Comments by "" (@danieleyre8913) on "The JFK Assassination - What Really Happened? And More Assassination Stories (Compilation)" video.

  1. 472 things that are weak, speculative and far-fetched.
    3
  2.  @overthis  LOL heed your own advice about reading history books because every one with any credibility states the facts and no the conspiracies, and this is my own conclusion nothing to do with the government.
    2
  3.  @kevingeier3385  Well then you agree wit( falsehoods. The gun was retrieved by the Dallas PD, not the FBI. And it was Oswald’s Carcano.
    2
  4. I agree. These conspiracy theories are all just ludicrous. They’re all based upon baseless speculation, clearly dubious claims, and sought after conclusions. And it’s pathetic how some people are trying to keep them alive. They’re slowly dying out and losing acceptance as the event becomes less relevant though.
    2
  5.  @benhassenabdelghaffar6187  The shot to the head caused a catastrophic fracturing of the skull, so there was no definable “exit wound”. There was however an entrance wound, evident by the bevelling, at the back of the skull. Both shots that hit Jack Kennedy came from behind. It is almost impossible that there was any shooter from the front that somehow escaped definite observation either shooting or trying to escape. Dealey Plaza isn’t actually very big.
    2
  6.  @GodlessScummer  Hmm interesting. I like Oliver Stone’s movies and style. So I enjoyed JFK as a 12 year old. But I never really took it seriously, I guess that even at that young age I was aware that you shouldn’t get history from movies because Hollywood is in the business of entertaining not informing. I remember years later I got into shooting and hunting and more experienced guys told me how the Carcano is actually a very good rifle. I remembered how in JFK in a scene it was derided as being bad and inaccurate. I got to try one at the range for myself and saw that yep it was just a load of movie bunkum. But I also wasn’t surprised, I never thought the movie was being even very let alone entirely truthful.
    2
  7.  @coopersimmons8627  The second shot’s round didn’t come out perfect. Conspiratards always claim it did, and show the photographs of the one side where it looks that way. But they never show the other side where the nose is entirely flattened-away. And they do mention that it lost much of its copper jacket, and that rifling groves are clear and evident. It didn’t hit any bone in Kennedy’s neck, but hit Connally thumbling, so it must have lost a lot of velocity/kinetic energy by the time it finally hit one of Connally’s ribs, and of course more velocity when it smashed Connally’s wrist.
    2
  8.  @david-spliso1928  Here we go, the conspiracy crappola…
    2
  9.  @tomgreen4872  Heed your own advice. And learn that “research” does not mean taking conspiracy drivel as gospel.
    2
  10.  @david-spliso1928  It simply IS true. Go and read their own accounts. Baker saw someone in a vestibule at the exit from the stairwell to the second floor that must have entered it second earlier (thus coming down the stairs). I was wrong about him hearing him, instead he just saw him. The guy entered the lunchroom so Baker drew his pistol, followed him in there and told him to “come here”. The man was Oswald and he turned around and slowly approached Baker. Truly came along, Baker asked if he knew him and he worked there and Truly confirmed that he did. Against this better judgment, Baker let him go, anxious to get to the roof to look for the assassin’s nest. Later Baker realised that he had let the assassin go. Victoria Adams ran down the stairs and out the building before Baker gathered Truly and while Oswald was hiding his gun.
    2
  11.  @HellcatMad  Ahahahaha at how you can believe something so impossible and far-fetched.
    2
  12. Oh yeah, some gangster. Lived in shared accommodation with other struggling middle aged men. Used to gate crash events and try and rub shoulders with prominent people. Had the IRS and various deg collectors after him for a decade. Was in business with his sister. And we all know that gangsters will take a guy out right in front of the city’s top lawmen with no chance of evading capture.
    2
  13. He also cried “police brutality” in the theatre when he was captured. Despite clearly having violently resisted arrest and even attempted to draw his own gun. Hahaha at how you imply that it must be true because he said so, the man was a compulsive liar.
    2
  14. Ah no. The Zapruder film confirms the shots came from behind.
    1
  15.  @overthis  Nope I do not trust the US government. And I am the one here who has actually read up on the facts of this assassination. Enough to know that it had nothing to do with the government.
    1
  16.  @nigelliam153  I’ll explain it: He never existed. It’s just conspiratard drivel.
    1
  17.  @nigelliam153  Okay I will explain it: Neither of those are true they are both just conspiracy blather.
    1
  18.  @HellcatMad  Yes yes that’s why Marina remembers taking the pictures. The far fetched nonsense out there. It’s like the plot of a comic book or crummy movie.
    1
  19.  @HellcatMad  Hahaha you don’t even detect sarcasm.
    1
  20.  @TonyRocha-c5m  Well what was he then? A Marxist?
    1
  21.  @positivelycurvedpikachu  All of the undeniable evidence points to Oswald. Many Conspiratards have been trying since the 1960s to debunk it, but it’s always been pretty desperate stuff. All of the theories that Oswald didn’t act alone, or that Oswald didn’t do it (conspiratards often contradict themselves by holding both positions) stand up to little scrutiny and all come down to speculation that is squally far fetched.
    1
  22.  @marilynhadley322  Yes yes according to that credible source Lee Oswald himself.
    1
  23.  @thomasraftery409  Oswald was heard coming down the stairs by a policeman and the building manager, and tried to slip away and hide in the second floor (where he was not supposed to go). And they caught him but unfortunately let him go.
    1
  24.  @david-spliso1928  What are you talking about? I’m telling you accepted fact. Hahaha at how you’re acting as though this is some far-fetched thing that I have come up with. To repeat: Baker saw Oswald entering the lunchroom from the vestibule through the door. Thus Oswald must have just come down the stairs. Did you even read what I had typed? You seem to imagine that Oswald was already sitting in that lunchroom when Baker entered or something. If that was the case; Baker and Truly would have never even set foot on the second floor let alone seen Oswald! The only reason Baker went to the second floor was because he saw Oswald entering the lunchroom. Oswald wasn’t supposed to use that lunch room ever. The second floor was where all the clerical affairs were handled, and warehouse staff like Oswald were only ever supposed to go there for a good reason. Oswald used the lunchroom for blue collar workers on the first floor (the “domino room”). Furthermore: Oswald uncharacteristically did not even bring his lunch that day. And no Dorman did not see Baker and Truly seconds after Adam’s left. Where did you get that? There is a mountain of evidence against Oswald of which this sighting is merely one small part of. He worked in the building. He oddly took “curtain rods” wrapped in a sack to work that day. He resembled the shooter as observed by bystanders on Houston st (in fact they gave the description that helped him get caught). He left that workplace after the shooting inexplicably. He soon later caught a bus during which passengers and the driver saw his frantic mood. He owned the assassination weapon. His prints were found on the weapon and all over the nest. The weapon was matched to that used in the assassination attempt in general Walker. He later shot patrolman Tibbit for no good reason. He violently tried to resist arrest. The list could continue. There is no chance he would avoided the chair had meathead Ruby not murdered him. The theories that he did not act alone are ridiculous enough. But to say he didn’t do it must come from either being utterly uninformed or from you suffering some sort of disorder.
    1
  25.  @david-spliso1928  And that is total BS what you claimed about the X-ray technician and differences in holes.
    1
  26.  @HellcatMad  Let’s just say you talk, and believe in, hilarious nonsense.
    1
  27.  @armorstef  What “women”? The Warren commission began its investigation and interviews within a week of the assassination, and compiled the report and its conclusions 10 months after the assassination in September 1964. Interviews with witnesses were completely public and recorded both on on audio tape and on film. So your claims are impossible.
    1
  28.  @thomasraftery409  Yeah the “magic bullet theory” as proposed by Conspiratards was dead on arrival back in the 1960’s, there was nothing relatable about magic about it. It hasn’t stopped conspiracy clowns desperately clinging to it in the 6 decades since.
    1
  29.  @richpiana8020  Nope. The “magical bullet” is just some deliberate obtuseness from the conspiracy clowns. Where they deliberately put the limousine occupants in the wrong positions, don’t account for angles and the downhill gradients, etc. it works on people who are spatially-challenged. In reality it is easy to see the straight line between the snipers nest, Kennedy’s neck and Connally’s chest. So no unlike most people who believe in conspiracy theories you are wrong.
    1
  30.  @jamescrane7034  Yeah Ruby had no choice because Ruby was an impulsive buffoon with no self control.
    1
  31.  @kevingeier3385  They didn’t take a different gun. The gun within the building was photographed before and during retrieval. It’s the same gun that Oswald photographed himself with and the same that was shipped by Klein’s sporting goods.
    1
  32.  @kevingeier3385  Hahahahaha what on earth are you talking about? None of the witnesses were dead within a year. The fantasies that people believe and circulate…
    1
  33.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning, You don’t accept the fact because you either are gullible and have been misinformed by charlatans or because you’re a failure acting out an inferiority complex. The CIA have no relevancy to the Jack Kennedy assassination.
    1
  34.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning, You don’t accept the fact because you either are gullible and have been misinformed by charlatans or because you’re a failure acting out an inferiority complex. The CIA have no relevancy to the Jack Kennedy assassination.
    1
  35.  @Ricey167  What are you talking about? How on earth could the CIA have any contact with me? I accept the fact that Oswald acted alone because I am informed enough to know that that’s what the evidence overwhelmingly supports. It was an easy assassination for Oswald, the only help he needed was the ride he tricked Buell Frazier into giving him that morning.
    1
  36.  @Ricey167  Yes yes well done you figured it out. The CIA showed up at my doorstep one day, I felt so honoured that they singled me out. I accept the fact of Oswald’s guilt because I am informed of the facts. You do not because you are both uninformed and naive.
    1
  37. Oh okay. So why was he the only book depository employee that couldn’t be accounted for? Why was the snipers nest found on the same 6th floor where the clients he was assigned to fetch were stored? Why was the assassination weapon his rifle? And why was it also found in the 6th floor? Why were his prints all over the nest? And his palm print in the rifle? Why did he match the description of the shooter seen by witnesses in the window? Why did he flee the crime scene without notifying anyone? Why did he later shoot policeman JD Tippit? And violently resist arrest?
    1
  38.  @shermbloom879  I think it was the 1980s, after her children had left home, that she changed her mind about Lee having done it, not in the 1970s. As I have long understood it: The conspiratards reached out to her and kept offering her invitations to their conventions. For years she didn’t return their messages but eventually she caved and started attending them as a guest. My understanding is that she had come to believe that Lee was part of a wider conspiracy also involving people in New Orleans, not so much that he was framed. It is very sad but vulnerable & alienated people are susceptible to these creeps and their misinformation.
    1
  39. She is still alive and lives in a satellite town of Dallas.
    1
  40.  @Fullsendfilosophy  Well be afraid there because she is still alive and kicking. Marina Oswald Porter.
    1
  41.  @MrBullethead63  She only changed her mind years later. At the time and for the years afterward she accepted that Lee did it. She only changed her mind years later after the conspiratards managed to get her to come to their conventions. Awful people.
    1
  42.  @chickenfist1554  Oswald had sent copies of the pictures to several left wing publications. So the FBI agent assigned to keep,an eye in him, Hosty, already had copies of the pictures.
    1
  43. That is a long debunked myth. Marina Oswald has never denied that she took those pictures. Dumb red herring.
    1
  44. That was debunked a long time ago.
    1
  45.  @thomaskallmyr  What?! Assassinated how? She overdosed on her pills.
    1
  46. Hahahaha what?! How do cigarette butts prove anything? Cigarette butts probably just blew over there from the car park (smoking in public was common back then) or people had a smoke there in the shade. And cigarette butts don’t biodegrade very rapidly; they stay there for months looking fresh-ish. There could not have been a second shooter in the car park. They could not have escaped definitive notice neither shooting nor trying to escape.
    1
  47.  @jetcat132  Oh yeah. They grasp at any straw and look for any excuse to disregard real evidence. Unfortunately they are for real. One thing that is very obvious is that few of these people have any appreciation of just how small and compact Dealey plaza actually is.
    1
  48. What a bunch of garbage. The Marines never said any such thing. Oswald’s mother (a white trash nightmare called Margueritte) saved his marine shooting card, and he scored 212 out of 250, which qualified him as sharpshooter. So he was a very good shot. The entry wound on Jack Kennedy’s skull was on the back, it was a glancing shot, so it splintered off a large section of scalp. That’s why the brain matter went forward.
    1
  49.  @BitCoiner-q2h  Actually the head initially moves forward for the first two frames after the headshot in the Zapruder film. It then snaps back after the first two frames. That very likely could be due to a neuromuscular reaction, or due to his back brace. If you ever do much hunting you will know that when animals get a fatal shot in the head; they are likely to suddenly and involuntarily twitch and contort about a half second after the impact. You can even often see it in execution videos of people. The fact is that his brain matter and blood went forward, indicating the shot came from the rear.
    1
  50.  @golfinspired2058  The book depository does not align squarely with elm st, the corner turn is 135 degrees, so Oswald could not shoot down with too steep an angle. His first shot was actually when the limo was near the top of the hill, not long after it turned, but it must have ricocheted off of either the overhanging lamppost arm or a branch. Much of the round hit the curb in front of some guy further down the hill and he got injuries. And people saw other fragments hit the road close to the limousine. It is about at frame 160 of the Zapruder film, you can see a little girl running along the limousine suddenly stop and turn to look up towards the window.
    1
  51.  @jamescrane7034  Be honest: You’re not listening to researchers, you’re listening to conspiracists. Yes it is true that after the motorcade had sped off; policemen on the scene and some civilians within a minute ran up to the car park beyond the Bryan pergola and the fence at the top of the grassy knoll (the knoll itself is actually the little grassy hill, where there was nobody). While nobody thought that they saw anyone there (except for Jean Hill’s jumbled account); they thought that the shot could have come from there. Bear in mind that Dealey plaza isn’t actually a physically very big place, and the car park is for the book depository. And that there was some echoing down in the lower area of the plaza. Of course they found nothing. No spent shell casings, nobody hiding. And nobody saw anyone leave from there. Also don’t forget that policeman Marion Baker ran into the book depository immediately after the shooting. And gathered the manager Truly and began ascending to the 6th floor. And even encountered Oswald, who tried to slip and hide away from them on the second floor.
    1
  52.  @jamescrane7034  "Researchers"? You're being very generous there. Be honest they're just conspiracy clowns.
    1
  53.  @jamescrane7034  You’ll take McClellanf’s word. But not those of his colleagues who say he’s full of it. Well done. Yeah at first reporters said people were running to the grassy knoll. But they found nothing, so nothing was there.
    1
  54.  @jamescrane7034  You listened to con artists.
    1
  55.  @jamescrane7034  Yeah that’s right. And as an example: You have bought all of this conspiracy twaddle at face value without applying any critical thinking for yourself.
    1
  56.  @jamescrane7034  Critical thinking: If this one guy McClellan made claims about bullet wounds, despite examining them not even being his job, and none of the rest of his colleagues corroborated it, then most likely he is either wrong or lying. Especially if he didn’t make these claims until a long time later and was known for being an attention seeker.
    1
  57.  @jamescrane7034  Hahahaha at least you’re being honest. I did my own assessment. I looked at the evidence, filtered out the far-fetched speculations, and drew the natural conclusions. You on the other hand have an emotion interest in maintaining the pantomime. Even if they did some DNA analysis on the artefacts that proved beyond doubt that it was Oswald: You would still claim conspiracy.
    1
  58.  @jamescrane7034  Try learning reading comprehension.
    1
  59.  @jamescrane7034  No. The bias here is with you. On the basis of claims from one doctor at Parkland; you jump on a conspiracy where Kennedy had a frontal entry wound that flies in the face of the actual autopsy done later at Bethesda. Conveniently overlooking how these claims are not corroborated by any of the other doctors and medical staff at parkland, how he didn’t make these claims until many years after the event and overlooking his personality. And of course overlooking the near impossibility of a frontal shooter. And you tie it into an objectively far fetched conspiracy involving swapping bodies. See that above? That is what actual critical thinking is. And why? Because you want there to be a conspiracy, probably for warped emotional reasons.
    1
  60. @BenStevenson-c4z Ahahahaha ah no he didn’t at all.
    1