Comments by "佐々木楓(^.^)" (@Kaede-Sasaki) on "Alabama Supreme Court Says Embryos Are Children" video.

Other option: If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
6
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
3
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
3
@bane2201 If you want to change the state's political demographics, get the embryos and hold them there for 18 years, then presto, register to vote. Enough people do this, there'll be more embryos than physical people and then they can referendum new state laws and constitution
2
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
2
 @michaelcoward1902 "It's called JUDO Christian..." Isn't judo Christian a religious martial art? 😅 🤼‍♂️🥋
1
 @MissDeez Actual children can be accomplices to crime—they would just be treated as a child, unless court determined to be tried as an adult.
1
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
1
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
1
 @yankee2yankee216 Why just the president? All offices (civil servants, politicians, judges, etc).
1
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
1
 @tr48092 "*Congress* shall make no law..." Supreme Court: "That's our cue. Hold our 🍻 "
1
If they are considered children, then the state must pay for their care in frozen orphanages. Further, since they would be in the care of the state due to the above, they need to pay for adoption benefits and transfer to adoptive parents, as the state would do if they were actual children. Also, if the embryos are left at the doors of the supreme Court, if the justices saw them and ignored or even worse, stepped on them, are they guilty of endangering a child or murder?
1