Comments by "" (@PappaTom-ub3ht) on "Not What You Think" channel.

  1. Nor would i any of the thousand other missiles used in this war...
    7
  2. "It cannot be shot down So a nuclear warhead could fit on it without being shot down. Thats the point."* This has been the case from the very first ICBM. nothing new here.
    6
  3. ​ @harwardmbonxa-x5i  "What happened to Nato game changers or so called advanced weapons to stop Russia from capturing key ukraine cities on daily basis as Russia is using shovels." Russia has captured like 3 key cities in 3 years. So whatever advanced weapons are being given sure does work.
    2
  4. "No warhead was included." That is because Putin knows that nuking cities won't help him win the war. So really he just wasted an ICBM. You know, old technology from the sixties.
    1
  5. @ "You don’t have it. Russia showed it this way, believe me, there is something even worse, but it’s still a secret, I’m sure. Russia will never demonstrate its latest development until there is something even better in development than it will show the world." maybe about time to actually use some of this magical equipment in order to win the war they startet 3 years ago...
    1
  6. Everybody knows that most nuclear ICBMs will penetrate most air defenses. this is nothing new.
    1
  7. " the site would have been opened as a tourist attraction to spectators to see how little damage the Oreshnik had caused. " Only the russians are stupid enough to give such evidence to their enemies.
    1
  8. Because they might share photos with the russians.
    1
  9. Well of course. same with all other similar attacks.
    1
  10. in order for russia not to gain info
    1
  11. All ICBMs the past 50 years are hypersonic.
    1