Comments by "Random Thoughts" (@anuragsinha2013) on "andrew gold | heretics." channel.

  1. Morden politics can be explained in simple words. 1) Intersectionality (Red Green alliance) 2) Inversion of morality (Religion of Peace) 3) Diversion Deception Slander (Main trick of Bassem Yousef and Mehdi Hassan) Tricks of Mehdi Hasan and Baseem Yousef 1) Diversion (Whataboutism) 2) Deception (Pull a lost in translation,You don't understand Arabic interpretations) 3) Slander (Call of Islamophobia by Islamofascist) So Just remember, Political ally of the left "Religion of Peace" is not to be blamed for it. Osama bin Laden used to say "we have to use democracies (country) against democracies (Country) and you have to infiltrate and get inside a democracy to weaken it from the inside" case in point: Bassem Yousef, Mehdi Hassan and Hassan piker, Cenk Ugyur, illhan Omar and Rashida Talib. Erdogan was also mainly in favour of using immigration as a tool to infiltrate Germany and weaken it's Democracy. I love it how people keep telling us about these "Moderate Mussies" in the "religion of peace" but somehow they never show up against Boko haram, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Thani' Qatar, Taliban or Grooming gangs etc etc but they all showed up against Israel after October 7. They all show up to do politics in the Kuffar land. There are people in the world who give a lot of credit to George Bush for the "Islam is a Religion of Peace" statement. George Bush also said the Iraq war was necessary because Saddam Hussein had WMDs and he collaborated with Osama Bin Laden on September 11 attacks. Turns out, George Bush is wrong on both accounts.
    190
  2. 17
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. There is a tendency on the Right to think that the Left is dumb and stupid and doesn't know better and somehow the Left wing is also liberal. The Left is really smart and cunning.They know very well what they are doing with the RED GREEN ALLIANCE and when they are flirting with ISLAMOLEFTISM or trying to form a CHR-ISLAM alliance (which even the Right does sometimes). They know it very well that Fascism is a very left wing trait. The moment they get called out on these topics they simply shed thier skin and change their colours like a chameleon, Shift the Goal post and say that, "They are to the Left on these issues" of their LEADER they elected or that their LEADER is not Left Wing but actually Right Wing or simply that they didn't leave the LEFT, the LEFT left them, and they are actually more LIBERAL and not that LEFT. (The Left wants permanent political power that's the shortest possible route that they have found) When the Islamist say that "they are also against the Grooming Gangs or terrorists attack" they are saying that because IT MAKES THEM OR THEIR RELIGION LOOK BAD, it's also because it might cause a backlash of Islamophobia so that would affect them, and these crimes also affect them as well, and in the vast majority of victims of these crimes by radical Islamist are actually muslims. These are merely self centred and Narcissistic accounts by the community to deflect the blame from the Islam to just "people in Islam" (just bad apples argument). But that's not actually correct because they also claim that the radicals don't have anything to do with islam and they also care to be very concerned with Islamophobia (The Doctrine and people don't have any connection). These are just diversion, deception and Slander tactics of Islamist. I love it how people keep telling us about these "Moderate Mussies" in the "religion of peace" but somehow they never show up against Boko haram, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Thani' Qatar, Taliban or Grooming gangs etc etc but they all showed up against Israel after October 7.
    2
  20. 2
  21. 1
  22. Islamoleftism is Islamophobia according to Al Jazeera. Multiple claims of Islamist. 1) They are facing Holocaust like the Jews (Victim Claim) 2) They are the fastest growing religion in the world (so, it's a bit like Christianity in numbers so it's diverse and large and you are not allowed to be critical of vast swathes of people who believe in this ideology) also the claim is...if islam is expansionist then so is Christianity, So don't criticise of us because we have the numbers and doing the same things you do. 3) Any Criticism of islam is Islamophobia as it is a religion of black and brown people (except islam kills a lot of black and brown people and also white people) but you can't be critical of it because you are white. 4) Islamist have killed people,(white, black, brown) and people are being killed in the name of islam but it has nothing to do with islam and any reaction from other side is racist, Islamophobic and a Holocaust. 5) Islam has done a lot of violence around the world but Christianity has done a lot of violence around the world (So don't criticise us). Islam has done violence since the Prophet Muhammad but still it's a religion of Peace. 6) Don't talk about Islamoleftism because it's a bit like Jewish Bolshevism. 7) Islamist borrows Native American story in the Palestinian conflict 8) Islamist uses the Story of the Black Americans in the American Context. 9) Don't talk about islamic Colonialism because of British Colonialism in India and America. The question to you guys is... Are you willing to fall for these tricks again? Are you falling for these tricks again and again? How long are you ready to fall for these tricks?
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingfull participant in the project, The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water, and The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it. When intellectuals criticize Islam it's called Islam it's called Islamophobic. When Political figures criticize Islam it's called they are called Demagouges. When Political Activists criticize Islam it's called Far Right Extremist. May be the Left should just say the Left and Islam are above criticism. That's the marriage of islamo Leftism has come up with. Marry the Left Wing Authoritarianism with Islamic totalitarianism to get political power. I also disagree with anyone who thinks that America is an ally in a clash against political islam. America is too tied with countries like Saudi Arabia (oil) and Qatar (Natural Gas) to do anything about it. Also in many cases America has actually funded Radical Islam against countries that it does not like. Even to the point of funding Militant islamic outlets. What Americans generally care about is MONEY and nothing else, till money keeps flowing from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and it seems profitable to America, they'll look the other way and do nothing. Most people cannot see a new situation until it hits them. America will always do the wrong thing till a couple of planes hit a building in New York or in pearl harbour and then America will forced to do the right thing. America was the last one to enter the world war and the first one to take the credit once the world war was won.
    1
  29. They are not only motivated by Khomenism, They are not only motivated by Wahabism, They are not only motivated by Islamism, They are not only motivated by Muslim Brotherhood, They are not only motivated by Shiaism, They are not only motivated by Sunnism, They are mainly motivated by Islam. Why are we pretending that all these ideologies have nothing to do with Islam? There is nothing called "Anti-war Left" just as there is nothing such as Islam being a "Religion of Peace". Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot and Chairman Mao have put more people in body bags than most Warlords in history. In the name of Jihad Prophet Muhammad' Islam has managed to kill 270 million people. They all have the same doctrine for the Kuffars. Can you apply the Noam Chumpsky' Nuremberg principles on the Prophet Muhammad or will it be too Islamophobic for Noam Chumpsky? The islamist derive thier power from one thing, they know that America, Britain and France on one side and Russia, China and India on the other side have too many disputes among themselves and are not be ready to drop off thier differences to confront the real threat of islam, while they practice the Brotherhood. Once all of us unite against islam then they will run out of thier "whataboutism" tricks. In my view, I don't think America will be up for the task in the clash of civilizations against islamic totalitarianism, because "THE DOLLAR LAND" cares more about it's financial intrest in Oil and Natural Gas that are tied to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. As a "Kaffir" one has to say, Sometimes there is a wrong analysis of the "Religion of Peace" that gets repeated so often that it becomes more mainstream. In the words of Christopher Hitchens "There is a civil war within the islamic world and they have brought that civil war to west. That's a completely new situation." With due respect to Hitchens he was right and wrong about it. The Shia' and the Sunnis have the same doctrine about the Kaffirs. This is not a passive doctrine but an active doctrine regardless of the the two sects of the religion. In thier war cry, They often call upon 1.8 billion muslims, they claim to be the fastest growing religion in the world with 49 countries in thier grip with the most important natural resource (oil and natural gas) under their control. They also boast about being the final revelation with a totalitarian doctrine. The prophet (one who must not be disrespected) has to be never ever be disrespected even by the non believers "Or Else". There are prescribed punishment of death for Atheist, Polythiest, Idolatry, Jews, and Apostates and once that job is done they'll go after Christians and replicate life, the prophet Muhammad way.(Name any other religion that has that). This is a religion of a sadist. We are practicing self deception if we don't see this. Obviously most Islamist believe that in the "islamic world" the Shia' will have to go under the sword because Shia' are not following the true branch of the religion. If right wins over the wrong, if good wins over evil, and if this is your view, then someone explain it to me why did prophet Muhammad, Khalid bin Waleed, Mohammad Ghouri, Mahmud Ghazni and Taimur the Lame win so many wars while committing atrocities around the globe. We often get told by the Left and Islamist about how America is only interested in war in the Middle East because of the Oil. We have to remind them that when islam was in the peak of it's power, they were raping, pilageging, looting gold from temples and taking slaves. May be some Micheal Moore will make a movie about it. For the past 20 years there has been a debate on the same topic "Islam is a religion of Peace." I have seen Douglas Murray do one 10 years ago. I have seen Christopher Hitchens do one 15 years ago. I have seen others intellectuals do one 20 years ago. The point of these debates have become one thing only, which is to make this "Topic of Islam" merely a topic of academic discussion, so that no one demands any action but only to stifle or delay any action, till the barbarist reach our gates and then everyone is just forced to bend thier views to suit the views of this new electoral constituency.
    1
  30. They are not only motivated by Khomenism, They are not only motivated by Wahabism, They are not only motivated by Islamism, They are not only motivated by Muslim Brotherhood, They are not only motivated by Shiaism, They are not only motivated by Sunnism, They are mainly motivated by Islam. Why are we pretending that all these ideologies have nothing to do with Islam? There is nothing called "Anti-war Left" just as there is nothing such as Islam being a "Religion of Peace". Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot and Chairman Mao have put more people in body bags than most Warlords in history. In the name of Jihad Prophet Muhammad' Islam has managed to kill 270 million people. They all have the same doctrine for the Kuffars. Can you apply the Noam Chumpsky' Nuremberg principles on the Prophet Muhammad or will it be too Islamophobic for Noam Chumpsky? The islamist derive thier power from one thing, they know that America, Britain and France on one side and Russia, China and India on the other side have too many disputes among themselves and are not be ready to drop off thier differences to confront the real threat of islam, while they practice the Brotherhood. Once all of us unite against islam then they will run out of thier "whataboutism" tricks. In my view, I don't think America will be up for the task in the clash of civilizations against islamic totalitarianism, because "THE DOLLAR LAND" cares more about it's financial intrest in Oil and Natural Gas that are tied to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. As a "Kaffir" one has to say, Sometimes there is a wrong analysis of the "Religion of Peace" that gets repeated so often that it becomes more mainstream. In the words of Christopher Hitchens "There is a civil war within the islamic world and they have brought that civil war to west. That's a completely new situation." With due respect to Hitchens he was right and wrong about it. The Shia' and the Sunnis have the same doctrine about the Kaffirs. This is not a passive doctrine but an active doctrine regardless of the the two sects of the religion. In thier war cry, They often call upon 1.8 billion muslims, they claim to be the fastest growing religion in the world with 49 countries in thier grip with the most important natural resource (oil and natural gas) under their control. They also boast about being the final revelation with a totalitarian doctrine. The prophet (one who must not be disrespected) has to be never ever be disrespected even by the non believers "Or Else". There are prescribed punishment of death for Atheist, Polythiest, Idolatry, Jews, and Apostates and once that job is done they'll go after Christians and replicate life, the prophet Muhammad way.(Name any other religion that has that). This is a religion of a sadist. We are practicing self deception if we don't see this. Obviously most Islamist believe that in the "islamic world" the Shia' will have to go under the sword because Shia' are not following the true branch of the religion. If right wins over the wrong, if good wins over evil, and if this is your view, then someone explain it to me why did prophet Muhammad, Khalid bin Waleed, Mohammad Ghouri, Mahmud Ghazni and Taimur the Lame win so many wars while committing atrocities around the globe. We often get told by the Left and Islamist about how America is only interested in war in the Middle East because of the Oil. We have to remind them that when islam was in the peak of it's power, they were raping, pilageging, looting gold from temples and taking slaves. May be some Micheal Moore will make a movie about it. For the past 20 years there has been a debate on the same topic "Islam is a religion of Peace." I have seen Douglas Murray do one 10 years ago. I have seen Christopher Hitchens do one 15 years ago. I have seen others intellectuals do one 20 years ago. The point of these debates have become one thing only, which is to make this "Topic of Islam" merely a topic of academic discussion, so that no one demands any action but only to stifle or delay any action, till the barbarist reach our gates and then everyone is just forced to bend thier views to suit the views of this new electoral constituency.
    1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. Of all the Critics of Islam, Professor Bill Warner is the Best. Others are 1) Bill Warner 2) Robert Spencer 3) Christopher Hitchens 4) Sam Harris 5) Douglas Murray 6) David Wood 7) Apostate Prophet These guys are also good but Prof Bill Warner is the best. https://youtu.be/ylsxVzdHcaA Political islam cspii islam methodology https://youtu.be/YF1TNcugtLE Political islam in Kaffir politics. Diversion, Deception and Slander. https://youtu.be/6iDgppye9f8 Every one is fed up with academic debates about Islam. It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century). Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics. The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*. But eventually they will retort back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history. To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia. Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy. On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingfull participant in the project, The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water, and The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it. The transition that the left makes from Secularism to Pseudo secularism to Pro Islamism is a great mental gymnastics. Orwellian magic of Noam Chumpsky Left War is peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strength 1) Islam is a religion of War But let's call Islam is a religion of Peace 2) Let's Celebrate Qatari and Chinese Freedom is Slavery to build Stadiums and I phones.(Hide thier strength and bide thier time) Boko haram and Isis taking sex slaves is thier freedom to practice thier own religion. Wearing burka is Freedom while western women practice slavery of internalized mysoginy. 3) Ignorance of the Scripture like Quran and Hadith is thier Strength Do you really think when Al Jazeera puts Noam Chumpsky on the air waves in Qatar state televison do you really think they are interested in a human rights or international law or two state solution or LGBTQ rights. He is a useful idiot for their propaganda. No, they are interested in manipulation of America politics and foreign policy. They are generally the mouth piece for thier General Alladin' and it's thier media spouts thier official state policy (the one they can't openly say). The Broader pattern on the Left has always been it's Blind Sport and appeasement of Islam for political power. You can see this same pattern in Gandhi, Noam Chumpsky, Yanis varofakis, Barack Obama, Justin Trudeau, Jeremy Corbyn and Bernie Sanders. Islamofascism is on the rise in the west not Islamophobia.
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1