Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Sam Seder Debates Another Anarcho-Capitalist Caller" video.

@antipositivism3128 hierarchy: a system or organization in which people or groups are ranked one above the other according to status or authority. What reality has capitalism without a hierarchy of status? You're describing something never before seen in the history of private property ownership. How would that work? I didn't say "necessarily", I said "could". There's no guard against monopolies. The op is pointing out terms were hijacked. It's circular to point at different definitions, which stem from that hijacking of terms. The point is that it shouldn't be compatible with the isms in question. It should be called feudalism or neo-feudalism.
4
@sargentpilcher Rofl. Who is going to enforce that one right, one rule, so that things don't devolve into feudalism? You'd build yourself a house or live in an RV on whose property?
3
@antipositivism3128 Anarchism is, basically, taking democracy to the extreme, with everyone having an equal voice in economic, social, and political, matters. No hierarchies, at all. How is that truly compatible with a zero democracy system, that could allow for giant monopolies?
3
@antipositivism3128 hijack: take over (something) and use it for a different purpose. I didn't argue your definitions don't exist. I argued it was a hijacking. Apparently, you don't understand English very well. Is it your second language? Explain how capitalism without a hierarchy would work?
3
@antipositivism3128 That's your definition of direct democracy ... mob rule?
2