Comments by "" (@PappaTom-ub3ht) on "Russia's Frontline Tradeoffs: The Strategy of Every Current Battle in Ukraine" video.

@Kalenz1234 "Just realistically speaking it doesn't look good for Ukraine." 2.5 years of fighting for such a small part of ukraine taken does look good for ukraine. Especially since the most gains was during the first few months. If one were to be more realistic this war seems bad for russia.
18
@nikhilannur So much wrong with what you write here. "and most advabced US weapons" It is not. Most the weapons sent so far are the oldest in stock, not used anymore by the western powers. "US never win any war in the past 100 years" This is so silly. I know you don't believe this as you very well know about ww2. "If US is strong why do they need NATO to fight russia ?" USA does not need to fight russia at all. and NATO would not be needed, russia can't even beat ukraine...
4
I doubt it actually. The west benefits from having russia loose all ukraines possessions Unless US pulls out. Then Ukraine might have to concede to the 2014 borders
3
@mikelthemafia Lol Not sure if that is the case, but quite sad if it is. 2 years of war economy is just competing with countries at peace. and their quality is so shit compared.
3
@AaSs-ln9mm "Yep, they run out of everything since 2022." Sure about that? How could they stay in the fight if that is true?
3
Wow. So it took russia 2 full years to capture a tiny border town...
3
@nikhilannur So you do understand that a larger country can lose to a smaller one? and Ukraine is far stronger than Afghanistan, and russia is far weaker than USA. My bet is that it will take for less than 20 years for russia to surrender.
3
@walterbrunswick "Russians withdrew" I know. thats how we know they are losing.
3
In order to win ofc
2
"Zelenskyy army at this point consists mostly of this hapless cannon fodder kidnappe" And this is the army russia is loosing to? Imagine if russia was to face NATO troops-
2
@energeticzombie I read that russia is running out of infantry as well. they now pay 1.5 million in the districts for a signup bonus in order to try and fill the ranks.
2
"Ukraine will be brokered to the highest bidder. " What does that mean?
2
@nikhilannur almost forgot... "couldn't make any success" have you forgotten Kherson city being retaken? Russian withdraws from Kiev? Kharkiv county was freed etc...
2
@walterbrunswick "why are you not at the frront?" Why would i be?
2
@walterbrunswick I am not a bot. And you know that.
2
I doubt they are. Biden just gave 8 billion extra in funding. that is 10% of russias yearly funding given to ukraine this week
1
@joshuapaul2022 Think about what you are claiming here. if this was true, how bad is the russian army then not to win against such a crappy army in 2.5 years. Saying that the ukrainians are loosing hard or are cowards only really tell that russians are even worse.
1
Ukraines intelligence claim that russia will run out of equipment in 2026. with continued support from the west until then, the tide will turn on the main front lines as well.
1
@wallnut7624 "You can't really expect them to compete with THAT." I don't, i expect russia to lose.
1
Tigr_Rus Lol. They outclass russian tanks though, and that is enough.
1
@AaSs-ln9mm "I believe everything the Western Media says because democracy" That is very silly. Western media often states the exact opposite of each other.
1
@gadingnicolas1394 "1. Russia keeps the current territory and stops the offensive, " And then what? ukraine would not stop fighting just because russia gives up on taking the territory they claim is russian. So this is just a slow way of russia loosing. "2. The west abandons Ukraine and Ukraine surrenders. " yes. if the west abandons ukraine they will loose. lets hope that does not happen. "Extra point: Ukraine will never return to 1991 borders. EU officials have already stated this is impossible without depopulating Ukraine" This is just false. But even if true. It should be Ukraines choice if they want to depopulate in order to keep their borders intact.
1
@gadingnicolas1394 "they will lend the territory back without a fight." I am also sure that they won't. But that is not being discussed. Ukraine will keep fighting until it regains the territory. And fighting includes bombing russias oil refineries and power plants. They don't have to fight for every centmieter of ground. In the end russia will be so bankrupt that they will have to surrender in order to get peace.
1
@thyrussendria8198 Nobody pays USA for their support, so that is probably wrong. And russia can't afford to pay for american support anyway. not to mention that american support is not the only thing deciding this war.
1
@MADNESS084 "Selydove " Never heard about... So 2 years and 2 weeks in order for russia to advance those few miles from the border to an unheard of town named Selydove... Gj russia. At what rate will Kiev be taken? 2-3 centuries?
1
@MADNESS084 "It was a city that homed about 70k people before the war. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selydove "Population (2022) 21,521" why do you inflate the numbers by more than a factor of 3? And even if they do capture land faster than before, russia controls less land now than it did 2 years ago.
1
@makimaxx2311 "Letting the defense of Pokrovsk fall?" The defenses for that small city has not fallen yet. And it has already been close to half a year. " pouring units into Kursk, for what? " For occupation of russian territory. Giving Ukraine real leverage in negotiations. As well as other benefits. " I really hate to see slavs fight each other." If this is true then you surely support Ukraine in their fight against a nation of slavs starting a war against another slavic nation?
1
"World support is waning," Lol Biden just gave 8 billion extra in funding. that is 10% of russias yearly funding given to ukraine this week
1
"I feel like I'm watching the same video over and over again. "I know it looks bad but here is how russia can win the war!" " this is what they show on russian media. plus threatening with nukes ofc
1