Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Attrition is beginning to bite" video.

  1. And its PPP representing production is larger than Germany. Fastest growing economy in Europe as per world bank. Keep that in mind.
    2
  2. He has - he is like comic for pro Ukraine point of view - I am waiting for his video explaining UA surrender ;)
    2
  3. He will even think that once Ukraine surrenders ;)
    2
  4. What 20x bigger economies? Russia is largest economy in Europe. China is largest in the world - who can say Russia has to loose? Who has that power? No one in Ukraine corner. Ukraine will lose the war, that is clear. What is not is how badly.
    2
  5. Well, we can see this somewhat clearly with Russian army increasing in size and UA army decreasing in size and with massive advantage in artillery, air power etc. Russia has. Take any WWI book that explains losses and look at allied advantage in artillery - it is tiny compared to what advantage Russia has. While at it look at casualties from artillery and look at WWII casualties from bombing. Each glide bomb is equivalent to 25 dumb bombs as per US. Now you will graduate to Russian troll rank.
    1
  6. Vote for Trump - lets end this war.
    1
  7. Relax, western people are super easy to play with using propaganda. They defy logic to believe.
    1
  8. Kursk was a brain dead move for PR reasons that cost massive loss of equipment and lives.
    1
  9. Yep, UA surrender coming soon.
    1
  10. Exactly - Russia has 7x more ammo for its artillery.... not to mention aviation and missile troops. This will not change in favor of Ukraine but in favor of Russia.... Defeat of Ukraine is certain.
    1
  11. And proof of that is??? Reminder - you don't beg for foreign volunteers if all is going well - and that is what UA does ;)
    1
  12. Including the ones in Donbass?
    1
  13. There is no sense here.
    1
  14.  @brianquigley5743  Umm, there is no sense here - its just pure propaganda. Look at Nazi Germany - they were "winning" even in 1945 ;) My other hobby is studding military and WWII in great detail. Also know a lot about Soviet Union and their system post WWII
    1
  15. Yeah but far worse then what the central powers did in WWI.
    1
  16. Ummm, 10x is not possible. Even 1x is not possible. The aid amount is 190B per year. Largest in human history. The equipment portion of aid is equivalent to all of EU (!!!) So 10x more would be 10x EU military purchases ;) This would be MORE than all of NATO purchases - i.e. including the US (!).
    1
  17. LOL, I am sure this is going to get super comical once west runs out of stuff totally and Ukraine surrenders sometime in 2025.
    1
  18.  @MrElliotc02  Pro UA seem to only notice high inflation in Russia and ignore everything else.
    1
  19.  @MrElliotc02  GNP of Russia is growing faster than world average and fastest in Europe - so this is pro Russia stance. Performance of Russian weapons in this war has been excellent as compared to western weapons - which sure will increase their sales. If weapons sales were not loaded with politics who would ever buy western tank when they can get a better tank form Russia for like less than 1/2 the price??? Not to mention their missiles and flying bombs or top of the line drone industry! Not to mention innovation and super modern stuff such as fiber optic drones. The loss of people due to conscription is a pro Russian stance - people are literally swimming through rivers to escape conscription in Ukraine. Even if many drown. Life of a conscript is like three weeks as per UA sources - actual brigade commanders - cannot hide this as guys are rather hard to fake & would be called as fake by real guys.
    1
  20.  @MrElliotc02  How can Russia lose the war when it completed or is about to complete all its goals? Big picture is that the west lost control of the world. Russia is with the east - with the new rulers.
    1
  21. Ah yes, the aid is 190B per year out of which about 55B are for equipment alone. This is largest aid in human history. The equipment part is roughly equivalent to all purchases of EU countries (!) And people say that weapons are "managed" LOL! Aid for UA adjusted for inflation and per year is MORE than US aid to other allies during WWII - which was 17% of US war expenditures... Sure UA does not get enough aid ;))))
    1
  22.  @harmless6813  Nice try Boris but as per google aid to Ukraine has been 380B as of March 2024, so 190B per year. Aid to Soviet Union as per Google again - taken from bloody US embassy in Russia web page was 180B inflation adjusted between 1941 and 1945. Over 4 years. so per year the aid was less than 45B. Last time I checked 45B is way less than 180B. In case you wonder aid to UK was about 3x that of Soviets over longer period of time - so also LESS.
    1
  23.  @harmless6813  Google points out info from reliable source - such as US embassy to Russia. Is US government reliable source for you on WWII aid data or not?
    1
  24. ​ @harmless6813  You have 64B as a US aid only in weapons - I assume its maybe as of September? So you fully agree with me and my numbers. Good to know. Total aid per year of 190B, with US portion of the aid as military only (weapons) aid of less than 30B per year. Largest ever military aid in human history to a single country - agreed?
    1
  25. Not just fine - they are winning!!!
    1
  26. Stop using logic - if you do this channel is pure comedy.
    1
  27. With what? They don't even have power to keep the lights on.
    1
  28. Exactly - Russia got that idea.
    1
  29.  @pinkyfull  40% of EU equipment was sent and Russia is winning....
    1
  30.  @maurvir3197  Russian reserves are increasing as we speak - have you seen their production??? Their aerial bomb development? Missile production??? At this rate they should pass US military power index this year. NATO plan, if there was one, totally backfired.
    1
  31.  @maurvir3197  Russia did not switch to some total war economy. West is NOT handling Ukraine some excess old material - captured US Bradley was made in 2012. "Remember, the US and Europe are still in peace-time economies and aren't spending significantly on materiel production." EU does not have any means to do any "production" and they have no money to spend. They EU is on the brink of bankruptcy. The US military spending NOT AT WAR combined with interests payments are larger than that of Russia (!) US spends almost 50% of its tax income on military and interest payments.... I am sure US can somehow spend more on the military - maybe causing little starvation here and there ;) One has to note that aid to Ukraine is largest in human history. It is larger than all combined aid US sent during WWII. Expenditures on weapons alone are equivalent to all of EU - i.e. same number of tanks by value is sent to Ukraine per year as all of EU purchases. Eventually west may force China to enter the chat and it will dwarf any total war economy whole west can create. West made huge mistake by entering this war and now there does not seem to be any exit possible other than Russian total defeat of Ukraine. What do you propose? That west sends 2x purchase of weapons for all of EU to Ukraine??? Where will all that come from? Even if billions were spent to ramp up production - money that does not exist - it would take years to industrialize. Even with Hitler at the helm of Germany and Himmler saying that either you make a tank or die its not possible. It took Soviets 20 years to industrialize with millions that starved.... 20 years! Even with ramped up production by 2x we see Russia has at least 5x the advantage in ammo. In defense to overwhelm Russia one would need 3x or 4x production. Even with that you would need more people - people that Ukraine does not have. So either you need to send the French to the trenches or provide even more equipment. So say 6x. Where will all that stuff come from? People just don't seem to know how to count and realize they are asking for impossible.
    1