Comments by "Christian Baune" (@programaths) on "Sydney Watson" channel.

  1. 22
  2. 15
  3. I have a Bachelor in Industrial Computing, tested into Mensa, and tutored students through Algebra, Calculus, Algorithms and Graph Theory (although, for a very limited time) and I am now doing a second bachelor to be a math teacher. I can concur that people have vastly different abilities in mathematics. Saw a lot of freshmen having troubles...with fractions. Other with spatial awareness and other unable to abstract a problem written in plain language (know the mechanical part of math, but not how to get there). The worse I saw was an high school student not knowing how to test for divisibility by 3, then shocked, I asked by 2 and was even more surprised (Thanks COVID!). You can have "equity" through differentiation. You teach 100% and test on 80%. Also, you provide two tracks, the "normal track" with 5 hours and the "advanced track" with 8 hours. So, the best of the best in mathematics can chose the hardest track and decide to learn 100%. You also offer remediation, which are extra hours that the slowest can take if they wish. So, yes, the outcome will not be the same, but everyone will have the same challenge opportunity. What is very counter-intuitive is that true "equity" comes through flexibility, or in other word, inequalities. There is no point in shoving linear algebra in the throat of a student having no abilities whatsoever. It's also equally stupid to tell to a student that he won't learn this, because we can't shove it down the throat of other students. This still lead to the question: what's the bare minimum that should be taught ? Not much on the content, counting, fraction & ratios, first and second degree. On the transversal competences, there is much more: problem solving, critical thinking, expression (Written a& Spoken). In Belgium, students can chose a path where the most complicated mathematics is about evaluating algebraic expressions. Those guy becomes successful plumber, electricians, masons, ... and they are well paid too. And some even take a few transition years to go to university. Diversity is what makes equity. It's funny that those who fight for it, make everything to avoid it. Our system is not perfect, but it's not that bad considering what we can see in other countries. And yes, I copied OP first line because I found it funny he felt the need to put his "credentials" ^^ Also good to learn about: Active learning.(Montessori Method)
    7
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. The only things I find fair we have to pay collectively is maternal leave and hygienic products. Those are things that are specific to being a woman. Being unsafe on the street is a cross gender issue. Education can solve that very well. I routinely walked one stop to accompany a women who felt unsafe, although I could just ignore her and hop on the metro. During this walk, we talk and she feel safer. I remember old "adverts" which explained girls how to use other people at their advantage, it should be done again. In a strange way, when a guy is in a weird situation, he seeks reinforcement. When a girl is in a weird situation, she isolate herself. Probably comes from the fear instilled by media "all men bad!". Except it's not the case... People are more and more isolated too and fear to talk to each other and it takes more effort for men to realize something is weird. Also, men themselves can fear things goes bad, but usually, when you walk in a situation, the guy assaulting the girl will fly. Even had the case where I talked over metro track and even if the guy knew I couldn't cross easily (would have to walk one stair up, checkout, check in then come down the other stair), it was enough to ask the girl how she is to deter him. They are weak predators and can only target people they think are weak. Think is that you don't need to confront the aggressor. Just to engage with the victime and walk away together and if it becomes too much, walk in the closest business. (and girls can do that too) It's also important to not adresse the perpetrator and just walk firmly toward the victime. It confuse them because it indicates you've some link with the victime, not that you're playing the hero. It's very important, because confronting the aggressor verbally will just motivate him. And if you've to, you've to be very short, like "hey" very loudly, but it's very difficult to convey a good enough threat, so it's risky. If you approach correctly, 99% of the job is done. I also had to walk myself in a business due to an assault where I saved my life and ran straight in a business, explaining what was happening. One should not fear to say it. It's not being weak, it's being smart! All the rest is pure BS.
    1