Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "UK Buys AKs to Train Ukrainian Troops" video.

Wait, you mean Ukrainians made it clear they do not care about Geneva convention - there are multiple videos of Ukrainians executing POWs. Multiple.
2
@TheArmourersBench Sure it does! Ukraine pushed in one spot in Donbass 6 brigades. At full strength that is 6 x 8k troops. At one spot in Donbass. As per UA map i.e. pro Ukraine. All infantry. So yes, man power does make up for capability gap. It will take weeks for Russians to kill so many people and move.
1
@baneofbanes Ukrainians.... outnumbered? Where!!!! They usually out number Russians 3:1. Standstill? Despite heavy numerical superiority and fortification of every square meter the Russians are pushing forward every day. Despite super heavy losses Ukrainians keep resisting a war they have clearly lost. Note "Russians" are mostly DPR / LPR / Chechens / Wagner group / all sort of volunteers. About half of pp fighting on Russian side are former citizens of Ukraine.
1
@TheArmourersBench I say equally bad choices - UK cannot build even half decent armor and Ukraine already lost the war.
1
@baneofbanes Lots of possible targets - Chinese, Germans, French. Yet another ME war?
1
You probably do not know that majority of "Russian troops" are not Russians - its like Pakistan using proxy in Kashmir to attack Indians. These proxies are not exactly up to Pakistani standard. Russian regular troops did not perform badly at all - they are fighting badly outnumbered and still advancing against huge fortifications. Russia does not have 200k troops, they do not have even 100k in right now. Logistics is quite good - they do fire 10x as much artillery as Ukrainians - it must be getting to the front somehow. Training is not bad - I watched Russian troops clear trenches in face to face combat and I do not see anything "bad". Russians are not gone b/c they are by far better army - and this is why the already won the war.
1