Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Österreichs Bundesheer" channel.

  1. Austria for whatever reason actually kept it's word from end of WWII treaty. They... Kept their word.
    30
  2. Nah he is biased. He mentions Kursk and Vulhedar but does not say what a total disaster for Ukraine these are.
    30
  3.  @louisowens5723  Ukraine lost the war over a month ago. Victory since that time has been impossible. Its now how long before Russia completes the operation.
    24
  4. @N Fels Well, on video he shows Ukraine running out - of everything. Not Russia. Ukraine lost the war.
    14
  5. Ukraine lost the war. It is now just stupid fight to the last Ukrainian. As last minutes of the video show, Russians do not need to hurry up too much as by winter time Ukraine will really be out. However, I do believe that Russians, unless they do more pausing (as Putin said "rest for troops") will take all of Donbass in the next few weeks, maybe with exception of the cities. Reason is Ukraine - Russia troop ratio - as per this video is more and more in Russia's favor.
    8
  6. Of course. They would have gotten far better deal - heck in March 2022 they would have gotten a better deal. Literally now Ukraine will loose a lot of land, lots of people, no NATO, no equipment etc. etc.
    8
  7. And Russia won as they were better prepared and had far better leadership.
    7
  8.  @mirnicht6183  Yes, it is clear Ukraine lost the war. Also, NATO is only less then 13% of the planet, 13% is countries that sanctioned Russia, so NATO is like less then 10%.
    7
  9. He cannot help it... Austrians and Germans have strong belief in Wunderwaffe - its like genetical ;)))
    5
  10. This is old info from like few months ago. Do something modern - showing total failure of UA offensive and how they cannot win this war. Be honest for a change.
    4
  11.  @kineahora8736  No one is 100% percent objective - they cannot be. I am a realist. Ukraine lost the war. It is clear. There is no path to any victory as declared in Kiev. All they can do is watch Moscow and cannot take initiative. What am so different then the Col? He also is pointing out future attack vectors of RUSSIA. Not Ukraine. So the main difference is I say it, while he makes it "implicit".
    4
  12. He is not 100% truthful - he is biased. Only makes sense for sending troops - but not for equipment.
    4
  13. In the last 15 days Ukraine lost land in 63 areas and gained in 2. After total operational failure of Ukrainian offensive - which I pointed out as failure after the first week of operations was offensive of last resort. Now Russia has regained all lost areas near Bakhmut and is regaining as I write this areas near Tokmak. Ukraine lost the war. It should be clearly said now. Without weapons, manpower etc. Ukraine is forced to negotiating table or will continue loosing more areas & possible regime change may happen. Colonel Reisner is part of western propaganda machine as he is clearly bias - for example "wonderwaffen" exists such as "game changers". Come on colonel, please spare us BS. Same please spare us "new Ukrainian offensive" BS - Ukraine is in full retreat mode - they cannot hold terrain. Ukraine does not have man power to do another "offensive". The bridge head at Krinki is a success? To much vodka colonel? Same as naval success? The ships of the black sea can fire their cruise missiles from far - they don't need to be close - actual losses of few auxiliary ships is a joke.
    3
  14. Exactly - who is the aggressor in Donbass?
    3
  15. I rate him average. I predicted better. This an average person on the net did better than him.
    3
  16. @N Fels T-62s are for DPR / LPR - same as a lot of towed artillery. führer is in Ukraine not in Russia. There is no occupied Finland.
    3
  17. 11:35 - Ukraine is on the ropes and loosing the war, I claim they already lost. So they cannot "build up a brigade" - they are being overrun by the Russians and if they were to "build up" such brigade by the time it would be operational the Russians would be close to Dnipro.
    3
  18. Propaganda can get you so far but eventually reality kicks in.
    3
  19. Exactly - everyone on Earth sees west is loosing and keeps escalating, first Javelin, than artillery than HIMARS, than IFV than tanks than missiles and now F-16.
    3
  20. The war is now undeniably lost for Ukraine. Ukraine no longer has man power reserves. Ukraine no longer has equipment reserves or chances of getting more. The Ukrainian state survival, even after unconditional surrender, is questionable. Even if Ukraine surrendered today I doubt country can exist past 2050.
    3
  21. OMG, it took over two years for him to realize its a war of attrition and Russia is winning and will win the war. No mention of the total failure of Kursk offensive and what a huge tactical and strategic mistake it was. No mention of total defeat of Ukraine at Vulhedar and how plain brain dead Ukraine was and lost whole elite brigade. He should firmly mention that Ukraine does not fight with their brain.
    2
  22. The reserves are 6ft under :)
    2
  23. Belogrod was a total win for Russia - it solidified Putin argument that he is fighting Nazi. Everyone knew this is done to take away the view of failure of Kiev regime in Bakhmut. What spring offensive? Spring is over. What drone and attacks on Moscow or raids into Russia - so stupid thinking - Austrians and Germans have learned NOTHING from WWII. Idiotic. Surprise- what surprise??!! What Ukrainian air defense??? Ukraine has almost none left - lets look at the previous three days - they thrown 4 brigades - light and they totally got creamed. What game changers? Russia used 1000s of missiles - they have at least 10:1 advantage. LOL, score is not 1:1 - Russia is clearly winning the war - and the 70min means UA is spent. Ukraine success rate is not 80% - it is much lower - if it was so rosy they would not make it a 10 year prison sentence to film. On video we can clearly see Patriot system hit. We see explosions. As for "boiling the frog" - one has to remember that if US over does it then the Chinese can simply walk in and we know US is no match for China production wise even when combined with EU.
    2
  24. Legally west is part of the war - neutral states are not allowed to send arms to any of the parties at war - its written set of laws. Hence why Switzerland does not want to participate in weapon sending as it wants to be neutral.
    2
  25. In Bakhmut UA losses were easily 4x Russian losses - look at even this video - see the power of artillery!
    2
  26. Trump said any troops Europe deploys in Ukraine will not be covered by NATO.
    1
  27. When you loose conventional war you turn into terrorism - Ukraine Nazi unit attacks in Russia had only one aim - terrorize local population and kill civilians to create panic. Any Ukrainian knows Russians are super resistant to such tactics, so it had to be western suggested. Same as this Austrian, obviously west learned noting from WWII. As expected such operations only gave stronger hand to Putin and increased his support. Russians also did not really go all OMG over these attacks.
    1
  28. Ukrainims use innovative tech? Lol! Russians suffer from UA attacks? Lol!
    1
  29.  @spottydog4477  Of the end...
    1
  30. I just downvoted for spreading UA propaganda.
    1
  31. ​ @tomw.6511 Poland. It was illegally annexed by Soviet Union. Should be returned.
    1
  32. Not so fast - a lot of stuff was usual BS. For example, Krinki bridgehead was called a "success" - to much vodka? Too much drugs? Who on earth would call this failure a success? Seriously? A lot of other bias as well. He should have pointed out that Russians are now running successful creeping offensive against Ukraine - significantly better than UA failure in the summer.
    1
  33. Ukraine is loosing - so he cannot be impartial - he could have been in previous videos - even provided some truthful info - but not now. Now he simply cannot. Cannot hide Ukraine loss and be impartial. You need to lie.
    1
  34. Ukraine just did reverse and suffered even heavier losses. They used multiple reserve brigades - all light - and got totally smashed. They are now calling it "diversion".
    1
  35.  @nostro1940  Putin entered negotiations over a month before - so you are making stuff up. A year before RT run many articles how terrible the war would be. NATO failed to expand to Ukraine - and it is now clear it never will.
    1
  36. He is part of the propaganda.
    1
  37. Downvoted for using a lot of Ukraininan propaganada at face value. This guy is just less of a pro UA propaganda guy than others but he is still propaganda. You can clearly see this when he says thay Ukrainins keep Kursk to use as bargaining chip. This is pure propaganda for UA. Kursk is held by Ukraine because they are srupid. That is it. No other reason. This should be obvious now to even medicare analyst.
    1
  38.  @ZugZugMahogny  Can you show these pp alive? No? Why not?
    1
  39.  @mirnicht6183  LOL, as they said in BRICS meeting, we are the world. We represent 3.2B people. Who is this "G7" whom represent not even 0.8B? Stop living in 1960s. Its a free liberated world now. Western powers are on the decline. You no longer can keep brown or yellow people down. Besides, Ukraine is loosing bad. War is lost for it. They can fight to the last Ukrainian but it will not change the outcome.
    1
  40.  @scofield1154  Ukraine lost the war in military sense as the goals of Russian federation are about to be fulfilled while the goals of Ukraine are impossible. May I remind you that stated goals of RF were liberation of Donbass while Z stated goals are to take back all of Donbass + Crimea. Please do not add your opinions as to what stated goals may "really be". Or what you think intentions were. Stated goals count, not your idea of maybe they wanted occupy all of Europe goal.
    1
  41.  @scofield1154  Wow, you know.... what Putin had in his mind??? LOL! You should be hired as a mind reader. The goal of de-Nazify is very fluid as no one actually stated what that means - this is the propaganda goal. Donbas is a clear, verifiable goal - so this is the real goal. De-Nazification could be completed as an example, since someone can say that most Ukrainian Nazi units, including most famous one, were taken care off. Others say it cannot be complete until Putin takes all of Ukraine and blows up Bandera monument near Lviv. Finally others say it is all of Ukraine + 10 years. To make sure they are all cleansed. Come on, it can be read 100 ways === propaganda goal. Not so much with clear land which can be measured. For example, first Gulf war had a clear goal - removing Saddam from Kuwait. Easy to find out whatever it was or not a success.
    1
  42.  @scofield1154  I do not support Putin. Neither do I support the other side. Goal is not irrelevant as it is used to judge success or failure. Putin has minimal goals and extra goals (which are a bonus). Minimal goal is to take over Donbass. Why do you support Ukraine? They are loaded with Nazi scum and are refusing to give freedom to people that hate them. They also killed 1000s of people in this war and love pp that killed millions in the last one. If he is a Nazi scum, yes your friend deserves to die. Why pp fighting for their freedom have to die?
    1
  43.  @Stoiko90  "partisans " LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Dude, learn a bit more about this conflict ;)))
    1
  44.  @jonathanbowen3640  Yes, BRICS would win vs. NATO. All major previous wars were won in the factory. I.e. who makes more.... BRICS makes MORE than G7. I.e. NATO is not as powerful as it seems it is - not even close. West is not that powerful either. West is also only 13 % of the planet. It is tiny. West is less people than... China alone (18%). Boiling the frog escalation cannot match Russia as Russia's allies will out match anything the west can throw b/c they are simply bigger. No you cannot send F-35s from Poland to attack Russia as it is too far ;) West is at disadvantage: -- demoraphically -- production wise -- and to an extend technologically How can they win other than using nukes? If west was so powerful why did US loose so many wars? Why did US loose in Afghanistan? They did not want to win? Get real. The west is escalating as it is loosing - it is clear Ukraine is loosing and Russia is winning. What other levels? There is nothing beyond F-16s - pressure Poland to join the war? Again, West is just trying to stay relevant as long as possible and protect "western order" - which is crumbling... Watch the war end with Ukraine winning and .... Russia winning - both will win ;)
    1
  45. A bit biased explanation - in Kharkiv Russians had very weak forces - there was no "3rd core there" and total troop numbers were less then 10,000 - Ukraine had around 8 to 1 advantage and mostly light mechanized infantry Russia deployed did not have a chance. Russian command correctly withdrew all forces leaving very little equipment behind as ... they did not have any equipment to begin with. Screening force in Kharkiv is just example of Russian constant problem of holding large front line with little troops. It may at some point be necessary to move out of Kherson just to shorten the front line & thus no longer threaten Odessa.
    1
  46. Ukraine strategy of defeat. Massive losses on UA side. Russia won the war. Trump needs to end it with an agreement.
    1
  47.  @marnixbrugmans4181  If you are not neutral then you picked a side. If you picked a side and supply weapons you are party to the conflict. So yes, US was a side in the Afghan conflict and same was Soviet Union / China in Vietnam. However, without active use of regular military force there usually is no consequence for such help - up to some certain point.
    1
  48.  @michaelmueller9635  Are we now going to point out that Hitler was also not German and a lot of "German" officers were not German? Heck we don't even know whom Hitler was racially - he has only 3/4 grandparents.
    1
  49. To win the war. Down voted. Come on man, stop BS propaganda.
    1
  50. ​ @Timrath unconditional surrender.
    1