Comments by "" (@PappaTom-ub3ht) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. It is already a success
    10
  2. This scenario does not include russia.
    8
  3. How does that slow down their offensive? take a look at the map ivan.
    6
  4. This scenario does not include russia.
    5
  5. Quite big compared to what the russians are able to take. Ukraine has taken areas in two weeks which it have taken russia 8 months to take.
    5
  6. " I use math and compare what I see in the map." Let us see that math...
    4
  7. 6 months for storages to run out. but it will take another full year for battlefield stuff to actually reduce enough for Ukraine to win. my guess is that in two years Russia will loose this war militarily. (with the front not moving much after about a year.)
    3
  8. Iran confirms losses though.
    3
  9. "European brotherly love." Yeah... Germany has been famously nice to Poland during wars the last century...
    3
  10. How would the subjective iranian comment make this more objective?
    3
  11. 25% success rate against the invincible kinshal does paint western weapons in a very favorable light.
    2
  12. who predicted that? Facebook karens?
    2
  13.  @McSpanklez  There are pictures from satelites in space. Gj in calling photographs for lies.
    2
  14.  @chrisparnham  "Where on earth do you get this nonsense from?" from immigration rates into Germany. They are insanely high.
    2
  15. Or they naturally think that no pictures are available yet...
    2
  16.  @gmw3083  "Europe would sure like it but they're paying 5 times more for American nat gas." Not 5 times. not even 2 times. But even at 5 times, europe can afford it without real problems. Still selling oil. But at an insane bargain for countries like india and china. they are ripping russia off.
    2
  17.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  Neither is asking for evidence
    2
  18. @LinusIslamTips " he wrote there aren't any migrants in the army " Where di he write that? Some secret post only you can see?
    2
  19.  @mabussubam512  You seem to be mistaken something here. This is not a competition in just having a higher number of something means one is winning. Russia is getting weaker by the day, while Ukraine is getting stronger. So with time Ukraine will win. And since it has taken russia over 2 years to achieve so little there is no reason to think that they will achieve much more before Ukraine is far stronger thatn russia.
    2
  20. Nothing naive in joining EU. It seems quite guaranteed that they will.
    2
  21. "when Russia has said it isn't. " because russia lies.
    2
  22. @Silver_Prussian "Russia has completed most of its objective" it hasn't even managed a single one yet.
    2
  23. 130? That is almost nothing. At that rate it will take a century for russia to win
    2
  24.  @Garoslol  Nice of you to think that NATO exists in 5 years ;) I doubt Russia does.
    2
  25. Seems like a good bet. russia is doing terribly.
    2
  26. As if wall street journal knows everything
    2
  27.  @AdmiralValdemar  "Why launch any nuke when Russia is winning conventionally as it is?" lol. I know you don't believe this.
    2
  28.  @CyrilSneer123  You should look up what the word collapsing means.
    2
  29.  @kate_love_cat_dog  "Don't worry, the Russian economy is fine" Official interest rate is 21% that is not fine.
    2
  30. The west never said that.
    2
  31. I bet you can't even find a single example.
    2
  32. Russia started development despiste the treaty.
    2
  33.  @IvanToman  Lol. That is Covert Cabal. He did not claim russia was running out of missiles.
    1
  34.  @IvanToman  Do you know what the word "might" means? it means that there is a possibility that they are starting to run low and a possibility that they are not starting to run low. He did not say they were running low. And "running low" is not "running out". Russia did reduce their missile strike a lot, so they probably did run low(not out...) But with imports from abroad and increased production they could later increasae strikes.
    1
  35.  @IvanToman  So you admit to being wrong? he did not say that russia was running out, just that they "might" be "starting" to... "Wars are lost due to underestimating of the oponent." In this you are right. If russia hadn't so severly underestimated ukraine they might have won the war.
    1
  36. More territory than russia has taken in a year
    1
  37.  @robertklimczak5630  "the Russians would win by conquering these countries." Russia can't even beat Ukraine, a country weaker than either of these.
    1
  38.  @robertklimczak5630  "Russia hungry, the Russians would win by conquering these countries." They can't even conquer Ukraine, a weaker country than either of these
    1
  39.  @gmw3083  So? Still can't sell them much gas
    1
  40.  @Dralon98  Succeeded in taking as much territory as russia did in one year. "I don't see the russians redirecting significant troops to Kursk," You should watch the news more... lots of troops being redeployed. Lots of them getting bombed while in convoy as well.
    1
  41. "according to them russia has no army anymore" Doubtful
    1
  42. 25% succes rate at the invincible kinshal. quite good for a 40 year old system using leftover ammunition
    1
  43. Another god...
    1
  44. This missile, what damage did it really do? next to nothing... then how will it matter if they get such a low number as 52 per year?
    1
  45.  @PCGames-387  "yet they are creaming their pants " Putin and russian media are the ones creaming their pants and talking about nuclear war because of allowing these missiles being used on yet another russian territory. The problem for russia is that their are currently on track to loose the war. Adding 52 new rockets with minimal damage potential will probably do nothing to a Ukraine which is showing no signs of breaking anytime soon.
    1
  46. @LinusIslamTips "he implies that these people won't fight for germany which isnt true. " Ok, this is not what you said before that he said. But in addition to you showing the mistake you made, i do wonder how you know that they will indeed fight for Germany?
    1
  47.  @mabussubam512  "Reply with your main account after this to assert dominance." wow. As in dominance is here is of any relevance. btw, you are wrong again. This is my real account.
    1
  48.  @mng8680  They are getting mroe and more modern equipment. Their production of drones are ramping up. Evident by the fact that they defeated the russian navy and is sending drones 1000 miles into russian territory and ruining refineries. Regarding manpower, they recently enforced mobilization.
    1
  49.  @mng8680  "Russia still produces 3 times more artillery shells than all NATO countries combined, and not all shells in NATO are going to Ukraine so" i know. And it is embarrassing. Bad prioritization which has lasted for years. But Ukraine has many factors going for it. Western ammunition is more accurate and actually kill more people per shot. Western intelligence is far superior, so is the kill chain. Here the russians have indeed learned over the past 2 years :( The west has enough of simple weapons to defeat russias army. But only if they choose to actually send it to Ukraine.
    1
  50.  @mabussubam512  "I used all my asset to assert dominance. It takes now not only reading comprehension but actual IQ to understand. I also did your mom and your brother." You showed here that you in no way are trying to prove anything or argue any point.
    1
  51.  @Drowcarry  used to be twice that
    1
  52. also legal to send them into Kherson city as per russian law that is soverign russian territory
    1
  53. Who intercepted them then?
    1
  54. yes
    1
  55. @Silver_Prussian " the one that US general miley claimed ?" Sure, 3-day war is a western term. but putin himself said that it would take two weeks.
    1
  56. @Silver_Prussian "sure, ,,putin himself said it" so can you provide a clip to him saying ? " Yes... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8-IIZNd9dk Does the pigeon of truth hurt you?
    1
  57. @Silver_Prussian "And still you cant admit that repeating the 3 day cringe isnt something that was said by the russians but by a us general, " sure i can. A bit silly, but a truism at this point. "This happen in early april, the SMO started in 24th of February belive so putin was off from his estimate a by a few weeks." It has been almost 3 years. Kiev has still not fallen...
    1
  58. @Silver_Prussian "I mean the russians were able to make the ukrianians negotiate by simply surrounding the city" The city was never surrendered. and the ukrainians were negotiating before russia started their invasion.
    1
  59.  @Fero-72  "Stupid warhead with a temperature of 4000 degrees" Oh no. high temperature. how terrible... look at how little damage it did.
    1
  60.  @dannydanny2789  "We surely aren't incompetent at building and launching hypersonic missiles that cannot be intercepted by any conventional means." 30% interception rate when facing 30 year ol patriot systems...
    1
  61.  @dannydanny2789  Russia has been bragging more about the kinshal. Those have 30% interception rate. If you are talking about nukes then it has always been known that most missiles will reach their target. And Putin knows that using nukes in an offensive war like this will just make russia loose the war even faster.
    1
  62. "Absolutely unneccessary video in our current european situation" all videos on youtube are unneccessay. But this one is fun and thought provoking. That is why we watch it.
    1
  63. ​ @bluefox9436  That you don't know about how things are fun is no surprise. But there is nothing about backstabbing in this video. And the aim is not to provoke a strong united europe, it is to entertain.
    1
  64. "Ukraine is clearly not going to win the war of attrition" Even with low interception rates russia is advancing slower than a snail across the battlefield. And as for who is winning the attrition warfare, ukraine has more weapons now than before the war.
    1
  65. It was the republicans who held up the aid, not democrats.
    1
  66.  @aceryer  "weren't news outlets reporting that Russia was losing ground? " yes... because they were...
    1
  67. "Against a symbolic retaliation attack? " yes... If it makes you feel better then the strike back was symbolic as well.
    1
  68.  @The_one_that_got_away  ""let's commit a war crime and then cry about them attacking is "unprovoked" in retaliation of said war crime"" This is what Hamas did. Didn't work out so well for them did it?
    1
  69. How did they kill anybody if everything was intercepted?
    1
  70. It is not nice to call putin a midget even though he is small and sends little green men.
    1
  71.  @valorz6064  I doubt you can show a single such comment
    1
  72. Why would those two have anything to do with each other?
    1
  73.  @Svarog2012  "It can carry nuclear warheads." ok. so could a thousand of the other missiles russia sent the past 3 years.
    1
  74.  @xReLentLess213  "They are NUCLEAR CAPABLE!" So are most of the other missiles russia sends into ukraine. And they are not really making russia win the war.
    1
  75.  @valorz6064  Where do you find a single comment claiming such nonsense?
    1
  76. I thought youtube was blocked in russia...
    1
  77.  @AL-lh2ht  Ah.. I always assumed they were russians getting paid and using vpn from within russia.
    1
  78.  @maglev469  try to find one then..
    1
  79. "At 4 million USD per PAC 3 it's not really sustainable. " it is very sustainable. Russias economy is at the size of italy....
    1