Comments by "Thee Joe Kisonue" (@joeKisonue) on "See Thru Rotary Engine in Slow Motion - (Wankel Engine) 4K" video.

  1.  @incryptowetrust8064  I know. Really all I.C.E are obsolete now Tesla is on the block
    2
  2.  @samuelseidel6148  yeah, its fine because the carbon rich coal is a dry lube like graphite 😅
    2
  3. Excellent!! Thank you very much
    1
  4.  @MrJohnnyb42  YouTube Mad Mike quad rotor. Your question is hard to answer because of variables. But generally for naturally aspirated regular engine vs engine rotarys make more hp for the same displacement
    1
  5. Well liquid can't burn. Only vapor
    1
  6.  @Someguy6571  So funny that we all accept the incredible oil output of multi cylinder 2 stroke outboards. If you run one in a test tank the top of the water gets a thick slick. It's only in the last 10 years Evanrude has worked to direct oil and scavenge back excess.
    1
  7.  @doktorbimmer  there was a point after midway when yes it absolutely was flooded. You won't be seeing sloshing liquid from even your richest mix.
    1
  8.  @dieselgeezer18  do they? Do you have any personal experience? A model T required a rebuild after 10,000 miles due to oil and metallurgy tech. You drive 10,000 in a year and do 3 oil changes
    1
  9.  @sandervanderkammen9230  some people have found modifications to combustion well do make an improvement. And with computer aided design things are improving for the rotary fans.
    1
  10.  @sandervanderkammen9230  hmm. Two engines of same displacement and higher hp from the rotary is what I'm seeing. Naturally aspirated on pump gas.
    1
  11.  @foxman105  they have 3 voids that fill with fuel/air but only one combustion per one crank revolution like a 2 stroke
    1
  12.  @ischwhit6747  this is a carburated mini. Not a fair comparison to an injected full size with dual plugs
    1
  13.  @sgtbuttermilk  SKS 😄
    1
  14.  @ischwhit6747  yes it is physically impossible for liquid to burn. It just like solids must change phase into an aerosol of molecules in order to combine and bond with oxygen and perform oxidation. It is a chemical process activated by heat. Liquid cannot burn
    1
  15.  @sandervanderkammen9230  please provide some evidence to support those claims. List some redline specs of similar displacement passenger car engines as compared to the wankel, and if you want torque get a diesel.
    1
  16.  @sandervanderkammen9230  ok. But you don't take tachometer reading from crank? And what then is terminal rpm for the Mazda engine?
    1
  17.  @sandervanderkammen9230  would you consider the stock rx8 engine displacement 1.3L or 3.9L I was considering the smaller displacement and power output when I compared it to any normal piston engine. If I was incorrect then I agree it's less efficient.
    1
  18.  @sandervanderkammen9230  ok so it's taken from ignition pulses?
    1
  19.  @sandervanderkammen9230  I'm writing all this down.
    1
  20.  @sandervanderkammen9230  Hot damn that's a lot of hoppin and poppin
    1
  21. Well it will only do that once or twice. If it did rotate backwards, the carb would have exhaust coming out and no refresh of fuel to carry on after that
    1
  22. All larger rotary engines have liquid cooling.
    1
  23.  @WarpedYT  where did you source this engine?
    1
  24. There is an animation on Wiki wankle under the Design tab
    1
  25. They run hot. Those people probably would have been ok on 92 octane
    1
  26. It has been perfected as much as can be by real live mechanical engineers. And this guy didn't create this one, he just added the clear plate
    1
  27. Only one punch per Rev. The rotor does a reduced speed dance around the output shaft. Yes 3 power pulses per full rotor rotation. But 3 shaft rotation per 3 pulses. Its just like a 2 stroke in that regard
    1
  28. The starter
    1
  29. And the fact that if it continued clock wise the carburetor would not be filling up the void. Pressure would come out the carb and it would draw in through the exhaust port as well. Its able to fire and counter rotate just a little.
    1
  30. I would make a plate like this . Place the rotor in its most volumetric position and measure how many cc of oil it takes to fill the void. Its how its done
    1
  31. The engine was designed in the 50s. Any possible design and corrections have been made. I believe the only real improvement is in shaping the combustion well on the rotor to improve efficiency.
    1
  32. You would need to use pure O2
    1
  33. That's actually not correct. Yes 3 voids are all active, but there is a mechanical reduction by the interior gear size. Wiki wankle and open design tab for an illustration
    1
  34. It's just called the Rotor. It dances around its center of mass in a way that doesn't cause much vibration. They can happily reach 1/3 higher rpm than piston engines. Did you realize that a 20 ounce piston has the effective weight of like 45lbs on the connecting rod at high revs? My figures are just for illustration but not to far from fact
    1
  35.  @Deere2154D  Do you have any objections to 2 stroke dirt bikes? I would say you might rebuild the top end many times in time but never have to do that on a 4 stroke. Most every one who complains about rotaries has never had first hand experience. I think they are far easier to remove and rebuild than a subaru.
    1
  36. The force is produced ant applied to the center of the face. On larger rotors there is a large combustion well in the center/middle. Wiki Wankle
    1
  37.  @maxhuber961  Well it would depend on the capacity of the single rotor multiplied by 8
    1
  38.  @sandervanderkammen9230  Sure I got one. Is it difficult to find hats that fit?
    1
  39.  @sandervanderkammen9230  right so besides the fill, fire, exhaust, there is one ignition per crank revolution. That's how I compare to a 2 stroke. A lot of people are saying it does 3 fires per revolution. It appears to make 4 fires per the same rotor face making it back to the starting point.
    1
  40.  @sandervanderkammen9230  why compare it to a 2 cylinder? I feel it's comparable to a single cylinder 2 stroke. And then again why not compare to a 3 cylinder?
    1