious plan and was carried out by vile methods. (Stalin wanted to get a double benefit.) The NKVD specifically killed a German near a Belarusian village or did some other provocation in order to provoke a punitive operation by the Nazis (who usually burned the entire village, most often along with the people). Thus, by the way, as a result of a special provocation by Soviet partisans, the famous Khatyn was also burned, which the communists then advertised to the whole world in the 70s as a typical victim of fascist atrocities.
As a result of such a communist-fascist joint "work", more than 9 thousand villages were burned in Belarus. Therefore, by the end of the war, as a result of a special operation of the NKVD, many Belarusian commanders were sent to death, removed from command, killed and repressed. Their places were taken by Russians sent from Moscow and loyal NKVDs. In the summer of 1944, when the "Red Army" occupied Belarus, the Russians mobilized into the army on Belarusian territory. Tens of thousands of young Belarusian men, almost without training, were thrown to the front line. Russian commanders raised them in unnecessary attacks under the fire of German machine guns, without even giving weapons to their hands, or with rifles, but without cartridges. They died by the thousands, like grass under a scythe. And those who fled back fell under the bullets of the NKVD "blockade detachments". However, detachments fired in the back. This is how the destruction of Belarusians in the war continued, by the hands of the Germans and Russians.
them at the same time. As the communists said, "in the struggle for the Soviet motherland." In the 1940s, the Russians took them to Siberia and tortured all the foresters and the so-called "kulaks" from Western Belarus there. They were taken out by wagons, in different rows.
5
5
4
@stormshadow5283 K. Marx: The Mongolian Origins of Muscovite Power
The policy of the first Ruriks is completely distinguished from that of modern Russia ... The Gothic period constitutes for Russia only a chapter of Germanic invasions ...
Thus the Russia of the Normans disappeared completely from the scene and those feeble vestiges which persisted were obliterated by the terrifying apparition of Genghis Khan. The origin of Moscovy lies in the bloody degradation of Mongolian slavery and not in the rude heroism of the Norman epoch. Modern Russia is nothing but a transfigured Moscovy ...
Ivan Kalita, the First [4], and Ivan III, called the Great, incarnate, [in] the one, the growth of Moscow under Tartar domination; [in] the other, Moscow becoming an independent power, thanks to the disappearance of Tartar domination. In the history of these two individuals is summarized the entire Moscovite policy from the moment of its entry upon the historic arena.
Ivan Kalita’s whole system may be expressed in a few words: the Machiavellism of the slave who wants to usurp power. His very weakness, his servitude, became for him the driving principle of his strength.
Ivan III delivered Moscow from the Tartar yoke, not by a bold and decisive blow, but by the patient work of twenty years. He did not break it, but surreptitiously extricated himself from it. Thus this deliverance bears more resemblance to a natural phenomenon than to a human act. When the Tartar monster was on the point of uttering its last death-rattle, Ivan appeared at its death-bed as a doctor who makes the diagnosis and announces the end, and not a warrior who strikes the coup de grace.
Every people appears to have grown in stature when it shakes off a foreign yoke. From Ivan’s hands, Moscovy emerged still more debased. To be convinced of this, it suffices to compare Spain and its struggle against the Arabs with Moscovy and its struggle against the Tartars.
It is still interesting today to note to what extent Moscovy endeavored – just like modern Russia – to conduct attacks upon the republics. Novgorod and its colonies open up the cycle, the Cossack Republic follows suit, and Poland closes it ... Ivan seems to have wrested from the Mongols the chains which crushed Moscovy only to impose them upon the Russian republics.
4
2
2
Belarusian Orthodox (the real one and the NKVD- golden horde one) Church : Некананічны статус Маскоўскага патрыярхату ў Беларусі. У 1924 годзе Ўсяленскі патрыярх Рыгор VII, надаўшы аўтакефалію Польскай праваслаўнай царкве, у склад якой увайшла значная частка былой Кіеўскай мітраполіі, у тым ліку Заходняя Беларусь зь Віленшчынай, у сваім томасе зазначыў, што далучэньне Кіеўскай мітраполіі да Маскоўскага патрыярхату не было кананічным. У 1990-я гады ў лісьце патрыярху маскоўскаму Аляксію (Рыдыгеру) Усяленскі патрыярх Дзімітры заявіў, што Канстантынопаль вызнае Маскоўскі патрыярхат у межах 1589 году, гэта значыць без тэрыторыі Беларусі, Украіны, Балтыі і Смаленшчыны, якія на той час уваходзілі ў склад Рэчы Паспалітай. Наступны Ўсяленскі патрыярх Барталамей дадаў, што РПЦ бесьперапынна ўрывалася ў краіны, якія знаходзяцца пад духоўнай юрысдыкцыяй Канстантынопаля, менавіта ў Эстонію, Вугоршчыну і іншы краіны, робячы гэта заўсёды з дапамогай узброенай сілы савецкай арміі. У 2006 годзе патрыярх Барталамэй зрабіў заяву ў Кіеве, што Канстантынопаль лічыць Кіеўскую мітраполію сваёй дачкой і, калі прыйдзе час, разгледзіць пытаньне аб яе самастойнасьці. У кастрычніку 2018 году Сынод Канстантынопальскай царквы спыніў дзеяньне граматы 1686 году аб падпарадкаваньні Кіеўскай мітраполіі Маскоўскаму патрыярхату.
Увогуле, праваслаўныя каноны (34-е апостальскае правіла) патрабуюць асобнай царквы для асобнага народу, аднак РПЦ-НКВД працягвае не прызнаваць беларусаў (як і ўкраінцаў) асобнымі народамі. З гэтай прычыны на розных узроўнях агучваецца і паўтараецца формула пра "трыадзіны расейскі народ"
2
@Vitalis94 Moscow pagan God K. Marx said "The Mongolian Origins of Russian Power
The policy of the first Ruriks is completely distinguished from that of modern Russia ... The Gothic period constitutes for Russia only a chapter of Germanic invasions ...
Thus the Russia of the Normans disappeared completely from the scene and those feeble vestiges which persisted were obliterated by the terrifying apparition of Genghis Khan. The origin of Moscovy lies in the bloody degradation of Mongolian slavery and not in the rude heroism of the Norman epoch. Modern Russia is nothing but a transfigured Moscovy ...
Ivan Kalita, the First [4], and Ivan III, called the Great, incarnate, [in] the one, the growth of Moscow under Tartar domination; [in] the other, Moscow becoming an independent power, thanks to the disappearance of Tartar domination. In the history of these two individuals is summarized the entire Moscovite policy from the moment of its entry upon the historic arena.
Ivan Kalita’s whole system may be expressed in a few words: the Machiavellism of the slave who wants to usurp power. His very weakness, his servitude, became for him the driving principle of his strength.
Ivan III delivered Moscow from the Tartar yoke, not by a bold and decisive blow, but by the patient work of twenty years. He did not break it, but surreptitiously extricated himself from it. Thus this deliverance bears more resemblance to a natural phenomenon than to a human act. When the Tartar monster was on the point of uttering its last death-rattle, Ivan appeared at its death-bed as a doctor who makes the diagnosis and announces the end, and not a warrior who strikes the coup de grace.
Every people appears to have grown in stature when it shakes off a foreign yoke. From Ivan’s hands, Moscovy emerged still more debased. To be convinced of this, it suffices to compare Spain and its struggle against the Arabs with Moscovy and its struggle against the Tartars.
It is still interesting today to note to what extent Moscovy endeavored – just like modern Russia – to conduct attacks upon the republics. Novgorod and its colonies open up the cycle, the Cossack Republic follows suit, and Poland closes it ... Ivan seems to have wrested from the Mongols the chains which crushed Moscovy only to impose them upon the Russian republics."
2
2
1
1
1
@kosa9662 The Mongolian Origins of Russian Power
The policy of the first Ruriks is completely distinguished from that of modern Russia ... The Gothic period constitutes for Russia only a chapter of Germanic invasions ...
Thus the Russia of the Normans disappeared completely from the scene and those feeble vestiges which persisted were obliterated by the terrifying apparition of Genghis Khan. The origin of Moscovy lies in the bloody degradation of Mongolian slavery and not in the rude heroism of the Norman epoch. Modern Russia is nothing but a transfigured Moscovy ...
Ivan Kalita, the First [4], and Ivan III, called the Great, incarnate, [in] the one, the growth of Moscow under Tartar domination; [in] the other, Moscow becoming an independent power, thanks to the disappearance of Tartar domination. In the history of these two individuals is summarized the entire Moscovite policy from the moment of its entry upon the historic arena.
Ivan Kalita’s whole system may be expressed in a few words: the Machiavellism of the slave who wants to usurp power. His very weakness, his servitude, became for him the driving principle of his strength.
Ivan III delivered Moscow from the Tartar yoke, not by a bold and decisive blow, but by the patient work of twenty years. He did not break it, but surreptitiously extricated himself from it. Thus this deliverance bears more resemblance to a natural phenomenon than to a human act. When the Tartar monster was on the point of uttering its last death-rattle, Ivan appeared at its death-bed as a doctor who makes the diagnosis and announces the end, and not a warrior who strikes the coup de grace.
Every people appears to have grown in stature when it shakes off a foreign yoke. From Ivan’s hands, Moscovy emerged still more debased. To be convinced of this, it suffices to compare Spain and its struggle against the Arabs with Moscovy and its struggle against the Tartars.
It is still interesting today to note to what extent Moscovy endeavored – just like modern Russia – to conduct attacks upon the republics. Novgorod and its colonies open up the cycle, the Cossack Republic follows suit, and Poland closes it ... Ivan seems to have wrested from the Mongols the chains which crushed Moscovy only to impose them upon the Russian republics.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1