Comments by "David Wong" (@davidwong5197) on "SUPERCUT: Stacey Plaskett And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Battle Throughout Dramatic Weaponization Hearing" video.

  1. Best idea I heard so far. But let me add any acusation must be supported by evidence or they can shut down the speech. Opinion piece are allowed but clearly marked as such. Bring back equal time as well.
    10
  2.  @davidrounds3245  There is a preamble you missed. "if the issue is personal accusation". Shouldn't you find out the truth first before you denounce someone in public? I always found it funny, when the judge strik something out in witness testimony as if that will wipe the comment out of jury's head.
    3
  3.  @virtualenvironmentfellowsh6671  If US want free speech, Free Julian Asange. I dobn't see any Republican or Democrat advocating. And if this hearing is about free speech why is Julian Assange and Glenn Greenwald not invited?
    2
  4. He brought it on himself by not presenting all the facts and kissing up to the populist. It is true he is only against an ingredient in a vaccine. But he generalized it to get support from the anti-vax crowd. He supported the Israel military aid until he debated Glenn Greenwald on why we should fund Israel when they have a higher living standard than US. He reversed direction and promised to look into it. I like Kennedy and tried to get as much information as I can because I beleived he has been defamed. But the latest episode had me worry, the ethenic differential study on COVID he cited is not what he had claimed. It was a study of 81000 DNA samples and did not have a conclusion the COVID is bioengineered. He basically took an article shoe horned to fit his agenda. In a way that's better than Trump and Biden, they just make things up. That has been a sad day forme, I have lost hope.
    1
  5.  @MrLawDawg  This is a BS show. Free Julian Assange then I beleive the hearing is ledgitimate. How about tell me why banning book is free speech or money IS speech (Citizen United)
    1
  6. No. It is party before country. Biden cannot debate anyone, neither can Trump. By promoting RFK, they can weaken Biden. And they don't think RFK can beat Biden. Just you wait. When RFK defeated Biden, the Pub will change their tune.
    1
  7. Are the Republicans trying to promote free speech by banning books? republicans supporting free speech is a oxymoron.
    1
  8. The scientific study did not say what he said. Read it, I did. I am very disappointed with RFK.
    1
  9.  @madisynissaquah243  Actually not. They did not censor him. They demonized him, that's even worse.
    1
  10.  @madisynissaquah243  I am talking about Colin K, but I will tell you why I care about this hearing. Because I care about the truth. I care why a free speech hearing did not invite Julian Assange and Glen Greenwald. I care that this is just a political stunt than a real hearing.
    1
  11. If they can not be represented, then let them be independent. Cut Puerto Rico off and let them be independent. Maybe China will bail them out.
    1
  12.  @gianni_schicchi  Puerto Rico has applied. What happened? So you believe people wants to be in a colony rather than an union? Congress said the vote is non-binding. Huh? Washington DC is not a territory right? How com they have no representation in the senate?
    1
  13.  @damianwallace-be3ck  So I can buy a stinger missle?
    1
  14.  @nova396  Great then it is totally oK for Ukraine to sell stinger missle to Mexican Cartel.
    1
  15.  @maxgamesst1  The problem is that it is not the purpose nor a conclusion of the paper he cited. (there is no conclusion). It is a study of two specific element of DNA and its reaction to COVID. RFK used this as an evidence that COVID is bioengineered to target white and black.
    1
  16.  @virtualenvironmentfellowsh6671  True they said black and brown people suffered more compared to white. RFK said it targeted WHITE and black.
    1
  17.  @maxgamesst1  He did. He was talking about ethenic target bioweapon and then cited COVID. Yes he did add he did not know for sure. Then he continued. So if he doesn't know for sure should he ne implying it is true? Moreover, the paper he cited DID NOT say what he said. I encourage you to read the paper. The way I see it is he is trying to shoe horn the paper into his agenda. Well, nothing wrong with that all politicians do it. And that's the problem with America, people make up shit to justify their agenda. Does the Inflation reduction act really reduce inflation, or is the Patriot Act really patriotic, I was foolish to think RFK was better than that.
    1
  18.  @maxgamesst1  Are you talking about this paper he tweeted? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/ Show me where it said COVID ethnic targeting white and black. My problem is not anti-bioweapon. My problem is him mispresenting the fact. How do I know he doesn't lie about other stuff.
    1
  19. So the MAGA folks are going to vote for him. LOL. Be careful what you wish for. RFK might just beat Trump.
    1