Comments by "VoidX" (@aus-li) on "Misconceptions About Native Americans w/S.C. Gwynne | Joe Rogan" video.

  1. Владимир Бадалян Yea, YouTube has been deleting my comments for months now. They want to censor you...it’s very scary.
    2
  2. Владимир Бадалян I’m not surprised at all. I’m sure there’s always a brief time of peace before the storm. During the Umayyad period (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity) everyone could pray in peace. Nope, I didn’t know that? I mean, there must be people who could read the Bible in that language, since it was translated in Aramaic, Greek, and Hebrew.
    2
  3. Владимир Бадалян Muslims did damage in a ton of places all in the name of Allah. Not saying the Christians were great, but it’s really sad how Islam has progressed.
    1
  4. Владимир Бадалян I’m not hating on Muslims, I’m an atheist who’s read the Quran, I’m an enthusiast in everything. But Islam is very toxic depending on how you teach it, which Saudi Arabia is accountable for providing toxic teaching methods. Besides that, I’m sure it’s still very hard to be a Christian minority in Syria. Sadly, that’s still extremely relevant. Religion never dies but only grows stronger (I’m sure atheism is progressing also).
    1
  5.  Ajmal Ali  Everything you said is bullshit. You clearly haven't read anything and it's a pathetic attempt to prove me wrong when I've done all the research. How about you fact check everything and send me links? Also, they did do it for their religion, look up the crusades. That's why everyone was fighting over the holy land.
    1
  6. Ajmal Ali Islam does not “ban” slavery, however it does ban female slavery. There are tons of contradictions in Islam, so I wouldn’t take Mohammed seriously. Slavery was extremely common back then, so that’s irrelevant. The crusades were indeed about religion. It was in the name of Allah and jihad to wage war against their enemies, who are non-Muslims/disbelievers. The Holy Land was one of many factors in the crusades, it was also about competing on what religion was the best (which was between the Roman Catholics and Islam), and conquering more land. Allah “forbids” a lot of things, doesn’t mean it’s necessarily true. He “forbid” fighting amongst each other, which automatically failed. For example, the Ummayyads were Sunni Islam, while the Abbasids who overthrew them, were Sunni Islam, but relied on Shia support to establish their empire. So no, it wasn’t for “territorial gains”, it was for Allah and Jihad. If you’re looking for a link about the “rules” of practicing under the Ummayyads: https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/spain_1.shtml No, again, Saudi Arabia is the one who is accountable for terrorism, especially in modern times. They teach Wahhabism Salafism, which is from the Quran. But the Hadith does add more fire to the flame, as they talk about killing Jews, while the Quran basically states they’re inferior. You want to talk about minorities? What about the zero-tolerance policy against Jews in Saudi Arabia? While in Israel, Muslims are free to practice their religion (and they’re 18% of the population)? Yes, look above for my link about their stance on non-Muslims. Doesn’t matter, you still agreed with me, so there’s no point in making an argument for no reason when I stated a fact. They were tolerant of others practicing their religion only if they followed the rules. Sorry, I don’t believe that. They still invaded for Allah to compete with the Christians. Radicalism was created in the 12th Century, with an organization called The Assassins. I never said they were “decent folk”, now you’re putting words in my mouth. And you’re contradicting yourself by saying they were “conquering disbelievers” when you said they couldn’t simply do that unless they were “defending” themselves, or they get it from the Hadith. Wrong. It’s for Jihad. Again, Mohammed didn’t like Jews that much, as he thinks they’re inferior and points out that Jesus was in favor of Allah. I don’t understand what you mean by how tolerant they were for “non-Jews” and “non-Christians”? You mean Muslims, then?
    1
  7. Ajmal Ali I’m sorry how insecure you are and how you can’t even have a normal conversation without jumping to conclusions (which is very pathetic, that I can only pity you), blaming the CIA for the continues use of hatred that Saudi Arabia preaches, and spamming me with with letters in caps that literally does nothing to benefit your “argument”. The crusades were very straightforward, yet you continue to spread propaganda and don’t link anything to back up your statements. You can’t even acknowledge the fact that the Quran has tons of inconsistencies since it’s written as a legitimate diary as Mohammed was a military leader who’s killed, probably hundreds. But no. The Quran is perfect...there’s no mention of violence at all. Yep, just like in the name, Islam is very “peaceful”. Insulting and spamming will only lower your intelligence, which you’ve accomplished...and I know you’re very proud. I’m 100% wrong and you win.
    1
  8. Ajmal Ali All I can hope for you is that you mature and see your mistakes that you’ve made. Insulting and spamming devalues you as an individual. I’m sure you’re young, full of angst, and I think in time you’ll be better at expressing your ideals at a level-headed position. I also hope you keep reading about history and enlighten yourself. I never accused you of being “anti-Israel”, it was an example. You shouldn’t take things to heart and lash out when someone gives an example.Good luck, Ali.
    1
  9. Ajmal Ali Contradictions in the Quran: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Qur%27anic_contradictions https://carm.org/contradictions-quran Stop with the insults. I didn’t “accuse” you of anything. I simply brought up how Muslims are not tolerable for Jews, yet Israel doesn’t mind. The crusades: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/crusades.html http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/hts/v74n1/09.pdf https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/pegroup/files/blaydespaik2015.pdf European did not “seek” an alliance, unless you can suggest evidence...but here is the reason why they did trade: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01604632/document Operation Condor is Irrelevant in this discussion. However, it is true that the CIA is responsible for aiding Osama bin Laden when the Soviets were occupying Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda (and other terrorist organizations) blames the US for siding with Israel when they stole land from the Arabs, and the Western influence they had on Saudi Arabia. The CIA also created ISIS in Iraq, since they were disorganized and ignorant of the groups who were imprisoned in their camp. They mixed up Sunni and Shia Muslims, therefore creating ISIS. This still doesn’t excuse the fact that Saudi Arabia is responsible for promoting hatred in their teaching methods, which I’ve clearly stated before. Osama bin Laden came from Saudi Arabia. The individuals who were on the plane on 9/11 were all from Saudi Arabia. It’s clear evidence these teaching are from Saudi Arabia.
    1