Comments by "Concerned Citizen" (@concernedcitizen7385) on "Auckland to exit week-long COVID lockdown" video.

  1. Casedemic over!?.. Have you guys stopped testing people?
    8
  2.  @LC-iz5nh  .. You too.
    2
  3.  @badam1446  .. I just remember how it all started: Immediately blaming the Chinese, with three different contradictory scenarios (wet markets, eating bats, released/escaped from a weapons lab), coupled with a lot of war rhetoric and threats - way too quick off the mark, and in my opinion a sure sign of nefarious shenanigans by the accusers. However, I agree - I don’t trust the WHO either.. but then again they could just as easily be in bed with the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab (who just so happens to have written books on just such an opportunity as this to introduce the ‘4th Industrial Revolution’.)
    2
  4.  @LC-iz5nh  .. That’s a good account, and could well be entirely accurate - I’m keeping an open mind on all possible scenarios. Yes, I agree it started when you say - right after Event 201 (another unbelievable coincidence). There was also an international military games/exercise hosted in China at about the same time. The US Consulate in Wuhan closed for Christmas BUT did not reopen in January for some reason - this was still before any alarm bells were ringing (that’s two more odd coincidences). Yes, I believe it is a man made/modified virus - again, Mr Gates has ties to patents on this virus research. And the biggest coinkydink for me is that all of this served US politics very well: The Democrats had been in relentless meltdown over Trump for four years, and it forced a nation to rely heavily on postal voting, and .. well, you know the rest! The Hong Kong angle is interesting - I know for a fact that Britain would love to have it back... You’re also right in saying that the CCP is not our friend... No country is a real friend to any other country - they all have “interests”, even allies, It’s all Statecraft. And yes, peoples of all countries are wonderful.
    2
  5. Agree with the first sentence, but not with the second.
    1