Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "I'm Not Convinced - Ukraine War Map Analysis / News Update" video.

Bakhmut is taken. There is no encirclement. It is UA cope. Flanks are not falling.
57
Regarding staging, it would be rather hard to do with video. Explain that. Explain videos. Explain UA vehicles driving in Russia. Pretending to be Ukrainians next to the border would be very dangerous.
3
@k-matsu Of course he is - this is called propaganda. He lies a lot as everyone else does. Come on. Also they now claim they have regained the high ground to the north of the city. We can only be sure of some limited stuff that is geo located - such as that Bakhmut is under Russian control 99% of the time for 99% of the city. Its close to the front line so there can be short incursions possible. Also this is as of the time of this writing - things can change.
1
@k-matsu LOL, this is low lands and there is no true "high ground" the elevation differences are tiny. Besides - Russians already retaken the tiny hill to the north. Cope. City is lost. Russians hold both flanks around it. Its low lands there are no "mountains" Diem Bien Phu had French surrounded not facing an enemy on the 1/5 of the axis... i.e. they were SURROUNDED. Now look at the map in Ukraine.... and cope.
1
@k-matsu Exactly - you are classical example of not knowing how to read one.
1
If you look at these "Russians" you clearly see Azov. I.e. These are hard core non Russians. There are no Russian partisans. There is no Russian legion. After failure of Bakhmut Ukrainians staged a diversion attack. It could not be staged as we have lots of video. Hard to fake video. In summary Azov units invaded Russia, took heavy losses and were pushed back.
1