Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Agent Provocateur In Tucker Carlson's Jan 6 Expose Is Actually A Big Tucker Fan" video.

  1. I thought Tucker previously said there weren't any weapons, and they were all just like tourists.
    96
  2.  @mimked  Something doesn't have to be illegal to be a concerted effort to overthrow the democratic process. All of 7 house Dems objected to Trump, in 2017, and since none of them had a senator's backing, none of them actually counted as an official objection. Zero official objections, in total. That's quite a lot different than the majority of Republicans, with multiple senators backing, objecting to Biden, based on zero evidence of voter fraud, just because they didn't like the result.
    4
  3.  @mimked  There are 261 Republicans in the house and senate. 147 objected to the election results.
    3
  4.  @mimked  Ahhh no. This was at a time when there was already plenty of video of those people being destructive and violent. Tucker chose to show videos of them looking at statues, instead.
    2
  5.  @mimked  Hitler's insurrection didn't make it past a beer hall. Being one hallway away from making it to the house floor, while members were still there, is quite a bit closer. They were going to stop the certification of the election, and not keep Trump in power? That makes zero sense. Weird how "enlightened centrists" are always defending right wing insanity. The entirety is that there were people trying to overthrow the democratic process, and a few people looking at statues. Why are people looking at statues relevant to trying to overthrowing the democratic process? Who the f*ck cares if a few dingbats were looking at some statues? Why is that news?
    2
  6.  @mimked  You get that, on top of the people who stormed the Capitol to try and overthrow the democratic process, the majority of Republican lawmakers also tried to overthrow the democratic process, and the Republican leader was repeatedly calling to overthrow the democratic process, right?
    2
  7.  @mimked  If the topic is Trump inciting an insurrection, and an attempt to stop the democratic process, to install an unelected dictator, are we talking about the few people milling about looking at statues, in the first place? Seems like a dishonest deflection.
    1
  8.  @CONEHEADDK  Sep 23, 2021: “You don’t see people hiding bombs, or using bayonets, or firing weapons trying to take over the country with an insurrection,” said Carlson. “You see people walking around and taking pictures. They don’t look like terrorists, they look like tourists.”
    1
  9.  @CONEHEADDK  Rofl. If that's all you saw, then you've been actively avoiding seeing anything else.
    1
  10.  @CONEHEADDK  Yep.
    1
  11.  @CONEHEADDK  There are dozens of images of inside damages. There are videos of them fighting cops indoors. If you can't find them, then you're avoiding finding them. Whatabout all you want. Oath Keepers just got charged with seditious conspiracy.
    1
  12.  @CONEHEADDK  Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout ... if you didn't even bother to look, to inform yourself about the thing you're talking about, isn't that actively avoiding looking?
    1
  13.  @CONEHEADDK  If you're admittedly ignorant about the topic, why are you discussing the topic?
    1