Comments by "Random Thoughts" (@anuragsinha2013) on "The Woke Left's HYPOCRITICAL Pact With Islam - Faisal al Mutar | heretics. 64" video.

  1. They are not only motivated by Khomenism, They are not only motivated by Wahabism, They are not only motivated by Islamism, They are not only motivated by Muslim Brotherhood, They are not only motivated by Shiaism, They are not only motivated by Sunnism, They are mainly motivated by Islam. Why are we pretending that all these ideologies have nothing to do with Islam? There is nothing called "Anti-war Left" just as there is nothing such as Islam being a "Religion of Peace". Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot and Chairman Mao have put more people in body bags than most Warlords in history. In the name of Jihad Prophet Muhammad' Islam has managed to kill 270 million people. They all have the same doctrine for the Kuffars. Can you apply the Noam Chumpsky' Nuremberg principles on the Prophet Muhammad or will it be too Islamophobic for Noam Chumpsky? The islamist derive thier power from one thing, they know that America, Britain and France on one side and Russia, China and India on the other side have too many disputes among themselves and are not be ready to drop off thier differences to confront the real threat of islam, while they practice the Brotherhood. Once all of us unite against islam then they will run out of thier "whataboutism" tricks. In my view, I don't think America will be up for the task in the clash of civilizations against islamic totalitarianism, because "THE DOLLAR LAND" cares more about it's financial intrest in Oil and Natural Gas that are tied to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. As a "Kaffir" one has to say, Sometimes there is a wrong analysis of the "Religion of Peace" that gets repeated so often that it becomes more mainstream. In the words of Christopher Hitchens "There is a civil war within the islamic world and they have brought that civil war to west. That's a completely new situation." With due respect to Hitchens he was right and wrong about it. The Shia' and the Sunnis have the same doctrine about the Kaffirs. This is not a passive doctrine but an active doctrine regardless of the the two sects of the religion. In thier war cry, They often call upon 1.8 billion muslims, they claim to be the fastest growing religion in the world with 49 countries in thier grip with the most important natural resource (oil and natural gas) under their control. They also boast about being the final revelation with a totalitarian doctrine. The prophet (one who must not be disrespected) has to be never ever be disrespected even by the non believers "Or Else". There are prescribed punishment of death for Atheist, Polythiest, Idolatry, Jews, and Apostates and once that job is done they'll go after Christians and replicate life, the prophet Muhammad way.(Name any other religion that has that). This is a religion of a sadist. We are practicing self deception if we don't see this. Obviously most Islamist believe that in the "islamic world" the Shia' will have to go under the sword because Shia' are not following the true branch of the religion. If right wins over the wrong, if good wins over evil, and if this is your view, then someone explain it to me why did prophet Muhammad, Khalid bin Waleed, Mohammad Ghouri, Mahmud Ghazni and Taimur the Lame win so many wars while committing atrocities around the globe. We often get told by the Left and Islamist about how America is only interested in war in the Middle East because of the Oil. We have to remind them that when islam was in the peak of it's power, they were raping, pilageging, looting gold from temples and taking slaves. May be some Micheal Moore will make a movie about it. For the past 20 years there has been a debate on the same topic "Islam is a religion of Peace." I have seen Douglas Murray do one 10 years ago. I have seen Christopher Hitchens do one 15 years ago. I have seen others intellectuals do one 20 years ago. The point of these debates have become one thing only, which is to make this "Topic of Islam" merely a topic of academic discussion, so that no one demands any action but only to stifle or delay any action, till the barbarist reach our gates and then everyone is just forced to bend thier views to suit the views of this new electoral constituency.
    1