Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "This 60-Mile Strip of Land Is NATO’s ‘Weak Spot’ Against Russia | WSJ" video.

  1. Not really. NATO starting WWIII would not end well for NATO as well.
    1
  2. But that made sense, this does not. This gap is a swamp land with forests. Its like warmer version of Finland.
    1
  3. Nah Kalingrad would be defended with tactical nukes. Taking it is out of question.
    1
  4. Another idiotic episode. Other then to denazify Baltic states what exactly would be Russian purpose? And no one invaded anyone yet just b/c their government has Nazi tendencies. Taking land that has 90%+ Russians now heavily discriminated is a possibility. But I doubt this is worth a war. Maybe NATO should look into largest in the world population of non citizens? So much so for "democracy".
    1