Comments by "Random Thoughts" (@anuragsinha2013) on "UnHerd" channel.

  1. 8
  2. 7
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. Multiple claims of Islamist. 1) They are facing Holocaust like the Jews (Victim Claim) 2) They are the fastest growing religion in the world (so, it's a bit like Christianity in numbers so it's diverse and large and you are not allowed to be critical of vast swathes of people who believe in this ideology) also the claim is...if islam is expansionist then so is Christianity, So don't criticise of us because we have the numbers and doing the same things you do. 3) Any Criticism of islam is Islamophobia as it is a religion of black and brown people (except islam kills a lot of black and brown people and also white people) but you can't be critical of it because you are white. 4) Islamist have killed people,(white, black, brown) and people are being killed in the name of islam but it has nothing to do with islam and any reaction from other side is racist, Islamophobic and a Holocaust. 5) Islam has done a lot of violence around the world but Christianity has done a lot of violence around the world (So don't criticise us). Islam has done violence since the Prophet Muhammad but still it's a religion of Peace. 6) Don't talk about Islamoleftism because it's a bit like Jewish Bolshevism. 7) Islamist borrows Native American story in the Palestinian conflict 8) Islamist uses the Story of Black Americans in the American Context. The question to you guys is... Are you willing to fall for these tricks again? Are you falling for these tricks again and again? How long are you ready to fall for these tricks?
    2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. China is no more authoritarian than it was, during the Chairman Mao days or during Deng Xiaoping or Xi Jinping. In fact they are much closer to the kinds of countries, rulers, dictatorships and establishments America normally aligns itself with. The only problem that Americans have with China is that, Right now they are within hitting distance of dethroning America from its number 1 spot. America is acting like a TINPOT DICTATOR of the world that is butt hurt by the success of new kid on the block that is China. They wanted to separate China from the Soviet union because the combined force of those two would be a bit too much to handle for America. (As it happened during the Korean war and Vietnam war even if they can't win they can create a stalemate). They didn't want to be close to China because they like China or have respect for Chinese. They came close to them because they hate the Soviet Union (Russia) more. It's not because they "thought" China will become some kind of democracy because of capitalism in China. China was brought in the WTO as a way to lure them away from Russia. The same way they courted Putin too because they were beginning to be weary of Chinese ambitions at the same time. Converting China into a democracy is a silly story they tell the kids in "Georgetown and Columbia University" to Propagandise them (and call it education). America is in the business of hating others and loving itself. (No wonder Self Loving Donald Trump is the president of the United States) Making China a democracy, was neither the goal, nor was it ever going to happen and every one knew it. Neither did the Chinese ever had any willingness to become a democracy of any sorts. What America hates is, China has committed the blasphemy of developing so fast, becoming the second largest economy in the world and that it became a natural contender to America and a direct threat to it's superpower status, that's the only mistake of the Chinese. In World War 2, Europe was destroyed itself because of a direct clash between the European Empires and the rest of the world was living under the boots of colonialism while being robbed of their honour and wealth by their colonial masters and were subjugated completely, they also faced the effects of the war. America was the last man standing after world war 2 mainly because of it's geography. America ran from the third base to fourth base and called themselves a winner of the WORLD SERIES. Since Deng Xiaoping, China has run from first base and now they have nearly caught up with America. The name of the game is Capitalism, who knew China was going to be so good at it. There is a side of America that every one sees but we continue to ignore, this obsession with being number 1 (whatever that means). Have you ever asked what happens if someday, because of some situations they are not number 1? What happens if they are not number 1? They will burn the world to the ground if they are not number 1. Americans are just that Jingoistic. America is the only country that has used nuclear weapons and nalpalm chemical weapons (and who knows might be even biological weapons). They used nukes on Japan which is racially, religiously and linguistically a different country to America. (As an act of Revenge-"not to end the war" as they have advertised) They would have never used nukes on Italy and Germany. (America is a Right wing, Nationalistic, Capitalistic, Christian, Conservative country, Predominantly ethnically White just like Italy and Germany) Not to mention, there is only one country that came into being by a Genocide of the natives and then dropped two nukes to become the super power in the world. (Which they made with the help of Nazi and Commie scientists) If you look at them since 2016 they are getting crazier and crazier.
    1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. Take away France Elections by votes in 2017 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 883,573= 17 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 8,926,901= 350 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 1,590,869 = 8 seats 4) Republicans: 4,898,061 = 136 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2022 1) Jean Luc Melenchon : 6,556,198= 131 seats 2) Emanuele Macron EN: 8,002,419= 245 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 3,589,465= 82 seats 4) Republicans: 1,512,181 = 64 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2024 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 7,040,198= 180 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 6,692,358 = 159 seats 3) Jordan Bardella(La penn): 10,110,079 = 142 seats 4) Republicans: 1,474,721 = 39 seats Centrist plus Far Left minus Marine La Penn= Outcome of French 2024 Election Elections are won by People mainly because people vote against somebody rather than for somebody. Usually politicians kick the can down the road but in this case, Instead of the politicians, the French people have kicked the can down the road this time. Things always seem to get worse in France before it starts to get better. In 7 years Macron has been built up and then slowly facing a complete wipe out. Going forward there will be 2 political parties in France, National Rally and Jean luc Melenchon' Far Left. Till then, France should keep on doing what it's doing, which is 1) Drink Wine 2) Smoke a cigarette 3) Talk about Philosophie. I have tried to lift France out the mud, But she will return to her errors and vomitings, one cannot prevent the French for being French.:- Charles De Gaulle
    1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. Just for Context because we are playing this game of Left Right and Centre is being played. What is the Left Right and Centre in the "Islamic world."? (Muslim brotherhood, ISIS, Wahabism, Al-Qaeda, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran,Iraq,Turkey and Syria) Qatar is Muslim brotherhood (Right wing) Saudi Arabia Wahabi (Right wing) Libya Arab Socialism under Gaddafi (Left wing) Syria Ba' athist party Bashar Al Assad (Left wing) Iraq Saddam Hussein Ba' athist party (Left wing) No idea who is the centre? Here in democratic Countries. On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingful participant in the project, The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water, and The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it. Islamophobia is the favourite word and a topic of the so called "left wing liberals" who generally dance to the tune of Dirhams and Dinars as self identified Dhimmis. Islamophobia is by far the stupidest word I have heard in my life. The left has always found a safe space in authoritarian movements no wonder they have found themselves aligned with Islam. The Left has always been Crypto Fascist and the recent marches show us that. Everyone is fed up with academic debates about Islam. It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century). Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics. The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*. But eventually they will revert back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history. To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia. Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy. It's basically as simple as Islam vs the Kaffirs and everything else is a smoke show. In the Sunni world all Shia' will be put under the sword. None of what "Islam" has to offer is actually Great including the Iranian regime which had an uprising with the Islamic Left Communist party. There are 3 power factions in the islamic world or middle East 1) Saudi Arabia 2) Iran 3) Turkey (Ottomans) Cut the head of all the 3 snakes and you will get a desired result in the in the region.
    1
  71. Take away France Elections by votes in 2017 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 883,573= 17 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 8,926,901= 350 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 1,590,869 = 8 seats 4) Republicans: 4,898,061 = 136 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2022 1) Jean Luc Melenchon : 6,556,198= 131 seats 2) Emanuele Macron EN: 8,002,419= 245 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 3,589,465= 82 seats 4) Republicans: 1,512,181 = 64 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2024 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 7,040,198= 180 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 6,692,358 = 159 seats 3) Jordan Bardella(La penn): 10,110,079 = 142 seats 4) Republicans: 1,474,721 = 39 seats Centrist plus Far Left minus Marine La Penn= Outcome of French 2024 Election Elections are won by People mainly because people vote against somebody rather than for somebody. Usually politicians kick the can down the road but in this case, Instead of the politicians, the French people have kicked the can down the road this time. Things always seem to get worse in France before it starts to get better. In 7 years Macron has been built up and then slowly facing a complete wipe out. Going forward there will be 2 political parties in France, National Rally and Jean luc Melenchon' Far Left. Till then, France should keep on doing what it's doing, which is 1) Drink Wine 2) Smoke a cigarette 3) Talk about Philosophie. I have tried to lift France out the mud, But she will return to her errors and vomitings, one cannot prevent the French for being French.:- Charles De Gaulle
    1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. Take away France Elections by votes in 2017 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 883,573= 17 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 8,926,901= 350 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 1,590,869 = 8 seats 4) Republicans: 4,898,061 = 136 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2022 1) Jean Luc Melenchon : 6,556,198= 131 seats 2) Emanuele Macron EN: 8,002,419= 245 seats 3) Marine La Penn: 3,589,465= 82 seats 4) Republicans: 1,512,181 = 64 seats Take away France Elections by votes in 2024 1) Jean Luc Melenchon: 7,040,198= 180 seats 2) Emanuele Macron: 6,692,358 = 159 seats 3) Jordan Bardella(La penn): 10,110,079 = 142 seats 4) Republicans: 1,474,721 = 39 seats Centrist plus Far Left minus Marine La Penn= Outcome of French 2024 Election Elections are won by People mainly because people vote against somebody rather than for somebody. Usually politicians kick the can down the road but in this case, Instead of the politicians, the French people have kicked the can down the road this time. Things always seem to get worse in France before it starts to get better. In 7 years Macron has been built up and then slowly facing a complete wipe out. Going forward there will be 2 political parties in France, National Rally and Jean luc Melenchon' Far Left. Till then, France should keep on doing what it's doing, which is 1) Drink Wine 2) Smoke a cigarette 3) Talk about Philosophie. I have tried to lift France out the mud, But she will return to her errors and vomitings, one cannot prevent the French for being French.:- Charles De Gaulle Take aways from the British election by Votes 1) Theresa May 2017: 13,636,684= 317 seats 2) Jeremy Corbyn 2017: 12,877,918 = 262 seats 3) Boris Johnson 2019: 13,966,454 = 365 seats 4) Jeremy Corbyn 2019: 10,269,051 = 213 Seats 5) Kier starmer 2024: 9,704,655= 411 Seats 6) Rishi Sunak 2024: 6,827,311= 121 Seats 7) Nigel Farage 2024: 4,114,221= 5 Seats 8) Ed Davey 2024: 3,519,199= 72 Seats 9) John Swinney 2024: 724,758= 9 Seats "First past the post" system. Things to know about Kier starmer 1) London or Davos? Kier starmer: Davos 2) Kier starmer is a Tony Blair candidate. 3) This is as much as a loss for the British conservatives than a win for Labour, The main story should be that thier is an 8 percent drop in voter turnout in UK. 4) Rishi Sunak was stupid enough to take that job in the very first place, and tried to handle the mess created by David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Theresa May. He took the poison pill and now is facing political death. But, he'll end up in a think tank in New York or Washington or on the board of WEF in Davos. That's just a reality. Sunak and Kier starmer are not very different in that regard. Everyone wanted Brexit but no one knows how to get Brexit done. If you think the Conservatives were bad wait till you see the Kier starmer' Labour. They talk of Political science as if there is any thing scientific about it, and they talk about political philosophy as if it is anything but circular logic. It's just psychology, you have to be able to read the room, and Donald Trump is great at it. At the heart of America' insecurities, is actually the thought, that the Americans didn't win the world war, or atleast they couldn't do it without Russia' help, actually the Soviets have a much bigger contribution in ending the Nazi regime than the Americans, Maybe that's why Americans feel the need to equate everything to world war 2 and draw some kind of a parallel storyline, where their enemies are Hitler and they are Captain America in the movie, they are trying to convince themselves that they had won the war but in thier minds they know it is the Russians who sacrificed a lot more and thier contribution is much more greater. And Yes! Americans were on the winning side but thier main contribution was mainly of weapons supply which is what they do best, they are the largest supplier of weapons in the world.(Lend lease agreement)
    1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. Freddie Sayers, Fiona Hill is not a very good source. She says things which suit her current narrative and completely dismisses what she was saying years ago. She says now, America should not have gone to Afganistan, Iraq, Vietnam and Libya etc. But she supports Ukraine war, Firstly, America should have absolutely have gone to Afganistan. Secondly, she is a shameless diversion artist who has also suggested that "she has talked to introlocuters from around the world" who tell her America when it doesn't get it's way throws it military weight around to get what they want you to do, while also suggesting that she doesn't agree with those interlocutors about Iraq, Vietnam, Korea, Libya and Syria etc. So, what is what "Fiona Hill"??, she has a diversion story for every occasion, which ever suits her interest in the NOW she actually goes with that story. She also tried to spin a bizzare Putin story of him being smelly. If you follow her Career, she's a crazy ideologue and an establishment hack. She's not a great source. They'll keep spinning this fake Ukrainian rotary club story who got on a boat on thier own gumption and stuck military grade explosives 200 mts in the sea. That's how stupid people got tricked by the Saddam Hussein WMDs story. Maybe, Saddam Hussein blew up the Nord stream 2 pipeline with his WMDs. The pro Ukrainian group sounds like the two MAGA hat wearing Nigerian guys who who beat up Jussie Smollett at 3 in the night and threw bleach at him near the Subway where Jussie Smollett had gone to eat a sandwich, and shouted "This is MAGA country".
    1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. The American Left and The American Right both want to interfere in the other countries in the world. Where they differ on, is the targets? There is no Anti war in America, America has been in a war or two every single decade, the marketing of war presidents (by the media) is just different. So, Lyndon B Johnson becomes a "civil war era" rather than "Vietnam war era" president. George Bush becomes like a " Iraq war president" unlike Barack Obama who was just a "First Black president". The media that mainly leans Left markets the democratic party to the population, they just don't see these things clearly. Also, I've Never bought this Churchillian rhetoric that United States is going to do the right thing after it has exhausted all it's options. Infact America has never done the right thing (from the Vietnam war or supporting Mujahideens against Soviets), it has merely ended up on the right side by tumbling down to the solution after the rest of the world has come to the conclusion about what they see as a threat of an existential nature which requires immediate attention and a need to come together. The united states then just hops on to that train, because it's merely forced to take a decision about an matter of extreme importance to the rest of the world, which is what happened during the world war, or War on Terror after it got hit by a couple of planes. Till then it merely takes care of it's narrow intrest like the power of the US dollar or Oil or countries that pose a direct challenge to American power or its hegemony like (Russia or China). Obviously, it is in the other side of the rest of the connected world in a different continent, so it can afford to be ignorant and doesn't experience things first hand basis but has a lofty view of things from an Armchair historians. Trump is very good at reading the room. Trump would care more about Gaza in (Israel Gaza war) than Biden because, in the Trump world the only thing you cannot do is "MAKE TRUMP LOOK BAD" and the war in Gaza in Israel is making Biden look really weak. He might still be supportive of Israel. But Still! Trump wouldn't like Israel to make America (or him) look bad.
    1
  124. Just for Context because we are playing this game of Left Right and Centre is being played. What is the Left Right and Centre in the "Islamic world."? (Muslim brotherhood, ISIS, Wahabism, Al-Qaeda, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran,Iraq,Turkey and Syria) Qatar is Muslim brotherhood (Right wing) Saudi Arabia Wahabi (Right wing) Libya Arab Socialism under Gaddafi (Left wing) Syria Ba' athist party Bashar Al Assad (Left wing) Iraq Saddam Hussein Ba' athist party (Left wing) No idea who is the centre? Here in democratic Countries. On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingful participant in the project, The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water, and The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it. Islamophobia is the favourite word and a topic of the so called "left wing liberals" who generally dance to the tune of Dirhams and Dinars as self identified Dhimmis. Islamophobia is by far the stupidest word I have heard in my life. The left has always found a safe space in authoritarian movements no wonder they have found themselves aligned with Islam. The Left has always been Crypto Fascist and the recent marches show us that. Everyone is fed up with academic debates about Islam. It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century). Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics. The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*. But eventually they will revert back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history. To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia. Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy. It's basically as simple as Islam vs the Kaffirs and everything else is a smoke show. In the Sunni world all Shia' will be put under the sword. None of what "Islam" has to offer is actually Great including the Iranian regime which had an uprising with the Islamic Left Communist party. There are 3 power factions in the islamic world or middle East 1) Saudi Arabia 2) Iran 3) Turkey (Ottomans) Cut the head of all the 3 snakes and you will get a desired result in the in the region.
    1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. https://youtu.be/_WyfsRVgk2Q China is not winning. China has already won. Some people in Washington DC don't understand why India, Russia and others align themselves with China and blame other countries rather than themselves for siding with China which is apparently USA' largest trading partner. China Won and you guys made them Win, Because you wanted to win against Soviet union and Russia.(and drive a wedge between Russia and China). That didn't happen. That didn't work with China. Congratulations USA! You succeeded in making them the biggest economy in the world. Because you thought, if you open up markets to them and welcome them in the WTO, somehow economic progress would make them a "democracy" and They'll seperate themselves from Russia. China' behaviour is a lot like imperial Japan and America itself (imperial japan was also helped by America). People in Washington, don't understand why was Donald Trump' Foreign policy so successful. It was successful because Donald Trump was already living in a multi polar world unlike the current administration which is living in the past and thinks it can somehow manifest a unipolar moment into existence. I'm always sceptical of "Western thought leaders" especially the ones that come across as the ones bullshiting you like 1) Christine Fair 2) Niall Ferguson 3) Ian Bremmer 4) Fiona Hill 5) Anne Marie Slaughter 6) Anne Applebaum 7) Peter Zeihan 8) Michael Mcfaul However, Elbridge Colby comes across as someone who knows what he is talking about. Basically the argument he's been making about China, for a long time is a non violent one (take that as you may). Basically he's been saying that China is creating a Monroe doctrine of thier own. That's what the RCEP, SCO, BRICS, China' Trade with African union (Cobalt mining for Electric cars), China's Middle East policy(Oil and Natural Gas), China' Trade with South America (Lithium Triangle), thier Space program, Artificial islands etc. etc. is all about creating a Monroe doctrine. Someday, they are planning to cut America off the global trade and that would lead to the fall of the American Empire the same way it led to the fall of the "European Empires" with the rise of the American Empire. And, He's not wrong. It's a simple argument rooted in reality. There is less war mongering, less theoretical Political philosophy and more Real Politik.
    1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. Just for Context because we are playing this game of Left Right and Centre is being played. What is the Left Right and Centre in the "Islamic world."? (Muslim brotherhood, ISIS, Wahabism, Al-Qaeda, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Iran,Iraq,Turkey and Syria) Qatar is Muslim brotherhood (Right wing) Saudi Arabia Wahabi (Right wing) Libya Arab Socialism under Gaddafi (Left wing) Syria Ba' athist party Bashar Al Assad (Left wing) Iraq Saddam Hussein Ba' athist party (Left wing) No idea who is the centre? Here in democratic Countries. On the issue of islam the Left(Radical Left, Far left or Mainstream Left) is a willingful participant in the project, The Centre is like a frog in the boiling water, and The Right seems to provide only token resistance to it. Islamophobia is the favourite word and a topic of the so called "left wing liberals" who generally dance to the tune of Dirhams and Dinars as self identified Dhimmis. Islamophobia is by far the stupidest word I have heard in my life. The left has always found a safe space in authoritarian movements no wonder they have found themselves aligned with Islam. The Left has always been Crypto Fascist and the recent marches show us that. Everyone is fed up with academic debates about Islam. It always starts with the First stage of Militant islam in 9/11(I know it predates 9/11 but just talking about this century). Then in the second stage the tone changes now they are doing the Political islam and Subversion tactics. The in the Third stage they will try to sell you the spiritual side of Islam *Sufi Islam*. But eventually they will revert back to the First stage because the ultimate goal of all three tactics of Islam is the same thing all throughout it's history. To subjugate the indigenous peoples bring them in the fold of islam and establish Sharia. Because essentially it's about Islamic Supremacy. It's basically as simple as Islam vs the Kaffirs and everything else is a smoke show. In the Sunni world all Shia' will be put under the sword. None of what "Islam" has to offer is actually Great including the Iranian regime which had an uprising with the Islamic Left Communist party. There are 3 power factions in the islamic world or middle East 1) Saudi Arabia 2) Iran 3) Turkey (Ottomans) 4) Azerbaijan 5) Qatar 6) Pakistan Cut the head of all the first 3 snakes and you will get a desired result in the in the region.
    1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1