Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @philliptemple9841  It will be a disaster as there are no defense lines behind it, attacks from it can go and hit rear of UA defenses in Donbass. so it is not just cutting UA supply it ensuring that supply goes to Russians.
    1
  2. So they destroyed few depots. Big deal. Russia destroys few every day. Its not that easy to distribute evenly at moments notice. Imagine that Ukraine has not even done that as they get hit every day.
    1
  3.  @mariaf.6601  Win is not possible.
    1
  4. They had such capability around year 2000 - now long gone.
    1
  5.  @unduloid  Now imagine Russia has roughly 5x as many drones!
    1
  6.  @unduloid  How can Russia be all of this yet they are winning the war without needing to even do a conscription? Come on, you have a brain, use it. Use plain simple logic. Observe the facts on the ground, and based on these facts draw conclusions. Don't use news, propaganda etc. just plain facts. And solid conclusions. What do you come up with now?
    1
  7.  @enpakeksi765  We are talking here about service in Ukraine, not annual draft for training. Most of the world had or has draft since roughly French revolution. Not sure what is your point here.
    1
  8. Correct. Russia needs to make it clear to NATO that it plays with fire and any deeper attacks on Russia would mean retaliation against NATO directly and MAD if needed.
    1
  9. Yes, his comedy is great!
    1
  10. Strong nations send warning first.
    1
  11. Yeah but far worse then what the central powers did in WWI.
    1
  12. Russian move is now strategic victory. They managed to draw in 1000s of Ukrainian soldiers from other front lines. They made sure Ukraine has zero reserves. They managed to destroy 20 artillery pieces confirmed in just 3 days. Now operation in other areas will have far more success. This is classical operations to stretch enemy when you have numerical advantage. This is like 1944, Soviets had 1.5 to 1 advantage. Same today. Ukraine is like 1944 Germany. We see whatever they enter 1945 next year or this year.
    1
  13. Ummm, 10x is not possible. Even 1x is not possible. The aid amount is 190B per year. Largest in human history. The equipment portion of aid is equivalent to all of EU (!!!) So 10x more would be 10x EU military purchases ;) This would be MORE than all of NATO purchases - i.e. including the US (!).
    1
  14. Any nuke use would not be in Ukraine but against France and UK and or their interests in Europe. Putin said that any attack by NATO deep into Russia would mean Russian response directly against sponsors. Including using nukes against nuke armed UK and France.
    1
  15. Well, as per Russia it will be Russian. New border with Ukraine is of course subject to discussion. But I doubt the initial deal Ukraine got is still on the table. I.e. they will loose more then Crimea and Donbass.
    1
  16.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  They were gained in same way US gained Alaska or US gained Spanish possessions in NA. Incidentally roughly at similar historical period.
    1
  17.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_the_United_States It outlines growth of US - it has good part about what US gained from Spain via acquisition and via combat. Early US history is expansion in not exactly friendly way - its pure force. Same as everyone else. Some of this force was "purchases" - like I hold a gun to your head, point at a paper and say, look, give me all your land for a dollar or I spent a cent on a bullet. To this day US occupies Gautama Bay in Cuba and pays "rent" of less then month rental of an average apartment ;)
    1
  18.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Should it? I been to Alaska - through they did keep their Russian heritage (i.e. preserved historical sites etc.) they are like close to 100% American. There is very tiny Russian presence there. So should we now disconnect a totally American state and attach it to Russia? I bet people of Alaska want to stay in US - they probably do not even want to join Canada. My view is people over state - state is made of will of the people - it is a construct. It should not override people. Thus people should decide their fate not some state.
    1
  19. Oh they know that Kiev is rather firm & they know Russia is far more flexible. But heck, if you do not try, you never will have a success.
    1
  20. What???
    1
  21. More like soon we see a POW for 30k or 40k Ukrainians there. Only 10km to go and 1 bridge.
    1
  22.  @ericgrace9995  Um, no they did not - if you knew where their HQ are they would be either moved or destroyed come on - use logic ;)
    1
  23. LOL!
    1
  24. But from WHERE is Ukraine to get this massive supply of equipment? No one in the west has it!
    1
  25. Nah, navy still there and HIMARS 300km missiles are not that of a big deal in small numbers - they simply need air defenses over the bases to shoot them down. However, such missiles will give Russia clear pretext to create 300km buffer zone. Thus adding such missiles would be terrible idea (for Ukraine).
    1
  26.  @Pyriold  And how would Ukraine or NATO know???? Remember when CNN did not even know who was in charge? Then suddenly they knew all the generals ;))) Magic.
    1
  27. No they have not and no they will not send them if they are sane. But hey, Biden does not even know he is alive so anything is possible.
    1
  28. Everyone waits for UA to surrender.
    1
  29.  @geofflepper3207  I am sure Z would get fair treatment in Moscow.
    1
  30. No, they claim 20m, which is lower than my estimates. Seems they are honest about 20m. Or do you think they are lower?
    1
  31. Ukraine already announced that they will do ethnic cleansing of any territories they occupy - thus Donbass better fight like their lives depend on it - b/c they do. Children are non issue - they are returned to their parents or guardians. I do not see any issue with them being initially evacuated. As soon as parents ask for them back, they are back.
    1
  32. But they went on massive attack and threaten cutting Ukrainians off!
    1
  33. Russia does not have fantasies - they have realities.
    1
  34.  @chaosopher23  s 400 actually is cheaper, you are talking Patriots. Russia is world leader in drones and drone tech. Ukraine mostly has primitive drones with short range or few longer range converted aircraft. Russian advantage in drones is huge. But air defenses still play a role, they can intercept missiles or aircraft.
    1
  35. About 95%+++ See Crimea as Russian including Navalny. I.e. there are super few Russians that don't see Crimea as Russia. Even heavy pro west opposition sees it as Russian. I mean Crimea ethnically is by far Russian, it was only moved administratively to Ukraine and has no real connection to Ukraine.
    1
  36.  @kevoliver7443  They will not - he is being truthful and sarcastic at the same time. I.e. it is clear to anyone Ukraine is loosing the war badly. Explaining loosing city after city after city as "trap". LOL!
    1
  37. Its not super flat - plenty of high rise buildings still stand. It is a fortress that will be very hard to take especially with Russian fire superiority.
    1
  38. This is why I told pp from Russia to volunteer - and this is why volunteering contracts are only max 6 months long! Also mobilized troops get around 4000 USD as a starting bonus.
    1
  39.  @mascot4950  Not really, 160km is too short. Remember these cannot be right at the front or they could be taken out - unless Ukraine risked their precious battery.
    1
  40.  @mascot4950  yes I am pointing out error on his side. The whole thing is hypothetical as there is zero proof of anyone loosing any aircraft.
    1
  41.  Harbin Tiger  Cut off from what ;) For cut off troops they sure act strange going on fire recon missions etc. ;)))
    1
  42. ​ @scipioafricanus5871  LOL, do you see Ukrainians attacking???? Nope. Russian did some recon in force. Otherwise for "cut off" it is sure very quiet. In fact cut off troops seem to be the one on the attack ;)
    1
  43. EU can be negotiated - NATO not. War will continue until last Ukrainian is killed or they accept they will never be part of NATO.
    1
  44.  @HenningJohansen  Well, same response as by someone 200 years ago claiming end of slavery in US is too silly to discuss.
    1
  45. Nah, they just have more storage close to the front. Not a big deal. Ukraine did that and they loose multiple depots per day and are still in the fight.
    1
  46. Both are well maintained. West attack on Russia would mean MAD or Chinese involvement which will end NATO. Either way west either looses big or goes for MAD.
    1
  47. Why on Earth would Putin want to take whole Ukraine? LOL! At most he would try to put pro Putin puppet in charge.
    1
  48. What??? Russian sources I read are all in as how stupid Ukrainians are and how badly they got beaten and how bloody this is for them. The usual losses are at least 4:1 and some are as high as 6:1 pointing out that most Ukrainian columns are destroyed before they even engage any Russians. In fact, a lot of sources are surprised at how well Russians did - almost everyone expected Ukraine to do better ----> in Russia!
    1
  49. Russia managed to stop Ukraine much faster than expected. I still think Ukraine will continue attacks till about November. I expect by Spring it will be clear Ukraine is getting very bloody nose. Russia may want to cut Ukraine from Poland. Just to make sure it is clear to Kiev there is no path to victory. It is getting more and more clear to anyone sane that Ukraine lost the war. Russia is willing to escalate as much as it needs to make sure it wins, no matter the cost.
    1
  50.  @migsvensurfing6310  I am sorry to break your world but Russia has won as it has achieved it strategic goal of stopping NATO. Since it has achieved it goals it has won. That is the definition of a win. Win may come at a high price, but that does not change it being a win. There is actually almost nothing left to sanction. West has sanctioned 90%+ of what it can sanction. Thus, currently west has no leverage left - as it used up all sanctions it could use. Also note that Russia is doing far better with sanctions than EU is doing - i.e. Russian economy and its counter sanctions were well thought off and worked! Note Euro is now less than USD, UK pound is almost even with US. All of Europe + UK are in recession.
    1