Comments by "David Wong" (@davidwong5197) on "Hong Kong Reporter Beaten at Pro-Beijing Rally" video.

@jvs333 anyone that disagreed with them are goons. Reading the comments , I realized the rioters is not fighting for freedom, they are fighting for denying freedom to others.
6
@victorotero3157 You need to read more. Rubio is also pushing a bill to legally steal Huawei's IP. They are doing everything they can to sabotage China because they have trouble competing with China.
1
@victorotero3157 You are misinformed by US propaganda. BT (British Telecom), DT (Deutsche Telecom) Both verified there is no backdoor/spying in their equipment. Microsoft (an American Company) CEO Smith had asked State Deparment publicly to provide proof China is spying, they cannot. IP theft has been debunked. Huawei owned 1/3 of all 5G patents. Because of the US ban on Huawei, Verizon now has to pay $1B in licensing fee. To avoid the fee Rubio has proposed a bill that disallow Huawei from collecting this fee, legalized IP theft. All these facts can be googled. Don't be deceived by propaganda.
1
@victorotero3157 Dude everybody spy. US has 17 Spying agency. They even spy on their ally. UK has MI6. I don't really care. But accusing a business of spying without proof is plain wrong. 5G is a standard you can't use it with AI. As a matter of fact you can't even use 5G for spying because the source address is encrypted. Spying can only be achieved using the management layer made by Cisco. This is why the technical community including those in US are up in arm. Actually, I am looking forward to the passing of Rubio's bill. Because it creates a precedent, now everybody can infringe on US's patents as well. The pharmaceutical companies now scream the loudest.
1
@victorotero3157 No. The forwarding table is encrypted. This means when data are received by the 5Gcell. The 5v G cell would not know where it is going or where is it from. Only the centralized management will know the full route and this system is made by Cisco. If you don't know the address, then you can't tell who is sending the message to whom. Let say if I tap your phone, I need to know what your phone number is and check if you are active. But in this case I have no way of knowing if you are making a call. So I will have to look at every single message in the entire country. That is simply impossible. This is why Microsoft's CEO asked for proof. And he is not pro-China. Huawei is not under any law suit. They are being black listed. FCC also now want to get rid of all Huawei equipment installed. Majority of the Huawei stuffs are bought by rural operator. Some operators already complaining because it will cost billions and they can't afford it. See US just can't stand being number 2 so they have to sabotage Huawei. Recently, they blacklisted another company that is number 1 in drone for security reason. Excuse me, this is a fucking toy and you have the remote. What's next? Black list BBQ pork buns.
1
@victorotero3157 It is not a VPN. VPN has encrypted data, but not the address and a proxy server. This does not encrypted data only the address. Look , this is a wireless system. So the data goes everywhere, you can simply cloned the address and snoop. In this case you can't get the address. There is a speculation that US opposed 5G because it affect their ability to spy.
1
@victorotero3157 Come to think of it. It is more like a leased line than a VPN. Any way, BT and DT verified there is no security risk. I have not read their report. I don't even know if they are on line. You can try and search for them. The news is definitely on line.
1