Comments by "Christian Baune" (@programaths) on "I Took an IQ Test to Find Out What it Actually Measures" video.
-
So, I am.
I proctored uneducated people who scored very well.
One guy flunked the math part, because they didn't knew what √³ meant (and it cant be explained during the test).
At the end of the test he tought he was low IQ because he couldn't complete the first series.
When asked the other parts, he said that those were quite obvious. You just had to look and the correct answer was easy. As we discussed, I understood he thought it was just a test of speed with different visuals.
I had candidates who were engineers and raced the first section, then were stumped past the few trial items.
So, scores seemed quite detached from education beside for the first series.
And it happens that the first series is not that important. It was added for completeness allowing a bit more of variability.
The training effect is limited to your actual potential.
People who get a boost from training are people who gained confidence.
On top of that, training can be impeeding. One famous example is the diagonal trick for RAPM. Except it can fail and some items test for that!
Top IQ is biological.
As an example, symbol chasing required good eye-hand coordination and this is regulated biologically by the amount of myelin you have. That amount is more or less fixed.
It's also why fMRI could be used in the future instead of IQ tests!!
Now, your IQ can be lessened if you don't do sport, don't eat properly, are very anxious, are tired...
But education does only a little.
Biology > Context > Education.
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1