Comments by "VoidX" (@aus-li) on "Joe Rogan is Leaving LA for Texas" video.

  1.  @williamgullett5911  What's wrong with liberalism?
    11
  2. @Brendan F I've done all my research, I'm a historian.
    9
  3.  @standardreplicantKD6-3.7  I don't believe in anything "neo". I'm a liberal, and I don't believe the large majority represent the healthy side of the definition, they always take it to the extreme. It's basically corrupted by uneducated individuals.
    8
  4.  EPC 1522  With that statement, it proves you've done absolutely no research whatsoever. Where are you getting this information from, I'm genuinely curious? Mainstream media and the former government?
    3
  5.  @TheDragonageorigins  Well, that's the issue of what's wrong with these terminologies, is that nobody does research to find out the origins. I don't support both parties of the US, because they're equally corrupt.
    2
  6.  MAGA MAN2020  No, everything is right with liberalism, it's what progresses our society and helps bring reform.
    2
  7.  @Clarozvozone  Sure, lol, thanks for the criticism.
    1
  8.  @williamgullett5911  Look up FDR. He was a liberal who got everyone out of the Great Depression. I'm a liberal and I don't support "gun confiscations"? I also believe abortion should be available, and not be shunned by a theocratic system based in certain regions of the US. No, I already said both parties are equally corrupt, so I don't support any of them and their fake agendas.
    1
  9. William Gullett But the Great Depression ended when FDR was elected and in term?
    1
  10. LizardMan 2500 When FDR was elected, his reforms definitely helped the labor force. I didn’t say anything about FDR, as an individual, stopping the entirety that was the Great Depression, which meant the world. You could say the same about WW1 and the US making the most money, since we didn’t join until 1917, a year before the war was ending. It’s still a fact, lol. No, the federal states that are anti-abortion are mostly Bible Belt states. That’s why theocracy is correlated with the issue. It’s the women’s body, so again, I have to disagree.
    1
  11. EPC 1522 That’s not true at all. You obviously consider human livelihood and morality. It’s all about principles and integrity. You’re thinking of the present and the future, and how to help society based on innovative ideals. Again, where are you getting this info from? You still didn’t answer me?
    1
  12. LizardMan 2500 Obviously I’m talking about the US, that’s why I specifically mentioned FDR. I was also talking about liberalism, and FDR was a liberal who said this many times in his public speeches. As long as you kill the baby at an earlier stage, then morally, I can’t condemn the act. Technology just isn’t the issue, though? If the parent(s) can’t have the baby, based on a number of dysfunctional or financial issues...then what is the future of the child? There’s too many factors to deal with, and all the responsibility ends up on the mother who can’t be responsible. That’s why, ultimately, I think the mother should have the choice.
    1
  13. EPC 1522 It seems like you’re talking about “neoliberalism”, no? You should look up Ayn Rand, who had a similar philosophy. Lol, but what you’re referencing is not liberalism? It sounds like complete anarchy to me. I highly doubt you read any information on the topic, since you sound confused on these terminologies. I already said I was a liberal? Which means you’re saying I don’t have integrity and intelligence? Lol, transsexual and homosexual feelings have been around forever? Paganism supported both those feelings, until modern paganism set standards on how a human should act. By saying all this, it means you don’t understand the fundamentals of history.
    1
  14. William Gullett It wasn’t magic? His reforms took time to impact society. You mean the conspiracy that FDR made an opening at Pear Harbor so he had a reason to join the war? It’s a conspiracy for a reason, but I don’t know about that one.
    1
  15. LizardMan 2500 No, I just gave examples. The main point is that it should be a human right to do what you want. That’s what liberalism stands for, human rights. If we’re talking about Japanese Americans during WW2, the same happened during WW1 with German Americans. But what happened to the Japanese Americans were far worse (more than two thousands Japanese Americans died), and that is something I don’t support when it comes to FDR; his wife didn’t support his decision either. During WW2, Italians and Germans were also put into interment camps along with the Japanese. It’s all about factors, yes, and that is something we may have differences in, but I still support human rights. If the mother chooses not to have the baby, then she should have the right to not have it. It’s not entirely banned in all of the US? Abortion is still available, but there may be boundaries depending on the state.
    1
  16. William Gullett That’s not true at all. There’s evidence that FDR and his reforms slowly helped society rise up from unemployment. War did particularly help the US, just like it did during WW1.
    1
  17.  @williamgullett5911  Oh yea, you mean Hitler? The US was still hit the most severely because that's where it came from. FDR did help a lot, but as you said, the war finished the job.
    1