Comments by "佐々木楓(^.^)" (@Kaede-Sasaki) on "Is too much democracy destroying America? | America are you OK? Part 4" video.

For countries that emphasis separation of powers, it doesn't make sense that judges would be appointed by one or two other branches. That doesn't show separation of powers, but fusion of powers. For all countries, its hard to have judicial independence if the people appointing the judges are politicians (legislative) or even just the executive. Electing judges makes sense to me, but I think instead of election, it should be the same way they select juries (voir dire for nonpartisanship) and have them sit for either a case or for a very short term, rotating out jury-judges so the whole bench doesn't leave at once. Also have law clerks to advise the jury-judges who probably don't have legal training.
5
For countries that emphasis separation of powers, it doesn't make sense that judges would be appointed by one or two other branches. That doesn't show separation of powers, but fusion of powers. For all countries, its hard to have judicial independence if the people appointing the judges are politicians (legislative) or even just the executive. Electing judges makes sense to me, but I think instead of election, it should be the same way they select juries (voir dire for nonpartisanship) and have them sit for either a case or for a very short term, rotating out jury-judges so the whole bench doesn't leave at once. Also have law clerks to advise the jury-judges who probably don't have legal training.
3
For countries that emphasis separation of powers, it doesn't make sense that judges would be appointed by one or two other branches. That doesn't show separation of powers, but fusion of powers. For all countries, its hard to have judicial independence if the people appointing the judges are politicians (legislative) or even just the executive. Electing judges makes sense to me, but I think instead of election, it should be the same way they select juries (voir dire for nonpartisanship) and have them sit for either a case or for a very short term, rotating out jury-judges so the whole bench doesn't leave at once. Also have law clerks to advise the jury-judges who probably don't have legal training.
3
Why can't the district mp also be the local mp? Why not make it a double duty?
2
For the pm, I try to view it by which party wins the most seats. If i just look at electorates, it can be depressing 🤨 Addressing the judiciary: For countries that emphasis separation of powers, it doesn't make sense that judges would be appointed by one or two other branches. That doesn't show separation of powers, but fusion of powers. For all countries, its hard to have judicial independence if the people appointing the judges are politicians (legislative) or even just the executive. Electing judges makes sense to me, but I think instead of election, it should be the same way they select juries (voir dire for nonpartisanship) and have them sit for either a case or for a very short term, rotating out jury-judges so the whole bench doesn't leave at once. Also have law clerks to advise the jury-judges who probably don't have legal training.
2
Why don't we just elect 5 mps for every district and they double as both the local council and represent nationally (or state, if federation)?
2