Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Host FED UP With Republican's Idiotic Bible Fascism" video.

  1.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  Then stop disagreeing with me, and dictionaries, dmwt.
    6
  2.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  And? "Materialist" and "spiritual" aren't compatible. You seem to be explaining that he suggested abandoning the "spiritual", for the "material", not that he was himself spewing spiritual gobbledygook. You're an oxymoron, hold the oxy.
    5
  3. ​ @aheroictaxidriver3180  What "mystical" goals would those be?
    4
  4.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  Nope. Just new to your mrnc uses of words.
    4
  5.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  Try stating the "mystical" goals again, using the actual definition. mystical: having spiritual powers or qualities that are difficult to understand or to explain mystical: having a spiritual meaning or reality that is neither apparent to the senses nor obvious to the intelligence mystical: Something that is mystical involves spiritual powers and influences that most people do not understand.
    4
  6.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  *people who use dictionaries
    4
  7.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  😂 Logic very much requires sticking to definitions, Mr "Reason" (aka dmwt). What's "mystical" about "peace, brotherhood, justice"? People seem to understand what those things are. There are no spiritual or magical processes required.
    4
  8.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  What does "the world", and its tangible, objectively existing, problems, and suggesting real world, tangible, fairly easy to comprehend, solutions, have to do with the "mystical"? You make little sense, Mr "Reason" (aka dmwt).
    4
  9.  @isasooner5  Blah, blah, gish gallop. Try to focus. I replied about the "geocentric model". First you made the claim it had a "geocentric model". Then, you changed your mind, claimed you wrote it down incorrectly, and that it has a "heliocentric model". Now, you're claiming it doesn't have any model. Lol, is that your final answer?
    3
  10.  @aheroictaxidriver3180   Our brains, and the thoughts they produce, objectively exist. A "problem" may be subjective (based on personal feelings, biases, likes/dislikes, etc.), but our subjective thoughts objectively exist. We have instruments, that can map where objectively existing thoughts and feelings are produced in the brain. There's no magic, or spirits ... no "mystical" gobbledygook ... needed. Everything that's subjectivity based isn't "mystical". People's values objectively exist ... what they value is subjective ... and, if they aren't appealing to magic and spirits, or whatnot, then there's nothing "mystical" about it. But, I get how you might think that that brain of yours having a thought is pure magic.
    2
  11.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  Rofl. You think that the existence of thoughts is a subjective opinion?
    2
  12.  @isasooner5  Yes, Islamic scholars used the geocentric model. You know the geocentric model is wrong, don't you?
    2
  13.  @isasooner5  Nope. Islamic scholars kept teaching the geocentric model, although they greatly improved the math.
    2
  14.  @isasooner5  That's nice. I assume you failed the class.
    2
  15.  @isasooner5  I addressed your claim about the geocentric model, which you were originally correct about. If the interpretation you're claiming is true, then why did the Muslim scholars ignore this supposed breakthrough for centuries? Copernicus used the much improved math of Ibn al-Shatir, but al-Shatir's model was geocentric.
    2
  16.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  So? If you don't agree with something, it doesn't magically make it "mystical". You appear to be dmbr than a stump, or a Trump.
    1
  17.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  Our brains, and the thoughts they produce, objectively exist. A "problem" may be subjective (based on personal feelings, biases, likes/dislikes, etc.), but our subjective thoughts objectively exist. You know we have instruments, that can map where objectively existing thoughts and feelings are produced in the brain, don't you? There's no magic, or spirits ... no "mystical" gobbledygook ... needed. Everything that's subjectivity based isn't "mystical". People's values objectively exist ... what they value is subjective ... and, if they aren't appealing to magic and spirits, or whatnot, then there's nothing "mystical" about it. But, I get how you might think that that brain of yours having a thought is pure magic.
    1
  18.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  You are literally pulling definitions out of your a55 and flinging them around like a monkey.
    1
  19.  @aheroictaxidriver3180  You are literally just pulling definitions out of your ___hole, and flinging them around, like a monkey.
    1