Youtube comments of (@PappaTom-ub3ht).

  1.  @algor8541  Lol. Russia can't even take Kiev or Kharkiv.
    136
  2. Imagine being a prisoner from Mariupol for 2 years and then released to the news that ukraine is invading russia :)
    118
  3. He should sue again in the name of his now dead wife. Her estate or something
    116
  4. "You don't sell off your weapons if you plan to invade." depends what you buy with them. NK have enough artillery shells. Selling of their oldest in order to gain new modern different systems is probably a military gain. For both sides.
    111
  5.  @GalAxy-u9s  You honestly believe that the ukrainians will reach Moscow and Leningrad?
    95
  6.  @Nenernener123  That is not an misinterpretation. That is exactly how it was. According to Disney you can not sue them for killing their wife. They unilaterally decided to allow the husband to sue in this case because of bad pr. "This man would’ve likely gotten more money and sooner if he had done arbitration" This is not relevant at all to whether or not he was allowed to sue.
    72
  7.  @SpaceLion79  "Russia won't really effect the war that much " Then why is ukraine asking for it? And why is russia trying to prevent it?
    51
  8.  @greengeck0  First of, Article 5 is only implemented if the attacked country asks for it. No automation there. Secondly, Stationing your troops in another country which is at war, and then getting attacked there would in no way be good enough for article 5. Lithuania would not be under attack, even if their troops are getting attack in Ukraine.
    47
  9.  @briankenison7995  "I'm sorry but that's a dumb idea. Entire world should sit down at the negotiating table. " And part of that negotiation would be to start trading with russia again. the more money and goods we give russia the longer they will refuse negotiations.
    43
  10.  @blugaledoh2669  "That statistic has been debunked." no it has not. it has rather been verified by genetic studies showing that it is a long lasting thing, not just some modern twist.
    38
  11. "but can't build a nuke?" nobody is saying that they can't make a nuke. It is not that hard
    38
  12.  @GalAxy-u9s  Sounds more like how one would loose a life
    35
  13. This is probably the best response. Does not require military intervention. And Belarus can't really afford to call the bluff.
    35
  14.  @SamSitar  "that law is unconstitutional." How so?
    34
  15.  @StrangerHappened  "his channel said in 2022 that the crisis should be now. Moving goalposts" Stop lying. the first video about artillery came out a year ago..
    33
  16.  @jaysdood  Not really struggling. Ukraine controls more land now than they did in 2022.
    30
  17.  @AugustusOmega  "But why would you want a dollar? over valued shit that cant buy much yet it takes a broken back to earn" can buy more than a hundred rubles...
    29
  18. @sesameseedbar8853 "Russia continues to gain ground and settlements." at a snails pace. It will take them ocer 100 years at this pace. And russia still controll less territory than they did in summer off -22
    27
  19.  @damianm4727  "Why would Russia just leave, especially uninvadable Crimea" In order to lift sanctions. in order to stop the war and loosing soldiers. In order to stop ukraine bombing their refineries and other industry.
    26
  20.  @Toebytes  Europe supports Ukraine more than USA does...
    24
  21. "That seems so much more ambiguous" so what? it does not affect the numbers which is what he is asking about
    23
  22.  @chuhrov  "Ukraine inevitably loses the war." lol. cope harder. Time is clearly on ukraines side, and russia has already used 2.5 years and is still not even close to winning.
    22
  23.  @michaelotieno6524  "the war was about NATO expansion" In that case russia has lost. NATO has expanded because of the war. And to a significant degree when it comes to russias naval possibilities.
    21
  24. Your one vote. plus additional votes from the friends that you tell that you are voting who also decides to vote.
    20
  25.  @abdouj7116  To defend against similar unprovoked attacks from russia(USSR). But irrelevant ofc since Ukraine was not a part of Nato
    18
  26.  @Kalenz1234  "Just realistically speaking it doesn't look good for Ukraine." 2.5 years of fighting for such a small part of ukraine taken does look good for ukraine. Especially since the most gains was during the first few months. If one were to be more realistic this war seems bad for russia.
    18
  27. This is what i would do. And i would guess that the nukes onboard of submarines do work quite fine.
    18
  28. If Russia was in any way competent they would have won during the first year.
    17
  29.  @oakleysv9600  So many lies from you. "Russia sent ~200k troops into Ukraine to force them to negotiate." they were already negotiating. "Russia simply wanted them to not be in NATO ." ukraine could not join NATO anyways because Crimea was under occupation. "Russia, not wanting to be threatened by missiles that close (flight time from Ukraine makes missile defense systems ineffective)" Ukraine is not closer to russias major cities than the Baltics, already in NATO. And this war prompted Finland to join as well.. " Russia wanted Ukraine to stay out of NATO, keeping out NATO's missiles, thus maintaining peace and neutrality." Starting a war does not maintain peace or neutrality. Putin simply guaranteed that Ukraine will now join NATO.
    17
  30. ​ @Meem_Begorski  "will be able to sell this equipment at a more favorable price to other countries" Probably not. First off, the quality is far to low for most countries who can afford stuff to buy. And Russia has spent all of its reserve fleet on this war, any excess from the active army after the war would be put into a reserve storage. Russia is a very self sufficient country. Food and oil and low level basic industry. It will never collapse completely by economics. But life quality will continue to dwindle, and hopefully people get enough and rise up.
    16
  31.  @tempeleng  Disney as the owner of the premisses have some burden of responsibility that the tenants don't kill their customers. They also assume some of that since they advertised the restaurant on their website, stating it was allergen safe. Obviously disney did not personally kill someone, the chef/waitress did that. "but disney waived the right to arbitration this time because of all the bad press." you admit yourself here that you are mistaken. If disney had not waived ther arbitration this time they could be not be sued.
    16
  32. yachts? retirement houses in China with vaults full of gold?
    15
  33.  @tuub1281  "It conquered 5 and lost 2. What are you smoking?" can you name a administrative capital russia did not control before the war that they control now?
    15
  34.  @phoenix5054  lol? Who mentioned anything about loans?
    14
  35.  @Arjay.M88  Afghanistan as a metaphor is perfect. The superpower which invade even donated lots of military equipment to the defendants.
    14
  36.  @theantifurryact4678  "Russia is already fighting against nato" How many NATO troops have been lost so far?
    12
  37.  @Princip666  "Apparently? So there is no evidence? Then your argument is dismissed." lots of evidence. one still uses the word apparently. Because in western countries we usually treat suspects as innocent until proven guilty. Must be a foreign concept to you.
    12
  38.  @gary_beniford  That country can't even beat a small nation like Ukraine. Imagine how little chance they would have against USA.
    12
  39. Putin wanting a cease fire on energy means that ukraine should focus on that even harder.
    12
  40.  @phoenix5054  "That’s a very marginal function of the IMF." Yes, and that marginal function is loosing its credibility... You know, what this thread is about. Which has nothing tio do about loans to Argentina. Loans to Argentina are quite marginal to the function of IMF... As for lies, i don't see how that is relevant as i didn't mention lies. But the best example of why they are loosing ther credibility is how IMF claim that russias oil exports have increased while they in reality has decreased.
    11
  41. That is troublesome to make illegal as "forced arbitration" is not forced, it is a contract between to parts that they will use arbitration. What should be illegal on the other hand is having 30 pages long EULA admissable as a contract. Since there is noe reason to think that they are read, and therefore a contract based on it can not be valid. in order for a contract to be valid, both parties need to agree on all things regarding to it. And one can't agree to something one has not read.
    11
  42.  @thc6664  "Russian economy grows" Lol. I know you don't believe this.
    11
  43.  @jamesfeeney7903  "Excellent idea! Pay your fair share for NATO ! Six years ago!" USA is the only member state who has ever actually needed help from the alliance.
    11
  44.  @mtube620  "so why US is helping a sovereign nation?"^ so that the nation can defeat russia and keep its borders.
    11
  45.  @tempeleng  Initial premise is that you are saying that; " "At Disney we make sure suing us effectively and fairly is impossible. Even if your wife died" That's how anyone sees this."; is because Disney is misrepresented in media. But this is exactly correct. no misrepresentation or misunderstanding at all. Disney claimed (and still claim) that they can't be sued for deaths happening on their premisses. As long as someone at some point had a 1 month trial at Disney+
    11
  46.  @Steve-yr5vi  "And I suppose you're willing to put boots on the ground to impose that outcome?" No need. ukraine has proven that it is a match for russia. just double or quadruple aid and support and it becomes obvious quite fast that russia will surrender.
    10
  47. It is already a success
    10
  48.  @piotrd.4850  "Especially US had to do A LOT of arms twisting to keep EUrope supporting Ukraine" USA has been blocking the use of european weapons in ukraine just because a few parts are made in USA. The arm twisting is going much more the other way.
    10
  49.  @External2737  How can he scare russia?
    10
  50.  @timeverson728  "It was Ukraine backed by the west who said they would fight to the last Ukrainian." Well of course they will. It would be silly going into negotiations saying anything but that. In order to end this war russia just have to retreat from all the land they have occupied. Ukraine is absolutely ready to negotiate, saying otherwise is just lying.
    10
  51.  @RogerK9883  Overcome your fear, don't let it control you. be brave and vote for the one you know is the best for both USA and the world.
    10
  52.  @max_skim-pontoon-cough  When will you join the russian army?
    10
  53. Russias terms are not for peace but for a ceasefire...
    10
  54.  @Ricky-oc4xc  " Been using them with no problem for years." no problems for the opponents you mean ;) And what would US need hypersonics for? Russia can't even shoot down propellar drones flying into moscow
    10
  55. But you can be charged for violence. why is "domestic" important?
    10
  56.  @abdouj7116  Now Nato is stronger than ever thanks to Putin. Why would Nato die after USSR fell? no need for that. nato building Ukraines army is probably why Russia hasn't won yet.
    9
  57.  @fingerprint8479  "The consequences will not look nice fir europe!" less russian power does indeed look nice for europe.
    9
  58.  @kasperwittrup1288  " And since they are not within sovereign waters," They have to sail through such water to pass denmark
    9
  59.  @tctopcat1981  "We have been saying that for 2 years now lol" nobody serious said that. This is just a russian lie.
    9
  60.  @phoenix5054  Among other things they make reports about the state of russias economy...
    9
  61. Good point. For those people doubting if these youtubers are corrupt or not, russias KGB does not think so.
    9
  62.  @mal2ksc  "They might win politically " that is what a win is.
    9
  63.  @markmuller7962  At least a king has his reputation to consider. In a democracy a new government can easily invalidate anything promised by the previous ruler in a heartbeat.
    9
  64.  @Haroun-El-Poussah  So are t-64s...
    8
  65.  @phoenix5054  Really? What conspiracy theory have i made about it?
    8
  66. This scenario does not include russia.
    8
  67.  @thc6664  Lol. PPP is of little use when trying to buy western microchips.
    8
  68. "The EU should become a country, " absolutely not.
    8
  69.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  "No but he can cut them off financially and in terms of military aid if Ukraine doesn't comply" Only from the american aid. Trump have no impact over european aid. And it will probably increase if US pulls out.
    8
  70.  @urphakeandgey6308  "And just to clarify, he's not saying send them out into the front lines." Why not. Why should women not be sent to the front lines?
    8
  71. Good point
    8
  72. "in Poland's case, literally blackmailed their way into NATO. " how could they blackmail themselves into NATO?
    8
  73. ​ @abdouj7116  "Unprovoked sounds like you been sleeping." How did Ukraine provoke Russia?
    7
  74.  @kingace6186  "But the US is vetoing any such action. " USA have no veto power over what France does with its military
    7
  75. Then why use 80 year old equipment...
    7
  76.  @languaha  "you can't blame biden so much because he probably thought the same thing that happened in Afghanistan would've happened in Ukraine." that was a good excuse for the first week. And after month three when russia withdrew from around Kiev we all knew that it would not be the case.
    7
  77.  @Ode-to-Odysseus  "Within the first month it was clear to me that America and Europe would fail, due to their apathy. " So far it only seems like america and europe has been strenghtened. NATO has become more solid(+ more members).
    7
  78. Yeah. it is really nice to see how consistent and good the photographs and counting is. Amazing that he keeps on going producing high quality videos
    7
  79.  @attilamarics3374  WE do. they are being photographed and tallied up in open source lists of destroyed russian equipment.
    7
  80.  @suntzu94  Is signing up for soldier duty the new go to respons from russian trolls?
    7
  81. Sure. but russia claims that kherson is russian. And that has been invaded ages ago.
    7
  82. Nor would i any of the thousand other missiles used in this war...
    7
  83. That might be true. at the same time. The north koreans might figure out how much of a whimp the average russian soldier is and take advantage of them
    7
  84. "Russia will never turned over their gains after their sacrifices" They won't have much of a choice. nor much of a capability to protest.
    7
  85.  @scipioafricanus5871  What could Nato do to stop it? And why would Nato try to prevent it?
    7
  86.  @derljackson5365  "Woman were seen as PROPERTY??? " stop making stuff up. they were not seen as any more property as the men were considered property. THis is just some propaganda from the matriarchy.
    7
  87. The most shocking thing i learned here is that "before present" does not in fact mean before present. But rather, "before a specific point in time last millenium."
    7
  88. Do you think that there is any chance at all of real protests if things get worse?
    7
  89. Flunked? they captured more land than russia did in a year. Russias front is not collapsing, just wobbling a bit.
    7
  90. "They have 0 leverage now" lol. Both sides have leverage. They occupy each other lands, they keep killing young men on both sides. Both are bombing each other economic capabilities etc.
    7
  91.  @reubensandwich9249  "Exactly how well have things been going for the last two years. Say, December 2022..." Extremely slow for russia. At the rate they have been going since then it will take russia about 200 years to take the rest of the country. I cherry picked summer of 2022 because it glaringly shows that ukraine is in a better situation now than it was before. So no reason to think that they are loosing anytime soon.
    7
  92. ​ @wesleywyndam-pryce5305  I know they don't own the land, and i never said that they did. The point is not whether or not Disney should be found at fault. Such fault such be up to a court case to decide. But if Disney gets their way, even if they were the business owner, and direct employer of the staff, they could not get sued, ever, because you at some time clicked "i agree" to a free trial years ago.
    7
  93. The thing is that we know about the soviet storage spaces. and there is no reason to think russia built new secret underground storages for their 50 year old artillery
    7
  94.  @cureit9161  palestine has never been its own country
    7
  95.  @yaeli_i_guess  "That argument is stupid lmao I'm a woman from a country where women have to serve in the military too." it is a very good argument. You are living in a differet situation now. Women can vote in your country, so your point is moot.
    6
  96. How does that slow down their offensive? take a look at the map ivan.
    6
  97.  @Oomph6006  "These Ghost ships are pretty hard to stop." Not really. it's not like they are armed, or have a navy capabel of protecting them.
    6
  98.  @bucium7  "Has your country ever tried to bring peace and justice to a war torn nation?" It was the US tearing it up with war...
    6
  99.  @toplel1860  "Not to defend Elon but that logic applies to the bulk of CEOs it's not exactly unique to just him. " That ius why most CEOs don't claim to know how to build rockets...
    6
  100.  @dpelpal  politics is interested in you
    6
  101. "In fact, Russia only has a contract with Moldova," The contract is with the gas company is it not? Not moldova per se. And not russia, but Gazprom. And that moldovan gas company is mainly owned by... Gazprom.
    6
  102.  @Azraelfromgamefax  Seems like i need to check out how riflings are made. It has to be a bit more difficult than just a lathe and a steel tube. But still. Barrels are ww2 technology. shouldn't be that hard.
    6
  103.  @cmgeorge12  "having a volunteer spend inordinate amounts of time preparing the stuff" There is not inordinate amount of time needed to freezedry milk. You simply pour the milk from your container into the trays located in the machine and press start. Milk is the perfect food for this. Egg is a close second where all the work is cracking the eggs into the tray and throwing the shell away.
    6
  104. "It cannot be shot down So a nuclear warhead could fit on it without being shot down. Thats the point."* This has been the case from the very first ICBM. nothing new here.
    6
  105. Putin is desperate though. might happen. Nato should start a prompt exercise near Belaris borders and keep them there until Belarus withdraws.
    6
  106.  @AAB463  "But can they outlast Ukr?" Ukraine can last basically forever IF they get enough support
    6
  107. This is just blatantly false. Finland was indepedent before the war, so they did not gain independence. They lost the war hands down. Had to give up a bigger piece of territory than the original demand from soviet was. and there was no claim that Finland was run by nazis and was in need of denazification or demilitarization.
    6
  108. "Just two more weeks" that is the exact amount of time Putin claimed was needed to take Kiev...
    6
  109.  @ahmadomar5806  "Let's not forget media said 2 yrs ago russia ran out to ammo and were using shovels to fight," Stop lying
    6
  110. So wash your car yourself. The money you save can be used to pay down interests or invest in the stock market.
    6
  111.  @thc6664  Then why do they buy them at extra expensive prices?
    6
  112.  @thc6664  " europe buy russian oil from india for double price" Even if true. Europe can afford that. And it does not help russia
    6
  113. Training outside = Free Eating less = actually saving money
    6
  114.  @EvaSkagulBrynhild  Then punish it as violence with extra circumstances. still no need for it to have a specific genre of law. "because a victim has no safe space to hide and rest. " ofc this is obviously false as the victim can run away to a safe location like anyone else not living with the offender.
    6
  115.  @samuel10125  ofc they have a choice.
    6
  116.  @ValDJesus  "Would you try to sue the whole mall just because a branded clothing store treated you wrongly? " What i would do is not relevant to what disney is claiming about the possiblity to sue them. "If the case was more directly tied to Disney, like in a mechanical ride or such, the case would be completely different." How would that make it different? The agreement you signed with disney state that you can't sue them, ever. "It is not a Disney owned restaurant" Yeah... this is obvious.
    6
  117.  @HunterShows  A region can have a buffer space. No one is saying otherwise. But it can't make one. A piece of land is simply not capable of doing that. Individual soldiers or organizations can though.
    5
  118.  @Alejandrica  "why is there no war anywhere.." There are wars lots of different places.
    5
  119.  @BattleBrotherCasten  "not wanting to start nuclear war has nothing to do with "balls"" not helping ukraine properly increases the chance of a nuclear war.
    5
  120. Nobody have a reasonably functional nuclear defense
    5
  121. Thanks. tell your other conservatives the same thing. gl in 2028 or something :)
    5
  122. This scenario does not include russia.
    5
  123.  @deavman  So? We are not discussing if they are legit targets or not. If they are below 18 they are children. Holding a gun does not make you an adult.
    5
  124.  @alt1f4  "so you're calling 15 hundreds europe developed?" more developed than any other part of the world.
    5
  125.  @dm121984  "Even if NATO invaded the Russian heartland, the risk/reward ratio for Putin is going to be less than him fleeing with some suitcases of money to try and hide out away from international police." This i do disagree with. As putin has one goal different than just surviving. Making russia great again. Or at least being remembered as being a great leader who made russia great. Having mainland russia invaded by Nato is the only thing i think warrant nukes from him. He is old and will die soon. No point in running away with money to Dubai or the like.
    5
  126. He is aware. and time is clearly on ukraines side.
    5
  127.  @jonshadow4052  "who told you that, Russia pumps more oil an gas from sibera ." reality. Russia uses one year to take 0.5% of ukraines territory. Ukrtaine uses one day to take out 5% of russias refineries.
    5
  128. THe same island which Russia recently gave away?
    5
  129.  @kidkiw  "if the North Africans became the most powerful nation in the world with a large part due to slavery of ‘one’" this is simply false. Slavery held america back. And by using your logic then the descendants of those slaves should now pay reperations to the whites..
    5
  130. Quite big compared to what the russians are able to take. Ukraine has taken areas in two weeks which it have taken russia 8 months to take.
    5
  131. Bet you can't find a video posted which backs up your claim.
    5
  132.  @Ranyick  "Then we’re all fucked" not really. it just pushes the date for running out from end of -25 to somewhere in -26
    5
  133. Russian blood is indeed "oozing"
    5
  134.  @TheHonestJock  "Sure it is, when someone treats you as their enemy " NATO never threatened russia. "especially when there was an original understanding that NATO wouldn't do exactly that. " There have never been such an understanding.
    5
  135. They probably are void under standard contract law anyways. in order for a contract to be valid both parties need to be in agreement about the contract. And you can't agree to something you have no knowledge of.
    5
  136. What do you think "attriciam" means?
    5
  137.  @levihalperin7649  Which makes it Lebanons governments responsibilty to handle what Hezbollah do abroad. why do they even allow such a large military faction inside their own country?
    5
  138. Civilians work there. It is a "mostly" civilian target.
    5
  139.  @tylerisnthere2922  "they may have used at most 35% of their aresenal" Odd that they need to use ancient korean ammunition if that is true...
    5
  140. And proving that countries like Romania would rather escort russian drones to safety than let them fall into a field in Romania...
    5
  141.  @DIREWOLFx75  "And by this time next year, there will be no UA left." So you think that russia will have conquered ukraine in before nect christmas? I wonder what your excuse will be next year when that is not the case.
    5
  142.  @suicidalbanananana  "point fingers at EU lately but its not really justified," yes it is. EU sold more shells abroad than they gave to ukraine during this war. and the war is happening to a local country.
    5
  143.  jebbush9614  "Russia has been running out of tanks in 2 weeks for 2 years lol" Stop lying.
    5
  144.  @WannaKnowAll  If getting your car washed for you is your only pleasure in life you really have problems. And if you think 6k is not important to a lot of people then you are truly out of touch.
    5
  145.  @thc6664  " they are getting them from china " That russians are poor and thus high PPP does not help when buying from China either. And as for russia making their own. lol, get real they are 30 years behind at least in this kind of tech. Even China is a decade behind.
    5
  146. The photographs taken from space are wrong somehow?
    5
  147. "The lord blessed you with a good upbringing " Years after years of abuse and torture by his mom is not a real blessing.
    5
  148. Ukraine is not under NATOs protections though.
    5
  149.  @BillyBasd  "They don't have to be infantry" Then why should men... THe vote should be linked to the most dangerous part, not the safest.
    5
  150. Stop lying. this is literally the very first video he has made on this topic.
    5
  151.  @dread6987  "They told NATO if they won't get invited to NATO, they start a nuclear-weapon program" How is that blackmail? It is the only other realistic option in preventing a russian invasion.
    5
  152. "Russia should be allowed to keep the Sevastopol Naval Base and perhaps a few other military installations on Crimea." Why?
    5
  153. Never is a long time. But probably not during the next few decades.
    5
  154. They are not fighting NATO
    5
  155.  @AnthonyMcRedmond-Vg2ry  Ok. How is that relevant?
    4
  156.  @tingleblade4274  But this is a reason to NOT attack. Ukraine only invaded Russia because Russia attacked Ukraine first. The best way for Russia to keep foreign troops out of their land is to not attack others.
    4
  157.  @lesshugah3003  "Shelling the russain etnic Donbas since 2014? Maybe?" Well, Ukraine shelling ukrainian land is none of Russias matter.
    4
  158. His son could haul out barrels of gold from the treasury, get convicted, and then pardoned...
    4
  159.  @issadraco532  "russia already has a military that is large enough and powerful enough to take on the whole of europe combined." Odd that such a military can't even beat up Ukraine.
    4
  160.  @gary_beniford  "Ukraine made a peaceful solution impossible," they never did this. peace was always an option. Russia simply chosed war instead of letting their neighbour live in peace.
    4
  161. Just skip it
    4
  162.  @rhodium1096  How many NATO troops have been lost so far? The West and NATO is only supporting Ukraine. not part of the war. If NATO was part of the war russia would loose in a week or two.
    4
  163.  @dixonpinfold2582  Yeah, it seems odd. Removing specificity from such terms just means that those people loose part of their identity.
    4
  164. Technically they are.
    4
  165.  @TheEverFreeKing  "because owning a gun is a human right." Wow. do people actually believe this?
    4
  166. Wrong about the photographs from space... Sure about that?
    4
  167.  @johnritter6864  That is like saying that they can't do anything against the cables since they are in international waters.
    4
  168.  @soulscanner66  "Pretty much told him to open the window " What law is being broken by not doing what the police said?
    4
  169.  @JoeJohnson-i9d  " Russia is just trying to defend itself, " Russia is the one attacking another country.
    4
  170.  @timeverson728  "They already voted didn't they ? They now belong to Russia at least a few area's." What do you mean voted? No vote outside of Ukraines parliament could legally transfer ownership of the land to russia.
    4
  171. "so there could be 100k taks in warehouses noone knows about. " lol. Even though this is obviously not true. If it was, why is russia not using them to win the war?
    4
  172. "Iran, as the oldest country in the world " lol. how do you make up this shit?
    4
  173. Why would we do that?
    4
  174.  @Azraelfromgamefax  How can that be? Barrels seems like one of the things an soviet style industry base like russia should be able to make easily after 2 years of a full war.?
    4
  175. " I use math and compare what I see in the map." Let us see that math...
    4
  176.  @rjnemoyer  They are just snoozing
    4
  177. " guess where all that new defense spending is going" Hopefully not the US as they block the use of so many systems.
    4
  178.  @johnmahoney9354  If that was the real reason then in 2 years after the war turned slow they would have built up new production lines. the truth is that more european ammunition is sold abroad rather than to ukraine. And new orders were laughably late to arrive.
    4
  179.  @cloudycolacorp  "Is a nuclear physicist really cheaper if they're russian?" Yes
    4
  180. Why not? He was an enemy combatant invading their land and not surrendering.
    4
  181. "Are you now a Harvard professor?" What relevance does harvard have? Do they have some secret insight?
    4
  182. Cryptocoins are not a business.
    4
  183.  @ViniciusVieira13  "Until the 1970s, women needed their husband’s permission to get a credit card," Most men did not have credit cards at that time. it was a brand new invention, makes sense that they had some odd rules for 15 years or so.
    4
  184. Can you link to what video was plagiarized?
    4
  185. "Since Russia just keep advancing faster and faster," that sounds bad, what year do you think russia will win?
    4
  186. So Putin made a huge mistake picking Trump as his pal?
    4
  187.  @nikhilannur  So much wrong with what you write here. "and most advabced US weapons" It is not. Most the weapons sent so far are the oldest in stock, not used anymore by the western powers. "US never win any war in the past 100 years" This is so silly. I know you don't believe this as you very well know about ww2. "If US is strong why do they need NATO to fight russia ?" USA does not need to fight russia at all. and NATO would not be needed, russia can't even beat ukraine...
    4
  188. Which rapidly advancing russian front? Russia has lost more territory than they have gained this year.
    4
  189.  @diegoflores9237  Because they get north korean artillery shells and because they are not afraid of loosing 1000 men a day to make miniscule advancements. but those advancements are so glacially slow that it will take russia 100 years to win. a strong military would beat ukraine in a year.
    4
  190.  @DIREWOLFx75  Your numbers are so off that they are just imaginary. Russia is facing higher loss ratio than ukraine, and has done so for most of the war. But even pretending that you are right... "By summer 2025, UA will likely have between 100 and 250 thousand troops left, no or poorly functional logistics, while Russia will have 1.3 million troops, all welltrained and fully equipped." Why would russia not be able to win over ukraine this coming summer if the troop number look like this?
    4
  191.  @FrankElec  Just because you are ignorant about how many dies from childbirth does not mean that more have died from war.
    4
  192.  @Hugohhhgg  "What does Syria have to do with protesting genocide in Palestine?" Just as much as college campuses in general.
    4
  193.  @Jagonath  "but Russia can easily build one to the east of Crimea. " then why do you think they haven't done so in the hundreds of years they had the opportunity?
    4
  194.  @KolyaUrtz  " absurd propaganda" Super absurd propaganda counting satelite images...
    4
  195. Because that would benefit the russians.
    4
  196. THey don't have storages of unused systems like this.
    4
  197.  @tedzehnder961  So only 5 single ships that can keep shipping open? Not a real security in the case of an actual war.
    4
  198. understandably. the most powerful alliance in the history of mankind.
    4
  199.  @DementiaJoeGottaGo  "And you keep believing Ukraine is winning while their defense lines are getting crushed." are you for real? Russia has lost more land than geined in the past year. Russias defensive lines are the only ones who have been broken through the last 6 months.
    4
  200.  @sguploads9601  "it's not connected in reality in any case" satelite images are not connected to reality...
    4
  201.  @michaelgoetze2103  Might be. But that was two years after Germany successfully occupied kursk on their way to moscow. The battle in 43 was while Germany was on their back foot. Much like Russia is today.
    4
  202. Imagine if they thought 1 billion was enough. Then they would not have needed to invent this drug at all...
    4
  203.  @zur2016  Is that worse or better than arab slavery where all the men were castrated?
    4
  204. "We're just about to win" That is what the russian said two years ago...
    4
  205.  @jamesringo7070  "Reads like a 13 year old trying to be deep lmao" The fact that you find Tolkiens writing on the level of a 13 year says more about you.
    4
  206.  @geediosman6415  "the fall of vuhledar will push the russians to the dniepr " what is you timeline for this? What month/year do you think the russians will reach dnipr from Vuhledar?
    4
  207.  @ngonzales3781  The russians are yes. Azov is reducing their numbers every day :)
    4
  208.  @StrangerHappened  Why do you think that only parts of the storeage spaces are in open air? Do you know of any real examples of artillery storages which are not open air and contain more than a hundred items?
    4
  209.  @WakeUpWest  "Why should the US and NATO as a whole risk escalation of conflict?" We should not. Removing all restrictions and increasing aid will reduce the chance of escalation. Supporting russia will increase the risk of escalation.
    4
  210. "I am worried about what will Trump do when it becomes apparent that Putin can't be negotiated with." if he does realise this then he will allow more violent respons from ukraine. That wopuld be a good thing.
    4
  211.  @gmonkman  "People who are morbidly obese have physical barriers to any exercise." Sure. but what they don't have a physical barrier to is to eat less. That is not only free, but also saves you money. And happens to be the very thing the drug help you do.
    4
  212. Ofc shovels are good tools.
    3
  213.  @mingo7929  "Finland isnt a threat. If a war with NATO started Finland would fall in like, a week" considering russia has spent 3 years in their 3-days war against ukraine that would tranlslate to 6-7 years in order to take Finland. And as opposed to ukraine, Finland would recieve actual help in their fight.
    3
  214.  @tylerkirbyson1921  Did you loose your leg while invading another country who had not attacked yours?
    3
  215.  @ghyslainabel  -rather make price gouging illegal instead of fixing the exact prices. -monopolies have never happened before in history without it being enforced by the government.
    3
  216. That BTR really seems like the perfect gift. I bet Jake truly feels gratitude in his heart.
    3
  217. Agree. or at least start "checking" all ships for not being a danger to the coasts of nearby countries.
    3
  218. I doubt it actually. The west benefits from having russia loose all ukraines possessions Unless US pulls out. Then Ukraine might have to concede to the 2014 borders
    3
  219.  @abdouj7116  How? Now you are kidding. Larger and more modern, army, navy and airforce... Nobody would die for Nato expansion. BUt lots would die for Nato protection.
    3
  220.  @diawannoto  What do you mean? I know a lot of what has been happening in Ukraine.
    3
  221. 6 months for storages to run out. but it will take another full year for battlefield stuff to actually reduce enough for Ukraine to win. my guess is that in two years Russia will loose this war militarily. (with the front not moving much after about a year.)
    3
  222.  @gary_beniford  "They only wanted to bring Ukraine to the negotiations table which was working for couple months until nato shut down diplomacy and bankrolled Ukraine's war effort." Again bullshit. Ukraine was negotiating before the war. War removed any real hope of negotiation happening. And NATO never shut down any diplomacy.
    3
  223.  @gary_beniford  "Russia is holding most of its reserves back in case they need to fight nato directly." then why do they withdraw troops from every single NATO country they border?
    3
  224.  @maxpower3990  "potential repercussions from Russia is greater than from Ukraine." Except for nukes russia have no real repercussions available to them
    3
  225.  @JayJay-vb7om  "yet..... according to broe it's all Trump's fault" he has never said this
    3
  226. You got your answer. No need to wait anymore.
    3
  227. NATO is not part of the war, how could they loose?
    3
  228.  @luciusartorius3437  Unless the west completely abandons ukraine there is no real way russia will be able to hold on to the territory they have taken.
    3
  229. "If there an award for Russophobia then you win it." I am not afraid of a country which can't even defeat ukraine.
    3
  230.  @masada2828  "What would u suggest?" ... not use such a broad and diffuse term for a large group of different people.
    3
  231.  @Cramblit  "U.S. didn't "lose" the war in Afghanistan or Iraq. Their military objectives were all achieved." Not true for afghanistan. Their military objective was to destroy Taliban. They failed that after 20 years of fighting.
    3
  232. Only to us. To his own people he can sell that he got some secret cards up his sleeve which we don't know about. So he truly IS a strategic mastermind, just wait and see..
    3
  233. "has the offensive failed?" depends on the goal of the offensive.
    3
  234. Iran confirms losses though.
    3
  235. "European brotherly love." Yeah... Germany has been famously nice to Poland during wars the last century...
    3
  236.  @AkenValle  "Russia only have money for 30 days war." Stop making stuff up.
    3
  237.  @mikelthemafia  Lol Not sure if that is the case, but quite sad if it is. 2 years of war economy is just competing with countries at peace. and their quality is so shit compared.
    3
  238.  @AaSs-ln9mm  "Yep, they run out of everything since 2022." Sure about that? How could they stay in the fight if that is true?
    3
  239. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    3
  240. No? He counts artillery and BMPs as well. Awesome content.
    3
  241. Lol. what drones would do any damage to them at those safe storages?
    3
  242. It is already fair. Other countries are allowed to join Ukraine, they just are choosing not to.
    3
  243. It is only a right if the government says it is. They do not :(
    3
  244.  @timeverson728  "Russia has been open to the entire time." No, they have only been open to taking ukraines territory. So far they have refused to give back all the land they have taken.
    3
  245.  @voldemarvaglaots6690  Surely not winning at least. And for the attacker in a war that is a loss. 2.5 years later in this war and russia still has less land than they did in spring 2022. Their economy is in ruin, with no hope of getting better. But probably worse as there are fewer and fewer workers every month. Ukraine can hold on basically forever at this pace, Russia can't. That is why is say russia will loose.
    3
  246. 2500 stored in dry desert. 32 taken out.
    3
  247. The west never attacked or destroyed any russian stuff. that is not comparable to actually attacking the west like this.
    3
  248.  @Ciborium  "Ukraine is the Germany of 1938, N4zis and all. Except that Ukraine already occupied the Sudetenland (Crimea)." you mistook ukraine and russia here. russia is the one occupying crimea
    3
  249.  TheMusicHeals.kjhjhhg  Lol. as if you would give money to the homeless.
    3
  250. Probably because in the big picture ukraine seems to be winning.
    3
  251. How would the subjective iranian comment make this more objective?
    3
  252.  @rejeanlevesque8881  "Ukraine will keep on Fighting for Democracy worldwide" i hope so. But with sanctions russia is probably 1-2 years away from collapse. Without US sanctions that number might jump to 3-5 years.
    3
  253.  @johndewey6358  He is surely allowed to put out misleading positive propaganda about his own country. Telling the truth on the other hand is more dangerous.
    3
  254. The math says russia will loose.
    3
  255. Then why use MLRs?
    3
  256.  @antony6799  Exchanging a possbile Georgia for a certain sweden and Finland into NATIO is a clear loss to russia.
    3
  257. What about them?
    3
  258.  @timur43378  He is talking about letting NATO air power crush russias ability to wage war.
    3
  259. They tried that. Wasn't welcomed
    3
  260. "It was Ukraine that put itself in this situation." How so? russia made the decision to attack, not Ukraine.
    3
  261. Getting billions and billions in profits will make it easier to fix those problems. But only if you chose to spend the money that way.
    3
  262.  @Acidfunkish  "He said it costs as much for one cycle of freeze-drying as his freezer chest consumes over 25 days. So... Almost surely not worthwhile." His chest freezer is really cheap to run though. If this saves a gallon of milk during those 25 days it has been worth it.
    3
  263.  @morewar01 But it never varies like that for women. so saying that it is an average does not change the underlying truth.
    3
  264.  @peterflohr7827  What would the point of meeting taylor swift be?
    3
  265.  @sergeyboychuck8872  "Russia has run out of (you version) since March 2022." Lol. no one is saying this. How is Kursk going Ivan?
    3
  266.  @mweskamppp  "That wont happen. " Why not?
    3
  267.  @mweskamppp  And you think that they will send a portion of these new tanks to storage bases? WIthout using old tanks from storages, russias production will probably be reduced by 3/4. that is not sustainable.
    3
  268. "The results are therefore invalid." Nope. having a different number of people in each group does in no way invalidate the test. And in medicine it is almost always different numbers of people i each group. Only for teeny tiny tests are the numbers equal. "doesn't include those for which there was no change)" There was no people for which there was no change. it would be silly to include and extra row with just "0" in it.
    3
  269. "Pokrovsk is now surrounded and doomed ." So 3 years into this war and they finally have surrendered a small town close to the border? that seems pathetic. " That proves Russia had no plans to take Kiev or large parts of Ukraine " It rather proves that Putin guessed wrong about resistance.
    3
  270. "Actual smart people would ask how that data is gathered, how good was the sample, a breakdown by level of education and country of residence...instead of taking those numbers at face value," no they wouldn't. smart people realize that those factors are not relevant to answer the question asked by the interviewer. They are being asked, based on these numbers, does gun controll reduce crime. How the data is gathered does not in any way affect this.
    3
  271.  @fabb5  "The Homless veterans" they are probably happy that america is helping fighting russia. go on, ask them
    3
  272. WW2 was fought precisely because the allies did not betray them.
    3
  273.  @victorzvyagintsev1325  "he is quite literally an unelected dictator." not according to Ukraines constitution
    3
  274.  @tijan8948  "But you inherited a system built upon slavery and arguably every ounce of your wealth derived from slavery in some way." So does the blacks in america today. Should they pay reparations as well?
    3
  275. So weird that arsenals deep in russia blows up even in hardened bunkers if their EW is so good...
    3
  276.  @mikebugaj730  Blown up infastrucutre and industry.
    3
  277. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    3
  278. "They have 8+ FPV drone teams for ever Ukrainian team." Wow. why don't russia use this capability to actually win the war?
    3
  279.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  For a full year? And Ukraine still occupies part if Kursk. How large an advantage does russia need in order to beat ukraine if 8 to 1 is not enough?
    3
  280. @termonostruman "they turn off lights to avoid attacks its a very old technique" Do you really believe that modern drones are navigating by lights? And is russia too weak to protect its cities?
    3
  281. It is not needed as there is already law against violence.
    3
  282.  @thepoliticalanalyst5684  Russia is loosing more territory than they are capturing. And loosing more troops. How is that winning?
    3
  283. Wow. So it took russia 2 full years to capture a tiny border town...
    3
  284.  @nikhilannur  So you do understand that a larger country can lose to a smaller one? and Ukraine is far stronger than Afghanistan, and russia is far weaker than USA. My bet is that it will take for less than 20 years for russia to surrender.
    3
  285.  @walterbrunswick  "Russians withdrew" I know. thats how we know they are losing.
    3
  286.  @anthonymanderson7671  "you are correct that hamas started the current war 10 months ago" This is the answer to your question about why people support ukraine and israel. being attacked by their neighbour often draws sympathy.
    3
  287.  @DIREWOLFx75  All of these numbers. According to you they clearly show an incredible superiority of russian army. yet they are advancing at a rate slower than a snail. It has been 2.5 years already. How is russia not winning already with such an enourmous advantage in numbers?
    3
  288.  @TotoGeenen  Countries like USA does not lack storage space. Terrible comment.
    3
  289.  @etienne8110  "basic logic and knowledge of logistics are stupidity..." you have neither though.
    3
  290. That makes no sense
    3
  291.  @Mesopotamia-v6d  "im talking about the the current days , you said Israel doesn't depend on it's allies, can Israel win a war against the Arab countries in 2024 without the it's allies support?" Quite easily it seems
    3
  292. What about it? Nato is giving very small amounts away to Ukraine and is by itself not at war.
    3
  293. obviously because russia took a lot of tanks and guns out of storage and put them into the field.
    3
  294.  @mikeellis9720  This is just ridiculous. Moving is an enormous cost for most people. Both in money(which can't be sent to ukraine) but also in time, which means fewer and lower quality videos etc. Besides, it wouldn't help. Moving is a very public act. The FSB would see it and find the new adress. Not broadcasting plans on the other hand is a good, effective and reasonable tip.
    3
  295.  NatCo-Supremacist  You do know that Ukraine captured t80s an t90 in kursk right?
    3
  296.  @mursuvaara4  "Even all their WW2 memorials are always from 1941-1945" Well of course they are... The winter war was a different war. It would make no sense to include memorials from a different war into the great patriotic war. "Tho that's probably because they were allies with the nazis with the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement." yupp. And that soviet was the aggressor vs Finland, while they were the defenders in ww2
    3
  297.  @HACK_THUGGO  I have not built any nukes.
    3
  298.  @bluemystic5980  "lil bro" Lol. That is just pathetic. the reason so few countries have it is that it is not needed for most, and too exepnsive for others. This if 80 year old technology. Truly not difficult today.
    3
  299.  @johnwray393  Not true. If you know that the person you are selling the gun to intend to go and kill someone you would put restrictions in place.
    3
  300.  @Robert6889  "The USSR did not lose the war in Afghanistan;" yes they did loose. Claiming anything else is just cope. They did not "simply" withdraw their troops, they were forced to by enemy combatants.
    3
  301. You can debunk lies anywhere without appearing bitter. But at the least you don't have to go on and help the neighbour spread their lies and convince others to believe him.
    3
  302.  @GigaNietzsche  In the ethnoracial group of whom the vikings consisted of the women had roperty rights, inheritance right and divorce right... And the "short period of time" was longer than countries like USA or modern France.
    3
  303.  @enochprophet2794  Those tanks are either to replace losses. or to build up a russian forces. the second one would mean that russia for some reason is building up a secret army they are not using.
    3
  304.  @Tony-fl3rl  " Did they help pay for a drone to protect Ukrainian lives", they might have. Both in helping other private individuals in deciding to give. But also in helping shape national politics which is far more important.
    3
  305.  @JackTheBlindOrganistAndCrepey  "so the authority will not take the crime seriously." Authorities like that would either not care about a new specific law, or they wouldn't allow it to be made. in a funcitoning society violence is violence even if it happens at one owns house.
    3
  306.  @bdott1538  I have not complained about anything.
    3
  307.  @bdott1538  Stop complaining yourself then.
    3
  308. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    3
  309.  @Bidmartinlo  "We in the Nordics should start production of everything we need to build our own weapons and vehicles, as soon as possible. We and anyone else who value their freedom can't rely on the EU nor the US if the worst happens." yes. If our alliance partners can stop us from acting in our own self interest with our weapons then what is the point of producing them
    3
  310.  @samuel10125  Russia actually managed to make nazis heroes. That says something about how bad russia is.
    3
  311.  @jaynikk758  lets be real and call it 2.5 years. Still not great..
    3
  312.  @andrirublov  Voluntary contract.
    3
  313. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    3
  314. No shit. luckily they are recieving support.
    3
  315. Why not? Just send troops, it is not like russia can stop anyone.
    3
  316. They took more than russia did in a year...
    3
  317. Except this time USA and the allies is supporting the enemy of Russia instead of carrying it through the war.
    3
  318. Did sholz call to offer butter? or did he call putin to tell him to gtfo of ukraine?
    3
  319.  @markmuller7962  What then? I guess the exact same as if a democratically elected president says it. No real difference.
    3
  320.  @Iamabot4708  Laugh all you will.
    3
  321. That makes noe sense. American natives are redskins, not black.
    3
  322. @ "In peace negotiations you might need to give a little. " Ok, this is fair. But i do think that if Russia gets beaten enough that they will give up the Donbass and Crimea they will accept a peace treaty withouth Sevastopol as well.
    3
  323. Well, it is one of the few bad mouthings that is actually correct. Ukraine as a nation is begging for aid. But it does speak volumes that mighty russia can't even defeat a bunch of beggars...
    3
  324. "But somehow they are still going forward. " They are not though. Russia has less territory now than it did before.
    3
  325.  @tempeleng  You are wrong. I heard that. But please explain what disney is being sued for again...
    3
  326.  @IanMikrut  "I can't confirm nor deny the numbers." then stop saying that he is wrong...
    3
  327. Not even price gouging. One can get the same effect as the drug by 30 min of exercise a day. And that is free.
    3
  328. USA did not allow for this before Russia attacked Kharkiv the 2nd time.
    2
  329. Not enough before he releases his alst video on the topic before christmas
    2
  330. There is no need to drop out of Nato in order to send troops whereever you want to.
    2
  331. His logic also almost always result in that the weaker country should simply give up parts of their territory whenever a larger country country asks for it.
    2
  332.  @lineoflads1388  Np. We are different. I didn't see his content from before 2022, so i don't know what you are missing. But i would like to point out that it is not repetitve, it is an evolving story, both with more details (usually) and with further progression.
    2
  333. 25% success rate against the invincible kinshal does paint western weapons in a very favorable light.
    2
  334.  @aAverageFan  Ok. Why bring this up here? It is not relevant at all to the discussion.
    2
  335.  @aAverageFan  Not true. United nation was the one who decided and justified an intervention. Nato was just the muscle. Not the case in Crimea and Donbass. And Nato didn't annex the territories like russia have done.
    2
  336. who predicted that? Facebook karens?
    2
  337.  @fingerprint8479  Do you really need sources for understanding that less russian forces will be good for the rest of europe?
    2
  338. "With predicted growth by the IMF of nearly 4% over the next year. " based only on the few official numbers russia gives out. So just bs. "35% of its military budget " Nope. 35% of its entire budget.
    2
  339.  @vriskaserket8058  "It's difficult to enforce this kind of policy without escalating into a full war." Not really. Just perfom "inspections" on all ships going towards st.petersburg when they are close to danish waters. traffic can be slowed to a halt without any real problems. And just what are the russians going to do about it?
    2
  340.  @om1noa  What makes that fair? Steal from someone who makes food to give it to someone who does not? doens not sound fair to me.
    2
  341.  @McSpanklez  There are pictures from satelites in space. Gj in calling photographs for lies.
    2
  342.  @badluck5647  How can you not know this? Taiwan does not have nukes.
    2
  343.  @МихаилЧерников-п2т  Russia is indeed coping hard. But it is a dwindling resource.
    2
  344.  @mikeneill6813  Yeah. US logistics can easily support huga armies in the field, especially with such a slow build up. but the inevitability of it would show russia that time is so hard against them that the faster they surrender the better.
    2
  345.  @chrisparnham  "Where on earth do you get this nonsense from?" from immigration rates into Germany. They are insanely high.
    2
  346.  @peterflohr7827  Thanks
    2
  347.  @test-rj2vl  "Just sign whatever makes Trump happy and next president after Zelensky will say that agreement signed under duress is not binding flush it down from toilet." yupp. It is easy to just call Zelensky a dictator and only agreements signed after the next vote to be valid. So after the war is won, any forced deals can be ignored or renegotiated.
    2
  348. Or they naturally think that no pictures are available yet...
    2
  349. In order to win ofc
    2
  350.  @bowencreer3922  He blocked aid to ukraine for half a year during the war. He does not do what is best for freedom loving people.
    2
  351. ​ @AnirbanDuttaasn  Rather than what exactly? Not sure what you are asking here. But any business, hospital included should be answerable to its owners and customers. When it is not, bad healthcare is the result.
    2
  352. If the society does not collaps then yes.
    2
  353.  @chancellor3122  "why would the U.S allow the EU to take a slice" because they have no say in the matter
    2
  354.  @Fiztex553  "That would mean 10-15% extra tax." no it would not. it would make the europeans more money as they would by buying from europe, creating more jobs there.
    2
  355. Lol You would run out if food in a year. And the enemy could gather huge armies in that time.
    2
  356.  @Cramblit  "They came back after the U.S. left " "objective achieved." Then i must wonder what you think the objective was... and why it was not achieved in year 2.
    2
  357.  @airsoft9077  " Militarily we succeeded in Vietnam" This is just cope. The north vietnamese was never defeated, not even close. It was USA who surrendered and ran away in the end.
    2
  358.  @jandolinmarks  " Russia has NO desire to beat up anyone except Zelensky and crew." then ehy do they threaten to nuke washington? And why do they put bounties on american troops?
    2
  359. "Zelenskyy army at this point consists mostly of this hapless cannon fodder kidnappe" And this is the army russia is loosing to? Imagine if russia was to face NATO troops-
    2
  360.  @LambofSuffering  "average life expectancy for new Ukrainian troops is 4 days so, and ?" So silly. if that was true then the entire population of pre war ukraine would have been spent several times over already.
    2
  361.  @gmw3083  "Europe would sure like it but they're paying 5 times more for American nat gas." Not 5 times. not even 2 times. But even at 5 times, europe can afford it without real problems. Still selling oil. But at an insane bargain for countries like india and china. they are ripping russia off.
    2
  362. "they do not tell you the side affects. " Ok, but now she knows... She can just stop if she feels it is not worth it anymore.
    2
  363.  @energeticzombie  I read that russia is running out of infantry as well. they now pay 1.5 million in the districts for a signup bonus in order to try and fill the ranks.
    2
  364.  @jerrymiller9039  Yes
    2
  365. There should be a line in the "more" section of the video information that states "leaving a negative comment in the comment section means agreeing to give me $100USD." For some reason i think they would eat their words..
    2
  366.  @zoolkhan  The complication is that Russia should not attack its neighbours.
    2
  367. "in my sphere russians are advancing," Your sphere must be an echo chamber. Think for yourself. Take a look at the map and do some math. How much territory has russia gained since january this year? or since january 2023? and even if russia doubles that rate, how long until they reach their stated goals?
    2
  368.  @Xiaengao  Ah... So nothing really then. You are just making up stuff.
    2
  369. Turkey is extremely valuable for NATO
    2
  370.  @jorgemanso521  "The people did not say no, their governments did..." Who elects that government? And who allows them to rule?
    2
  371.  @Chad_Gepetinsky  "The West broke promises made to Gorbachev and Yeltsin about NATO expansion." the west never made any promises to Gorbachev or yeltsin regariding this. Gorbachev has even said so in more recent years. Not to mention that it is none of russias business wether or not any country want sot join NATO. But please, of you truly do believe that such a promise was made by the west. where is the documentation of it?
    2
  372. " We would rather Ukraine settle, give up the land, so we can go back into our comfortable coccoons and ignore the world even as the world around us sharpents their bayonets to skewer us." speak for yourself
    2
  373.  @dimas3829  "Czechoslovakia didn't fight for it's life, " Neither did ukraine when it came to crimea. Giving away crimeas really felt like czechoslovakia prior to ww2 at the time. "Poland participated in annexation of Czechoslovakia, you know." did not know, got a link or source?
    2
  374.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  Neither is asking for evidence
    2
  375. no. A rash can either get better or worse over time. The cream just slightly shifts the percantage of people into the worse category.
    2
  376.  @randodejambo2921  How does recieving funding and weapons from USA not make them the most effective military?
    2
  377. Lol. Ukraine just took more land from Russia have done in the last year. Cope harder Boris.
    2
  378. Hospitals are also often owned by state corporations, and used to treat wounded soldiers...
    2
  379. Why not? It is literally impossible to prove one self innocent of an alleged crime which happen between two people 5 years ago. All that is needed for a long jail time would be a judge just believing what a girl says above that which a guy says. much better tactic to accept a plea deal where you avoid the chance of american prison.
    2
  380. @LinusIslamTips " he wrote there aren't any migrants in the army " Where di he write that? Some secret post only you can see?
    2
  381. "Mate, the two sides DO NOT have a 'disagreement' which they have decided to settle by violence! " so how have they decided to solve it? Or do they actually agree (but for some odd reason still decide to fight)?
    2
  382.  @mabussubam512  You seem to be mistaken something here. This is not a competition in just having a higher number of something means one is winning. Russia is getting weaker by the day, while Ukraine is getting stronger. So with time Ukraine will win. And since it has taken russia over 2 years to achieve so little there is no reason to think that they will achieve much more before Ukraine is far stronger thatn russia.
    2
  383. "f this simply was a war of attrition, Ukraine would have surrendered long ago, not having anyone left to fight." That makes no sense. Russia is attriting faster, and has less of a pool to draw from.
    2
  384.  @Mark16v15  "Russia has vastly more soldiers and potential soldiers than Ukraine." Not really though. Russia is "only" 3-4 times bigger in population than ukraine. That means that if 1% of russias population is willing to fight then ukraine only need 4% willing in order to match. And since ukraine is on the defensive, numbers like 2-3X the casulties for the russians are not unprobable. meaning ukraine only needs 2% willing population in order to win. when it comes to materiell it is much easier. As long as the west keeps supplying ukraine there is no way that they can loose attritionally vs russia regarding equipment.
    2
  385.  @MrMudEagle  Who said it was?
    2
  386. Nothing naive in joining EU. It seems quite guaranteed that they will.
    2
  387.  @romanmendicant6864  Np american weapon keep flowing in. last week Biden donated weapons worth 10% of russias yearly budget. And just for weapons, not wages or tranpsort or anything.
    2
  388.  @noname-sz4br  "Now they are saying there are only 2-3 weeks of tanks left." i doubt the useful idiots are saying that.
    2
  389. This video clearly contradict you
    2
  390. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    2
  391. Still has 100% success rate
    2
  392. It was before the war. Jeeez
    2
  393.  @marksnyder7255  No. but nobody poked russia
    2
  394.  @marksnyder7255  "public their intention to join NATO " that is none of russias business though. No poking involved.
    2
  395.  @marksnyder7255  "They have no one to blame but themselves for ignoring the dangers" joining NATO would be the best way to stop the dangers. russia is not going to attack a NATO country, so if ukraine had joined they would be safe now.
    2
  396.  @marksnyder7255  They didn't try though. That is just rumors. But russia now has ensured that once the war is over ukraine is going to join, and will get accepted as well. Also, sweden and finland joining NATO withouth russia doing anything to prevent it proves that russia never really cared about NATO expansion.
    2
  397. do they have a seperate drone flying and showing the MAVIC in order to control it?
    2
  398. "when Russia has said it isn't. " because russia lies.
    2
  399. At least that way the prices goes up and delivery is slowed down.
    2
  400. I doubt that 10k casualties really mattered in the big picture. There are several other factors at play. they country was collapsing anyways. the war lasted 10 years. lets hope that it now takes only half that time. they had more freedom of speech and information in Gorbatsjovs soviet with glasnost. Russia now is far far richer, meaning that no one has to starve or wait for hours on end for food.
    2
  401. ", fainting interest would not work." why not? Tell Trump that you are willing to join his peace plan, whatever it is. Then keep fighthing with american support.
    2
  402.  @rinsonator1668  Ofc it can. Ukraine has more willing human resources than russia does. And russia is loosing their faster.
    2
  403. "Ukraine will be brokered to the highest bidder. " What does that mean?
    2
  404. ​ @frankcooke1692  "He didn't say it in 'public' per se" On a public street is one of the most public places you can be.
    2
  405.  @gregoryfilin8040  "If you can see what is seen on the ground, they don't have a chance." I agree. Now with russia having so few tanks they are lossing men at an ever increasing rate. No chance of recruiting enough.
    2
  406. What law has zelenskyy broken?
    2
  407.  @molecatcher3383  "The most belligerent country in the Middle East is not Iran," Gaza and Lebanon are. but we know who fuels that belligerency...
    2
  408.  @RapMusic490  Good to know. So does people from Israel.
    2
  409. Yeah.. Russia is so pathetic for begging for weapons from Iran and North korea
    2
  410. When has this channel ever said that the end is near?
    2
  411.  @isaacgriffin5690  Correct. the stockpiles can be running out.
    2
  412.  @Oldsmobility455  "neutral would involve evaluating comparable equipment levels on both sides" That would not be neutral. That would be two completely different statistics.
    2
  413.  @Czeckie  "What does crime increased and decreased even mean? " That is irrelevant though. it can mean whatever you want it to. The meaning does not in any way change the answer to the question. same with the sizes of the cities etc.
    2
  414.  @sleepyjoe7843  Russian state media claimed 2 days... Putin himself said 2 weeks.
    2
  415.  @sleepyjoe7843  Russia-1.
    2
  416.  @sleepyjoe7843  I am shocked that paid russian chills don't know what the english word media means..
    2
  417. They will try to hold this territory. Not permanently, just to the war ends.
    2
  418. And they did reduce the use by a lot. Like really a lot.
    2
  419. maybe this is a second reason for increasing interest rates. hard to pay a mortage at 25% interest.
    2
  420. or 3 years I just hope we the west keep supporting.
    2
  421.  @Lingboysc2  But he was a threat. Being dazed like that can pass in a few seconds. He alone could have wiped the team from behind if they had left him there to gather his wits and pick up his gun again.
    2
  422. No.
    2
  423. "sure, you could technically call that a disagreement." so not a gross misunderstanding then? Pretty accurate description really... The fact is that they disagree, and that this disagreement is big enough for the leaders to go to war for.
    2
  424. Lol. Nobody even heard about Pokrovsk until recently. It is an unimportant city.
    2
  425.  @victorzvyagintsev1325  U2
    2
  426. Lol. Satelites from space do not need permission.
    2
  427.  @johnricardo9917  "To the Americans, the 2WW started in 1939 not 1941, did it take the Americans that long to find out where Europe was?" Same goes for russia...
    2
  428.  @SoulSoundMuisc  By asking... it would be a part of the contract ofc. If you don't want them you wouldn't be hired. Not more difficult than that.
    2
  429. Lol. withouth israel iran would have had nukes ages ago.
    2
  430.  @TestName286  More like enforced socialism.
    2
  431. Yeah.. like ukraine. being neutral really turned out great for them.
    2
  432. "wars ALWAYS ends with negotiation." Such bullshit. There might be some facade of negotiation, but in reality lots of war ends either by someone being conquered or by having one part giving up.
    2
  433.  @chuhrov  "Sorry for winning too slowly." not winning though. but at what year do you believe that russia will actually win?
    2
  434.  @ttexastt  When do you believe that russia will win? what year? and i guess you must have the same dedication if you still support russia agfter 2.5 years
    2
  435.  @anaremelam5998  "it seems very unlikely that Russia will loose at this point" i disagree. with continued support from the west i see no real way that russia can win this. But at least your timescale is sound. And we won't know who is right until either peace suddenly happens or in several years.
    2
  436. @Silver_Prussian "Russia has completed most of its objective" it hasn't even managed a single one yet.
    2
  437. "and we know that without support we lose for sure" and what do you think with support?
    2
  438.  @notspm9157  But he had no no knowledge of the part about arbitration, hence there can exists no valid contract about it.
    2
  439.  @ttuliorancao  "This would be a declaration of war " nope. just call it a special maritime operation.
    2
  440. Yeah. probably the least "single point of failure" system there is in the world.
    2
  441. If they are not replacing anything, then waht are they being used for? Evidently not for winning more in ukraine at least.
    2
  442. That would just be silly
    2
  443. who cares?
    2
  444. "they can build 900 tanks a year." *restore 6-700, build 2-300
    2
  445. 130? That is almost nothing. At that rate it will take a century for russia to win
    2
  446. @ Are you taking about Trump taking office? as the oldest president ever? That won't save Russia.
    2
  447. And yet they have less territory than they did before.
    2
  448.  @g33k37  You care... "Russia is taking territory in days what used to take them months" See?
    2
  449. Well. Exactly because they are using hand tools, it will be easy to rebuild the workshop again.
    2
  450.  @TheRealBillBob  This is Ukraines' interest. Respect that and stay in your own country.
    2
  451.  @TheRealBillBob  I don't have any fumbling war efforts. your interest is it? why did you say earlier that it was russias interest? "Respect that and stay in your own country." This is what you said. why don't you listen to your own advice?
    2
  452.  @kobekkop  "Which was to make a push into kursk when their other frontlines are falling apart." That does not have to be a tactical blunder
    2
  453.  @no8592  "We will take them eventually, and not just Karelia " Russia can't even take 4 oblasts from Ukraine. Imagine if NATO got involved.
    2
  454. What makes it "nazi" lightning bolts?
    2
  455. Any country can send any troops they want to. No need to be cute about what to call them. Is not like russia can do anything to stop it.
    2
  456.  @leon-jj9dv  So easy that it only takes a few weeks, sure about that?
    2
  457. Well, the 3% is more than russia did during the last year... so it put Russia back a year. Meaning that much more time for Ukraine to get aid.
    2
  458.  @Thetequilashooter1  the spirit of the deal was oviously that the signatories were to defend ukraine.
    2
  459.  @jonm2416  Pre-recorded flight plan. F-16 just shadow them. Still silly.
    2
  460. Who says it can't?
    2
  461.  @thepoliticalanalyst5684  Good
    2
  462.  @nikhilannur  almost forgot... "couldn't make any success" have you forgotten Kherson city being retaken? Russian withdraws from Kiev? Kharkiv county was freed etc...
    2
  463.  @walterbrunswick  "why are you not at the frront?" Why would i be?
    2
  464.  @walterbrunswick  I am not a bot. And you know that.
    2
  465.  AndyWoohoo666  Of course you can. Just say "no" no need to involve the UN
    2
  466.  @masoodjalal1152  Palestine started the worst war and it's ally Russia started the second worst war :(
    2
  467.  @WolphL0  Nobody is pretending anything about a "situation". But there was not an ongoing war before october 7th.
    2
  468.  @dunnowy123  You are easily amused
    2
  469. Nope. evidently from destroyed items they used the best first.
    2
  470. Really, i have never seen that. Are you lying now?
    2
  471.  @Oldsmobility455  Lying does not help Ukraine. Lying helps Russia. So this is bs. no one credible claimed what you say here.
    2
  472.  @FrankElec  "that maternial deaths was at 1% which is doubtfull. " Yes, this is highly doubtful. it was probably much higher. 1% is relatively modern. Only during wars like ww1, ww2 and gengis khan and maybe a few other examples would have war deaths be higher than childbirth deaths. even wars like the ukrainian war now kills fewer than dies in childbirth.
    2
  473. Just skip the ad
    2
  474. European countries can even if north korea is not sending troops. no one is stopping france from sending soldiers. No one can stop the swedes from sending as many thousand troops as they want.
    2
  475.  @etienne8110  "I m really flabbergasted by the average stupidity level of this comment section" you are the one displaying it.
    2
  476.  @georgelyddane8283  "so this is wrong" How can you be so sure? you have no proof at all that russia didn't ask iran to start the war?
    2
  477.  @sharonlavery7656  Not even close.
    2
  478. That is what ukraine is reporting. And it matches well with russias own numbers of 30k new recruits every month without increasing the size of their army.
    2
  479.  @JohnDorian-j7x  So it is a war then? Careful, saying that might get you in prison in Moscow.
    2
  480.  @Garoslol  Nice of you to think that NATO exists in 5 years ;) I doubt Russia does.
    2
  481. Funny how russia is paying people to comment on youtube.
    2
  482.  @samael335  No country can join while having territory which is disputed.
    2
  483. No. There was never a palestine in the first place.
    2
  484.  @cyborgchimpy  "how about the US and Russia go fight their fights in the middle of the great ocean? " First off. USA would win that fight with two arms behind its back. and secondly, there is no fight between USA and russia, so why start one?
    2
  485.  @scottgray636  "Didn't fail at two plants did they?" Two plants is not really that many.
    2
  486.  @ronclark9724  european airforce alone has more than enough stock to defeat russian military. and europe sold a millio artillery shells abroad last year.
    2
  487.  @occamraiser  How about YOU?. Doing anything wortwhile?
    2
  488. Then why do they have to pay so extremely high wages to the soldiers?
    2
  489.  @randomamerican8236  "When you lose a fifth of your countries territory to a foreign military power.....yeah I'd say that's decisively losing." not when Ukraine already has reclaimed a huge part of it.
    2
  490. "Russia's military is the strongest we have ever seen?" it is not. They are using tanks made by their grandparents.
    2
  491.  @GameHEADtime  russia never stopped Germany. USSR did thanks to western aid. Now Ukraine is the one recieving western aid.
    2
  492.  @StGeorge257  It has belonged to ukraine for many more centuries than to russia.
    2
  493. But we should not expect anyone to make these kinds of drugs which help people.
    2
  494. To be actually bulletproof it would as heavy as the rest of gear is combined.
    2
  495. That just makes it worse though... If they needed 20 years to build their war chest it just means that russias base economy is weaker than we give it credit.
    2
  496.  @bluemystic5980  "get your facts right" i have my facts straight. Anyone who finished physics at a university level can design one.
    2
  497. "will they give up? " if they give up then they lose.
    2
  498. Nah. not a declaration of war at all. same as if french soldiers fight in ukraine that is not a declaration of war against russia.
    2
  499.  @goiterlanternbase  What would the legal trouble be? what laws would france be breaking by sending in 10k troops to fight at the front in zaphorizia?
    2
  500.  @markwalton8644  "Foreign fighters who went to Ukraine were volunteers NK Soldiers wee officially sanctioned by NK an Russia!! Massive Difference" so what? Seriously, how does it matter?
    2
  501.  @TheRealBillBob  "there's." not american are you....
    2
  502. This is just wrong. Viking women had property rights, inheritance right and divorce right.
    2
  503. Yeah. they have captured alot of them. can trade back and grow their army even despite their losses.
    2
  504. Seems like a good bet. russia is doing terribly.
    2
  505.  @rizkyadiyanto7922  "but the west vs russia." Lol. not a single western country have joined yet.
    2
  506. @ Lots, why? No western country have joined the war, even if they send some leftover munitions.
    2
  507. As if wall street journal knows everything
    2
  508.  @Tony-fl3rl  What are you on? I mean, what did you not understand? Not a difficult concept...
    2
  509.  @TheAmrthe2nd  Why not?
    2
  510. @Cluck40k "Prideful men dont just let that happen" Putin does not really have any pride though
    2
  511.  @nobodyherepal3292  You think USA won in vietnam?
    2
  512.  @bd8063  You think it belongs to Russia? What makes it so?
    2
  513.  @gamurarandrei2657  It gives him experience in delivering such funny statements in a good way.
    2
  514. He would call it an escalation ;)
    2
  515.  @DrakonPhD  It will probably be a partial mobilization.
    2
  516.  @mffmoniz2948  Nobody mentioned who is financially dependent on whom. And it is the same regardless of gender. Neither one would run into the snow, that is just silly. And laws against domestic abuse would not change anything anyways.
    2
  517.  @nameherez  "ook into how difficult it can be to escape an abusive spouse if you dont have what you need." it is just to walk away. Not very difficult. take the bus even. Easy to reach a completely different city before the abusive partner even comes home from work.
    2
  518.  @teru797  USA cut support for 6 months straight. The front did not collapse. Russia made no significant gains. And Ukraine is now in a better position, while Russia is having more trouble than a year ago.
    2
  519.  @reddragonflyxx657  "The temporary monopoly is a patent thing, which is more capitalist than socialist" you got that exactly opoposite. The government laying out rules for who can produce what is clearly socialism.
    2
  520. That is just tanks which have been photographed and verified, the real number is probably twice that.
    2
  521.  @ashleykerlin  What city is that?
    2
  522.  @Papasmokes875  a bit over 2 thousand. from countries who have them and are looking to get newer platforms.
    2
  523. "medicare was not legally allowed to (negotiate better prices)" So problem is clearly not the drug company but silly americans laws preventing free trade.
    2
  524.  @OleDiaBole  "Entire combined western amo production goes to Ukraine." not true. European countries send more ammunition abroad to other countries than to ukraine.
    2
  525.  @AdmiralValdemar  "Why launch any nuke when Russia is winning conventionally as it is?" lol. I know you don't believe this.
    2
  526.  @ngonzales3781  And noone was shown here.
    2
  527. by not having neither usa nor uerope contributing even 1% of their economies to this.
    2
  528.  @Alejandrica  Lol None of the countries of brics are supporting russia. they are just robbing russia of all their wealth in exchange for scraps. Not to mentioning that they sell weapons to ukraine as much as to russia.
    2
  529.  @ieuanhunt552  "So we're just going to conveniently forget all those little green men in Donbass from 2014 onward. Or Russia illegally annexing Crimea." I sure haven't. But ukraine refrained from turning it into an actual war. there is a reason that ukraine did not strike any part of crimea before 2022. Exactly because it was annexed by russia(without a fight), and ukraine was not at war with russia. all the fighting were in Donbass where there was civil war(heavily supported and fired up ofc). So it was a war between ukraine and 2 small "republics". Russia bet on crimea surrender happening again, it didn't. this time ukraine was ready for war with all of russia.
    2
  530.  @ChristianSt97  "at least russia is advancing everyday." lol, at a rate slower than a snail. it will take them 100 years to conquer ukraine at this rate.
    2
  531.  @ChristianSt97  "what has ukraine done the last year other than taking a small region of russia?" They have taken back most of the black sea from russia, struck oil and ammo depots far inland in russia. But most importantly, they have basically stopped russias advance. Russia is barely making any gains. So slow that it will literally take a hundred years to win for russia. As long as western support remain at similar levelse to now i am esily optomistic that russia will surrender at some point.
    2
  532.  @petermartell568  "so - "Peace through War" How very '1984'" you must have misunderstood that book.
    2
  533.  @petermartell568  "so - "Peace through War" How very '1984'" The party in 1984 wants an external war in order to get internal peace. This is not at all the same as defending oneself against an aggressor and stopping the war in order to get peace. Increasing support to Ukraine will increase their combative powers, this ending the war sooner. 1984 does NOT want the war to end.
    2
  534.  @CyrilSneer123  You should look up what the word collapsing means.
    2
  535. They could have been making plans for 2 years after kiev-offensive failed.
    2
  536. This is insane to watch.
    2
  537.  @Iamabot4708  I doubt it.
    2
  538.  @SBmasta441  So a full year just to reach the major river. And then what? If it takes 3.5 years in total to reach it, how will russia ever be able to cross it and capture cities like Kiev?
    2
  539.  @hieubui9542  "you absolutely have no idea about the geography of Ukr" "the Eastern part hold 70% of the Ukr GDP" these two sentences have nothing to do with each other. knowing geography is not relevant to where Urkaines GDP is from. And as Ukraine is monetarily supported by the west their GDP is not the the most important part when it comes to this war.
    2
  540.  @kate_love_cat_dog  "Don't worry, the Russian economy is fine" Official interest rate is 21% that is not fine.
    2
  541. If it is not a problem, how come Russia is loosing russian territory?
    2
  542. My guess is that they don't care about youtubers. USA would know anyways how many they have. Either by just keeping count of constant in and out or by satelites using other waves than light.
    2
  543. This channel and some western intelligence agencies would say about 2 years more if the same rate keeps up. If russia after a year stops advancing and only tries to hold on to territory they might stave of defeat for 4-5 years considering equipment.
    2
  544. The west never said that.
    2
  545.  @breizhrudie4757  "You're either trolling or idiotic. Russia is closing in on Pokrovsk, aka Ukraine's key hub and HQ city in Donbass, if it falls, the entire line collapses and they have to make a new defensive line" and then what? How will that make russia win? Ukraine will not stop bombing russian industry just because russia captures a few towns. Besides, they have been closing in on pokrovsk for months now....
    2
  546.  @glintongordon6811  "Ukraine is out of soldiers either way" What month/year do you think russia will win over a country who is out of soldiers?
    2
  547.  @guidosarducci209  "@osric1730 I'm not sure where you get the emotion part. Ukraine and Russia are coming from two totally different places. Failing to recognize that difference is not being logical or accurate." Do they agree or disagree on these differences?
    2
  548. If the US void the patent of this drug. Denmark, and the rest of EU, should do the same to any american drugs.
    2
  549. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    2
  550. "And been wrong." can you give us an example og where he miscounted the systems left?
    2
  551. ​ @harwardmbonxa-x5i  "What happened to Nato game changers or so called advanced weapons to stop Russia from capturing key ukraine cities on daily basis as Russia is using shovels." Russia has captured like 3 key cities in 3 years. So whatever advanced weapons are being given sure does work.
    2
  552. This war made Nato gain even more members. So the war failed.
    2
  553.  @choski76  So 1 F16 vs 200 russian planes?
    2
  554.  @heroofhyrule9778  That is not common sense. More involvement from the US would end this war faster and thus make it safer for everyone
    2
  555. It would be difficult for ukraine to break its contracts with eu member states. Not renewing them on the other hand should be a no-brainer.
    2
  556. I bet you can't even find a single example.
    2
  557. Evenly spread out. but more importantly, they are not missing from important places where proper russians with value lives.
    2
  558.  @DrMosseeay  "Not particularly." Ukraine is still fighting russia. that means a couple of years vs a couple of weeks.
    2
  559. What is the PPP regarding tritium do you think?
    2
  560.  @gmonkman  "I'm trying to get over that it is a bit more complicated than "we shouldn't treat with semaglutide coz eat less exercise more"." I agree. and if they find it to be worth it they should. the prices are probably set to how much americans will pay for it. For now it is 1k. But probably as earlier it was just for some diabetics, now the drug has a broader market and therefore costs society more in general.
    2
  561. Russia started development despiste the treaty.
    2
  562. Ask for your money back
    1
  563. I bet you can't find a single unaccounted factor which can't be written off.
    1
  564. So that they become less reliable on the good will of the US navy.
    1
  565.  @gvibration1  "no but they inherited the power of the USSR" Then why are they so weak as to not even win against ukraine?
    1
  566. There have been several days where russia alone lost more than 2k soldiers. And if you trust russian propaganda at least thousands of ukrainians are dying everyday.
    1
  567.  @bryan0x05  Why? An attack against NATo does not mean there has to be nuclear exchanges.
    1
  568.  @jontnoneya3404  Opposite, this is how you avoid getting into jail.
    1
  569.  @bilic8094  " many big companies are going down." That does not equal the country gouing broke. In any functional capitalist country there will be companies going bankrupt, that how it gets more efficient over time.
    1
  570.  @ultimaetsolder  "Take time off? He posts like 1 video a month..." this is his 4th video posted this week
    1
  571.  @Maceta444  How do you know?
    1
  572.  @Maceta444  and why do you think everything else he said is made up?
    1
  573.  @Maceta444  "Because it'd batshit crazy, nonsensical and insane" so no objective reason. Just you not trusting him.
    1
  574.  @Maceta444  but no objective reason to think that one can not have the experience of talking to god while high on hallucinogens.
    1
  575.  @kevinmullner4280  And given away by the ukrainians. It was clearly telegraphed half a year ion advance.
    1
  576. "Both have sold out the Norwegian people in favour of the EU and demented "green shift"" now you are mixing them up with labour, the left and the green party.
    1
  577.  @hippiemetal7  So not a war between NATO and russia then. a proxy war...
    1
  578. What speed does it do?
    1
  579.  @michaelball1887  "The reason is that the supreme commander of NATO is American so he calls the shots," calls the shot for Nato perhaps. But not for other countries. Britain does not have to listen to NATO about how it uses its military.
    1
  580. Because otherwise they don't know where people belong to
    1
  581.  @lovemoviesful2  So in your view, a person born in alaska then moved at year 1 and lived 50 years in texas should still get their vote counted in alaska?
    1
  582.  @lovemoviesful2  "In my view the popular votes should be the winner, " Ok. But that is not how the union operates. And given that the vote one gives should benefit the state one live in people have to register.
    1
  583.  @lovemoviesful2  Nope, you are wrong. "You're talking about statewide election, which of course would limited to states voting only. " I am talking about national presidential election.
    1
  584. "Finnish Winter War (1939–1940)" Finland clearly lost this war. Soviet won and achieved all of their objectives.
    1
  585. They probably could. Russia would fail so fast if NATO started using som real resources on this war instead of 30 year old scrap.
    1
  586. It is because russia keeps invading its neighbours
    1
  587. That didn't really work out for them.
    1
  588. France and UK has allowed it all the time. Only USA said no.
    1
  589.  @convopit  What about it... For starter it would never have existed were it not for government regulations which hindered natural growth of competing oil companies. Instead of growing large and compete they were incentivezed to join together into a massiv trust. and secondly, they never reached a monopoly. even in their top product they just hit 90% for a few years. Several years before the antitrust laws broke it up they only controlled 60-70% of the market share of thier narrow product. so if that is the best example it more helps me prove my point.
    1
  590.  @TheGreySpectrum  Luckily the official Ukrainian position is of little importance on how other people speak.
    1
  591.  @lineoflads1388  Sterile? This is like saying that one shouldn't report on the second part of a football match just because it is still the same football match.
    1
  592.  @lineoflads1388  "it’s an attrition war, Russia is going to lose artillery." Exactly and the rate of this is intersting. It enables one to think for one self with hard information instead of relying on others interpretations.
    1
  593. So odd that ukrainians have captured russian conscripts as POWs...
    1
  594. Russia would gain vast resources from the territories if they somehow managed to invade and win.
    1
  595.  @ThePilot3332  " only as long as Russia is against it." Russia don't have any say on the matter.
    1
  596.  @diegonatan6301  If that is true then Nato did something worng. That would mean that Russia is doing something wrong now. Not sure what you are trying to prove here.
    1
  597.  @IvanToman  Lol. That is Covert Cabal. He did not claim russia was running out of missiles.
    1
  598.  @IvanToman  Do you know what the word "might" means? it means that there is a possibility that they are starting to run low and a possibility that they are not starting to run low. He did not say they were running low. And "running low" is not "running out". Russia did reduce their missile strike a lot, so they probably did run low(not out...) But with imports from abroad and increased production they could later increasae strikes.
    1
  599.  @IvanToman  So you admit to being wrong? he did not say that russia was running out, just that they "might" be "starting" to... "Wars are lost due to underestimating of the oponent." In this you are right. If russia hadn't so severly underestimated ukraine they might have won the war.
    1
  600. "We know that if a rich white football player..." No we don't
    1
  601. Lol. Russia is so much poorer. they have to put locks on their butter now.
    1
  602. A good read of the deal. thanks.
    1
  603. Russia has not declared war on Ukraine. They call it a special military operation
    1
  604. Why would any country do that? and by "any country" i mean china, they are the only one with the means.
    1
  605.  @PeterG-xb3zo  lol
    1
  606.  @krakken-  That is because those wars was started by USA in order to beat down on people. in this case after a win USA could just walk away as heroes. Similar to WW1 and WW2.
    1
  607.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  " The IMF says America is the biggest or second biggest economy in the world. What is that based on BS too ?" No. america gives out a lot of their data. Russia does not. So IMF has far less real data to base their estimates on when it comes to russia. Russia is probably faking the few numbers they give out. USA can't fake the numbers since their economy is so open.
    1
  608.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  " that Russia is spending 6% of its GDP on the war" Knowing that russias national budget is about 17% of the GDP then they spend about 1/3 of their budget on the war... That is insane.
    1
  609.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  "It’s not insane if you have too to protect the country. " Russia is not protecting their country. They are attacking another country.
    1
  610. How so?
    1
  611.  @daledykes9253  You calling ukraine great? Cool. But since it is on the "verge" when do you think it will happen? This year? Next year.... 5 years?
    1
  612. "Most economists agree that if the ruble were to hit .832 cents, " I highly doubt that.
    1
  613.  @ChrisM-tn3hx  " It doesn't change reality." neither does spouting out random numbers and claiming economists agree on stuff.
    1
  614.  @ChrisM-tn3hx  "I don't see any. I just see a useless opinion." So basically the same as you writing then... Where did you get the number from? are economist really agreeing to that being the magical number? Not an immediate collapse at 0.843? And using words like "immediate" is just as silly as economists agreeing. Russia is self sufficient in all important goods for their society, a collapse will not be fast no matter what the external price for ruble becomes.
    1
  615. How is it not fairly distributed? USA produce a lot of food through its hard work and ingenuity. Seems fair that they deliver the food to those who pay for it.
    1
  616. ". Ukraine joining NATO and foreign military are inching towards Russian border which can pose security threat. " and now because of Putins war 2 new countries have joined. And ukrained seems destined to join as well after the war.
    1
  617. What about them?
    1
  618.  @thomaslove6494  Seems doubtful. Ukraine is currently invading Russia. no nukes in sight... And China has their own nukes, so Russia would be less willing to use them om China than on Ukraine.
    1
  619.  @gary_beniford  "Even now Russia could choose to escalate the war" this is bullshit. Russia is doing all it can except using nukes.
    1
  620.  @williamosgood3565  They probably have som 10% show pieces that does work.
    1
  621. "My question is why we're even involved in NATO? " If we are the USA then it would serve you well to remember that USA is the only country who have ever required and gotten help from NATO. Not anyone in europe.
    1
  622. "Budapest Memorandum?" Russia also signed this and promised to defend Ukraine against invasion... But anyways, none of those are NATO.
    1
  623. "with blocking out parts of the city and kidnapping men." it is not kidnapping though. just as when regular police arrest someone they are not kidnapping anybody.
    1
  624. Yeah. Almost like alternative history where czechoslovakia didn't surrender but chose to fight.
    1
  625.  @BlackEpyon  "Russia has already moved them out of range" * So ATACMs have already destroyed all russian airfields in range...
    1
  626. Also how they lost wars in the past
    1
  627.  @SebastianSnoeck  Sure, it is kinda complex. but no need to make it som complex as NATO membership. The major western powers can give russia a deadline. If not met then 1000 western troops can be added to the front every week until russia gives up. nothing russia could do against it, and no consensous needed from NATO.
    1
  628. USA is helping Ukraine win the war.
    1
  629. More territory than russia has taken in a year
    1
  630. Take Ukrainian land ofc. Both the people and the vast natural resources.
    1
  631. Why don't they use this advantage to win the war?
    1
  632. Because russia was weak there. and the advance in the east is so slow anyways.
    1
  633. age-restricted video :(
    1
  634. I wish. but most politicians seems too afraid. there are so many thing europe can do to really hurt russia without them being able to do much back, yet it is not being done.
    1
  635. If that was true then surely the russian army would have made at least some impact in the years following?
    1
  636.  @robertklimczak5630  "the Russians would win by conquering these countries." Russia can't even beat Ukraine, a country weaker than either of these.
    1
  637.  @robertklimczak5630  "Russia hungry, the Russians would win by conquering these countries." They can't even conquer Ukraine, a weaker country than either of these
    1
  638.  @minoramare5829  More like, 40 million choosing to surrender
    1
  639. Compared to russias land gain the last year it is enormous.
    1
  640.  @ЭдуардШкумат-ч4г  In such a case i would say something to the effect of. "our politicians should not release any sanctions until Ukraine is restored" But i do believe that russia will fall and splinter up before ukraine does.
    1
  641. I doubt they are. Biden just gave 8 billion extra in funding. that is 10% of russias yearly funding given to ukraine this week
    1
  642. Sounds silly that one would feel the need to be republican if one was in the military. Especially considering that the republican party has been the most pro Russia these past 3 years.
    1
  643. ""socialism" healthcare" is the problem... Exactly because it is a socialist healthcare system in USA with medicaid the price is so high. In a freer market heatlhcare system the price would have to get close to Danish or British levels.
    1
  644. ​ @UrsulaMajor  "that is literally the opposite of true." really? How exactly is healthcare funded by the government capitalist and not socialism? I would rather have the best doctor. As for fridges, i would like the most profitbale.
    1
  645.  @AnirbanDuttaasn  "Your argument is the current system (of hospitals and insurance etc) maximizing profit and answering to VCs/shareholders should work. " No. i did not mention insurance companies at all. Besides, France, a european country which have often been claimed as having the very best healthcare system in the world have private hospitals in addition to public ones. "And yet you are telling me, without trying, that system wont work in US." I never told you that. but you grossly misunderstand the system in Europe anyways. USA spends more public money on healtchare than any european country does.
    1
  646.  @MrZlocktar  When do you think russia will win? what year?
    1
  647.  @MrZlocktar  Do you think russia has a chance if the democrats win and aid basically stays the same per year?
    1
  648. How has it been debunked?
    1
  649.  @dcanedemboyz7431  "“Will the invasion push Iran to join the war? This is unlikely”" Still unlikely. So not debunked then.
    1
  650.  @dcanedemboyz7431  No they haven't. They just sent some rockets.
    1
  651. 2 years later and russia still has not made any real progress. They control less territory now than when the video launched.
    1
  652. How much time do you think russia will need to do the job?
    1
  653. What is not objective about saying "invade". Russia did in fact invade ukraine. Saying something else would just be lying.
    1
  654. And coming from the guy who sits on the wallet...
    1
  655.  @markusgollinger1843  It would cause more damage
    1
  656.  @FutureMartian97  3. If he sued the wrong company or not is not relevant. even if he did, congress still allowed these kinds of click and waive the right to sue for getting killed. 2. is irrelevant for the same reason. 1. They knew the risk. so what? How does that cange what congress allowed?
    1
  657. Yes. which is why Russia is doomed to loose. Ukraines allies have so much more than russia can ever hope to get.
    1
  658.  @GorgutsFan1998  evidently not
    1
  659.  @micky100  Not if they are adults ofc. (Which they are if they are 18 years or older.
    1
  660.  @deavman  It is not pulling very hard on semantics using the correct term for children and adults. If it was a child soldier that person is both a child and a soldier at the same time. When a child soldier is killed, a child is killed. I don't get why this is difficult to understand for you. You saying that they should not be listed as "non combatant civilian youths" is a different matter. But nobody is using such distinctions. You just say that they do.
    1
  661.  @leonnozik  Well, we are speaking english here and not arabic. in the western world anyone under the age of 18 are children. Whether or not they are married or soldiers does not affect this at all.
    1
  662.  @leonnozik  Instead of talking legal terminology, lets just speak plain english. In the english language a cild is someone below that age of 18. An adult someone 18 and up. Have you never heard about child soldiers? They are still children, hence the name.
    1
  663.  @yoados2949  Why not count them as both? That would paint hamas even worse then they are already. That would show to what extent they are using child soldiers in their fight.
    1
  664.  @ozyermiahu  Really? So Hamas states that for example, "israel killed 20 000 kids this year, 5 000 of those were our soldiers" Or " we have lost 10k soldiers, 5k of them were children soldiers" Somehow i very much doubt that.
    1
  665. They are not stored out in the open smartass.
    1
  666.  @dirtdevil70  1000km2 is that much. It is as much as Russia has used a full year to conquer. Meaning that Ukraine basically added a full year to the duration of this war if Russia wants to win by occupation.
    1
  667. No we haven't
    1
  668.  @Илья-у1ю  "Russia is stronger than NATO 🇷🇺🇷🇺Z" Russia is not even stronger than ukraine. Imagine how bad russia would loose of any NATO country actually helped in the war.
    1
  669. Gj in giving recognition: That is almost as important as pointing out bad behaviour.
    1
  670. Sure. but there is no good reason for any country to have veto power there.
    1
  671. Because the answer clearly is "no"?
    1
  672.  @Toebytes  Lol. You truly have been listening to some odd propaganda. (Or you are just making stuff up?) Europe has been aiding ukraine almost double the amount of which USA has been doing.
    1
  673.  @Toebytes  Lol Your numbers are way off. Germany has so far spent 30 billion on refugees alone. So even without counting financial or humanitarian aid Germany matches half of what USA does.
    1
  674.  @WorldCrucified  NATO does not depend on the US. USA is the only country so far who have required help from NATO, so the dependency really goes the other way. Btw. Europe was able to help ukraine during day one of the war. I doubt USA did much better.
    1
  675. "The pen makes you take a full dose" no it does not. You can select exactly how much to take with the pen.
    1
  676.  @stefanwild7756  "U can also tell this to the Russians in Donbass whose family members died by ukranian nazi. Its about 14000" 14k... that is quite a small number of people. Especially considering russia now have lost over half a million men failing to take ukraine.
    1
  677. "There is no way after Ukraine that Estonia can remain independent. " i see no way it will stop being independent.
    1
  678.  @joshuapaul2022  Think about what you are claiming here. if this was true, how bad is the russian army then not to win against such a crappy army in 2.5 years. Saying that the ukrainians are loosing hard or are cowards only really tell that russians are even worse.
    1
  679. So they control their drones by watching a video feed from a different drone?
    1
  680. Then why did they reduce how many missiles they launched so much? and why do they have to import from north korea and iran?
    1
  681.  @ali-haider5788  "korean balistic missile not cruise missiles " So what? "They didnt import from iran" Half of russias strategic strikes are done using iranian drones... "Also there is no targets left in ukraine for russia to hit " If this is true, why hasn't russia won already. They are still struggling after almost 3 years.
    1
  682.  @gmw3083  So? Still can't sell them much gas
    1
  683.  @KrishBB  Easy to resolve the issue peacefully. Just for Russia to withdraw its troops back to their own borders.
    1
  684. God damn, i guessed wrong. I went for the birds themselves.
    1
  685.  @Dralon98  Succeeded in taking as much territory as russia did in one year. "I don't see the russians redirecting significant troops to Kursk," You should watch the news more... lots of troops being redeployed. Lots of them getting bombed while in convoy as well.
    1
  686. Greed from by whom?
    1
  687. Telegram is peer to peer encrypted
    1
  688.  @AkenValle  Nobody seriously predicted russia would opny have money for 10 or 30 days. that would just be silly. Even if all their money magically disappeared there would be no problems for 30 days as that is the period most people get paid at.
    1
  689. @ " You should really look up the CEO psychopath/sociopath correlation." Why? being a sociopath has no real correlation between knowing to build rockets/business/whatever.
    1
  690.  DS1945-bj4bt  Himself. And that shoudl be the target for manipulation.
    1
  691. Ukraines intelligence claim that russia will run out of equipment in 2026. with continued support from the west until then, the tide will turn on the main front lines as well.
    1
  692.  @wallnut7624  "You can't really expect them to compete with THAT." I don't, i expect russia to lose.
    1
  693.  Tigr_Rus  Lol. They outclass russian tanks though, and that is enough.
    1
  694.  @AaSs-ln9mm  "I believe everything the Western Media says because democracy" That is very silly. Western media often states the exact opposite of each other.
    1
  695. "How does one refine metal in zero Gravity?" There is gravity on the moon...
    1
  696. This turned out to happen.
    1
  697. "n agreement was reached to dissolve the Warsaw pact, in return, NATO was also to stop its expansion & dissolve." this is just a lie. No such agreement was ever made. And it was never needed anyways, USSR and warsaw pact collapsed because the members had been forced into it and finally managed to break free. NATO was not involved.
    1
  698. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  699. Ukraine can hope for more than that. They can hope for russia withdrawing from the entire border. Paying for the rebuilding, having a demilitarized zone say 50km inside of russia. Nato membership. Returning kidnapped children. lots more to hope for.
    1
  700. why not? He did claim they would run out after 3 months.
    1
  701. As if USA can win a war against NATO.
    1
  702. As if USA have a schance against NATO
    1
  703. He is already a convicted felon. It does not matter.
    1
  704. What air defence should turkey have chosen instead? USA blocked them from systems like the patriot. Turkey was forced by USA to buy from the russians.
    1
  705. " Russia is stronger day by day." Then why are russia getting bombeb more and more every week?
    1
  706.  @feelandhealth  " why it looks desperate to you? " because it is a blatant lie. russia is using older and older equipment over time. They are clearly weakening. Unless all support from the west to Ukraine drops off there is really not any way russia can win this war.
    1
  707. "according to them russia has no army anymore" Doubtful
    1
  708.  @gadingnicolas1394  "1. Russia keeps the current territory and stops the offensive, " And then what? ukraine would not stop fighting just because russia gives up on taking the territory they claim is russian. So this is just a slow way of russia loosing. "2. The west abandons Ukraine and Ukraine surrenders. " yes. if the west abandons ukraine they will loose. lets hope that does not happen. "Extra point: Ukraine will never return to 1991 borders. EU officials have already stated this is impossible without depopulating Ukraine" This is just false. But even if true. It should be Ukraines choice if they want to depopulate in order to keep their borders intact.
    1
  709.  @gadingnicolas1394  "they will lend the territory back without a fight." I am also sure that they won't. But that is not being discussed. Ukraine will keep fighting until it regains the territory. And fighting includes bombing russias oil refineries and power plants. They don't have to fight for every centmieter of ground. In the end russia will be so bankrupt that they will have to surrender in order to get peace.
    1
  710. But that is not the case. Ukraine never broke away from russian soil
    1
  711.  @ВераНаконечная-з5б  Russia is facing a demographic catastrophe. It is such a shitty country that half the women don't want to have kids.
    1
  712. That is not being honest, that is clearly lying. Ukraine is gaining more land than rusia this year
    1
  713. They will do something else. Just like they did before the war.
    1
  714. It means having reserves to replace losses
    1
  715.  @FerdinandAkin  Well yes. That makes sense. as not having the ability to replace losses means that russia can't fight as hard as it does now. it will have to scale back.
    1
  716.  @DIREWOLFx75  Lol. no one believes that ukraine hos lost over a million. And by your own number of 150k dead russians, 10k koreans is a significant part. obviously a part of the war.
    1
  717.  @Vasily_dont_be_silly  "The 1990's and beginning of 2000's were both the freest time for the economy and business in Russia," Not true. The only thing free was oligarchs stealing national businesses and criminals being free to do what they want. And that situation was just as russias empire just had fallen at the end of a failing system. The west didn't grow prosperous in a few years, it took time.
    1
  718.  @y.r._  He claimed a few weeks of resistance. It has been a few years already.
    1
  719. tanks are far more capable than drones. this is why every army still usese tanks.
    1
  720. Surely by now, you are rather rich and well set? Time to start using the advantages you have built up during the years i order to get a wife.
    1
  721.  @MrZlocktar  Ok, sure. when do you think they will win?
    1
  722.  @agentxcompany  " From a russian perspective it is not territory that interests them but destroying the enemy army capability. " that just makes it worse for the russians as ukraine now has a bigger and better army than before. And no sign of this trend turning anytime soon. at the same time russia is using older and crappier tanks every day.
    1
  723.  @KMPM-ov8rw  They are still not an actual first time homebuyer.
    1
  724.  @rosevan7845  My point is that if you have bought a home before you are not a first time homebuyer. Even if som law says so in order for you to be elligeble for some discount loans.
    1
  725. "No radioactivity was detected" no shit. it was underground..
    1
  726.  @waterst9  They don't have to loyal. They have to be self serving. Europe is safer against Russia with Turkey in Nato. But crucially, Turkey is safer against Russia as well. And they "buy" their protection by doing what they can in a real showdown. They don't need to start a land war against Russia in the case of a war. But they will keep the black sea safe, and clear the skies of russian planes. (Hopefully we will never test my theory)
    1
  727.  @henriikkak2091  Conscience? Not many. Self preservation? most of them. Using a nuke would make russia loose the war faster and with more consequences for generals involved.
    1
  728.  @Mrdm0066  Nah. the ones already at the front might have little chance. But russia recruits 30k volunteers a month. By paying them millions of rubles now. That will dry up if payments stop.
    1
  729.  @BlondBeast  How does Zelensky win by having his country ruined?
    1
  730.  @jonathanbuzzard1376  They were independent before...
    1
  731. Gaza probably.
    1
  732. 25% succes rate at the invincible kinshal. quite good for a 40 year old system using leftover ammunition
    1
  733. I wonder how much they paid that actoor who got shot in the face
    1
  734. i would
    1
  735. " Ireland all come under the UK " Sure about this? If you can't even learn how your own kingdom works, don't expect someone from the baltics to know.
    1
  736.  @Chad_Gepetinsky  If the Monroe doctrine is US saying that it opposes foreign powers influencing south america, then yes. But it does not make it right for USA to invade Brazil just because China wants it to join a defensive alliance. Same goes for Ukraine and Russia. They have no right to invade Ukraine just because they wanted to join Eu or NATO.
    1
  737.  @Chad_Gepetinsky  As for you saying that there was an agreement from the west to Soviet leader (ie, not russia) Then this is simply false. Gorbachov himself denies it. That should be enough. Lack of any written agreement should alos be enough to discredit such a claim.
    1
  738.  @Chad_Gepetinsky  The soviet union does not exist anymore. So any promises to it like this would have nothing to with russia. After all, ukraine is a soviet state. Any such promise was made to ukraine as much as to Russia. Baker was in no position to make any such promises. He had no decision making power in NATO, not even a NATO official. Kohl stopped being in charge of Germany after -90. So he also had no say in NATO policies. (at the time Yeltsin was in power) He could not make any assurances whatsoever. And lastly, the constitution of NATO allows countries like the ones in eastern europe to join. Without a change in NATO constitution there would be no way for anyone to make any promises like these.
    1
  739.  @Chad_Gepetinsky  " This doctrine isn’t about “South America” - it’s about blocking rival military influence close to U.S." yeah. it covers both americas, not just the south. "Russia’s reaction to NATO at its borders follows the same logic." So... are you saying that Russia is right now because USA was right in doing all the things you mentioned? Or are you saying that russias war now is wrong because what USA did was wrong? "You’re defending your position with standard American propaganda about who “has the right” to act" Even american progaganda is correct once in a while... Attacking your neighbour in order to try and take their land is never right.
    1
  740.  @ferrumtv7421  " the West march on Russia at least three times " i bet you can't even mention a single time.
    1
  741.  @ferrumtv7421  Sure, just that you can't remember a single time...
    1
  742.  @ferrumtv7421  " I'm question my government decision to spare Europe " Lol. unless you are talking about nukes there is basically nothing russia could do against the west. And that would be a two way street. Image how fast the russian army would crumble if EU or NATO got involved. It has taken almost 3 years to fight Ukraine to a stalemate. Even small nations joining in would easily tip the scale.
    1
  743.  @ferrumtv7421  "I talking not about nowadays, I talking about 80 years ago, 212 years ago and 265 years ago." 80 years... is that when the western powers like france, britain and USA saved USSR? You know, the western powers... again 212 years ago, britain was russias main ally against napoleon. 265... crimean war? Here it was russia who started a war against the ottomans, france and britain did beat up the russians during that war, but only to help the ottomans in their defensive war. you see what i mean about there really are no examples?
    1
  744. that is there for decoration obviously.
    1
  745. NATO should not send troops to ukraine. That would make no sense. But any western country should.
    1
  746. Another god...
    1
  747. Without it you wouldn't have this medicine
    1
  748.  @ronclark9724  "Unfortunately the Ukraine is not a member of NATO..." So what? That does not prevent anything at all.
    1
  749.  @Waccoon  Good to know. You should know that there can't be a valid contract without agreement btween the parties.
    1
  750.  @palsci  Print more money. meaning higher and higher inflation until at some point russians truly get poor and rise up. But that is a looong way off. Russia produces food, lots of food. As long as they are getting that most russians are not gonna try to stop their government.
    1
  751. And what response would that be?
    1
  752. Well. Now Russia gave away some of its territory to China for free :)
    1
  753.  @ross-carlson  You seem very stupid coming out like this. If the tractor needs to driver over the land then the crops under the wheel gets destroyed. Is this news to you?
    1
  754. Keep them dry and safe for storage
    1
  755. They risk nothing. And have only known state media for 50+ years
    1
  756. "A better measure would be to compare GDP growth not trade with the US" no. because how much better the average polish guy or ukrainian does is of little concern to the average american voter. How much better the average american guy does is the only relevant thing to focus in if you want to influence americans to vote for more aid to ukraine.
    1
  757. " but the UK and Washington refused." I doubt that. and why would russia work with those two countries regarding this_ they have no stake in the baltic sea.
    1
  758. "Other nations want to invade Iran for years" What nation wants to invade Iran?
    1
  759.  @canidrinkyourneckblood9932  A single one.
    1
  760.  @testtest-je8xb  "Because both groups should have the same amount of people when only 1 trial is done with a control" There is no reason for this. in real research there is almost never the same number of participants in two different groups.
    1
  761.  @testtest-je8xb  "A rash can not be affected" but when zoomed in enough. it will always change in some way. rashes are not something static like a painted building. a rash is an active response from the body. It WILL change over time. nothing can change that.
    1
  762.  @Arwiden  Ukraine does not want Moscow, they want russia off their land. If they had been given proper supply russia would have surrendered already.
    1
  763.  @Arwiden  A long war with ukraine and further expansion of NATO surely must be a greater national security threat than staying out of war and keeping ukraine neutral?
    1
  764.  @romangolovko8306  "False, Greek and Turkey has regional conflict still." Not false. You are just ignorant
    1
  765. USA have done it plenty of times. Russia have done it twice in ukraine in less than a decade.
    1
  766.  @ouroboros3141  invading Ukraine made Finland join NATO, bringing the borders far closer to Moscow.
    1
  767. Trump likely does not know the difference between casualty and killed. and 800k is "almost" a million.
    1
  768.  @lordfeeda9627  By now russia has lost their ability to defend themselves with anything else than nukes i think.
    1
  769.  @carolwilliams8511  "The non voters share most of the blame for the mess, in my view." so not the ones voting for Trump?
    1
  770. This missile, what damage did it really do? next to nothing... then how will it matter if they get such a low number as 52 per year?
    1
  771.  @PCGames-387  "yet they are creaming their pants " Putin and russian media are the ones creaming their pants and talking about nuclear war because of allowing these missiles being used on yet another russian territory. The problem for russia is that their are currently on track to loose the war. Adding 52 new rockets with minimal damage potential will probably do nothing to a Ukraine which is showing no signs of breaking anytime soon.
    1
  772. NATO never promised such a thing.
    1
  773. @ Then surely you can point to this promise?
    1
  774. ​ @tomlorenzen4062  So not NATO then.. An american with no power over NATO said something. That does not mean that NATO promised anything.
    1
  775. @ That is obviously false. but also irrelevant. James Baker is not someone in the position to make promises like that on behalf of America, let alone NATO.
    1
  776. @ even if america is all of NATO. That still means nothing as James Baker is not one who could make promises on behalf of America. and maybe most damming of all. Ther very person he said it to, Gorbachov, said that it was not a promise at all. and not conserning NATO expansion when it comes to member states, just troops in Germany. Gorbachov repeated this after Putin launched his war.
    1
  777. No... WWI was the war to end all wars.
    1
  778.  @crane3  "That will we last thing NATO will ever do" because after that russia will be of no real threat to anyone?
    1
  779.  @PoppinC-l3w  How so? Who would have stopped it?
    1
  780.  @jongrover8763  "Many of the countries in the world are on Russia's side. More than half" 11 countries are not more than half
    1
  781. Government regulation in the US is somehow capitalism? Watch the video again. In a more free and capitalistic country like Denmark the drug is cheaper than in USA
    1
  782. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  783. I wonder if Peter change his position after a russian ship was seized, just as he feared.
    1
  784.  @GrigoriZhukov  Their votes counts as much as anyone elses.
    1
  785. Imagine USA of 1960 for some odd reason mainly lost blacks or mexicans in Vietnam. I would think that they would accept far more than 60k casualties before any real problems at home.
    1
  786. That would land him in prison
    1
  787. They have not started developing nukes. It will not help them at all during this war. Nukes are the option after the war if ukraine is not under NATO
    1
  788. why would being tidally locked mean that it is a bad idea?
    1
  789.  @SouthTipBuckeye  you are wrong
    1
  790.  @you-know-who5657  "wait didnt russia just didnt want ukraine to join nato?" no. they want to occupy their territory and people. In addition to that. What alliances Ukraine joins are none of Russias business.
    1
  791. Loosing territory on the other hand is a good sign Since this video was launched russia has lost a lot of land.
    1
  792.  @citizensnips7949  lol hard for you to accept facts perhaps? I mean, since you jump straight to personal attacks. Kherson has been freed. Enormous lands east of kharkiv freed. cope harder putin suckup.
    1
  793. Putin told us that. he signed it inot law.
    1
  794.  @JG-nm9zk  Lol My arguments are correct so you try to discredit me. Sad. My old account was created while you were in kindergarden.
    1
  795.  @Outdoors_Chesapeake  Maybe what it is for. But not how it is used. Prosecutors know that if you convince an innocent man that it is a 10% chance of getting wrongly convicted and facing 20 years in american prison, then the rational thing to do is to take a plea deal.
    1
  796.  @daedalron  You have misunderstood something. taking a plea deal does in no way mean that one admit to any guilt whatsoever.
    1
  797.  @daedalron  I see how it is easy to misunderstand. But you basically said it best yourself "Though to be fair, some people will take a plea and admit to being guilty even though they're innocent, in order to make the whole thing stop." Except it is not "admitting" to be guilty, it is lying and claiming one self to be guilty.
    1
  798. What have they used this "key staging ground" for during the past 2 years? Lots of good effective invasions or offensive measures?
    1
  799. "Once they control the ports, they can starve the rest of Ukraine." seems like russia pivoted to the new strategy of getting invaded by Ukraine in order to win. "if Russia stopped shipping oil, Germany will cave." when did germany cave?
    1
  800. @LinusIslamTips "he implies that these people won't fight for germany which isnt true. " Ok, this is not what you said before that he said. But in addition to you showing the mistake you made, i do wonder how you know that they will indeed fight for Germany?
    1
  801. What year will russia win?
    1
  802.  @languaha  "So again,being cautious was a good call." Not as cautious as they have been. We know nukes was not on the table because it would make russia loose the war faster. That alone has prevented Putin from using nukes. India and China protesting against using nukes might also be enough by itself to stop any real consideration of using nukes. Russias legal territory(by russian standards) have been bombed with western weapons since the start of the war. Even when Kursk was invaded they never really considered using a nuke on a safe spot like inside their own territory.
    1
  803.  @Ode-to-Odysseus  "OK, but the question is: if Russia called NATO's bluff, would article 5 count for anything?" NATO is not bluffing. and yes, article 5 would be enforced if a NATO country was attacked.
    1
  804.  @languaha  I am not saying he should "provoke" putin. i am saying he should have sent much more weapons and without the restrictions put on them. If Putin feels provoked from that, then that is on him. "That biden should'nt have taken the country with the most nukes in the world seriously?" I am arguing the opposite. One should take them very seriously. By sending as much aid and force as possible to stop them from gaining power, influence and legitimacy in their actions.
    1
  805.  @languaha  "and provoke putin because he should've been SURE that putin would NOT have carried out his threat of using nuclear weapons even though he said so?" If putin tells USA that they must pay Russia 10 billions every year otherwise USA gets nuked. Should they pay up? Putin will be provoked if you say no, and you can't be sure that he won't use nukes...
    1
  806.  @Ode-to-Odysseus  NATO would not collapse without USA. And when it comes to fighting russia. they can barely stand even with Ukraine. Even just a few minor nations joining up would turn the tide. Besides, apart from the baltics(maybe Poland), no country benefits more than USA from their membership in NATO.
    1
  807.  @daveweiss5647  "I missed it too... but apparently in 10 hour stretch of time he uploaded three, two to three hour long autobiographical videos then deleted them... it was supposedly pretty dark... but that's all hearsay..." autobiographical videos where he talks about himself and the abuses he went through. Silly to upload, especially if he then removes them again in a day or so.
    1
  808.  @mabussubam512  "Reply with your main account after this to assert dominance." wow. As in dominance is here is of any relevance. btw, you are wrong again. This is my real account.
    1
  809.  @mng8680  They are getting mroe and more modern equipment. Their production of drones are ramping up. Evident by the fact that they defeated the russian navy and is sending drones 1000 miles into russian territory and ruining refineries. Regarding manpower, they recently enforced mobilization.
    1
  810.  @mng8680  "Russia still produces 3 times more artillery shells than all NATO countries combined, and not all shells in NATO are going to Ukraine so" i know. And it is embarrassing. Bad prioritization which has lasted for years. But Ukraine has many factors going for it. Western ammunition is more accurate and actually kill more people per shot. Western intelligence is far superior, so is the kill chain. Here the russians have indeed learned over the past 2 years :( The west has enough of simple weapons to defeat russias army. But only if they choose to actually send it to Ukraine.
    1
  811.  @mabussubam512  "I used all my asset to assert dominance. It takes now not only reading comprehension but actual IQ to understand. I also did your mom and your brother." You showed here that you in no way are trying to prove anything or argue any point.
    1
  812. "And of course Trump will drop sanctions soon." that is not of course.
    1
  813. Noone barks as much as putin
    1
  814.  @Mark16v15  "America's military personnel represents less than 1%" america is not at war. And not being funded by outsiders. ukraine can handle 4% better than russia can handle 1%. and if ukraine kills twice as many russians then they only need 2%.
    1
  815. Russian leaders do not care about mines in their own land.
    1
  816. This will never happen to our sun. We will mine all the metals from it and prevent it from ever balloning out or collapsing inward.
    1
  817. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  818.  @jojomclain8496  "Not true at all. Z started dissing the cease fire at minute 24." Pointing out that Putin has broken cease fires several times before is not dissing anything.
    1
  819.  @Gstyle1  Photographic evidence is not trustful?
    1
  820.  @yishan4124  "that's complex, how americans think of the massacre to indians , how british people think of the starve to irland" it is legal to speak of those things in the west. that is a huge difference.
    1
  821. Probably because Ukraine do not want to give Belarus a good reason to escalate. The worst Belarus is doing now is moving troops along the border. If Ukraine hit them the population might allow Lukashenko to engage with Ukraine directly, taking troops away from the eastern front. Lukashenko can't be the direct aggressor against Ukraine as he is sitting on a powderkeg of revolution at home.
    1
  822. No, it should not be.
    1
  823. Russia has been invaded this year by Ukraine.
    1
  824. Russiand are used to not getting paid for 6 months. So i doubt pitchforks will come out. And russia is probably selective in who the reduce payments to. Widowers and pensioneers are not gonna be a threat if they come out with torches.
    1
  825. How are those russian stocks doing?
    1
  826.  @kineahora8736  i've never claimed that Deny is russian. But it is probably just a coincidence that you are repeating the same question that the russian supporters are.
    1
  827.  @kineahora8736  You are guessing wrong.... and what i have seen of other videos is not really relevant.
    1
  828. When did the video say russia would run out?
    1
  829.  @thiefsleef6752  "How is it "absurd"? The obvious reason was because Russia has nukes " absurd because those restrictions increased the chance of russia using those nukes.
    1
  830. How is that relevant? (If true at all...)
    1
  831.  @enriquelaroche5370  yes... i have also heard about socks. Guess that is too much of a luxury for russsians...
    1
  832.  @felixdombek6052  "Doesn't fly: Scholz and most other EU leaders also don't want to give security guarantees." So what? No need for Germany, their military only have shells for 30 days of war anyways.
    1
  833. Still think it was nonsense?
    1
  834. "No warhead was included." That is because Putin knows that nuking cities won't help him win the war. So really he just wasted an ICBM. You know, old technology from the sixties.
    1
  835. @ "You don’t have it. Russia showed it this way, believe me, there is something even worse, but it’s still a secret, I’m sure. Russia will never demonstrate its latest development until there is something even better in development than it will show the world." maybe about time to actually use some of this magical equipment in order to win the war they startet 3 years ago...
    1
  836. He is not an average russian.
    1
  837. Not much oil will be needed for the occupation after everything is built
    1
  838. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  839. Why is that chinese territory and not... Mongolian territory?
    1
  840.  @mmarsh1972  Historically it was under the mongolian empire.
    1
  841.  @mmarsh1972  Neither does the chinese empire...
    1
  842.  @trezenx  and what view is shown on these tablets? A different view that in the goggles? (btw, one can choose what device to display the picture on)
    1
  843.  @davidmclean357  Seen them :)
    1
  844. "if he drops all sanctions against Russia as a carrot to end the war, " that is not how a carrot works. if you drop all sanctions you have no leverage anymore. Trump is a person who clearly understands this. He will not give it away for free.
    1
  845. Ofc. but if they are not destroyed, and not used at the front. where do they go?
    1
  846. Which NATO country is fighting against russia?
    1
  847. Still a joke to you?
    1
  848. "IMO "general winter" isn't a thing," Napoleon and Hitler would argue otherwise.
    1
  849. Putin seems to have forgotten this.
    1
  850.  @Drowcarry  used to be twice that
    1
  851.  @whitslack  "So what you're saying is that the insurance system is structured to guarantee the "yo-yo effect." " Pay for it yourself then.
    1
  852.  @molt45  Weekly bombings by muslims
    1
  853. What do they think? do they support waging war on ukraine? do they think russia will win at some time?
    1
  854. "You don't need to join the EU to have free trade though." True, but is sure does help
    1
  855. Do the math genius. how many do you think war has killed? how many do you think childbirth has killed.
    1
  856.  @bw9382  "But if you take into account civilian deaths in wars over this same peroid it would definitely be more dying due to wars. " but then if you take into consideration that we are now at the lowest childbirth mortality rate EVER, the 50 mil number gets jacked up a bit.
    1
  857. Sure. But a Putin saying that he must invade a little or get shot might convince him. Putin is desperate.
    1
  858. I wish i could give you more upvotes Jake. You are making a difference. Good luck with the election.
    1
  859. The government is not afraid of ideas. They are afraid of a foreign country harming its citizens.
    1
  860. Trump also have noo idea what Trumps plan is
    1
  861. What is the problem with that?
    1
  862. Russua has less resources that ukraine with western aid.
    1
  863.  @thyrussendria8198  Nobody pays USA for their support, so that is probably wrong. And russia can't afford to pay for american support anyway. not to mention that american support is not the only thing deciding this war.
    1
  864. When do you think russia will win?
    1
  865.  @christophmahler  "Russia won it's war in Ukraine, last year. " Lol. You are delusional. Russia controls less territory now than they did 2 years ago... USA alone can defeat china witha blockade and russia with air power.
    1
  866. Due to government regulation in the US. If there was not laws against it, any american could fly over to UK and just buy all the stocks from the pharmacies at double the price and fly back to USA and double the price again for a profit. And still reducing the cost for americans.
    1
  867. Hmm... Care to reconsider?
    1
  868. "However, there’s a significant obstacle: the military-industrial complex, which thrives on the existence of perceived or real adversaries. For these industries to continue profiting, they need ongoing tension or conflict" Np. china is not weakened by this. and investments will be needed to match them.
    1
  869. Everybody knows that most nuclear ICBMs will penetrate most air defenses. this is nothing new.
    1
  870. That is a very good point. Slander might not be protected by their officer status.
    1
  871.  @titanproductions3628  "Taking another man's land by force and oppressing said man for decades while occuping his land would make him rebel" Hamas should stop trying to do this then.
    1
  872.  @oggaBugga  "Not sure how pointing out that you have no idea about the topic makes me a troll. But ok." You know very well that there are lots of photographic evidence about this. you are simply lying.
    1
  873.  @jobloluther  " they will soon become more efficient." How soon? Closing in on 3 years now. shouldn't it be about time?
    1
  874.  @RapMusic490  Lol. I am not "Anglos". and the israelis are the locals.
    1
  875. Why would anyone want Russia in Nato?
    1
  876. So America is powerful enough to control Putin and russia?
    1
  877.  @Marc_Gagné  Not in the rain and snow
    1
  878.  @amirsadeghi9888  Still better to live in USA.
    1
  879.  @TonyL-gw4qx  They look very nice. Especially compared to this.
    1
  880.  @amirsadeghi9888  Better to be middle class, rich and poor in USA compared to those same groups in russia.
    1
  881.  @CovertCabal  using software from the last millennium. Seems fitting for visualizing russias military.
    1
  882. The thing is that engines can be produced at a rate faster than 300 per year. and if the limiting factor is the hull. Well that is the part less likely to be bothered by long term storage in snow and rain.
    1
  883.  @hedgehog3180  I hope you are right. If so then those hulls with no turrets are all useless after 30 years in the open with rain. (and those with hatches open)
    1
  884.  @laQwoter  Russia invaded
    1
  885. till not happened almost 3 years later...
    1
  886. NATO does not have borders. Only member states do. THeir borders have not changed. Russia has invaded and occupied other states and changed their borders that way.
    1
  887. also legal to send them into Kherson city as per russian law that is soverign russian territory
    1
  888. "Was it clear to the interviewees that "no change" wasn't a possibility for the cream?" Yes. obviously. "But the survey results could be skewed by their actual wording." Not really, as the numbers are what is relevant, not the wording. "This ignores purely social/moral issues." so what? let it ignore it.
    1
  889. Go look at an ukrainian coffee shop..
    1
  890. When do you think russia will start the second or third phase?
    1
  891.  @TonyBustaroni  who cares what America said? Putin claimed two weeks. Other russians from the state media said 2 days.
    1
  892.  @angeurbain6129  "You don't hink about what is going on on the ukrainian side." i do. Ukraines military now i stronger than it was at the start of the war. More equipment, and the equipment they have are more modern. but more importantly, the western powers can easily equip ukraine with far more than russia can ever hope to destroy. So with continued support an ukrainian victory is almost guaranteed.
    1
  893.  @angeurbain6129  " The russian military are getting stronger every day in Ukraine in comparison with the ukrainian army." Ok, so how long until russia wins in ukraine? Because at the current rate it will take 80-100 years to occupy the country. Btw photographic evidence shows older and older russian equipment being used at the front.
    1
  894. Because he is the leader of a nation standing up against a war of aggression against his country. Thats it.
    1
  895.  @TTV5  " about as selfish a party " shouldn't any party put its own people first though?
    1
  896. " Is there a reliable way to deduce from the stock levels of depots to the availability of MLRS at the front?" No. But there are some conclusions to be made. Either ukrainians are destroying these systems and they are taken out of storage to counter that. In that case the front would stay stable until completely out and then Russia will start falling back. Or russia is using them to increase the size of the russian army. In that case russia should have advanced a lot since this would mean a doubling of their MLRS at the front. We know that the last option is not true since it hasn't actually happened.
    1
  897. Lots of people cared.
    1
  898. Why do you think that it is combined injured and dead and not just dead?
    1
  899. Sure about this?
    1
  900. your excuse for Napoleon is basically the same excuse both Hitler and Putin used.
    1
  901. I wouldn't call that fast. They are moving slower than walking.
    1
  902.  @TrevorCrook-c1s  Lol. super important ;) If russia takes it, how long after that until they capture rest of Ukraine? what year do you think?
    1
  903. Not anymore...
    1
  904. I see no problem with that.
    1
  905. some plans... Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  906.  @thebaker8637  It clearly goes against the spirit of the law though. There is simply no reason at all to seek asylum in Norway because in order to get there you first have to pass through countries like Germany, and it is hard to claim that you were persecuted there.
    1
  907.  @Anonyomus_commenter  Choosers can't be beggars. learn the local language... But yeah. there would too much of a burden of eg. Turkey if one only traveled to the closest country. But my point is that they are lying and sneaking in order to reach countries like denmark or sweden. That should not be rewarded. rather let them enter the closest safe country and the ask to be transferred to a willin country.
    1
  908. Prison?
    1
  909. Who intercepted them then?
    1
  910.  @boovssf  “If the enemy soldier were surrendering or so ill or injured that they could not fight back, then it would be a war crime to kill them” Seems like you have misunderstood the "research" you have done. This soldier had not surrendered and did not seem so ill or injured that he could not fight back. Therefore no war crime was comitted. Being dazed for a few seconds is not being incapabel of fightning in this engagement.
    1
  911.  @boovssf  " relax lol i just thought it was funny that you said no without any explanation" I am calm.
    1
  912.  @boovssf  What a part of you thinks is not really relevant to if it is a war crime or not.
    1
  913.  @freak94able  "oh and if you numbers were true Ukraine would be winning while gaining ground here and there not losing it and withdrawing on an hourly basis" Why? How does loosing fewer men equate gaining ground?
    1
  914.  @markobucevic8991  "russia who has more ammo" lol. Then why ancient shells from north korea?
    1
  915. @ "The term disagreement makes it appear that one group was not listening to to the opinion and concerns of the other and that there was some kind of solution available that would suit all parties if they can agree." not it does not. They both listened clearly to what each other had to say. And disagree about possible solutions. Ukraine wants to exist, Russia wants ukraine not to exist. they clearly disagree. War is just a continuation of diplomacy.
    1
  916. @ "So then choose words more correctly." they word was correctly chosen. Unless you think that Ukraine and Russia agrees here.
    1
  917.  @Crazmuss  ""If Ukraine stops fighting, the nation and people of Ukraine cease to exist." are you tellind that nation and people of Ukraine did not exist when Ukraine was part of Russia?" The nation obviously did not exists. And when Russia ruled, the holodomor happened. an attempted genocide killing millions of ukrainians.
    1
  918. Why?
    1
  919.  @bunnieskitties293  "The fact that archery is given a 'dex' role when it should be a strength one. " strength is just for the draw. aiming is still dex.
    1
  920.  @SdawgSenior  Was it a lawful command though?
    1
  921.  @brianbetz7030  "And it keeps on going like that, just keeps escalating. How is doing any of that escalation?
    1
  922. So did russia.
    1
  923. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  924. Isn't Telegram peer-to-peer encrypted? As in, Telegram company or CEO have no possibility to read messages or shhow them to anyone.
    1
  925. They wash their clothes in the river... Now i understand why russians were stealing washing machines.
    1
  926. What change would that be? And them joining BRICS is an argument for not letting them in, not the opposite.
    1
  927. Do you still think this?
    1
  928. yes
    1
  929.  @alhubele654  Lol How can another country mobilizing = starting a war?
    1
  930.  @Rozarez213  "Israeli citizens itself already a thread to the Palestinian lol" only to the ones that fire rockets.
    1
  931. It is blamed for those wars...
    1
  932. 401k is not pension though. They are money you have saved up for yourself.
    1
  933. Then why is russia still fighting?
    1
  934.  @Anne.marie.zimmermann  "you mean why is Russia still fighting the Nato in Ukraine," No, i mean why is russia still fighting against ukraine in ukraine and russia if the war is already lost?
    1
  935.  @Anne.marie.zimmermann  But why are the russians fighting if the opponent side already has lost?
    1
  936. "might trigger epileptics." No it does not
    1
  937.  @The_real_Marcoman  Except in the sense that "anything" can trigger epileptics there is nothing in particular in this video triggering them.
    1
  938.  @arthassmurfethil1636  1 part is not = 1... It is just a part of one. 1/3 in your example.
    1
  939. No worries. Russia won't be able to afford moon programs for the next century
    1
  940.  @anaremelam5998  Do you think russia will win this war? If yes, what year do you think russia will win? If no, when do you think russia will surrender?
    1
  941. Ukraine did not loose in a couple of weeks even though the americans didn't fight.
    1
  942. Not sp unpopular that he does not get voted for more than anybody else...
    1
  943.  @jmbs9833  That he is in fact not so unpopular.
    1
  944. Lol. how was that a world war?
    1
  945. @Silver_Prussian " the one that US general miley claimed ?" Sure, 3-day war is a western term. but putin himself said that it would take two weeks.
    1
  946. @Silver_Prussian "sure, ,,putin himself said it" so can you provide a clip to him saying ? " Yes... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8-IIZNd9dk Does the pigeon of truth hurt you?
    1
  947. @Silver_Prussian "And still you cant admit that repeating the 3 day cringe isnt something that was said by the russians but by a us general, " sure i can. A bit silly, but a truism at this point. "This happen in early april, the SMO started in 24th of February belive so putin was off from his estimate a by a few weeks." It has been almost 3 years. Kiev has still not fallen...
    1
  948. @Silver_Prussian "I mean the russians were able to make the ukrianians negotiate by simply surrounding the city" The city was never surrendered. and the ukrainians were negotiating before russia started their invasion.
    1
  949. ". At most, they may split economically" How would that benefit China? more likely they would keep pushing russia into selling land.
    1
  950. The difference is that Hamas attacks cities (terrorism) while ukraine attacks tanks and soldiers.
    1
  951.  @t.m.2415  How would the history change anything regarding whether or not they are doing terrorism?
    1
  952.  @notspm9157  There are many excuses could one claim to have no knowledge of it. First and foremost that one did not read it. Which is probably legit as well, as few people do. If the employers NDA was stuffed in the back of a 30 page long document and not informed about than that too would not be valid. The thing about contracts like this is that they are informed. The employer tells the candidate that they are not allowed to spill company secrets. Then they have the employe sign the NDA, knowing what it is. That is what makes it valid. Informed consent.
    1
  953.  @notspm9157  Clicking a button on the screen does not mean that 30 pages of something has been read. Usually the button can be pressed even without having the agreement actually come up. You tell me how an agreement can be made when one of the parties does not know what the agreement is.
    1
  954. Lol not even close to either
    1
  955.  @pavelvladimirov2651  "and then Russia will close traffic across the entire Baltic Sea" How exactly?
    1
  956. Fallen over to conspiracy territory.
    1
  957. Way too expensive. And not needed. These depots are so far out in no mans land that they have never been threatened by anything. As for hiding the number of tanks. They don't even bother putting up storage sheds for the tanks.
    1
  958. soon 3 years later. Russia still controls less territory then when this video was launched.
    1
  959.  @Fero-72  "Stupid warhead with a temperature of 4000 degrees" Oh no. high temperature. how terrible... look at how little damage it did.
    1
  960.  @dannydanny2789  "We surely aren't incompetent at building and launching hypersonic missiles that cannot be intercepted by any conventional means." 30% interception rate when facing 30 year ol patriot systems...
    1
  961.  @dannydanny2789  Russia has been bragging more about the kinshal. Those have 30% interception rate. If you are talking about nukes then it has always been known that most missiles will reach their target. And Putin knows that using nukes in an offensive war like this will just make russia loose the war even faster.
    1
  962. Why not? They have already have kids. Much more fair to draft them than to draft men who have yet to get kids
    1
  963. Then why did the Russian army have tanks driving in ukraine and shooting at their army?
    1
  964. This is basically how all of earth was colonized
    1
  965. "I don’t understand why the Russian people are considered “Villainous” and “Guilty”" It is because russia attacked a smaller country for no good reason.
    1
  966. Because Argentina attacked UK. And even in response Uk didn't actually hit Argentina despite being able to .
    1
  967.  @donaldengel4128  "Honor on the world stage. My guess is they still believe in it." Not that simple. Putina and Trump say that Zelensky is illegitimate. That means that the Ukrainian honourable thing to do is to ignore any agreements he signed and renegotiate new ones after the war..
    1
  968.  @chillxxx241  "This is a really bad deal for the US. It would be best if the deal wasn’t signed." How is it in any way bad for USA? It costs nothing to USA and gives them some control over another countrys use of money.
    1
  969. *less dangerous This means that thet are less capable of producing weapons and equipment needed to win.
    1
  970. "The Chinese don't want to interfere in other countries' internal affairs." This is not an internal affair, it is external. And btw, russias war ensured that NATO got new members closer to russia.
    1
  971. What russia does is not relevant to what ukraine does.
    1
  972.  @andrewreynolds912  You do realise that denmark is more capitalistic than USA right? It is government regulation in the US that makes these drugs so expensive.
    1
  973.  @andrewreynolds912  "heck one can argue that denmark is a more pure form of a capitalist system than America is" I agree. "we are not a social democracy" Ok? so what?
    1
  974.  @andrewreynolds912  Your point is wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom USA is nr. 25. Denmark is 9
    1
  975.  @RichardRodi526  NATO does allow their countries to protect their own borders.
    1
  976. ATACMs are not long range though...
    1
  977. And what would that do? Make russia loose faster...
    1
  978. What is not neutral about that question?
    1
  979.  @RCx44  "creating new units" Why have those new units not done anything in the past year. If the russian army has doubled in size, why not use them to fight and take more land in ukraine?
    1
  980.  @MarkG-h2y  3-5 years is probably more than enough. most analysts agree that russia will be "out" of heavy equipment in 2026.
    1
  981. "chinese" it just changed flags from russian the week before the sabotage
    1
  982. They should start playing them.
    1
  983. Hiding at development centers probably. Russia does not have the capability to produce enough new.
    1
  984. not in english
    1
  985.  @jimcalhoun361  "I really do feel bad for the Russians" They are the ones enabling this war.
    1
  986. How many hours exactly?
    1
  987. No, because they are not using those.
    1
  988. russia is protection moscow as well. Yet drones manage to blow stuff up there...
    1
  989.  @willl7780  It has failed by not subjugating ukraine. you laugh at "3 days". it is getting closer to 3 years now.
    1
  990. He also predicted that russia would win in a few weeks.
    1
  991.  @TikhonT.  Exactly. only russian shills care about that. it is because they want to shift the narrative.
    1
  992.  @cali7077  How is that relevant?
    1
  993.  @TheodoraKimmelHello  "No no no, please do not turn that pill into the source of depression rising unless you can prove it’s absolutely doing that." Then don't use it as a source of med school applications.
    1
  994. Georgia was never a part of Nato
    1
  995. 25% interception rate vs 40 year old patriot systems. Auch.
    1
  996. American workers.
    1
  997.  @studentofhistory2  "Jewish Germans might disagree with your statement. Oh, they can't. They were murdered. But I see your point." not many jews had been murdered by Hitler in -38. Get your facts straight.
    1
  998. "Russian army is showing the world how powerful they are in ground assaults" then why are they not winning soon? this is the third year they are fighting...
    1
  999. Such a silly statement
    1
  1000. "Absolutely unneccessary video in our current european situation" all videos on youtube are unneccessay. But this one is fun and thought provoking. That is why we watch it.
    1
  1001. ​ @bluefox9436  That you don't know about how things are fun is no surprise. But there is nothing about backstabbing in this video. And the aim is not to provoke a strong united europe, it is to entertain.
    1
  1002. 2 year update... Russia is still at war with ukraine. lost lots of land since this video was out.
    1
  1003.  @istvanglock7445  There are some tellings of what he will do. He will do things which 1. makes it more likely that he survives. 2. things which makes it more likely that he will stay in power. Using nukes will reduce his chances of both.
    1
  1004.  @АлексейПетров-б3й7о  "Why are there no sanctions against Israel for the genocide of Palestinians, or are Arabs less people than Ukrainians?" because israel is the victim. Palestinians attacked them, trying to exterminate them. just like russia is doing.
    1
  1005.  @maninthespace  Sure he does. Outside of countries like russia people have the right to free speech...
    1
  1006.  @magnetmannenbannanen  There would be no more bad apples...
    1
  1007.  @TheRealBillBob  It's yours...
    1
  1008.  @Paul_Sergeyev  "Well, they were extremely dependent" So not enslaved then...
    1
  1009. "Putin has also prohibited Sweden and Finland from joining NATO" Silly of Putin to think that he had any powers to prohibit this.
    1
  1010. You lost your bet
    1
  1011.  @noahtylerpritchett2682  "Infact I don't even think they are members of NATO unlike the E.U" thanks to Putin they now are parts of NATO.
    1
  1012.  @maniac7979  Western? do you need a map or something?
    1
  1013.  @Divanodav-q8x  So it is not nazi symbols. Rather symbols which existed before nazism even was a thing and they simply also used it?
    1
  1014.  @BOBYDOBSEN  "Just not to give Russia and pro Russian shills any propaganda talking points about aggressive NATO troops " Why not? Russia has been claiming for 2 years that NATO troops are fighting in ukraine anyways, there would be no propaganda win in proving them right. Besides. If it were to be a propaganda win, so what? Russia is fighting the best it can already. It does not have any more equipment to readily use.
    1
  1015.  @anthonytrevino3191  "How are they going to lose ?" By running out of willing men and functional equipment.
    1
  1016.  @anthonytrevino3191  "40% of their economy is wartime footing " that is truly unsustainable. So if that is correct, then all ukraine has to do in order to win is to keep fighting for a few more years.
    1
  1017.  @anthonytrevino3191  "30k new recruits a month " Well that tracks well considering that ukraine claims 1500 russian casulties per day. if 60-65% of those are permanent then russia is just standing still in numbers of actual troops. But we can tell from the signup bonuses that 30k is not sustanaible either. It is not that liong ago when the new record of 1 million rubles was announced. Now it is 2.5...
    1
  1018.  @j.t.7697  No. Vote against trump. He is working with the russians. to the detriment of both ukraine and israel.
    1
  1019. " They often transmit skewed information." as opposed to official russian information...
    1
  1020.  @luffebassen  " They have already won. They won the day it started." So why do they still keep on fighting? This makes no sense. I can say the same thing the other way. Ukraine won the day the war started, it just takes some time for russia to realize this before they surrender.
    1
  1021.  @luffebassen  When do you thinks russia will win? as in, what year?
    1
  1022. @ "I fell for Russo-American propaganda " Good to see you gained som insight from it.
    1
  1023.  @powerpointpaladin6911  "who presided over the declaration of war in 1939. " A bit late though... and by that time there obviously was no option.
    1
  1024. How so?
    1
  1025.  @polina-rs4lr  "then come back on his vacation and finish you." lol, you think russian soldiers gets vacation...
    1
  1026.  @LuminousMindGames  Lol. you seem to not know what terrorism is
    1
  1027.  @DominoSlava  Which law exactly?
    1
  1028. "They vote for this party mainly because they are afraid of foreigners." that is not short-sightedness. Take a good look at Sweden for what happens with too many immigrants. From the safest place in Europe to weekly bombings. If the other parties would think more long term and reduce immigrants then they would not give power away to a party which does.
    1
  1029.  @skp8748  "Lmao when you say Europe who do you mean? EU countries? European NATO countries? Or all countries in the geographical area?" Yes, all of them. With the exception of Belarus
    1
  1030.  @davidmcguerty8405  "At a minimum, pay their minimum NATO dues." there are no NATO dues.
    1
  1031.  @nevermindmeijustinjectedaw9988  he does not say Isreal should stop defending itself.
    1
  1032. ​ @MADNESS084  "Selydove " Never heard about... So 2 years and 2 weeks in order for russia to advance those few miles from the border to an unheard of town named Selydove... Gj russia. At what rate will Kiev be taken? 2-3 centuries?
    1
  1033.  @MADNESS084  "It was a city that homed about 70k people before the war. " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selydove "Population (2022) 21,521" why do you inflate the numbers by more than a factor of 3? And even if they do capture land faster than before, russia controls less land now than it did 2 years ago.
    1
  1034. @makimaxx2311 "Letting the defense of Pokrovsk fall?" The defenses for that small city has not fallen yet. And it has already been close to half a year. " pouring units into Kursk, for what? " For occupation of russian territory. Giving Ukraine real leverage in negotiations. As well as other benefits. " I really hate to see slavs fight each other." If this is true then you surely support Ukraine in their fight against a nation of slavs starting a war against another slavic nation?
    1
  1035. "now"
    1
  1036. less than russia has surrendered tanks to the ukrainians.
    1
  1037. Sure about that? How long time would it take do you think?
    1
  1038. It is the other way around. Moscow was under ukrainian rule
    1
  1039. no
    1
  1040. Sure about that?
    1
  1041.  @DIREWOLFx75  " that's not what i said." ok... But you did say that at that time there would be no ukrainian army left. Russia can't invade and occupy ukraine even after their entire army is gone?
    1
  1042. "Ukraine is clearly not going to win the war of attrition" Even with low interception rates russia is advancing slower than a snail across the battlefield. And as for who is winning the attrition warfare, ukraine has more weapons now than before the war.
    1
  1043.  @Votraxsa  "Canada here, what you think Trump can do, aside from talking like a Dictator." Send much more weapons than Biden did. And remove all of the silly restrictions palced on them.
    1
  1044. Because it is not gouging. it is offering a new product for a high price. it is like saying that Ducatti is price gouging.
    1
  1045.  @DontLookNowBuddy  The romans used oil to wash their bodies with...
    1
  1046. Could be. but if true then russia ought to have captured more land.
    1
  1047. Lol no.
    1
  1048. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1049. Ukraine is not telling anybody to give them nukes.
    1
  1050.  @jimnpen8451  Yes
    1
  1051. "Taiwan is a de facto NATO member." not at all.
    1
  1052. "Does not make sense at all" Why not? What evidence do you really need? Apart from perhaps during world wars or ghengis khan did people die more from war than from childbirth.
    1
  1053.  @vorynrosethorn903  tribal societies are the minority of societies.
    1
  1054.  @FrankElec  "Like i said from the beginning, where is the evidence?" just common sense combined with historic research. at least 1% of childbirths used to end in death. That means that if there has been around 100 billion people then as an absolute minimum 1 billion people have died from this. wars are considered to have killed about 150 million to 1 billion.
    1
  1055.  @FrankElec  But for every person born, there is a mother, not relevant if the baby is male or female. and a pregnancy resulting in a birth.
    1
  1056.  @FrankElec  "You can do research in the past 200 years. More men died fighting in war than maternal death during this period." but why limit yourself to such a short time period? and why 200 years? why not even shorter. lets say since the year 2000. google says that less than 5 million have died since then. while at least 6 million due to childbirth. and childbirth now is way way less dangerous now than in earlier times.
    1
  1057.  @user-ottoyu123  "So who is manipulating this fear? Who is benefiting?" Putin and the russian elite.
    1
  1058. "It's a military fact artillery causes about 75% of casualties. " is it? Statistics from USA in Afghanistan would say otherwise...
    1
  1059. "4. More and more money is being lend to Ukraine which makes me wonder how they will pay if the war ends." paid by russia as part of their surrender
    1
  1060.  @mrvwbug4423  Then why don't american companies just go to UK and buy up the drugs from the pharmacies there?
    1
  1061.  @Anas-im4gt  So.. how's the weeks-long takeover doing?
    1
  1062. Less sick than people saying that russia will win for 2.5 years...
    1
  1063.  @georgelyddane8283  You made the claim that "this is wrong". So you have the burden of proof for that claim.
    1
  1064.  @georgelyddane8283  You finding no sources does not make the claim wrong. It just makes it unsubstantiated. You can claim that there is no evidence for it. You don't need proof for that. but saying that it is indeed wrong is a claim which does require proof.
    1
  1065. " the site would have been opened as a tourist attraction to spectators to see how little damage the Oreshnik had caused. " Only the russians are stupid enough to give such evidence to their enemies.
    1
  1066. Are you sure? It seems like Ukraine did stop the russian unvasion.
    1
  1067. Germany alone has paid 100 billion
    1
  1068. "collapsing"? So how long until russia takes Keiv do you think?
    1
  1069. Sure about that?
    1
  1070. Seems you were wrong
    1
  1071. i don't think i ever saw anyone serious say something so silly in 2022
    1
  1072. " WHEN NATO WAS ATTACKING LIBYA" NATO has never attacked Libya
    1
  1073.  @ursinecanine9657  "Same could be said about America though, you sold the specialist oil and ariel parts that kept Herman in the air." That is not the same thing as being allied with Germany and jointly invading another country.
    1
  1074.  @Angelo-q4d  "Romania and Hungary complain a lot about commie guests and forgot how they sided with Adolf and invaded Russia together with Whermacht! :D" of course they would complain about being turned communist after joining a war to stop communism from spreading.
    1
  1075. Who does?
    1
  1076. Because if one one the countries in BRICS decides to start a long protracted war and need funding for this they can't print money if the other parties agree on it.
    1
  1077. It was the republicans who held up the aid, not democrats.
    1
  1078.  @aceryer  "weren't news outlets reporting that Russia was losing ground? " yes... because they were...
    1
  1079.  @christianbolisca1493  "But they shouldn’t commit war crimes, so they have to capture the territory and ask the population about their future." It is not a war crime to recapture and reintegrate a part of ones country back into its proper borders.
    1
  1080.  @KolyaUrtz  Why don't they use it?
    1
  1081.  @ratiounkn3210  "Do our guns and ammo work well?" killed half a million russians so far....
    1
  1082. So odd you want to shift focus just like the kremlin wants...
    1
  1083. "Russia is getting richer. " How?
    1
  1084.  @richardtorr4553  "Basically the West has pushed them to have very strong trade links with China and India, " the only way they could have been "pushed" is that these options are worse than trading with the west. Choosing a poorer alternative does not make one richer. besides, they trade less and at worse prices than they did before, so this is loosing them money.
    1
  1085.  @mastermindd  "Well, what I see is that, Russia could've just carpet-bombed Ukraine, but it didn't. It's an interesting question why though." Russia never had that capability. They would have lost all their bombers trying.
    1
  1086.  @krislalone4160  Your english makes it a bit hard to understand what you mean. "I made clear these Ukrainian official stated Russia’s abilities to sustain losses has also been maintained meaning no matter what they pull out of storage does not matter they are rebuilding it." Here you seem to misunderstand. If Russia looses say 1k tanks in a year and their storages last year had 2k tanks in them. Then they do have the ability to maintain/sustain their losses. Even if their storage has been halved during that time. And if all tanks in storage is fine they will keep that up for another year. When the storage run out Russia will no longer be able to sustain such losses. But that point is not yet here.
    1
  1087. No it is not. Taiwan is the seat of the proper government of China. CCP are just rebels trying to take more power.
    1
  1088.  @NickMak-m2c  Wrong dog breed.
    1
  1089. war of attrition
    1
  1090. "Against a symbolic retaliation attack? " yes... If it makes you feel better then the strike back was symbolic as well.
    1
  1091.  @The_one_that_got_away  ""let's commit a war crime and then cry about them attacking is "unprovoked" in retaliation of said war crime"" This is what Hamas did. Didn't work out so well for them did it?
    1
  1092. How did they kill anybody if everything was intercepted?
    1
  1093. Lol ukraine seems to be winning. Putin is the one begging for a ceasefire.
    1
  1094.  @Circle-vb2eu  Lol. How. Belarus is a small meaningless country. No reason for WW3 if it gets invaded. Even when Russia got invaded they didn't want to start WW3. Russia can't even defeat Ukraine in war. Imagine if just half of Nato showed up, Moscow would fall before christmas.
    1
  1095. "but because the main objective of Russia is to prevent Nato expansion instead of territorial expansion." Just nope. They want to occupy Ukraine and gain its resources and people. Ukraine could not join NATO post 2014 anyways. And Finland and Sweden joining with no objections proves that NATO increasing their members was never the real problem.
    1
  1096. Gone you say? Then why has russia not gained any land since this video was posted?
    1
  1097.  @bittemeinrammstein  ok... And russia is incapable of winning against this tactic? just loosing land.
    1
  1098. No worries. Ukraine matches Russias military power by itself.
    1
  1099.  @abhisekhkumar4948  Longer than russia
    1
  1100. "Georgia and Ukraine were promised membership in 2008 but didn't join." They were never promised membership. at least not by anyone capable of granting them that.
    1
  1101.  @ricardoroberts1947  Respond with what? Take resources out of Ukraine to piss of Israel further?
    1
  1102.  @connorgerrard-ky7ln  Ukraine produce over a million drones each year now.
    1
  1103. @ They also sell them abroad. they can produce even more if they get resources for it. But why would yoou need millions of surplus drones? Why not just thousands of surplus?
    1
  1104.  @gee8883  So remove it from russias control...
    1
  1105.  @jackwalker8991  Just like all of Kursk "was" russian, but is not anymore.
    1
  1106.  @trashcanthertrdman8459  Lol How would you force someone to do this?
    1
  1107.  @trashcanthertrdman8459  That would not incentivize anybody to develop new drugs though.
    1
  1108.  @kartoffelbrei8090  "that he doesnt explicitly say that the cream group is 298 people and the cream group is 128." the chart explicity say so. That should be enough.
    1
  1109.  @kartoffelbrei8090  The chart shows it. it is the number of people who get better added to the number of people who got worse.
    1
  1110. We are not talking about letting Ukraine into NATO before the war ends. The question is about after russia has been kicked out.
    1
  1111. Soviet won that war...
    1
  1112. "2 years ago, They also said that russia is 10 days away from disintegration, " Who said that? Russian propaganda about western media perhaps. The ones saying that europeans would freeze and eat their hamsters ;)
    1
  1113. Why not both?
    1
  1114.  @mountainmanmike1014  "why focuses on the less used weapons? why not count the number of rifle cleaning kits as well." Because they are not visible on pictures from space.
    1
  1115. " The issue is the quality of the troops that Kiev gets as a result." Evidently better than russia does...
    1
  1116.  @aleksandrs1422  Because they keep fighting of such a larger enemy nation.
    1
  1117.  @aleksandrs1422  " Does this reflect the troop quality there as well, you reckon?" Number of killed NATO troops vs killed Taliban reflect that better. But in Afghanistan specifically i would say the defeat more reflects better understanding of the situation by the Taliban. USA did a similar mistake as russia did in this war. They rolled up en masse and expected the population to rally behind the invader after a short and clear victory over the enemy military. both were wrong.
    1
  1118.  @thc6664  Russia is shit poor. That is why their soldiers are stealing toilets.
    1
  1119.  @jammmy30  So you are saying that Ukraine is kicking russias ass while stuffing money away at the side? Imagine how easy it would be if the didn't steal that money then.
    1
  1120.  @thc6664  "eally..europe economy dont grow." Ok... even if true. So what? What relevance does that have?
    1
  1121.  @ramonpen2592  What is naive about it? Russia can't keep up. With increased aid to ukraine and heavier sanctions on russia they will have no say in the matter.
    1
  1122. "PROFITABLE FOR WHO?" Americans.
    1
  1123. "Europe had no rights to arm Ukraine." why not? Who should decide what europe does with their own stuff?
    1
  1124.  @Star-xx5zr  the flag ship... but now, 2 years later russia lost control of the black sea.
    1
  1125. Never was
    1
  1126. They sure did reduce the numbers of missile they sent. Are they saving for something? And why do they need to import from north korea and iran?
    1
  1127. "World support is waning," Lol Biden just gave 8 billion extra in funding. that is 10% of russias yearly funding given to ukraine this week
    1
  1128. Auch. Imagine having a house mortgage at the same rate as regular credit cards. that is insane.
    1
  1129. Yeah... pictures taken from space is propaganda...
    1
  1130.  @LloydBrodrick-ne5ei  "Putin just waiting for that excuse." No he wasn't. He was waiting for his most opportune moment. he did not need any excuse.
    1
  1131. Lol. Crimea is obviously Ukraininan.
    1
  1132. You do realize that us companies are owned by US taxpayers? And that even if somehow they owned themselves they would still be taxed.
    1
  1133. "They’ll turn it into an even worse open air prison in violation of human rights" why would they do this? There is o benefit in that.
    1
  1134. Less against internationnal law than what hamas is doing
    1
  1135.  @maddskillz5177  "no, ukraine lost their independency" So lets restore it.
    1
  1136. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1137.  @narayasuiryoku1397  Np. Just don't tell anybody about it. and ofc. test the newest and best after refurbishment
    1
  1138.  @amyhartman6786  Obviosuly within their own territory. As all tests are. Down in a mine shaft or the like. No enviromental damage or contamination
    1
  1139. Since newly formed units fail to appear at the front i doubt a large part goes into that.
    1
  1140. "1. Russias early War goals are almost reach." was that denazification? demilitarization?
    1
  1141. "warsaw pack countries" you mean like Ukraine?
    1
  1142.  @markwalton8644  It is not an act of war against anybody to send in official military units into ukraine and fight against official military units from russia there. Russia itself has not even declared war on ukraine yet...
    1
  1143. down to 200 instead of 800 per year or so. But maybe they will squeeze out an extra 100 per year.
    1
  1144. It is not nice to call putin a midget even though he is small and sends little green men.
    1
  1145.  snarkasmgrant2534  "They keep changing something so it never qualifies for the generic production." the old product can still be generically produced though
    1
  1146. A huge mistake... But the red lines was russias threats to hinder western intervention. And so far every single lines which has been crossed did not make russia respond.
    1
  1147. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1148.  @yellowtunes2756  Faster than ever before? They have less land now than they did in 2022...
    1
  1149.  @yellowtunes2756  Ok. At this improved rate, how much time until they conquer ukraine? how many years?
    1
  1150.  @Meem_Begorski  The economy is not really growing. Just short term wasting of money from the government is growing. And that almost always leads to a worsening economic situation on the long run. it must be doubly so when the money is spend on bombs which are blown up. Nothing left there to benefit from.
    1
  1151.  @Meem_Begorski  "where did you get the idea that all this will go to the reserve? Just that Russia has fewer modern tanks now than they did before the war. It is doubtful that they would start selling off before reaching some sort of strategic reserve. You know... in case NATO attacks like Putin claims he is so afraid of.
    1
  1152.  @The_Loathsome_Dung_Eater  The current situations being that russia needs north korean troops in order to not collapse?
    1
  1153. Why would NATo accepting new members be relevant for these two countries who are not members?
    1
  1154.  @phenri4809  "While Trump has talked some smack as usual about the war, the only actions he's taken have been in Ukraines favor," He has taken no actions. except stopping foreign (civilian) aid to ukraine. this is detrimental to ukraine. Trump has made no move for more military donations to ukraine
    1
  1155. "right?" yes, that is right.
    1
  1156. Or just stop eating so much luxury food
    1
  1157.  @glintongordon6811  So the borders are already breached?
    1
  1158. yes
    1
  1159. If only the palestinians would cease this war they started against their neighbour
    1
  1160.  @worldexploreradventure4424  "Let's see in a few months..." it has now been a few months. We can easily say that Ukraine can offer serious resistance.
    1
  1161.  @thearpox7873  Well 300 new modern tanks a year in 5 years is 1500 tanks. This plus whatever they have currently and restored old ones. And with a conquered ukraine they gain more capacity. That is more than Europe could easily fight off if two factors are discarded 1. US help 2. Europes air force for some reason not crushing russia.
    1
  1162.  @TRD-JDM  "Russians ran out of tanks after 6 months... according to NATO" Stop lying.
    1
  1163. Weird how they have been friends with Japan for such a long time then.
    1
  1164. What mistake did you find?
    1
  1165. "impossible to actually properly count" What makes it difficult? the high resolution images?
    1
  1166.  @Jean-Seb  Vuhledar... is that the 20 buildings that russia has spent 2 years trying to take? Taking that is not really going to do much.
    1
  1167. Because they might share photos with the russians.
    1
  1168.  @valorz6064  I doubt you can show a single such comment
    1
  1169.  @USpartisan  Lets hope so.
    1
  1170. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1171.  @SolarWarden9  "anyone cheering this on is absolutely insane or stupid or both" so russia state media is stupid/insane? they have been cheering on nuking london and washington for years now.
    1
  1172.  @dfloper  He always is. and now he has even less of a reason to not bluff than usual.
    1
  1173. Helping russias intel is a bad idea. besides. the reserves in USA is almost untouched, so it would be a boring analysis.
    1
  1174. Jake is stepping up his political game. This is the right approach. Showing how republicans should be the strong party destroying russias possibilities and thus keeping america safe.
    1
  1175. Lots of video evidence proves you wrong.
    1
  1176.  @maynard3legs  Why put forward that point when noone is saying that?
    1
  1177. THey can never rebuild the Moskva. it was built by foreign parts. At ukrainian ports...
    1
  1178. Not Nato. Only some specific countries in Nato.
    1
  1179. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1180.  @charlethemagne5466  No shit. everybody knows that.
    1
  1181.  @daring6983  ", what are they supposed to do to live after they move and where are they even supposed to move to? " Move to a new city. Get a new job. Restart life there. I don't know if Russia actually has short term shelter for abuse victims, hopefully they do as that would make the transmission periode better.
    1
  1182.  @teru797  "yep, then if Trump does as he says he'll end up pulling the life support plug and it's all over." trump/USA does not hold the life support. So he simply can't
    1
  1183.  @teru797  " They cut support then reinitiated support " after half a year. So no reason for a total collaps after a few months. Not to mention that even after half a year russia still had no chance of using their aircrafts inside Ukraine. And in order to keep preventing russian air power they would save missiles for jets instead of shooting down drones and cruise missiles.
    1
  1184.  @markpashia7067  That is not true. The development cost was paid long before the drug reached american markets
    1
  1185.  @reddragonflyxx657  "patent system was inherently capitalist" it is not though. patents is a government regulation on the means of production. Thus the opposite of capitalism.
    1
  1186.  @Progan666  No they are not. Paying extra for drugs in the USA does not lower the price in Norway.
    1
  1187.  @reddragonflyxx657  " If it isn't, why are IP rights different?" Because IPs are just barriers on how to use the tools you already own. Ip-law regulate what you can make with your own tools. That is just silly. It is a clear violation of my property right. Having Disney, through the government, be able to prevent me from drawing what i want with my pen and paper for then to sell clearly reduces what i can use my own stuff for. I do see your point though, and i was a bit to white and black in the distinctions. My main point is that government preventing private businesses from using their factories to produce certain medicines that they are able to produce tend more towards socialism than towards capitalism.
    1
  1188.  @3nertia  How is that capitalism? this is more like the opposite
    1
  1189. This does not make any sense.
    1
  1190. " Looking at the proportion is the intuitive thing." only for high numeracy people...
    1
  1191.  @rootstone9883  "cargo that is under sanctions" One country sanctioning some goods does not make it legal for anyone to board and seize a ship owned by someone else. Seizing this ship was completely illegal by Finland. But so what? What is Russia going to do, call the shipping police on them?
    1
  1192.  @ashleykerlin  "Pokrovsk. Donetsk oblast." That is not a major city. It is the same size as Bakhmut.
    1
  1193. Did you not hear that these are private citiznes taking orders from noone?
    1
  1194. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1195.  @dax354able  I just showed how much of a miscalculation russia made. And that laughing at the fact that russian missiles is still raining down shows the weakness of the russians, not strength.
    1
  1196.  @dax354able  Russia has not won the war they started against ukraine over 2 years ago. That show that russia is not really that strong.
    1
  1197.  @goldenageofdinosaurs7192  "Once again, I see no anger towards the Slovakian president, just bitching about the US. It doesn’t really makes us want to help you, y’know." I absolutely get it. And bitching about smaller closer countries in the EU might actually change more policies than complaining about US politics which europeans truly have no sway over.
    1
  1198. "would that be considered an "attack of Poland" per article 4 of Nato?" No. that would be an attack on Ukraine. Poland declaring war on russia would open up Poland for attacks without NATO having to defende them. But if Poland only send troops to help Ukraine and not declare war, then a russian attack on Poland itself would trigger Article 5.
    1
  1199. "Ukraine is getting their ass handed to them; sad to see. " Weird how russia is still gaining so little land of Ukraine is getting their ass handed to them.
    1
  1200. He sure didn't say he was surrendering.
    1
  1201. Putin stated that in a war ukraine would fall in 2 weeks. and from their actions it is obvious that their plan wa never 3 years of constant fighting and bombing.
    1
  1202. Well. There is a reason russia is buying missiles, ammunition and men from other countries now...
    1
  1203. But russia is not using their nukes. Even when russia itself is getting invaded.
    1
  1204. Bullshit
    1
  1205. I has to suck being a russian war veteran with a lost limb and seeing that Ukrainians get sci fi bionic arms.
    1
  1206.  @itsyaboi1245  No, it is a good explanation. it takes time for the reality of weekly bombings in Sweden to filter through to people in norway. Sweden used to be the safest country in europe, now it is the 2nd worst.
    1
  1207. What do you even mean with NATO keeping out? They can only be invited.
    1
  1208. And yet Putin has not always been the smartest guy
    1
  1209.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  "in reality European aid won't last long," i hope you are wrong.
    1
  1210.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  "They are already looking for a way out, " no they are not. They have a simple way out. Just stop what they are doing. there is nothing easier. they actively choose to still be a part because it is in their best interest to do sio.
    1
  1211.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  Sure, i'll ask...
    1
  1212.  @jameskjx  "He can turn Brussels into a sea of molten glass." Lol. keep dreaming
    1
  1213. "The Ukrainian authorities were preparing an attack on Russia on March 8, if Putin had not had time, then now we Russians suffered" You russians are suffering now... Way harder than if ukraine truly had attacked on march 8. Which ofc is just a silly idea.
    1
  1214.  @johnjohnstone5206  "Zelensky said he would not negotiate. " of course he will negotiate. but Russia demands that negotiations only starts after ukraine gives up more land. That makes no sense. such "negotiations" should be discarded.
    1
  1215.  @Jason-fm4my  Not really. But if the war has lasted so long. Why did it take Ukraine almost a decade before mobilizing against russia? why didn't ukraine start attacking russian bases in crimea before 2 years ago? What a lousy effort ukraine has been doing in fighting an actual war for so long.
    1
  1216. Yes. petition away.
    1
  1217.  @jamesgillen2339  She should. Her strategy of not doing so resulting in her loosing the election.
    1
  1218. Could be. But if that was the case then it should be visible on the front line by now. it is not.
    1
  1219. Seems like the russian army did not do any better
    1
  1220. Why would those two have anything to do with each other?
    1
  1221. You were wrong. ukraine did not join NATO and got invaded.
    1
  1222.  @indja69  Ok. Ukraine still did not join NATO though. If they had done so then Russia would not have attacked.
    1
  1223.  @indja69  How is that relevant?
    1
  1224.  @gamesmovienation3516  Propaganda. Important for ruther funding for Ukraine. And as a bonus puts Putin down so that an coup gets more liekly
    1
  1225. Because they don't want to piss of the european countries dependent on it. Also they don't want to break their contracts and seem untrustworthy.
    1
  1226. You heard wrong. Now, 2 years later, russians are literally eating pet dogs supplied from korea...
    1
  1227.  @UmbraHand  Not true. They had a democratic vote and wanted to stay in Ukraine.
    1
  1228. Lol. How could america or ukraine possibly have provoked an attack from russia?
    1
  1229.  @sonyphotoguy6601  How can that be? Some polls show Kamala winning, some shows Trump. Are both polls wrong then?
    1
  1230.  @marikroyals7111  Incredible that it takes that much. it should be ovious that the husband can't remove the wifes (estate) right for legal recourse. Hope Disney gets hit hard for this.
    1
  1231. "Hurricane's and Spitfires for example would NOT hvave been available if war had happened in 1937." they would never have been needed either. and germany got just as much time as england got for preparation anyways.
    1
  1232.  @darkquaesar2460  Can you provide a link to when covert cabal did a count on MLRs before? loser...
    1
  1233. lol. Are you a russian bot trying to spread misinformation?
    1
  1234.  @IparIzar  There are quite few defectors from NK. now there might be a thousand people actually managing to escape. They might expose North Korea even more, and push global sentiment against it.
    1
  1235. why not?
    1
  1236.  @evaleyst  Wrong. russian propaganda put out complete TV-commercials about europeans having to eat pet hamsters if russia cut of their gas.
    1
  1237.  @bringback2007  "his means that we will use them when we are attacked" Russia has been attacked for 2 years already...
    1
  1238.  @thebrentwoodbicyclist3220  Ukraine. they have bombed Crimea, which according to russian law is 100% russian just like Moscow. so if bombing russia would respond in nukes, then it is odd that there was no nukes when bombing of sevastopol scared off the black sea fleet.
    1
  1239.  @bringback2007  " Running with sticks is different. " Ok... I didn't mention running with sticks. but if you say that the talk is about similar weapons, then no problem. Ukraine is not nuking russia, so no fear for nuclear escalation.
    1
  1240.  @thebrentwoodbicyclist3220  " but Russia is the only one that believes that Crimea is Russia" they don't even believe that. Ukraine has been striking Crimea with american weapons for years now. So that they are reacting to strikes in Kursk proves that kursk is more russian in their eyes.
    1
  1241.  @daddad8707  Russians steal copper wire from power lines if they are unused. Similar things can be found inside the tanks.
    1
  1242.  @kurtwicklund8901  You don't understand that he is talking about russia? that means you are quite dumb.
    1
  1243. How is this ethnic cleansing? this leaves the civilan peacefully to do what they want to. including breed.
    1
  1244. Is it a war crime to cover ones own equipment in the flag of your opponent?
    1
  1245. ​ @juliusfucik4011  "Ukraine lost up to 1.2 million; half of those dead. The other half wounded." if that is even remotely true. How come russia is still occupying less land than they did 2 years ago?
    1
  1246. If they didn't want it, why did they start it?
    1
  1247. So what?
    1
  1248.  @zbigniewmalec4816  "Lech Wałęsa and vaclav havel were cheering for republicans during Clinton reelection." ok, so what?
    1
  1249.  @iotaje1  This sounds like some made up stuff. And it would be an obvious mistake from Clinton to let such petty threats influence him. Anyways that would only account for USA, not for all the other 20 members of NATO who would also have to agree in order for Poland to join.
    1
  1250.  @bosstowndynamics5488  Insulin was not made in USA so bad example. Beside. Insulin has been a generic drug for almost 100 years now.
    1
  1251. Pretty sure the Wehrmacht reaced Moscow, that is pretty far beyond Pripjat...
    1
  1252.  @ulrichkristensen4087  Just 60 km from Moscow center? That is way, way beyond the Pripjat marches.
    1
  1253.  @ulrichkristensen4087  Yupp. Very famously they could. Thanks for helping me confirm that the Wehrmacht did not get stopped på some marches.
    1
  1254. "Once they stop the war Ukraine is immediately invited in." and then what? nothing changes. After russia looses this war ther will be peace anyways. does not truly matter if ukraine joins the day after or a year or two after.
    1
  1255.  @jacksonteller1337  ?? I can't be conscripted by anyone.
    1
  1256. Nato won't invade. not even if Russia pulls 100% of troops from the finnish border
    1
  1257. How didn't it age well?
    1
  1258. How so?
    1
  1259. Just because the west promised Stalin that he would be allowed to do it. The allies could have reached it earlier.
    1
  1260.  @sinoroman  How so?
    1
  1261. This fail to take into account that russias economy is largely based on export of a raw material which everybody wants. after the war they will be able to keep selling. And if they somehow win they will gain ukraines raw resources as well.
    1
  1262. And they suck. 25% shot down rate vs old patriot systems manned by beginners.
    1
  1263.  @markmuller7962  Lol Why? Just because you don't know what would happen if a king said he wanted my daughter as a wife?
    1
  1264. " it simply withdrew its troops. " That is losing...
    1
  1265.  @bonsaitrees6190  "can be used to improve health, education" it wouldn't though...
    1
  1266. This will probably be told in the end of year analysis. probably at the end of 2025 all useful tanks will be gone and russias active tank fleet will forever decrease.
    1
  1267. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1268.  @vladimirolef1977  "very wise strategy." lol. at this rate it will take over 100 years to occupy ukraine. does not seem very wise.
    1
  1269. Sure about this?
    1
  1270.  @TheGreatOne-gw7xh  Lol. As if americans have any real power in those kind of decicions.
    1
  1271.  @Xerox482  40 years old patriot systems donated to ukraine shoots down 25% of Kinshals..
    1
  1272. " which is described by western countries as barbaric," lol. this is just not the case. stop lying
    1
  1273. Well of course. same with all other similar attacks.
    1
  1274. No need. Seems like Ukraine is stopping Russia quite easily by utself.
    1
  1275. How could wanting ti trade Kursk for land be a sign of weakness? The entire aim of Ukraines defence is to win back their territory. The single best way for them to do it is a trade.
    1
  1276.  @SBmasta441  The river is a stronger fortification than anything anywhere else in Ukraine. So i doubt they would ever cross. besides, if it ever got to that they could build fortifications. As for negotiation. Ukraine would simply say "no" and keep fighting until russia looses.
    1
  1277. Why would USA blow up the line? only puting benefitted from it being blown up
    1
  1278. Time is on their side. the longer such a split is in fact the more real it becomes. If they are split up for 100 years then most people will accept it as true. (which it will be for all intents and purposes).
    1
  1279. in order for russia not to gain info
    1
  1280. Europeans like free markets which makes all trade win-win.
    1
  1281. yeah. Russia really messed up on this one. Now it is 2 years later and they are still stuck in a war going nowhere.
    1
  1282. Why would you think something as silly as that?
    1
  1283.  @Svarog2012  "It can carry nuclear warheads." ok. so could a thousand of the other missiles russia sent the past 3 years.
    1
  1284.  @xReLentLess213  "They are NUCLEAR CAPABLE!" So are most of the other missiles russia sends into ukraine. And they are not really making russia win the war.
    1
  1285. "The Russian interest rate is not high" 21% is insanely high.
    1
  1286.  @инопланетныйпришелец  "А почему вы об этом не говорите с другой стороны" ok... USA have sent 30 out of 3000 tanks in storage. all of which are more modern than what russia have in storage. As long as the west simply chooses to support ukraine there is simply no reasonable way russia can win this war.
    1
  1287. They could have given all the nukes to USA if they wanted.
    1
  1288.  @HasanProd  You consider hamas' own website as propaganda?
    1
  1289. "invade ukraine because ukraine want to jion the NATO " Ukraine joining NATO woulkd not mean in any way that russia had to attack.
    1
  1290.  @りんごT-i3t  "I am Chinese, and my friends are against war, but they do not interfere in other countries' internal affairs" this is not an internal affair. attacking another country is very external.
    1
  1291.  @artembolshakov3901  No, i am not braindead. But one could also ask why it has taken russia more than 2 yars to barely reack Pokrovsk. That is insanely slow.
    1
  1292.  @danieljames2015  Go away ivan
    1
  1293.  @martf3129  Well. We are not speaking ukrainian here.
    1
  1294.  @danieljames2015  We are both speaking english here.
    1
  1295.  @tommyschmoker8388  Biden is not running for presidency...
    1
  1296. So does Ukraine and Russia. For some reason i don't think russia will be doing much to stop this invasion..
    1
  1297.  @valorz6064  Where do you find a single comment claiming such nonsense?
    1
  1298. what was that message?
    1
  1299. If help to refugees are considered then Germany have given more than 50% as much total aid as USA have.
    1
  1300.  @zykom1  Russia didn't find other partners for their gas :( Europe did invest and build up infrastructure with no real problem.
    1
  1301.  @reubensandwich9249  " It'll take Russia 200 years to take Ukraine while it'll take Ukraine 200 years to recapture its territory" We agree on this. With western support this is a clear win for ukraine. There is no way russia can survive 200 years of war. Ukraine on the other hand is more than enough supported by the west to continue forever.
    1
  1302.  @azarath-  "you clearly don't understand the main purposes of this conflict." what is the main purpose of this conflict? prevent NATO expansion? denazification? Demilitarization? Taking the now legal russian oblasts? If not, you are calling Putin a liar...
    1
  1303. Yes there is. If Ukraine is kept supplied then russia will not win in several decades. Before that time either russia itself will collapse, or their soviet stockpiles will run dry and thus their military capability will shrink.
    1
  1304.  @АлексейПетров-б3й7о  "Try to reach the level of patience of the people of Palestine when you lose your child, wife, relatives and parents every day..." maybe they should start trying not to attack their peaceful neighbours.
    1
  1305. "In my opinion this is a bluff" It wasn't
    1
  1306.  @khn-o4n  Putin. he was the one with the most to gain from it.
    1
  1307. NATO accepting new members is not aggression. And it is unrelated to Ukraine anyways.
    1
  1308.  @I_Command_Future  Achieved nothin. Yet captured more land than russia in the past year. That means that russia also have achieved nothing in the past year?
    1
  1309.  @lazyman7505  No, just the ones who lie. like you are doing.
    1
  1310.  @lazyman7505  "Suriyak maps?" No?
    1
  1311. this is such a stupid comment
    1
  1312.  @hallcrash  By that time only a small minority of the human population would live on earth and feel anything. And any effect would easily be mitigated by millennias of new technology. Not to mention that nobody is talking about mining anything close to even 0.5% of the moons mass, let alone 50%.
    1
  1313. Nah. this could have happened last year. Avdiika could still be in Ukraines hand etc. The children hospital might have not been bombed.
    1
  1314.  @Juttutin  Yes. But the result would have the firmament be very close to us. And a third measurment further south would not make sense in such a model.
    1
  1315. All ICBMs the past 50 years are hypersonic.
    1
  1316. Why not? Iran has not joined the war yet.
    1
  1317.  @andrewosborn1451  involved, sure. But they have not joined the war. And probably won't as they can do very little.
    1
  1318.  @joejoejoejoejoejoe4391  "And who enslaved those slaves," black africans ofc.
    1
  1319.  @McZachary44  The south has no plans to invade. And they know that. So that is not the reason.
    1
  1320.  @azovandy14.88  "US accomplishing the main objectives in Afghanistan" They stated that removing Taliban was a main goal. the Taliban remains in power.
    1
  1321.  @hawklord100  "The US pulled out of Afganistan due to a deal with the Taliban by Thrump the year earlier," nah. they pulled out because they had no plan for winning the conflict.
    1
  1322.  @edthebumblingfool  Trump might have sped things up. But USA loosing was the inevitable outcome.
    1
  1323. I thought youtube was blocked in russia...
    1
  1324.  @AL-lh2ht  Ah.. I always assumed they were russians getting paid and using vpn from within russia.
    1
  1325.  @0xbaadf00d  Only about 25% wrong. That is quite good
    1
  1326. If it is not Russia then Putin screwed up.
    1
  1327. If not Russia then Putin made a big mistake.
    1
  1328. Yes. It poses no threat to russia. And is irrelevant when it comes to Ukraine anyways.
    1
  1329. So they have a seperate drone flying behind it to show it on video feed in order to control it?
    1
  1330.  @lynxminx4  " I get why this is important to police safety." is it though? There is no indication of the civilian planning on harming the officer even if the can't see his hands.
    1
  1331. "I feel like I'm watching the same video over and over again. "I know it looks bad but here is how russia can win the war!" " this is what they show on russian media. plus threatening with nukes ofc
    1
  1332. Running is free
    1
  1333. Even worse if you plan on a two or three year for your investment to pay you back.
    1
  1334. Due to private property laws ofc
    1
  1335.  @Jimmy-ye3wg  "keep living costs and business costs down to maintain jobs and living standards." no he is not. He is allowing rampant corruption to wreck the economy of his country and reducing living standards.
    1
  1336.  @grak1396  That would be a breach of contract
    1
  1337.  @Crazmuss  "I doubt you can buy 100 rubles for 1 dollar outside of Russia." really? so if you had 100 rubles, you would not sell it to me for 1 USD?
    1
  1338.  @PalleRunquist-d5c  "Why put limits on numbers? Just let Ukraine run their war the way they see fit." So that russia stops bombing Ukraine ofc
    1
  1339. How is it even close to a prison?
    1
  1340. "even managed to not get involved during the 2nd world war. " Well... Not involved in the same way belarus was not involved in the attack on Kiev...
    1
  1341.  @maglev469  try to find one then..
    1
  1342. "At 4 million USD per PAC 3 it's not really sustainable. " it is very sustainable. Russias economy is at the size of italy....
    1
  1343. Because Russia invaded ukraine in 2014. That makes joining NATO impossible
    1
  1344. Yes. He was not surrendering.
    1
  1345.  @oakleysv9600  "Ukraine was trying to join before Russia occupied Crimea, which is why they occupied it to stop them from being able to join." so after 2014 there was no need for a war. Why start one? "Starting a war doesn't maintain peace... Tell that to the USA which has been the #1 war starter and " ok, i will... "international ballistic missiles..." do you mean intercontinental ballistic missiles? They have ranges of ten times the distances you are mentioning.
    1
  1346.  @briank.6482  "only used 10% of their army so far" or something
    1
  1347. Sure. nobody is disputing that. Btw, NATO has the right to defend itself from russia.
    1
  1348. Russia could have pulled back troops from all the regions and they would have had peace. Why did they stop after just withdrawing from Kiev?
    1
  1349.  @denkeylee  " Russia pulled back there first to show their good intentions." russia did not have good intentions, so that would be a lie. Besides, there never was a treaty to tear up.
    1
  1350. How quickly is "very quickly"?
    1
  1351.  @jojothetasmaniansassmonkey8866  "his crime technically meets the legal definition, " no it does not. For that the intention to spread fear/terror is required. There is no sign of that being his intent.
    1
  1352. " predicting a loss for Russia if war was to happen ." well. russia is currently loosing a war against ukraine. So a war against NATO which is 20 times bigger and 30 years ahead in technology would be quite one sided.
    1