Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "War in Ukraine: Luhansk has fallen - what's to expect?" video.

@louisowens5723 Ukraine lost the war over a month ago. Victory since that time has been impossible. Its now how long before Russia completes the operation.
24
@N Fels Well, on video he shows Ukraine running out - of everything. Not Russia. Ukraine lost the war.
14
Ukraine lost the war. It is now just stupid fight to the last Ukrainian. As last minutes of the video show, Russians do not need to hurry up too much as by winter time Ukraine will really be out. However, I do believe that Russians, unless they do more pausing (as Putin said "rest for troops") will take all of Donbass in the next few weeks, maybe with exception of the cities. Reason is Ukraine - Russia troop ratio - as per this video is more and more in Russia's favor.
8
@mirnicht6183 Yes, it is clear Ukraine lost the war. Also, NATO is only less then 13% of the planet, 13% is countries that sanctioned Russia, so NATO is like less then 10%.
7
@kineahora8736 No one is 100% percent objective - they cannot be. I am a realist. Ukraine lost the war. It is clear. There is no path to any victory as declared in Kiev. All they can do is watch Moscow and cannot take initiative. What am so different then the Col? He also is pointing out future attack vectors of RUSSIA. Not Ukraine. So the main difference is I say it, while he makes it "implicit".
4
@N Fels T-62s are for DPR / LPR - same as a lot of towed artillery. führer is in Ukraine not in Russia. There is no occupied Finland.
3
@mirnicht6183 LOL, as they said in BRICS meeting, we are the world. We represent 3.2B people. Who is this "G7" whom represent not even 0.8B? Stop living in 1960s. Its a free liberated world now. Western powers are on the decline. You no longer can keep brown or yellow people down. Besides, Ukraine is loosing bad. War is lost for it. They can fight to the last Ukrainian but it will not change the outcome.
1
@scofield1154 Ukraine lost the war in military sense as the goals of Russian federation are about to be fulfilled while the goals of Ukraine are impossible. May I remind you that stated goals of RF were liberation of Donbass while Z stated goals are to take back all of Donbass + Crimea. Please do not add your opinions as to what stated goals may "really be". Or what you think intentions were. Stated goals count, not your idea of maybe they wanted occupy all of Europe goal.
1
@scofield1154 Wow, you know.... what Putin had in his mind??? LOL! You should be hired as a mind reader. The goal of de-Nazify is very fluid as no one actually stated what that means - this is the propaganda goal. Donbas is a clear, verifiable goal - so this is the real goal. De-Nazification could be completed as an example, since someone can say that most Ukrainian Nazi units, including most famous one, were taken care off. Others say it cannot be complete until Putin takes all of Ukraine and blows up Bandera monument near Lviv. Finally others say it is all of Ukraine + 10 years. To make sure they are all cleansed. Come on, it can be read 100 ways === propaganda goal. Not so much with clear land which can be measured. For example, first Gulf war had a clear goal - removing Saddam from Kuwait. Easy to find out whatever it was or not a success.
1
@scofield1154 I do not support Putin. Neither do I support the other side. Goal is not irrelevant as it is used to judge success or failure. Putin has minimal goals and extra goals (which are a bonus). Minimal goal is to take over Donbass. Why do you support Ukraine? They are loaded with Nazi scum and are refusing to give freedom to people that hate them. They also killed 1000s of people in this war and love pp that killed millions in the last one. If he is a Nazi scum, yes your friend deserves to die. Why pp fighting for their freedom have to die?
1
@Stoiko90 "partisans " LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Dude, learn a bit more about this conflict ;)))
1
I have a feeling idiots in Kiev will only stop once they run out soldiers, women, kids and elderly.
1