Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Moron Clearly Obsessed With Women's Sports: No One Cares About Women's Sports!" video.
-
14
-
13
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Because there's no moral issue, if nobody cares. We no longer consider women wearing pants to be a moral issue, because people no longer care if women wear pants. Who cares, if they actually care, and why, is relevant.
Matt Walsh is a Catholic. There's literally a Catholic catechism stating that the god he worships is sexless, but it's apparently perfectly fine to use masculine gender terminology, to identify it. Catholics also believe that sexless god transitioned into a human male for a time. They outright worship a trans god. In fact, the vast majority of Christians do. That makes them all hypocrites, when they whine about trans people.
The mere existence of a Y chromosome doesn't guarantee maleness (Swyer syndrome). The gene needs to express, to create maleness. For the first 5-7 weeks, only the mother's X (female) chromosome expresses. Anyone (including Matt and Ben) arguing life begins at fertilization, is arguing we're all female (or, at minimum, all sexless), which makes them trans.
They ignore the fact that there are also trans men out there, beating birth certificate certified males, in sports. Lia Thomas was beaten by a trans man, Iszac Henig, before Henig transitioned. The two effectively swapped leagues. Would anyone have cared, if Henig hadn't transitioned, and continued beating women? Thomas has broken no national or international records. She simply swam during some slow years in the women's division, in her categories. Kate Douglass broke 18 national records, but people preferred to blather on endlessly about Lia. Those people are the ones detracting from the accomplishments of a birth certificate certified female, by focusing on nonsense.
The makers of the movie admittedly refused to go through the transitioning process that would actually allow them to qualify as women. It's a completely dishonest movie. Nobody is transitioning, just to beat women. Hardly anyone is doing it. So, what's your big issue with it?
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Because there's no moral debate, if the person you're debating doesn't actually care. We no longer consider women wearing pants to be a moral issue, because people no longer care if women wear pants. Who cares, if they actually care, and why, is relevant.
Matt Walsh is a Catholic. There's literally a Catholic catechism stating that the god he worships is sexless, but it's apparently perfectly fine to use masculine gender terminology, to identify it. Catholics also believe that sexless god transitioned into a human male for a time. They outright worship a trans god. In fact, the vast majority of Christians do. That makes them all hypocrites, when they whine about trans people.
The mere existence of a Y chromosome doesn't guarantee maleness (Swyer syndrome). The gene needs to express, to create maleness. For the first 5-7 weeks, only the mother's X (female) chromosome expresses. Anyone (including Matt and Ben) arguing life begins at fertilization, is arguing we're all female (or, at minimum, all sexless), which makes them trans.
They ignore the fact that there are also trans men out there, beating birth certificate certified males, in sports. Lia Thomas was beaten by a trans man, Iszac Henig, before Henig transitioned. The two effectively swapped leagues. Would anyone have cared, if Henig hadn't transitioned, and continued beating women? Thomas has broken no national or international records. She simply swam during some slow years in the women's division, in her categories. Kate Douglass broke 18 national records, but people preferred to blather on endlessly about Lia. Those people are the ones detracting from the accomplishments of a birth certificate certified female, by focusing on nonsense.
The makers of the movie admittedly refused to go through the transitioning process that would actually allow them to qualify as women. It's a completely dishonest movie. Nobody is transitioning, just to beat women. Hardly anyone is doing it. So, what's your big issue with it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Why ignore the fact that there are also trans men out there, beating birth certificate certified males, in sports? Lia Thomas was beaten by a trans man, Iszac Henig, before Henig transitioned. The two effectively swapped leagues. Would anyone have cared, if Henig hadn't transitioned, and continued beating women? Thomas has broken no national or international records. She simply swam during some slow years in the women's division, in her categories. Meanwhile, Kate Douglass broke 18 national records, has won 11 world golds, but people preferred to prattling on endlessly about Lia. It's people like Matt, detracting from the accomplishments of birth certificate certified females, by focusing on nonsense.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Why ignore the fact that there are also trans men out there, beating birth certificate certified males, in sports? Lia Thomas was beaten by a trans man, Iszac Henig, before Henig transitioned. The two effectively swapped leagues. Would anyone have cared, if Henig hadn't transitioned, and continued winning against women? Thomas has broken no national or international records. She simply swam during some slow years in the women's division, in her categories. Meanwhile, Kate Douglass broke 18 national records, won 11 world golds, but people preferred to go on endlessly about Lia. It's people like Matt, detracting from the accomplishments of birth certificate certified females, by focusing on nonsense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 And then you failed to address the fact that Matt's favorite example is largely irrelevant ... 32nd in the 2021-22 NCAA rankings. And yet, Matt still kept ranting about her, even over a year after she was done competing. Likely still is. So, I've covered that he's contradictory ("I don't care", but I'll do constant videos, interviews, posts, and even a movie on the topic), that he's a concern troll, that he's a liar (you can't just dress up and compete in women's sports on a whim), and that he rants about largely irrelevant nonsense. My take is basically that ... that contradictory, dishonest, hypocrites, are making a big todo over nothing. Have you actually made a point about anything, yourself, Mr Contradictory, who doesn't want to limit the conversation, but wants to limit the conversation? Oh, yes ... that there are men's and women's categories. How observant.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 And then you failed to address the fact that Matt's favorite example is largely irrelevant ... 32nd in the 2021-22 NCAA rankings. And yet, Matt still kept ranting about her, even over a year after she was done competing. Likely still is. So, I've covered that he's contradictory ("I don't care", but I'll do constant videos, interviews, posts, and even a movie on the topic), that he's a concern troll, that he's a liar (you can't just dress up and compete in women's sports on a whim), and that he rants about largely irrelevant nonsense. And yet, you keep saying I'm the one having a limited conversation. Meanwhile, you've provided zero actual rebuttals, to any of those, and have just whined about me talking about them.
My take is basically that ... that contradictory, dishonest, hypocrites, are making a big todo over nothing. Have you actually made a point about anything, yourself, Mr Contradictory, who doesn't want to limit the conversation, but wants to limit the conversation? Oh, yes ... that there are both men's and women's categories. How observant. And that there's a reason. There's also a reason why you actually have to begin the transition process, to compete as a woman.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of that happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're not very bright. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, grow breasts, gain ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
You: "Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and to a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many examples would you like to talk about, from the zero trans Olympic medalists in 20 years? From any of the other trans athletes, that even the transphobes didn't think helped their case, so didn't talk about? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of that happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're a little slow. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, grow breasts, gain ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
You: "Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and to a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many examples would you like to talk about, from the zero trans Olympic medalists in 20 years? From any of the other trans athletes, that even the transphobes didn't think helped their case, so didn't talk about? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Take 3 ... @gnubbiersh647 Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of such a thing happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're working with one brain cell. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, grow breasts, gain ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
You: "Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and to a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many examples would you like to talk about, from the zero trans Olympic medalists in 20 years? From any of the other trans athletes, that even the transphobes didn't think helped their case, so didn't talk about? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Take 4 ... @gnubbiersh647 Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of such a thing happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're working with the single processor. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, grow breasts, gain ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
You: "Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and to a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many examples would you like to talk about, from the zero trans Olympic medalists in 20 years? From any of the other trans athletes, that even the transphobes didn't think helped their case, so didn't talk about? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Take 5 ... @gnubbiersh647 Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of such a thing happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're working with the single processor. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, go through the physical changes, ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
"Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many examples would you like to talk about, from the zero individual trans Olympic medalists in the 20 years they've been allowed? Or, from any of the other trans athletes, that even the transphobes didn't think helped their case? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Yes, people doing things wrong don't tend to tell, and yet many still manage to be exposed. Weird, that you've never heard of such a thing happening. There are some on the news every day. None taking hormones just to win a trophy, I guess.
It's a fine argument, since they had much more to gain, than an athlete in some low earnings sport.
Well, that's because you're working with the single processor. The point is that the likelihood someone would take hormones, go through the physical changes, ED, etc., just to win a trophy, is pretty low. Meaning, what we're talking about is trans women, who genuinely want to be women, who just happen to play a sport, and who will remain a woman long after they're done competing. A tiny minority of a tiny minority. Not some massive wave of men in wigs, that are coming to take over women's sports.
"Waaaah, waaaah, I came to a video about Matt Walsh, and a thread about Lady Ballers, and someone has the gaul to mention them!!! Waaaah! Waaaah!"
That would be one example more than you, correct? And, it's a fine example. The entire point was to pick the one all the transphobes have been going on about. Their "strongest" example. She happened to win in a slow year. She wouldn't have won a couple years earlier. She would have been absolutely annihilated, by 9 seconds, a few years before that. She broke no NCAA, national, or international records.
How many other examples would you like to talk about, from the zero individual trans Olympic medalists in the 20 years they've been allowed? Or, from any of the other trans athletes, that haven't won anything? You've provided zero examples of what we're supposed to be so terrified of, and zero examples anyone doing it simply to game the system.
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 Rofl! You need a source for people getting caught doing bad things, they were trying to hide? Like say getting caught paying off a porn star? Or the over 250 suspensions for performance enhancing drugs, since 2001, in the NFL alone? Just how dim are you, exactly?
What are you talking about? That would be the ultimate proof for them. It would make them a crap ton of money, and destroy trans athletes in sports, just like they want, if they could actually beat high end women athletes after a year of HRT. I didn't watch it either. What does Ben's admission have to do with the movie plot? Just how dim are you?
Learn to read.
Examples of there being an actual problem, dim one. Someone who has gone through at least a year of HRT isn't the same as a man who hasn't, so you can't just compare men to women. Compare trans women to women, and provide some examples of this horrible situation.
1
-
1
-
@gnubbiersh647 You need a source for people getting caught doing bad things, they were trying to hide? Like say getting caught paying off Stormy? Or the over 250 suspensions for performance enhancing drugs, since 2001, in the NFL alone? Just how slow is that single processor of yours?
What are you talking about? That would be the ultimate proof for them. It would make them a ton of money, and destroy trans athletes in sports, just like they want ... if they could actually beat high end women athletes after a year of HRT, that is. I didn't watch it either. What does Ben's admission in an interview have to do with needing to watch the movie? A very slow processor. But, do keep whining.
Learn to read.
Examples of there being an actual problem, slow one. Someone who has gone through at least a year of HRT isn't the same as a man who hasn't, so you can't just compare men to women. Compare trans women to women, and provide some examples of this horrible situation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1