Comments by "VoidX" (@aus-li) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
49
-
25
-
25
-
23
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
sss vv You should definitely check out Secrets of War on here, they have the whole series, and it’s mostly about WW2.
Yea, I think it was a mix of the bushido code and emperor Hirohito was seen as a literal God. Most people don’t know this, but propaganda (which creates mass hysteria) has always been the biggest factor of winning anything, as it brainwashes the masses very easily.
So for the Japanese it was a cult, and for the Nazis it was occultism; the swastika, for example, was a tool for the occult. Rudolf Hess was an individual in the Nazi inner-circle who was very interested in occultism, however, he ended his career early when he tried to make a peace deal with England, then his plane crashed in Ireland and he was held in jail for the duration of the war.
Brutality and sadism is always relevant with warfare. Islam and Christianity were also used as a tool for war and brutality (look up the Crusades), as such with extremism in Islam, when in the 11th century the Assassins were formed, until later on the Mongols invaded and killed them off. Now we have an organization like ISIS who very much resembles the Assassins.
If you think they were bad, during the Cold War, the US, Uk, and the Soviet Union were equally sadistic, using their own citizens and soldiers as experiments for many decades. Nothing has changed, because history repeats itself.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
justingutube It’s called facts? You can easily look it up? I’m not anti-American, I just don’t agree with the our government. They’ve experimented and killed our own people for their own benefit for many decades.
All the elites profit of war. Look up Rockefeller, Rothschild, and the Morgan families during WW1; then during WW2, you have similar people, and of course the BIS and Chase in Paris stealing millions from the Jews.
During the Vietnam War, DuPont made most of their profit.
This goes all the way back to Warren Delano (Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s father) making profit off of the Opium Wars in China.
You’re very uneducated and ignorant of history and politics. We haven’t achieved anything in undeclared (which goes against the constitution, btw) warfare except profiting off these senseless wars. The Bush family are the first to make it public and transparent in their passive-aggressive, propaganda speeches. It’s time for you to educate yourself and become enlightened, and stop with this nationalism charade, because you’re wrong.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LizardMan 2500 When FDR was elected, his reforms definitely helped the labor force. I didn’t say anything about FDR, as an individual, stopping the entirety that was the Great Depression, which meant the world.
You could say the same about WW1 and the US making the most money, since we didn’t join until 1917, a year before the war was ending.
It’s still a fact, lol.
No, the federal states that are anti-abortion are mostly Bible Belt states. That’s why theocracy is correlated with the issue. It’s the women’s body, so again, I have to disagree.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LizardMan 2500 No, I just gave examples. The main point is that it should be a human right to do what you want. That’s what liberalism stands for, human rights.
If we’re talking about Japanese Americans during WW2, the same happened during WW1 with German Americans. But what happened to the Japanese Americans were far worse (more than two thousands Japanese Americans died), and that is something I don’t support when it comes to FDR; his wife didn’t support his decision either. During WW2, Italians and Germans were also put into interment camps along with the Japanese.
It’s all about factors, yes, and that is something we may have differences in, but I still support human rights. If the mother chooses not to have the baby, then she should have the right to not have it.
It’s not entirely banned in all of the US? Abortion is still available, but there may be boundaries depending on the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ajmal Ali Islam does not “ban” slavery, however it does ban female slavery. There are tons of contradictions in Islam, so I wouldn’t take Mohammed seriously. Slavery was extremely common back then, so that’s irrelevant.
The crusades were indeed about religion. It was in the name of Allah and jihad to wage war against their enemies, who are non-Muslims/disbelievers. The Holy Land was one of many factors in the crusades, it was also about competing on what religion was the best (which was between the Roman Catholics and Islam), and conquering more land.
Allah “forbids” a lot of things, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily true. He “forbid” fighting amongst each other, which automatically failed. For example, the Ummayyads were Sunni Islam, while the Abbasids who overthrew them, were Sunni Islam, but relied on Shia support to establish their empire. So no, it wasn’t for “territorial gains”, it was for Allah and Jihad.
If you’re looking for a link about the “rules” of practicing under the Ummayyads: https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/spain_1.shtml
No, again, Saudi Arabia is the one who is accountable for terrorism, especially in modern times. They teach Wahhabism Salafism, which is from the Quran. But the Hadith does add more fire to the flame, as they talk about killing Jews, while the Quran basically states they’re inferior.
You want to talk about minorities? What about the zero-tolerance policy against Jews in Saudi Arabia? While in Israel, Muslims are free to practice their religion (and they’re 18% of the population)?
Yes, look above for my link about their stance on non-Muslims. Doesn’t matter, you still agreed with me, so there’s no point in making an argument for no reason when I stated a fact.
They were tolerant of others practicing their religion only if they followed the rules.
Sorry, I don’t believe that. They still invaded for Allah to compete with the Christians. Radicalism was created in the 12th Century, with an organization called The Assassins.
I never said they were “decent folk”, now you’re putting words in my mouth. And you’re contradicting yourself by saying they were “conquering disbelievers” when you said they couldn’t simply do that unless they were “defending” themselves, or they get it from the Hadith. Wrong. It’s for Jihad.
Again, Mohammed didn’t like Jews that much, as he thinks they’re inferior and points out that Jesus was in favor of Allah. I don’t understand what you mean by how tolerant they were for “non-Jews” and “non-Christians”? You mean Muslims, then?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
sss vv That’s very hard to say. I have very small hope for humanity, because we’re not in charge of our fates, if we’re talking about superpowers such as the US and China...they sadly, can easily start a war if need be.
In modern history, the US has caused more needless wars that have affected the world, and I believe, it was for the worst. I’m sure they thought what they did was justified, but I’ve read all the declassified documents to say otherwise.
I’m also extremely cynical of China and their priorities; there is a possibility China created the virus, COVID-19, and I only say this from doing research on SARS (2002-2004) and from past countries experimenting on their own people with chemicals and pathogens.
However, I do classify myself as a libertarian and a capitalist...of course, only in good nature. So I do believe in many terminologies that people may not agree with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
justingutube There’s no need to insult me. You could easily voice your opinion without the need to get irate and erratic.
The US became an empire after the Spanish–American War. Yes, we’ve saved the British during WW1 and WW2, but you can’t deny that we’ve profited greatly on both wars, especially joining near the end at WW1.
We did indeed break free from the English, even though the Declaration of Independence was the epitome of irony, since it reflects the Native Americans and the African slaves Europeans brought over to the US. It’s a shame that they had such strong morals of breaking free from a tyranny, yet everyone else besides the Europeans were being oppressed in a much worse situation.
How did we “try” to help the oppressed in the Middle East? The US failed so many times to try and stabilize the Middle East, that it’s a joke. I doubt the CIA cares for much, since they’ve created more wars and chaos for not understanding the regions, or the religion of Islam, including the Sunni and Shia ordeal.
Ever since the Vietnam War, it’s been a total disaster.
1
-
justingutube Also, you’re exaggerating at the end there. We’re a superpower, an empire that will soon be taken over by China. And that’s because our government has only cared for private institutions, our military might, and monopolies, which is the reason why our welfare system is always in critical condition. Education, healthcare, infrastructure, the tax system etc...is non-existent.
JFK was one of the last presidents who had integrity and an opinion when it came to the CIA and upper echelon. Is there a reason to be prideful over a nation that doesn’t care for its people? But yes, killing individual terrorists solves only a few problems, hmm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Joe Mamma You’re very arrogant, which is fine, I was once insecure. Like the dude in the video, you should never jump to conclusions without doing research. Yes, in Article 5 of the constitution, it does say you can propose amendments, which means you can definitely limit the power to the constitution itself. “Unalienable” right do not apply to the constitution, only the deceleration of independence. Most of the founding fathers hated religion/Christianity.
If you read the constitution yourself, which I have, you’d notice how some of the amendments are idiotic because they don’t work in today’s society. Anyway, I can tell you’re very passionate about your guns, but that’s why you can’t reason with a solution.
1
-
Joe Mamma Then that’s on you, but I believe we need to limit at least how guns are manufactured like candy. Yep, that’s what they meant, lol, whatever you say. Sure, like I support our current government and what the CIA has done to our own people...ha. I’m only patriotic to the people, which is why I’m a socialist.
My dude, after the Spanish–American War we violated the 13th amendment and enslaved the Philippines? Can you explain that?
Calm down, I didn’t say anything about taking guns away, I said we need to reduce the amount of guns being made, or at least put some restrictions on them. I’m not sure what “restrictions”, I’m not a gun expert, I only know that we produce and supply the most weapons globally.
Good. I’m glad you have it. Lmao, the 3rd amendment is trash. Nothing is “perfect”, my dude, there’s a ton of vagueness and contradictions written in the constitution.
1
-
Joe Mamma Look at this, please:
http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/T-Briefing-Papers/SAS-BP-Civilian-Firearms-Numbers.pdf
Socialism does work wonders. Welfare is socialism, and it doesn’t work as great because it hinders the population more so than helps. Andrew Yang’s proposal (UBI) is more beneficial to the overall nation.
I’m not talking about Obama? I’m talking about the history of our government, which predates to the OSS and their experimentations on humans for testing drugs. The CIA is held responsible for every war after the Korean War, and created terrorist organizations in the Middle East. Hitler, and every other dictator, are not “socialists”, they’re simply fascists/extremists.
Who is your so-called “hero”? I bet it’s a loser, since you advocate for a losers mentality.
Japan doesn’t have a military, it only has the JSDF.
Socialism does work, lol, I’ll repeat it as many times because you’re brainwashed by the government, which is hilarious. Obviously it would make our government a fascist regime rather than a democracy. You need to educate yourself, since you’re lost on all regards of our history...it’s sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lemur Theory So you’re saying there’s literally no contradictions? You’re talking nonsense.
Here’s some examples: http://www.skeptically.org/bible/id6.html
No, I did use many examples of both Christians and Muslims fighting each other over their religious beliefs.
Don’t make excuses. I’ve already said the these bibles talk of slavery and rituals. You’re ignoring everything I’ve said because you’re uneducated. Again, no different than paganism, and I’ll keep repeating it because you’re ignoring a key factor that matters.
I never said anything about Jesus in the New Testament. It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with war, God, and the pope.
I’m not hating on anything you’re stating. I’m speaking facts. Both Christians and Muslims hated the Jews. It has nothing to do with my personal opinion on race, sexuality, or gender. I don’t appreciate your false agenda to make me into a racist, confused individual when you’re ignoring common sense. And also, religion hates homosexuality because it was practiced in paganism, that’s why there’s still a stigma on homosexuality with the Catholics.
1