Comments by "cosmosofinfinity" (@cosmosofinfinity) on "" video.
-
If the federal government can ban marijuana since 1970-today or alcohol from 1920-2933, or in other words MANDATE that all bodies must be free of a particular substance, why can't they mandate that all bodies HAVE a particular substance, i.e. a vaccine? They are already making dictations on what substances CAN'T go in a body, so what is really the difference from that and saying a substance MUST go in a body?
The government has been making dictations and mandates on what we do with our bodies for ages, cops can fondle you just for THINKING you have a harmless substance like marijuana, pro-lifers believe pregnant women's bodies are government property, we have the Patriot Act flagrantly violating the 4th amendment of the Constitution every damn day, so what's different now?
Oh, it actually helps people, got it, we only care about the law as an obstacle when it comes to something what would actually help people, but if it is bald-faced unproductive trespassing with no moral basis, THAT'S when the law can be comfortably ignored.
1
-
1