Youtube comments of 佐々木楓(^.^) (@Kaede-Sasaki).
-
105
-
93
-
87
-
66
-
59
-
51
-
48
-
44
-
34
-
31
-
29
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Refusing to work with others should be grounds for revoking political party license. Politics is all about compromise and negotiation. If a party Refuses to negotiate, they're not a political party, but instead a religion.
The president should be authorized to force parties to act like grown-ups and negotiate with everyone. And if not, then to put parties in govt by percentage of vote (eg SDP 20%, Cdu 18%, Afd 10%, greens 5% = 53% for presidential mandated govt).
For those arguing Freedom of association:
sure, but when you enter politics, you understand that you give up on some things, such as privacy and slander protection (as a public official). The same should be true for association. You signed up for the job.
Just as freedom of association doesn't mean you don't need to work with coworkers. You can either work with coworker or freely associate with another company (eg resign), so political party members can either work with other political party members or freely associate by leaving parliament.
What do you think?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Refusing to work with others should be grounds for revoking political party license. Politics is all about compromise and negotiation. If a party Refuses to negotiate, they're not a political party, but instead a religion.
The president should be authorized to force parties to act like grown-ups and negotiate with everyone. And if not, then to put parties in govt by percentage of vote (eg SDP 20%, Cdu 18%, Afd 10%, greens 5% = 53% for presidential mandated govt).
For those arguing Freedom of association:
sure, but when you enter politics, you understand that you give up on some things, such as privacy and slander protection (as a public official). The same should be true for association. You signed up for the job.
Just as freedom of association doesn't mean you don't need to work with coworkers. You can either work with coworker or freely associate with another company (eg resign), so political party members can either work with other political party members or freely associate by leaving parliament.
What do you think?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tempejkl
It was actually illegal for most of the soviet era.
From wikipedia:
In the wake of the October Revolution, the Bolshevik government decriminalized homosexuality. The Bolsheviks rewrote the constitution and "produced two Criminal Codes – in 1922 and 1926 – and an article prohibiting homosexual sex was left off both."[1] The new Communist Party government removed the old laws regarding sexual relations, effectively legalising homosexual activity within Russia, although it remained illegal in other territories of the Soviet Union, and the homosexuals in Russia were still persecuted [ru] and sacked from their jobs.
[1] Under Joseph Stalin, the Soviet Union recriminalized homosexuality in a decree signed in 1933.[2] The new Article 121, which punished "muzhelozhstvo" with imprisonment for up to 5 years, saw raids and arrests. Female homosexuals were sent to mental institutions. The decree was part of a broader campaign against "deviant" behavior and "Western degeneracy".[1] Following Stalin's death, there was a liberalisation of attitudes toward sexual issues in the Soviet Union, but homosexual acts remained illegal. Discrimination against LGBT individuals persisted in the Soviet era, and homosexuality was not officially declassified as a mental illness until 1999
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
These points outline a scenario where the functions of government can continue effectively even without an active executive branch. Here's a breakdown of how each of your arguments addresses the potential challenges:
1. **Standing Laws and Civil Service**: It's true that a robust set of existing laws, regulations, and a well-functioning civil service can maintain order and continuity. Bureaucracies are often designed to be stable and to function independently of the political process, ensuring that essential services like healthcare, education, and law enforcement continue.
2. **Crisis Management by Head of State**: In many parliamentary systems, the head of state has the authority to act in emergencies, especially regarding national defense and disaster response. If the head of state can effectively deploy resources during crises, the absence of an executive government might not be as detrimental as it would seem.
3. **Parliamentary Functioning**: If the parliament is still in session, representation and lawmaking can continue through private member bills and other parliamentary procedures. This would allow for democratic processes to persist, ensuring that the people's voice is still heard and that necessary legislation can be passed, even without a formal executive branch.
4. **Caretaker PM or Civil Servant Leadership**: A caretaker prime minister or senior civil servant can manage day-to-day government operations, including international relations and trade agreements. This could provide the necessary continuity in governance while political parties continue negotiations or until new elections are held.
Your approach suggests that with a well-designed system, the absence of a full executive government might not be as disruptive as one might expect. It could even lead to a period of stability where existing structures manage the country effectively, avoiding the pitfalls of constant political changes and new taxes or laws. This could be an interesting experiment in minimal government intervention. However, it would also require a high level of competence and neutrality in the civil service and other institutions to avoid potential power vacuums or abuses.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@eriksonyw
I looked this up on chat gpt as it was interesting:
Before 1492, Chinese cuisine was quite different from what we might recognize today, particularly in its absence of chili peppers, which are now integral to many regional dishes. Peppers were introduced to China in the 16th century after being brought from the Americas by Portuguese traders. Prior to this, Chinese cuisine relied on other sources of heat and flavor.
Here are some of the key characteristics of Chinese cuisine before the arrival of chili peppers:
1. **Spices and Aromatics**: Chinese cooks used a variety of local spices and aromatics to flavor dishes, such as ginger, garlic, onions, and Chinese cinnamon (cassia). Sichuan cuisine, known today for its use of chili peppers, relied heavily on Sichuan peppercorns for a numbing, tingling heat (má là) instead.
2. **Fermented Ingredients**: Fermented products like soy sauce, fermented black beans (douchi), fermented tofu, and vinegar were key umami-rich ingredients. These added depth and complexity to dishes without the heat from peppers.
3. **Herbs**: Fragrant herbs like cilantro, green onions, and Chinese chives were commonly used to add freshness and complexity to dishes.
4. **Other Flavor Profiles**: The balance of flavors — sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and savory (umami) — was still important, even without the heat from peppers. Ingredients like honey, maltose, Chinese plums, and sugar were used for sweetness, while soy sauce, salt, and pickled vegetables brought in the salty and umami aspects.
5. **Cooking Techniques**: Stir-frying, steaming, braising, and boiling were widely used methods of cooking, with sauces often built on soy sauce, vinegar, or wine bases.
In regions like Sichuan, where chili peppers later became central to local cuisine, cooks relied more on aromatic spices and the numbing quality of Sichuan peppercorns to achieve a distinct flavor profile, even without the fiery heat we associate with Sichuan dishes today.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Why is there even insurance? Scrap all medical insurance and nationalize (apparently the president thinks they already are civil servants as he threatened to fire them). Make all doctors, junior, senior, and in between civil servants with salaries commensurate with time in the job. Silly as we don't pay other civil servants per customer. Pay well enough and people will be flocking to be doctors, getting the doctor to patient ratio to 9:1,000.
Also, no one—including doctors—should work more than 40 hours per week. Ideally, I would say: 6 hours of work, 5 hours of family time/personal time, 5 hours of personal time/friend time, and 8 hours of sleep.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To anyone curious about what ifs, please see these questions I had posed:
Welcome back! What can I help you with today?
can japanese people buy cars directly from manufacturer (eg toyota), or do they need to go through dealership like in the US?
In Japan, people can buy cars directly from manufacturers, such as Toyota, or through dealerships. However, the process and availability may vary depending on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model. Here are some key points to consider:
Direct purchase from manufacturer: Some manufacturers in Japan offer the option for customers to purchase vehicles directly from them. This can involve visiting the manufacturer's showroom or sales office to place an order for a new vehicle.
Dealership purchase: Dealerships in Japan play a significant role in the sale of vehicles, and many customers prefer to buy cars through authorized dealers. Dealerships often provide a wide range of services, including test drives, vehicle customization, financing options, and after-sales support.
Availability of models: Certain vehicle models may only be available for purchase through dealerships, while others may be accessible directly from the manufacturer. It's important for customers to inquire about the purchasing options for specific models they are interested in.
In conclusion, while people in Japan have the option to buy cars directly from manufacturers, they also have the choice to go through dealerships. The availability of this option may vary based on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model.
what if a) the US ordered all dealership groups (eg Group1, Lithia) to break up and only allow individual dealerships? or b) the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership? or c) the US expands the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of anything so consumers can only buy goods & services from independent dealers (eg Everett Amazon Dealership rather than Amazon, Harper McDonalds Dealership rather than McDonalds, McLeod Walmart rather than Walmart)?
a) If the US ordered all dealership groups to break up and only allow individual dealerships, this would represent a significant shift in the automotive retail industry. It could lead to several potential implications:
Impact on large dealership groups: Established dealership groups such as Group 1 Automotive and Lithia Motors would need to restructure their operations and potentially divest some of their dealerships to comply with the new regulations. This could result in changes to their business models and market presence.
Rise of independent dealerships: With the breakup of dealership groups, individual independent dealerships may become more prevalent. These smaller, independent dealerships would likely have to adapt to the changing landscape and may face challenges in competing with larger, more established entities.
Consumer choice and experience: The transition to individual dealerships could impact consumer choice and the overall experience of purchasing a vehicle. Consumers may find themselves dealing with a larger number of smaller, independent dealerships, which could lead to variations in service quality and available inventory.
b) If the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership, it would have significant implications for the automotive retail industry:
Direct sales by manufacturers: Automakers such as Tesla have advocated for the ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers, bypassing the traditional dealership model. Rescinding the franchise law would pave the way for manufacturers to establish their own sales channels, potentially reshaping the industry landscape.
Challenges for traditional dealerships: Traditional dealerships, which have long held a dominant position in vehicle sales, would face heightened competition from manufacturers' direct sales. They might need to adapt their business models to remain competitive in a more open market.
Consumer impact: Consumers could benefit from increased flexibility in how they purchase vehicles, with the potential for more direct interaction with manufacturers. However, they may also face a different set of considerations when it comes to warranty, service, and support compared to the dealership model.
c) If the US were to expand the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of goods and services, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, it would have broad implications across various industries:
Impact on manufacturers: Companies such as Amazon, McDonald's, and Walmart would need to reevaluate their sales and distribution strategies. They might be required to establish independent dealership networks to sell their products and services, which could have significant operational and financial implications.
Market dynamics: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers would likely disrupt established sales and distribution models across numerous industries. It could lead to a more fragmented marketplace, potentially affecting consumer access and pricing.
Consumer choice and convenience: Consumers might experience changes in how they access and purchase goods and services. Depending on the implementation, this could result in variations in pricing, availability, and overall convenience for consumers.
In summary, each of these scenarios would have profound effects on the automotive and broader retail industries, with implications for businesses, consumers, and market dynamics. They represent significant shifts in how goods and services are distributed and sold, and would require careful consideration of their wide-ranging impacts.
would prices for consumers be reduced? would it affect economies of scale since Walmart, etc would still deliver the goods requested?
The impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would depend on the specific changes implemented in the scenarios you mentioned. Let's explore the potential effects:
a) Breakup of dealership groups and transition to individual dealerships:
Consumer prices: The breakup of dealership groups and the transition to individual dealerships might not necessarily lead to immediate price reductions for consumers. While smaller, independent dealerships could potentially have lower overhead costs compared to larger dealership groups, the overall effect on consumer prices would depend on various factors, including competition, operational efficiency, and market dynamics.
Economies of scale: The shift to individual dealerships could affect economies of scale within the automotive retail industry. Larger dealership groups often benefit from economies of scale in purchasing, marketing, and operations. With the breakup of these groups, the extent to which economies of scale would be maintained or impacted would depend on how individual dealerships adapt to the new landscape.
b) Rescinding the dealership franchise law for vehicle sales:
Consumer prices: Rescinding the dealership franchise law and allowing manufacturers to sell vehicles directly to consumers could potentially lead to increased competition and innovation in the sales process. While this could benefit consumers through more options and potentially lower prices, the overall impact on consumer prices would depend on market dynamics, supply chain efficiencies, and the strategies of manufacturers and dealerships.
Economies of scale: Manufacturers' direct sales could have implications for economies of scale within the automotive industry. Traditional dealerships have historically played a role in leveraging economies of scale in areas such as inventory management, marketing, and service. The shift to direct sales could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are achieved and utilized within the industry.
c) Expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers of goods and services:
Consumer prices: If franchise laws were expanded to cover all manufacturers, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, the impact on consumer prices would depend on the interplay of market competition, pricing strategies, and operational efficiencies. It's possible that the changes could influence consumer prices, although the specific effects would vary across industries.
Economies of scale: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers could potentially affect economies of scale within various industries. Companies such as Walmart have traditionally leveraged economies of scale in areas such as procurement, distribution, and pricing. Changes to the sales and distribution models could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are realized and maintained.
In summary, the potential impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would be influenced by a complex interplay of market forces, competition, operational efficiencies, and consumer behavior. While changes in the distribution and sales models could have implications for pricing and economies of scale, the specific outcomes would depend on how businesses and markets adapt to the new regulatory and competitive landscapes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc. Giant tower city already exists and you're just copying and pasting.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To anyone curious about what ifs, please see these questions I had posed :
Welcome back! What can I help you with today?
can japanese people buy cars directly from manufacturer (eg toyota), or do they need to go through dealership like in the US?
In Japan, people can buy cars directly from manufacturers, such as Toyota, or through dealerships. However, the process and availability may vary depending on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model. Here are some key points to consider:
Direct purchase from manufacturer: Some manufacturers in Japan offer the option for customers to purchase vehicles directly from them. This can involve visiting the manufacturer's showroom or sales office to place an order for a new vehicle.
Dealership purchase: Dealerships in Japan play a significant role in the sale of vehicles, and many customers prefer to buy cars through authorized dealers. Dealerships often provide a wide range of services, including test drives, vehicle customization, financing options, and after-sales support.
Availability of models: Certain vehicle models may only be available for purchase through dealerships, while others may be accessible directly from the manufacturer. It's important for customers to inquire about the purchasing options for specific models they are interested in.
In conclusion, while people in Japan have the option to buy cars directly from manufacturers, they also have the choice to go through dealerships. The availability of this option may vary based on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model.
what if a) the US ordered all dealership groups (eg Group1, Lithia) to break up and only allow individual dealerships? or b) the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership? or c) the US expands the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of anything so consumers can only buy goods & services from independent dealers (eg Everett Amazon Dealership rather than Amazon, Harper McDonalds Dealership rather than McDonalds, McLeod Walmart rather than Walmart)?
a) If the US ordered all dealership groups to break up and only allow individual dealerships, this would represent a significant shift in the automotive retail industry. It could lead to several potential implications:
Impact on large dealership groups: Established dealership groups such as Group 1 Automotive and Lithia Motors would need to restructure their operations and potentially divest some of their dealerships to comply with the new regulations. This could result in changes to their business models and market presence.
Rise of independent dealerships: With the breakup of dealership groups, individual independent dealerships may become more prevalent. These smaller, independent dealerships would likely have to adapt to the changing landscape and may face challenges in competing with larger, more established entities.
Consumer choice and experience: The transition to individual dealerships could impact consumer choice and the overall experience of purchasing a vehicle. Consumers may find themselves dealing with a larger number of smaller, independent dealerships, which could lead to variations in service quality and available inventory.
b) If the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership, it would have significant implications for the automotive retail industry:
Direct sales by manufacturers: Automakers such as Tesla have advocated for the ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers, bypassing the traditional dealership model. Rescinding the franchise law would pave the way for manufacturers to establish their own sales channels, potentially reshaping the industry landscape.
Challenges for traditional dealerships: Traditional dealerships, which have long held a dominant position in vehicle sales, would face heightened competition from manufacturers' direct sales. They might need to adapt their business models to remain competitive in a more open market.
Consumer impact: Consumers could benefit from increased flexibility in how they purchase vehicles, with the potential for more direct interaction with manufacturers. However, they may also face a different set of considerations when it comes to warranty, service, and support compared to the dealership model.
c) If the US were to expand the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of goods and services, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, it would have broad implications across various industries:
Impact on manufacturers: Companies such as Amazon, McDonald's, and Walmart would need to reevaluate their sales and distribution strategies. They might be required to establish independent dealership networks to sell their products and services, which could have significant operational and financial implications.
Market dynamics: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers would likely disrupt established sales and distribution models across numerous industries. It could lead to a more fragmented marketplace, potentially affecting consumer access and pricing.
Consumer choice and convenience: Consumers might experience changes in how they access and purchase goods and services. Depending on the implementation, this could result in variations in pricing, availability, and overall convenience for consumers.
In summary, each of these scenarios would have profound effects on the automotive and broader retail industries, with implications for businesses, consumers, and market dynamics. They represent significant shifts in how goods and services are distributed and sold, and would require careful consideration of their wide-ranging impacts.
would prices for consumers be reduced? would it affect economies of scale since Walmart, etc would still deliver the goods requested?
The impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would depend on the specific changes implemented in the scenarios you mentioned. Let's explore the potential effects:
a) Breakup of dealership groups and transition to individual dealerships:
Consumer prices: The breakup of dealership groups and the transition to individual dealerships might not necessarily lead to immediate price reductions for consumers. While smaller, independent dealerships could potentially have lower overhead costs compared to larger dealership groups, the overall effect on consumer prices would depend on various factors, including competition, operational efficiency, and market dynamics.
Economies of scale: The shift to individual dealerships could affect economies of scale within the automotive retail industry. Larger dealership groups often benefit from economies of scale in purchasing, marketing, and operations. With the breakup of these groups, the extent to which economies of scale would be maintained or impacted would depend on how individual dealerships adapt to the new landscape.
b) Rescinding the dealership franchise law for vehicle sales:
Consumer prices: Rescinding the dealership franchise law and allowing manufacturers to sell vehicles directly to consumers could potentially lead to increased competition and innovation in the sales process. While this could benefit consumers through more options and potentially lower prices, the overall impact on consumer prices would depend on market dynamics, supply chain efficiencies, and the strategies of manufacturers and dealerships.
Economies of scale: Manufacturers' direct sales could have implications for economies of scale within the automotive industry. Traditional dealerships have historically played a role in leveraging economies of scale in areas such as inventory management, marketing, and service. The shift to direct sales could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are achieved and utilized within the industry.
c) Expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers of goods and services:
Consumer prices: If franchise laws were expanded to cover all manufacturers, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, the impact on consumer prices would depend on the interplay of market competition, pricing strategies, and operational efficiencies. It's possible that the changes could influence consumer prices, although the specific effects would vary across industries.
Economies of scale: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers could potentially affect economies of scale within various industries. Companies such as Walmart have traditionally leveraged economies of scale in areas such as procurement, distribution, and pricing. Changes to the sales and distribution models could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are realized and maintained.
In summary, the potential impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would be influenced by a complex interplay of market forces, competition, operational efficiencies, and consumer behavior. While changes in the distribution and sales models could have implications for pricing and economies of scale, the specific outcomes would depend on how businesses and markets adapt to the new regulatory and competitive landscapes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc. Giant tower city already exists and you're just copying and pasting.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc. Giant tower city already exists and you're just copying and pasting.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc. Giant tower city already exists and you're just copying and pasting.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
Comment disappeared: reposting
Just my 2️⃣🪙 🪙 ⤵️
1️⃣make self-contained neighbourhoods with no internal vehicular roads. If 🚗🚘🚙🛻 are needed, there can be a parking lot and transport🛺🛺🛺 to the entry. Inside, will be 🏘 🏘 , shops, schools 🏫 and offices 🏦🏨with gardens at least in the front. Pavement or paving stones would be for the pedestrian 🚶♂️🚶♂️ only streets and Plazas. Monorail or other public transport between these neighbourhoods, but each should be self contained so that they could get groceries, entertainment, job, etc.
2️⃣reduce working hours to 25 per week, with two 35 hour weeks allowed per year, when needed. Make schools match this as well.
3️⃣make it so students either attend regular school or cram school, but not both. If they need to go to cram school to learn what they didnt in regular school, then that school has failed. Again 25 hours per week max. Work-life balance.
4️⃣encourage or subsidize workplace ojt in lieu of degree. Only given to workplaces that agree to take high school graduates only or quota.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dao8805
Background as I didn't know this (from Wikipedia):
In September 2022, U.S. Senators Richard Burr and Roger Wicker introduced a bill that would have required labor unions to agree to the terms proposed by the Presidential Emergency Board, to prevent a strike.[18] It was blocked by Senator Bernie Sanders, who noted that freight rail workers receive a "grand total of zero sick days" while railroad companies made significant profits.[19] In the House of Representatives, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, "We’d rather see negotiations prevail so there’s no need for any actions from Congress."[16]
In late November, after some unions had rejected the agreement, Biden asked Congress to pass the agreement into law. On November 30, the House of Representatives passed the existing tentative agreement along with an amended version that would require railroad employers to ensure 7 days paid sick leave.[20] On December 1, the Senate passed the tentative agreement with only 1 day of sick leave.[21] President Joe Biden signed the legislation into law on December 2.[4] Writing for Jacobin, Barry Eidlin, associate professor of sociology at McGill University, said the message sent to the rail workers by the president and Congress was "shut up and get back to work."[22] The Biden administration's intervention in the dispute was condemned by over 500 labor historians in an open letter to Joe Biden and Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh.[23]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To anyone curious about what ifs, please see these questions I had posed:
Welcome back! What can I help you with today?
can japanese people buy cars directly from manufacturer (eg toyota), or do they need to go through dealership like in the US?
In Japan, people can buy cars directly from manufacturers, such as Toyota, or through dealerships. However, the process and availability may vary depending on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model. Here are some key points to consider:
Direct purchase from manufacturer: Some manufacturers in Japan offer the option for customers to purchase vehicles directly from them. This can involve visiting the manufacturer's showroom or sales office to place an order for a new vehicle.
Dealership purchase: Dealerships in Japan play a significant role in the sale of vehicles, and many customers prefer to buy cars through authorized dealers. Dealerships often provide a wide range of services, including test drives, vehicle customization, financing options, and after-sales support.
Availability of models: Certain vehicle models may only be available for purchase through dealerships, while others may be accessible directly from the manufacturer. It's important for customers to inquire about the purchasing options for specific models they are interested in.
In conclusion, while people in Japan have the option to buy cars directly from manufacturers, they also have the choice to go through dealerships. The availability of this option may vary based on the manufacturer and the specific vehicle model.
what if a) the US ordered all dealership groups (eg Group1, Lithia) to break up and only allow individual dealerships? or b) the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership? or c) the US expands the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of anything so consumers can only buy goods & services from independent dealers (eg Everett Amazon Dealership rather than Amazon, Harper McDonalds Dealership rather than McDonalds, McLeod Walmart rather than Walmart)?
a) If the US ordered all dealership groups to break up and only allow individual dealerships, this would represent a significant shift in the automotive retail industry. It could lead to several potential implications:
Impact on large dealership groups: Established dealership groups such as Group 1 Automotive and Lithia Motors would need to restructure their operations and potentially divest some of their dealerships to comply with the new regulations. This could result in changes to their business models and market presence.
Rise of independent dealerships: With the breakup of dealership groups, individual independent dealerships may become more prevalent. These smaller, independent dealerships would likely have to adapt to the changing landscape and may face challenges in competing with larger, more established entities.
Consumer choice and experience: The transition to individual dealerships could impact consumer choice and the overall experience of purchasing a vehicle. Consumers may find themselves dealing with a larger number of smaller, independent dealerships, which could lead to variations in service quality and available inventory.
b) If the US rescinded the dealership franchise law requiring consumers to buy through a dealership, it would have significant implications for the automotive retail industry:
Direct sales by manufacturers: Automakers such as Tesla have advocated for the ability to sell vehicles directly to consumers, bypassing the traditional dealership model. Rescinding the franchise law would pave the way for manufacturers to establish their own sales channels, potentially reshaping the industry landscape.
Challenges for traditional dealerships: Traditional dealerships, which have long held a dominant position in vehicle sales, would face heightened competition from manufacturers' direct sales. They might need to adapt their business models to remain competitive in a more open market.
Consumer impact: Consumers could benefit from increased flexibility in how they purchase vehicles, with the potential for more direct interaction with manufacturers. However, they may also face a different set of considerations when it comes to warranty, service, and support compared to the dealership model.
c) If the US were to expand the dealership franchise law to include all manufacturers of goods and services, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, it would have broad implications across various industries:
Impact on manufacturers: Companies such as Amazon, McDonald's, and Walmart would need to reevaluate their sales and distribution strategies. They might be required to establish independent dealership networks to sell their products and services, which could have significant operational and financial implications.
Market dynamics: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers would likely disrupt established sales and distribution models across numerous industries. It could lead to a more fragmented marketplace, potentially affecting consumer access and pricing.
Consumer choice and convenience: Consumers might experience changes in how they access and purchase goods and services. Depending on the implementation, this could result in variations in pricing, availability, and overall convenience for consumers.
In summary, each of these scenarios would have profound effects on the automotive and broader retail industries, with implications for businesses, consumers, and market dynamics. They represent significant shifts in how goods and services are distributed and sold, and would require careful consideration of their wide-ranging impacts.
would prices for consumers be reduced? would it affect economies of scale since Walmart, etc would still deliver the goods requested?
The impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would depend on the specific changes implemented in the scenarios you mentioned. Let's explore the potential effects:
a) Breakup of dealership groups and transition to individual dealerships:
Consumer prices: The breakup of dealership groups and the transition to individual dealerships might not necessarily lead to immediate price reductions for consumers. While smaller, independent dealerships could potentially have lower overhead costs compared to larger dealership groups, the overall effect on consumer prices would depend on various factors, including competition, operational efficiency, and market dynamics.
Economies of scale: The shift to individual dealerships could affect economies of scale within the automotive retail industry. Larger dealership groups often benefit from economies of scale in purchasing, marketing, and operations. With the breakup of these groups, the extent to which economies of scale would be maintained or impacted would depend on how individual dealerships adapt to the new landscape.
b) Rescinding the dealership franchise law for vehicle sales:
Consumer prices: Rescinding the dealership franchise law and allowing manufacturers to sell vehicles directly to consumers could potentially lead to increased competition and innovation in the sales process. While this could benefit consumers through more options and potentially lower prices, the overall impact on consumer prices would depend on market dynamics, supply chain efficiencies, and the strategies of manufacturers and dealerships.
Economies of scale: Manufacturers' direct sales could have implications for economies of scale within the automotive industry. Traditional dealerships have historically played a role in leveraging economies of scale in areas such as inventory management, marketing, and service. The shift to direct sales could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are achieved and utilized within the industry.
c) Expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers of goods and services:
Consumer prices: If franchise laws were expanded to cover all manufacturers, requiring consumers to buy exclusively from independent dealers, the impact on consumer prices would depend on the interplay of market competition, pricing strategies, and operational efficiencies. It's possible that the changes could influence consumer prices, although the specific effects would vary across industries.
Economies of scale: The expansion of franchise laws to cover all manufacturers could potentially affect economies of scale within various industries. Companies such as Walmart have traditionally leveraged economies of scale in areas such as procurement, distribution, and pricing. Changes to the sales and distribution models could prompt adjustments in how economies of scale are realized and maintained.
In summary, the potential impact on consumer prices and economies of scale would be influenced by a complex interplay of market forces, competition, operational efficiencies, and consumer behavior. While changes in the distribution and sales models could have implications for pricing and economies of scale, the specific outcomes would depend on how businesses and markets adapt to the new regulatory and competitive landscapes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1