Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Increasingly Worse Than Reported, You CAN'T HIDE This - Ukraine War Map Analysis u0026 News Update" video.

  1. He is heavily pro Ukraine. Not crazy like Denys through.
    10
  2. Lol, look at what was struck, we have images. It's a hotel or dormatory. We can see inside. Please stop spreading Ukrainians BS when there are videos and pictures.
    4
  3. Lol, if you are a parent in Ukraine and your kid is 17, would you wait for them to be 18????? Lol, God no. You would send them away from the death fields.
    3
  4. Regarding refinery damage, minimal to none. Better check out videos of massive damage to Ukriane electricity power plants. It will take years to fix.
    2
  5.  @leejones4429  In July 2022 Zielinski said that they have 1 million army. That was 2022. I assume that they did get some more troops in, correct? That is just in few months! Lets say that Ukraine adding pace slowed down a LOT. Clearly they should have been able to add 500,000 over almost two years as replacements. So that gives us 700k deployed. Math fully supports Ukraine loosing permanently 800k - or else Ukraine would be storming Moscow. It also fully underscores the need for 500k that was said at the beginning of the year - on top of "regular" efforts. Alternatively you can look at Russian losses - then use any handy WWII book about losses in static positional war - get any western source about Russian artillery superiority, get statistics of kills per round etc. and you also come up with huge UA losses.
    2
  6. Ukraine took heavy losses.
    2
  7. It's PR attack.
    2
  8. Ukraine now is around 25m
    1
  9. They are just taking now pp over 24. The 18 year olds cannot leave. They are maybe 2 waves away.
    1
  10. I think it's more. Average death rate is over 10k dead per month. So if 5 wounded per 1 dead we have 60k plus casulties per month. If you use these numbers, you see 700k pernamenet losses up to 800k. Now getting 500k more makes sense.
    1
  11. ​ @leejones4429  When this war started - like right at the start I said that if Ukraine is to fight to last Ukrainian they may last 4 years, if to last woman, 5 years. I think I did well. Lets looks at the losses in detail - so far Ukraine lost say under 350k per year. So at 4 year mark that would put as at most at 1.4m permanent losses, probably less. Is that impossible? Not really, during WWII it was common for around 1/10 of the population to serve, or maybe touch under it. Taking Germany as an example, and looking at the same metric for them - given length of war is similar, we see Ukraine, based on population of around 27m (after all pp that run away) has capacity for around 2.7m or say 2.5m - so after 4 years of massive losses, you can still have sizable army and still would be able to say defend Dnieper line. Regarding Russian losses they are roughly 1/3 that of Ukraine. This total non recoverable losses - i.e. much higher than actual killed people. Ukraine is now trying to do what Germany did in 1944 - try to take pp from the pool of non recoverable losses and "recover" them - thus push for people without arms and legs to go back to service. As time progresses we will see larger UA losses and/or much smaller Russian losses if positional fighting continues - especially when Russia starts better dealing with primitive PVP drones. Note Ukrainian ability to hold an army of men may be less than Germany in WWII as a lot of males escaped BUT Ukraine can lean more on women that Nazi Germany did - thus it all may end up being the same number. Thus by say late 2025 we may se half of UA army made up of women.
    1