Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Why Is No-one Talking About This? - Ukraine War Map u0026 News Update" video.

  1. Excellent idea. For these that do not know, M60 in Turkey are also Upgraded. And they are around same age! Ukraine is getting old Leopard 1s... And Russia is dissed on for upgrading T-55s and T-62s? Heck, we only seen T-62s so far.
    2
  2.  @ZootyZoFo  LOL, I also own Mosin. It is a good rifle. For militia purposes it is fine. The 2 MOA is good enough. No scope is also OK. It is not a problem for militia force at all. These guys are not exactly good shots and giving them a Mosin to play with is acceptable - same as some guys on UA side use Maxim guns or Maxim x3 for drone suppression duties. Russia of course has far more modern rifles that are used by more professional troops. Russia cannot produce its own drones? Well, they have better way to acquire them - called magic. Same with artillery shells - magic. There are actually no known WWII artillery systems in use - you mean 1950s - that is the oldest I saw. Again, no issue - US supplied Ukraine with same vintage artillery and no one is complaining. Many are used by 2nd rate militia forces. This is all an example of superior Russian manufacturing capability most likely helped by China vs. the west. The war cannot be won by the west as it simply is too weak manufacturing wise. Especially US is very weak in manufacturing and economically overall. The time of the west is now gone - we see rise of China as global hegemon.
    2
  3. Zielinski may try to go for a desperate attack onto the nuclear power plant. I mean for god sake, who places mines on the roof??? Ukraine is now on the ropes. In 5 days they will present NATO with total failure.
    1
  4. Not 6 inches - 60mm - around 2 3/8 of an inch. And they are very rare - T-34s are museum only.
    1
  5. Yeah, super idiotic plan that we see as total failure. Once Russia wins it can only get stronger. I feel like the west had... NO PLAN. They hoped some light weapons will deter Russia. Than artillery, then some tanks, then some missiles and soon aircraft. What a total failure.
    1
  6.  @ZootyZoFo  Sure, Mosin is a good long range weapon - can be used by 2ndary troops as a designated marksman rifle. No issues I can see. It is a decent rifle. I have no clue why someone whom knows guns would ... criticize it. Almost NOTHING they made was dependent on "western components & technology" come on be real. So far no one listed even a single such components. There were few attempts to list things but quickly I found out with a help of a credit card that there are no restrictions on buying it. So, thus far. not even 1 component. Well, and gee look at 3rd world country (so who is 2nd world???) kicking the ass of US - must be some kind of tradition now ;) So far the only Russian T-55/54 tank I saw was as mobile bomb. Did not actually see one yet in actual combat. I am unsure as to how many are available to even be used - few hundred? In case you wonder - there are few dozen T-34s - just enough for parades. Also, may I point out that M60 tank, still in active service with NATO and western aligned nations is from 1957 with service entry of 1959. "This became the Ob'yekt 155, and entered production at Uralvagonzavod 1 January 1958 as the T-55." I.e. T-55 is within weeks of the age of M60. So please enlighten me why NATO is using such junk still?
    1
  7. Never?
    1