Comments by "" (@PappaTom-ub3ht) on "Ukraine Fortifies Kursk Gains As Russia Goes After Pokrovsk" video.

  1.  @abdouj7116  To defend against similar unprovoked attacks from russia(USSR). But irrelevant ofc since Ukraine was not a part of Nato
    18
  2.  @abdouj7116  Now Nato is stronger than ever thanks to Putin. Why would Nato die after USSR fell? no need for that. nato building Ukraines army is probably why Russia hasn't won yet.
    9
  3. ​ @abdouj7116  "Unprovoked sounds like you been sleeping." How did Ukraine provoke Russia?
    7
  4.  @Alejandrica  "why is there no war anywhere.." There are wars lots of different places.
    5
  5. THe same island which Russia recently gave away?
    5
  6. Russian blood is indeed "oozing"
    5
  7.  @AnthonyMcRedmond-Vg2ry  Ok. How is that relevant?
    4
  8.  @tingleblade4274  But this is a reason to NOT attack. Ukraine only invaded Russia because Russia attacked Ukraine first. The best way for Russia to keep foreign troops out of their land is to not attack others.
    4
  9.  @lesshugah3003  "Shelling the russain etnic Donbas since 2014? Maybe?" Well, Ukraine shelling ukrainian land is none of Russias matter.
    4
  10.  @abdouj7116  How? Now you are kidding. Larger and more modern, army, navy and airforce... Nobody would die for Nato expansion. BUt lots would die for Nato protection.
    3
  11.  @diawannoto  What do you mean? I know a lot of what has been happening in Ukraine.
    3
  12.  @victorzvyagintsev1325  "he is quite literally an unelected dictator." not according to Ukraines constitution
    3
  13.  @thepoliticalanalyst5684  Russia is loosing more territory than they are capturing. And loosing more troops. How is that winning?
    3
  14. They took more than russia did in a year...
    3
  15. Except this time USA and the allies is supporting the enemy of Russia instead of carrying it through the war.
    3
  16. USA did not allow for this before Russia attacked Kharkiv the 2nd time.
    2
  17.  @aAverageFan  Ok. Why bring this up here? It is not relevant at all to the discussion.
    2
  18.  @aAverageFan  Not true. United nation was the one who decided and justified an intervention. Nato was just the muscle. Not the case in Crimea and Donbass. And Nato didn't annex the territories like russia have done.
    2
  19. Lol. Nobody even heard about Pokrovsk until recently. It is an unimportant city.
    2
  20.  @victorzvyagintsev1325  U2
    2
  21.  @thepoliticalanalyst5684  Good
    2
  22. Yeah. they have captured alot of them. can trade back and grow their army even despite their losses.
    2
  23.  @diegonatan6301  If that is true then Nato did something worng. That would mean that Russia is doing something wrong now. Not sure what you are trying to prove here.
    1
  24. Well. Now Russia gave away some of its territory to China for free :)
    1
  25. I wouldn't call that fast. They are moving slower than walking.
    1