General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder
comments

Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Jimmy Dore’s Targeted Misogyny Hits New Low With Attacks On Emma Vigeland, AOC, Ana Kasparian" video.

@SSGTA440 A performance art vote isn't actually M4A. Jimmy slanders people who have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime.
41
@Evirthewarrior Fact is he slanders the DSA and members of it. Fact is he slanders people who have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime. Fact is he didn't give a crap if 10m of the poorest Americans were tossed off Medicaid expansion, and didn't care to try and add 40m older Americans to Medicare expansion, when he promoted Trump as a better option than Clinton. Fact is he didn't back the 2020 M4A candidate. Fact is the third party route hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in its near 50 year existence. Fact is, at best, you peel away enough progressive votes from the Democratic party to hand the party totally back to corporate Dems and let Republicans rule for decades to come. Fact is he's a complete ignoramus, to be shocked and surprised that ancappers agree on some non authoritarian policies, at his age, and a complete moron to suggest far right ancap Boogaloos, who disagree on basically all economic issues, as potential allies. Fact is he doesn't grasp the basic math behind political leverage.
40
@Evirthewarrior Rofl. He pretty much just goes on and agrees with a bunch of right wing crap.
37
@bernlin2000 Better than Dore's right wing bargain bin.
29
@Sugarman96 Dore knows what happened to himself, in 2016. Sam has kicked his ass before. Still waiting for the moon to fall into Lake Michigan.
27
@Addamo Dore has healthcare. That's why he doesn't give a crap about taking some third party route that hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in its near 50 year existence. That's why he didn't give a crap about promoting Tulsi instead of Bernie. That's why he didn't give a crap about promoting Trump, who was running on tossing 10m of the poorest Americans off of Medicaid expansion, as a better option than Clinton, who was running on adding 40m older Americans to Medicare expansion. That's why he doesn't give a crap about slandering M4A's most ardent congressional supporters, who have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime. Dore doesn't actually give a crap.
19
@Addamo You're simply lying. Dore did back Tulsi in 2020 and did promote Trump as the better option in 2016. AOC used her platform and PAC to back 20 other pro-M4A progressives, helping to add a few more M4A yes votes to congress. The very thing that needs doing to ever pass the bill. She was just promoting M4A while campaigning for Nina. Dore knobs have nothing but slander. Whether Dore had money troubles, at some point, doesn't change the fact that he doesn't now, and only seems to care about himself. When the 30 year old broader progressive caucus is about 10 seats away from becoming the majority of house Dems ... when the 4 year old Justice Dems have replaced about a dozen corporate Dems ... when AOC who has been at it a couple years helps replace a few more corporate Dems ... that has to be about the dumbest time to give it up for zero seats, zero bills submitted, zero amendments submitted, zero votes on even a single bill, so you can take a third party route that hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in its near 50 year existence. It's nuts, and likely won't get you M4A in your lifetime.
19
@Evirthewarrior The reverse is also true, Dore knob. Adding 55-64 year olds adds healthier people, than just the 65+ crowd, to the Medicare risk pool, people who would pay into it but need it less. Dore knobs don't grasp basic math. I'm stupid? Dore vastly underestimated the benefits, claiming it would lead to a progressive wave that would "for sure" take the house and senate in 2018 (didn't happen) and the presidency in 2020 (didn't happen). He vastly underestimated the risks, claiming even Republicans would vote against a Trump agenda rather than follow him into overt fascism (didn't happen) and that Trump filling multiple scotus seats was as likely as the moon falling into Lake Michigan (the moon still hasn't fallen). He's a complete and utter moron, living in some fantasy land. The progressive movement behind Bernie started after an Obama presidency, dimwit Dore knob. You don't need a psycho as the head of government. I know exactly what he said about the Boogaloo guy before he came on, and while he was on. Dore is an idiot. The dead peeps on the Night of the Long Knives were leftists, dumb dumb, that teamed up with right wingers. You're the one who brought them up, dimwit.
17
@BloodMoneyLLC They share the same insane idea of bringing down the government with another civil war, Dore knob. Dore knobs are the type of dimwit left wingers who wind up on the wrong end of a Night of the Long Knives.
17
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701 Dore backed Tulsi, dumb dumb.
16
@A_Derpy_NINJA Sorry, how many seats has the Green party won again?
13
@barberwinning The $15 got an ever so important vote, passed the house (which M4A wouldn't have), got an ever so important list of no voters, and all Dore does is keep sitting in his garage, bitching about those who kept it in for a round of voting and voted for it. That takes stupidity, not balls.
13
@Addamo You're outright lying. Dore's argument was that because Trump was so much worse, that it would cause a massive progressive backlash, and that's why he was a better option. He was wrong on all of his predictions. AOC was, literally, just promoting M4A, dimwit Dore knob. You're still lying. Oh my, she wants Dems to remain the majority, and progressives to be in that majority, in a difficult midterm, in conservative areas where progressives got slaughtered, including ones she previously backed. I get it, you Dore knobs prefer a Republican majority. Just come out of the closet and say it already.
12
@Evirthewarrior Uh huh, and was Trump going to add 18-36 year olds to Medicare? No. He was running on eliminating the ACA, which includes eliminating Medicaid expansion for 10m of the poorest Americans. So your options were possibly adding 40m healthier people to Medicare vs possibly having 10m poor people tossed off of Medicaid. Dore chose the later as the better option. Not sure what you're blathering about borders for. So you have Republicans and corporate Dems who both suck on the border issue, but one party voted to give people another round of covid relief and the other voted against it. Are they both 100% samesies in the mind of a Dore knob? Dore called him a fascist, himself, dimwit. That Trump was so much worse was the whole point of his argument, dimwit, and why it was supposed to cause a massive progressive backlash. Instead, it got people so desperate to be rid of him, that they fell for bullshit "more electable" propaganda.
11
@e13kid Dore didn't give a crap about M4A during the election cycle, when AOC was campaigning for Bernie, and used her platform and PAC to help add a few more M4A yes votes to congress. He's full of crap.
10
@BloodMoneyLLC If you think Jimmy is Zen, then you don't know what "Zen" means.
7
@aarondickson9573 Dimwit. There was also a southern Republican amongst those filibustering, and 6 Republicans that voted against it. Do you think 27 Republicans passed the bill alone? Democrats introduced it, and the majority of them voted for it, dumb dumb.
6
@SSGTA440 Dore hasn't done anything and keeps going after M4A's most ardent congressional supporters. Dore knobs have already proved that ftv was pure bullshit. The $15 got a vote, actually passed the house (which M4A wouldn't have), and produced a list of no voters from both the house and senate. All Dore and his knobs do is keep bitching about those who got it to stay in for a round of voting, and voted for it.
6
@sergeikhripun A 100% guaranteed to fail performance art vote doesn't actually get you M4A, during a pandemic, Dore knob. Adding more M4A yes votes to congress, which the justice Dems and AOC just helped do, is what needs doing to ever pass the bill. You just got a new list of names of people who won't co-sign either M4A bill. How about protesting, and bitching about, them, instead of progressives who support it?
5
@jamesbarton1757 AOC helped add a few more M4A yes votes to congress during the last election cycle, and was just promoting M4A while campaigning for Nina, trying to help add another. Is there another option for how to pass an M4A bill, other than increasing the number of yes votes?
5
@FerdEdits Right wingers want to constantly hear that Democrats suck, they want to constantly hear that progressives suck, they want to hear left wing third parties promoted to split votes, ... if you think he's converting people en masse, then you're delusional. His right wing audience is just there to hear him shit on people they don't like. There are Trumpists using Dore talking points to trash progressives in the comment sections of multiple progressive channels.
4
@alex_macieira AOC, alone, has done more for M4A in 2 years than Dore has in his entire lifetime. She used her platform and PAC to back 20 other pro-M4A progressives, helped add a few more M4A yes votes to congress, and helped remove a few more corporate Dems. That's exactly what needs doing to ever pass the bill. It's exactly what would still need doing even if there had been a guaranteed to fail performance art vote. It's exactly what still needs doing after any amount of protests.
4
@2727rogers Jimmy would be bitching about Tommy not being able to pass the bill, calling him a sellout, and telling people to vote for a new party.
4
@inspectortanzi It's 100+ votes short in the house alone, it has less support as a percentage of the senate, and a president who said they'd veto it. Why do you think that's the time for a piece of performance art?
4
@Addamo A performance art vote isn't itself M4A, Dore knob. If you already know you need to convert or replace 100+ people in the house alone, trying to ferret out a few more fakers, who can still vote for it knowing it has zero chance of passing, is a waste of everyone's time. The party's speaker candidate is chosen by simple majority in the party caucus. Even the broader progressive caucus doesn't have enough votes to block Pelosi being the party's speaker candidate. The corporate Dems don't have to pick someone new, if you paralyze the house. They can keep picking her over and over and over, if they want. So, how long do you paralyze the house for, during a pandemic ... no new covid relief, no new unemployment extension, no new vaccine funding, etc.?
4
@2727rogers It actually passed under Tommy's successor. Tommy had troubles passing it. But, good effort.
3
@inspectortanzi That's the best time to possibly paralyze the house ... no new covid relief, no new unemployment extension, no new vaccine funding, etc. ... for a piece of performance art?
3
@jamesbarton1757 Name a single progressive who ran on paralyzing the house. You're adding a strawman to their platform, and then claiming they aren't doing what they said they'd do.
3
@inspectortanzi That made no sense, as a reply to my question.
3
David Winehouse Fact is you're delusional if you think AOC is corrupt and don't think anyone in a third party can be corrupt (Sinema is a former Green party candidate).
3
David Winehouse How many times ... she helped add more M4A yes votes to congress. She's helping to try and add one more, right now, in Nina Turner. Getting enough yes votes in congress is the only way to ever pass the f*cking bill. If doing the very thing that needs doing to ever pass it, doesn't count as fighting for it, then nothing does. Biden isn't as nuts as Trump. What was the other viable option? Hawkins? I get it. Dore knobs prefer Republicans winning. Just admit it already.
3
@jamesbarton1757 The house has been paralyzed for 2 months, before, over a speakership vote, and eerything on the schedule would get pushed. What's your point? The house has simply adopted plurality wins to get over a paralyzed house, before, as well.
3
David Winehouse Trump dropped more bombs than Obama, including on Somalia.
3
@sergeikhripun Dore's 2016 argument was that, because Trump was so awful, he would be a better option for progressives than Clinton. He vastly overestimated the benefits, claiming it would lead to a massive progressive wave that would "for sure" take the house and senate in 2018 (didn't happen), and the presidency in 2020 (didn't happen). He vastly underestimated the risks, claiming even Republicans would join the left and vote against a Trump agenda, instead of following him into overt fascism (wrong). And, he argued that Trump filling multiple scotus seats was as likely as the moon falling into Lake Michigan (still waiting for it to drop).
3
@2727rogers There is only one possible solution to passing M4A, and that is to convert or replace enough members of congress to pass the bill. AOC, Justice Dems, a Bernie PAC, have been working on doing just that. They added a few more M4A yes votes to congress in the last election. AOC and Bernie were campaigning to add one more M4A yes vote, in Nina Turner, while Jimmy opposed adding one more. There's already a list of members of congress that won't sign onto the bill. Go protest them. Pelosi actually introduced the M4A bill last session, where it died in committees that didn't do anything with it. It has already been reintroduced, and is in committees again. Look who is on the committees and go protest them to take up the bill. Endlessly bitching about, and slandering, the most progressive members of congress, M4A's most ardent congressional supporters, people who have done more for M4A in a few years than Dore has in his entire lifetime, is moronic and insane.
3
@NeveauRock Can't get much further right than promoting far right ancap Boogaloos.
2
@jpbm1873 M4A is, literally, 100+ votes short in the house alone, has even less support as a percentage of the senate, and a president who said he'd veto it. Any of you Dore knobs who thought it had even the slightest chance of passing are completely delusional.
2
Rofl. The tea party was backed by the Koch brothers, and the natural Republican tendancy is to move right. If you think the natural tendency is for corporate Dems to move left, and that massive corporate Dem donors are pushing them left, then you're living in a fantasy.
2
@xq8152 She just used her platform and PAC to back 20 pro-M4A progressives, and helped add a few more M4A yes votes to congress. Not a fast process, to be sure, but better than the third party route that hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in its near 50 year existence.
2
@zoobrizz Rofl. Half, or more, of Dore's audience are right wingers, and a bunch of others are third party voters or non voters, none of which voted Democrat anyway.
2
@sergeikhripun Seder was promoting Nina Turner, all along, trying to add another M4A yes vote to congress. Meanwhile, Jimmy actually argued against her ... against adding another M4A yes vote to congress. The DSA has had M4A rallies before, that Dore didn't promote. Dore has ... also not promoted every M4A rally ever, openly argued against adding another M4A yes vote to congress, donated to an anti-M4A Republican, promoted far right anti-M4A ancap Boogaloos as allies, promoted anti-M4A Trump as the better option in 2016, promoted anti-M4A candidate Tulsi Gabbard in the 2020 primaries, didn't give a crap if 10m of the poorest Americans were tossed off Medicaid expansion, didn't care to try and add 40m older Americans to Medicare expansion, and promotes third parties that have produced the likes of Kyrsten Sinema and haven't won a single seat in congress in decades ... but he has somehow crowned himself the one true champion of healthcare, and morons have bought it.
2
@robertpitts671 The $15 got a vote. Dore and his knobs have spent months making out like just getting a vote on an important progressive policy would be a big deal. It actually passed the house (M4A wouldn't have) and also got a senate vote, so you've got a list of no voters from both the house and senate. Dore and his knobs have spent months making out like getting a list of no voters would be a big deal. So ... what have Dore and his knobs done with it? Just kept bitching about those who got it to stay in for a round of voting and who voted for it. Just a bunch of useless pathetic hypocrites.
2
@robertpitts671 Trump helped kill hundreds of thousands of Americans, dumb dumb. If the US had responded as well as Vietnam or S Korea, they'd have under 12k total covid deaths. He was incompetent beyond belief.
2
@FerdEdits Oh piss off with the "there are no progressives in Washington" bullshit. Bernie, Justice Dems, and AOC, have done more for M4A in a few years than Dore has in his entire lifetime. Increasing the number of yes votes in congress is the only possible way to get any of those things. The most popular third party hasn't won a single seat in its near 50 year existence. The broader progressive caucus is 30 years old and is about 10 seats away from becoming the majority of house Dems. Justice Dems are 4 years old and have replaced about a dozen corporate Dems. AOC has been at it 2 years, and has helped replace a few corporate Dems. They're immeasurably more successful than any third party, because you can't even measure how many times better something is than zero ... zero seats, zero bills introduced, zero amendments, zero votes on even a single bill. Because there's no possible way for third party candidates, like former Green candidate Sinema, to ever become corrupt? You're living in some Puritan fantasy world. You get that "vote blue" works both ways, right? That Dems who voted against progressives in the primaries will vote for them in the general, if they win the primaries. Even if you somehow magically convinced every progressive to vote for your fantasy perfectly perfect party, that would just split the votes enough to let Republicans rule for decades to come, in most places.
2
@FerdEdits "M4A" and "a 100% guaranteed to fail performance art vote" aren't exactly the same thing. Be clear that you want them to try and block legislation to get a piece of performance art, not to actually get M4A, which requires 100+ more yes votes in the house alone. Also be clear that there are zero extra votes to be gained to the left of progressives, and there is the entire Republican party to try and draw extra votes from, on the right. In a standoff, a bill could be pushed far enough right to pick up enough Republican votes to pass a bill without the squad. On the other hand, it's absolutely impossible to pass a bill without the likes of Manchin, because of the fact that there are no extra votes to be gained to the left, by pushing a bill left. It's a numbers game, and adding numbers is how you win the game. Making out like increasing numbers is doing nothing is beyond moronic. It's the only possible way to ever pass any bill. AOC and Bernie are now trying to increase the numbers by one, by adding Nina Turner. Is Dore promoting Turner?
2
@FerdEdits Really? A month of Dore videos, and no headlines promoting Nina Turner. How far back do I have to go, exactly? AOC was just campaigning with her, on the ground in Ohio, a week ago, promoting M4A at rallies as well, and Jimmy's lying headline from 2 days ago, "Bernie and squad abandon Medicare4All". Not trying for what ... trying to actually get M4A, which requires numbers, or trying to get a 100% guaranteed to fail vote? She's actually trying to increase numbers. The $15 minimum vote proved FTVers would do absolutely nothing with a list of no voters, except keep bitching about those who got it to stay in for a round of voting and who voted for it, rather than use it to go after the no voters. There's also already a list of congress members who won't sign onto the M4A bill, during a pandemic, and FTVers just keep bitching about those who did sign onto it, instead of going after the 300+ house members who haven't.
2
@FerdEdits Also, Pelosi actually introduced the M4A bill, just last session, and the parliamentarian sent it to committees, where it quietly died, where 90% of bills die. Over a year, including 9 months worth of pandemic, and zero pressure from Dore on committee members to take up the bill, zero protest campaign against committee members ... nada. He was too busy making excuses for his girl Tulsi, and then running an attack ad campaign against Trump's only remaining viable opponent.
2
@jamesbarton1757 ftv is threatening to paralyze the house, dumb dumb. The house can't function without a speaker. No new bills, meaning no new covid relief, no new unemployment extension, no new vaccine funding, etc., during a pandemic, for a piece of performance art.
2
@inspectortanzi Why do you dimwits Dore knobs not know that ftv is a threat to paralyze the house, by not picking a speaker?
2
David Winehouse Is Biden encouring people to get themselves killed, like psychotic Republicans, dumb dumb?
2
@inspectortanzi My phone added an s to dimwit, Dore knob. But, yeah, a grammatical error is totally the same as having zero clue what the plan you're backing actually threatens to do.
2
@jamesbarton1757 Delaying covid relief for performance art would look bad for progressives. The corporate Dems and MSM would have a field day trashing them, and blaming them for the delays. The corporate Dem majority of the party should do a lot of things they don't.
2
@inspectortanzi Keep adding more M4A yes votes to congress, because that's the only possible way to ever pass a bill? It's exactly what you'd still need to do after a failed performance art vote. AOC was just trying to add 1 more, with Nina Turner. What were Dore knobs doing? Protesting AOC instead?
2
David Winehouse How is dropping bombs, while also sitting on your ass as hundreds of thousands of Americans die, exactly the same as dropping bombs, while trying to get everyone vaccinated? How is dropping bombs, while trying to toss millions of the poorest Americans off of Medicaid expansion, exactly the same as dropping bombs, while not doing that? What was the other viable option, again?
2
David Winehouse Biden didn't run on M4A, dumb dumb. The minimum wage got a vote and a list of no voters. Dore knobs have proven that they don't actually think getting a vote on an important progressive policy is important, and proven that they wouldn't have actually done anything with a list of no voters.
2
David Winehouse What was the other viable option, again?
2
@inspectortanzi If you think M4A would have actually passed, right now, during a pandemic, you're completely delusional. It's 100+ votes short in the house alone. What you wanted, right now, during a pandemic, was a 100% guaranteed to fail performance art vote, and then you'd still need to add more yes votes to congress, exactly like AOC and Justice Dems, have been doing.
2
@inspectortanzi She was just on the ground with Nina Turner, trying to add another M4A yes vote to congress, and promoting M4A at the rallies. That's more action than sitting in your garage bitching about everything and anything. But you do know that 300+ house members won't even sign onto the bill, during a pandemic, while you bitch about those who have and give those 300+ a pass. Absolutely psychotic, that Dore isn't constantly going after those who won't sign onto the bill, and is instead constantly going after those who have.
2
@artis1969 If helping to add more M4A yes votes to congress, the very thing that needs doing to ever pass the bill, is "inaction", then "inaction" is what's needed.
2
@CrucibleBlack13 They gave context. You seem to have reading comprehension problems.
2
@laleau92 Do you dimwit Dore knobs not grasp math? There are zero extra votes to the left of the party, so it is absolutely impossible to pass a bill without Manchin and Sinema (former Green party candidate ... one of those perfectly perfect incorruptible third parties). On the other end, there is the entire Republican party to try and bring in votes from. If Manchin can get some Republicans to vote for a bill, then you don't need AOC or the squad to pass the bill. That is not, in any way, in any reality, an equivalent amount of leverage.
2
What's in their strategy pamphlet is to pressure enough house members to support having a vote, not threatening to paralyze the house.
2
@2727rogers The senate is the most undemocratic part (the electoral college's problem was freezing the number of house seats, in the early 1900s, because electorals are tied to number of seats), but then you'd need the vote of the senate to dissolve itself.
2
What has Dore done? He slanders progressive politicians that back unions, and have even gone out on picket lines. He slanders progressive politicians who have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime.
1
@silversurfer4441 Rofl. If all the progressives are on board with Jimmy, then there are only hundreds of progressives.
1