Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "William Spaniel" channel.

  1. And proof of this NK weapons use??? Oh wait, none.
    1
  2.  @williamlloyd3769  Russia used lancets to destroy a lot of UA trench digging machinery and thus now most UA trenches are done by hand.
    1
  3.  @alexiskiri9693  it is certain. The question is when. Same as with chasiv Yar, it will eventually fall.
    1
  4. It was a bloody SHOW.
    1
  5. Russia won the war.
    1
  6. Kiev is an example of what happens when you take drugs and loose your brain in the process. Either that or some brain dead people from US are advising Ukraine. Clearly Russia plays chess and Ukraine ... does not play anything at all.
    1
  7.  @sadafhusain2059  maybe. But given the state of UA army Russia may just go for the city or for say Sumy region.
    1
  8. Crimea is now Russia. We see whatever whole left bank of Dnieper will be Russia + Odessa. Or all of Ukraine or 90% of it will be incorporated into Russia.
    1
  9. LOL!
    1
  10.  @johngoldsworthy1925  I doubt that will happen. No one has appetitie to invade Russia. Also not even Navalny in his prison cell thinks Crimea is Ukraine. So there is no even super pro western leader that would end the war with Ukraine.
    1
  11. I would put the "report" as a fake, as well as NK weapons purchase. So remove that. I assume that simply Russia does not need to deal with Germany as it does not need Germany. west is just simply not understanding this - RUSSIA WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WEST. Its a full divorce. Nothing to do with. No gas, no business, no relations, nothing. Thus it has little care if Germany switches its energy supplies and never needs RU gas.
    1
  12. And what will that do? They can be fixed quickly.
    1
  13.  @foxtrotbravo1744  Sure it can, Ukraine fixed these quickly and Russia can strike 10x as much as Ukraine can.
    1
  14. Lol 😂😂😂😂
    1
  15. LOL! Not with such strong economy.
    1
  16. Relax. Ukrainians already re deploy from Kursk to save Pokrovsk signaling operation failure. They gave up only after a few weeks!!!
    1
  17. The defections etc. show that no one in Crimea really feels like they want to be part of Ukraine - most of the population is Russian. I cannot understand why Kiev regime wants this Russian province so badly - people there do not want to be Ukrainians - this is 21st century, you do not force people to be with you at gun point.
    1
  18. I do not see Russian gas or oil flowing to Europe even when there is regime change - Russia will in few years not even have capability to send any oil or gas to EU - all resources will go to Asia.
    1
  19.  @marcdc6809  it shows Russia is run by the military whom think.
    1
  20. China invading Russia is as likely as US invading EU.
    1
  21. Russians did not think anyone is that stupid.
    1
  22. Of course - problem is that it will be difficult in 2025 for Ukraine to still be in this fight.
    1
  23. LOL! And whom will make Russia insignificant? You want to invade first? Their sheer size makes them big player.
    1
  24.  @Alexander-yb1zc  no, you are correct. Also Russians when they are stopped in one place attack another. The Russian war style may be boring but it leads to victory.
    1
  25. This is now as likely as Russia pushing US out of Alaska.
    1
  26.  @Katobase-u6t  it's not possible. Russia has too much world support.
    1
  27.  @FerroEquus-262  yeah and western ideas have not changed since then.
    1
  28.  @sszorin  lol yeah. Sure. Ukraine is getting more than double the aid Soviets got.
    1
  29. I do not see any backfire for Russia - they do not want to sell gas to Europe. Their choice. EU wants RU more then the other way around & it acts as a girl that was dumped - how dare RU not like us anymore?! There will be consequences! I find a new BF!
    1
  30. Russian channels do acknowledge it but relegate it to secondary front as they are more interested in Donbass front moving forward.
    1
  31. Russia sent reserve troops and stopped any progress as well as started counter attacks and regained lines. Ukraine created a dilemma for itself with Kursk failed attack. Ukraine now is moving troops away from Kursk. Well played Putin. As usual.
    1
  32. I think Poland invading Finland is more likely.
    1
  33. Why? Putin will 100% agree to adhere to agreement whereas Ukraine surrenders without conditions - why would he not?
    1
  34. LOL, no. Resources of Russia are already mostly Chinese - they can buy them. For cheap. Taiwan is part of China - they want to get part of their country back.
    1
  35. So they solved the problem by making sure they surrender sooner? Like before new administration takes power? How smart is that?
    1
  36.  @VilleKivinen  The can build liquified gas terminals. Or just ... burn not needed gas off.
    1
  37. No. Most likely the dam was taken out by Ukraine as they had the most to gain from its demise.
    1
  38.  @enpakeksi765  Well, they are the ones that mainly benefited from the dam demise. There was nothing for the Russians. Alternatively dam simply disintegrated due to luck of maintenance. The dam was attacked multiple times by Ukrainian forces using Himars system.
    1
  39.  @enpakeksi765  1. Attacks did happen 2. attacks did damage the gates / their mechanism Why then attack the dam? Please do explain. No that you admitted dam was attacked but state it did not damage, why millions of USD in ammo were spent?
    1
  40.  @enpakeksi765  Haw can you attack bridge section of a dam? You do know it's solid, right? I.e. You cannot make any holes. If you remove some surface concrete it can simply be filled in. Thus only thing you can attack are the gates or other control systems.
    1
  41.  @enpakeksi765  "The dam was visibly scarred by fighting in the months before the breach. Ukrainian strikes had damaged one part of the roadway over the dam" NY times. "A Maxar satellite image taken at 12:15 p.m. local time shows damage to a section of the roadway and sluice gates at the Nova Kakhovka dam in Ukraine on June 5." foreignpolicy I finally found an image from 15th of August - to the little bridge. Looks like damage was fixed later on. Through in September 22nd part of the tiny bridge is collapsed. So you are correct, the little bridge was targeted in addition to the dam itself - through the dam itself was attacked much later on.
    1
  42.  @enpakeksi765  Ah found the evidence of direct strikes on the dam, both video and pictures of the dam hits by HIMARS - google "SIMPLICIUS THE THINKER" and June 6th. Lots of info showing hits not on some bridge but the dam.
    1
  43.  @vladislavbondarenko7067  Stalin moved people around without much reference to race. As there was no race. There was class status only. Bandera wanted to wipe out all other races in his perceived land. Bandera also killed well over a million. Stalin polices were more in line with "You now live in Soviet Union ----> you are now a Soviet citizen. If you do not like it, we can wait till you do". Bendera - lets wipe them out so there is no trace of them, salt the land they had their fields on. Thus moving or eliminating populations is far more of a Bandera thing than Stalin thing. Stalin assimilated, frequently by force. Bandera killed. Stalin was - all are equal Soviet people. Bandera was, Ukrainians are master race. Current setup in Ukraine is Bandera - racial superiority.
    1
  44.  @cbo9090  what attacking force? The are defending force.
    1
  45.  @mfulan7548  Oh its simple, Crimea? That is the problem between Russia and Ukraine. Russia has resolved that problem. Using your exact logic.
    1
  46.  @mfulan7548  You are delusional. Land belongs to the people. Its not slavery times anymore. Move on with times - its time of freedom. Crimea belongs to the people of Crimea - and they want to be Russian. So any Nazi Kiev lovers are free to leave. West is on the wrong side of history - imperialism is not the future!
    1
  47.  @chairde  umm, right. And pigs fly.
    1
  48.  @chrissheppard3023  Ukraine has a plan??!
    1
  49. That is a myth as Ukraine attacked Russia proper many times - Belogrod terror attacks come to mind. Its just excuse to say why we lost the war.
    1
  50. Nah, Russia has like 5x as many POWs - Azov will not easily be exchanged for conscripts. Maybe at 5:1 ratio - or none at all. Stalin did not exchange his own son. West does not understand Russia AT ALL.
    1