Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Caller Pleads For Peace With Jimmy Dore" video.

@MrNH718 Dore has spent weeks using FTV as a purity test, and then turns around and claims Libertarian Boogs can be allies, as is. I think that's the hypocrisy you were looking for.
40
@eddieisfiction Jones is a nut that benefits the right. Dore is a nut who also benefits the right.
13
@TheBiggestSqueeze She just got done taking on the DNC campaigning for Bernie, and backing pro-M4A progressives against the DCCC, dumb dumb. That's the exact reason committee voters said they didn't vote for her. They stabbed her in the front for fighting them and Dore stabbed her in the back for supposedly not fighting them. M4A is the kind of bill that goes through committees. Pelosi even introduced it last session, where it died in committees, just like 90% of bills do. The speaker can't even force a bill through committees, all on their own. She didn't tout "forcing" (threatening to paralyze the house) a vote. She touted having a vote.
7
No he doesn't. He didn't give two craps if 10m of the poorest Americans lost their Medicaid expansion. He didn't care to add 40m Americans to Medicare. He's promoting a third party route that hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in going on 50 years, and won't get anyone healthcare in the next century.
5
@eddieisfiction Rofl. Ironic. Dore has just spent weeks bashing other progressives as "fakes", "frauds", "shills", "sellouts", etc. He made not just being pro-M4A a purity test, but his FTV tactic and use of slander as a purity test, writing off any progressives who disagreed, even if they only disagreed on the slander use. Then he turns around and welcomes far right Libertarian/ancap Boogs as allies, simply because they agree on a few anti-authoritarian issues, even though they have completely opposite economic goals, including M4A. He's a hypocritical moron. You know who is the only one who can benefit, when you claim Trump is the better option than Clinton? Trump. You know who is the only one who can benefit from running an attack ad campaign against Trump's only viable opponent, Biden? Trump. You know who can only benefit from possibly peeling off progressive voters from Dem progressives? Corporate Dems and Republicans.
4
@InternetMameluq Rofl. Trump saying a homelessan was more fortunate than him was bullshit is what it was. Even so, simply stating someone is more fortunate than you doesn't imply jealousy.
3
@TheBiggestSqueeze Committee voters outright admitted to not voting for her because she backed progressives against them and other party incumbents. Are you claiming she didn't use her platform and PAC to back 20 other progressives?
3
@MrNH718 Dore went on Tucker's show, agreed that Twitter deplatforming Trump and his cult was troublesome, threw Trump the off topic bone that he also considered "Russiagate" a hoax, and then made an argument, that has nothing to do with "left wing policy", for Assange to be pardoned.
3
@Aaron-ju2gp Piss off with the "tone" strawman. Dore was using it to outright slander the most progressive politicians in congress. Whatever "tone" it's said in, slander is just bullshit.
3
Dore. Jones is a nut, but he backs the right. Dore is a nut who claims to back the left but benefits the right.
3
@MrNH718 Have you Dore knobs only just discovered Libertarians and ancappers? What rock have you been living under? Sure, they don't want the government telling consenting adults who they can and can't sleep with, or who they can and can't marry, but they also don't want the government telling businesses who they can't discriminate against. He wasn't "pro M4A".
3
@TheBiggestSqueeze She just helped add more M4A yes votes to congress, the very thing you need to do to ever pass the bill, the very thing you'd still need to do after a guaranteed to fail vote. Saying adding yes votes to congress isn't fighting turns FTV itself into have a failed vote and then don't fight. You already get a brand new list of hundreds of people who won't even cosponser the bill, every new session it's reintroduced. Where were the 100+ viable pro-M4A candidates you have laying around during the election that just happened?
2
@Crimean Tiger Lol, are you here to help make the case that allying with morons is a bad idea?
2
@eddieisfiction What extra assumptions? The Boog said he was for an extreme free market, just like other Libertarian and ancap types. You know that doesn't support M4A, right? You know that's the complete economic opposite to socialism, right?
1
@eddieisfiction Is Jimmy the one you were implying was on a different side, or his guest?
1
@eddieisfiction You asked questions, dumb dumb.
1
@Crimean Tiger You can't wait to track people down and ... ?
1
@Crimean Tiger And? What did your imagination fill it in with?
1
@Crimean Tiger You're not my type.
1
@eddieisfiction Rofl. You're making no sense. You ask me questions about people on the other side. I assume you're referring to the right wing guest, not Jimmy. I answer the questions. You then ask me what it has to do with Jimmy Dore. Are you saying Jimmy is the one on the other side then?
1
@Crimean Tiger bawk, bawk, bawk, bawk
1
@eddieisfiction And I asked what assumptions, dumb dumb, which you didn't answer. Thinking you might have been referring to a thing I said about the Boog, being the person on the other side, I answered about that.
1
@eddieisfiction My previous comment to your questions, I stated exactly what Jimmy had been doing, exactly who benefits, and exactly the economic position the Boog said he held. So, again, what "extra assumptions"?
1
@eddieisfiction Rofl. He hasn't just spent weeks bashing other progressives and using FTV as a purity test?
1
@eddieisfiction Lol. So, if a guy with social media promotes the idea to his audience, that Trump is the better option than Clinton, you think there is someone else, besides Trump, that could benefit from that? Who?
1
@eddieisfiction That was not at all, all he said (and Trump has dropped more bombs than Obama, btw). He claimed Trump beating Clinton would be better for the progressive movement. He claimed it would lead to Dems "for sure" taking both the house and senate in 2018 (and not just any Dems, but progressive Dems who would advance the "progressive agenda"), and to a progressive president in 2020. Aside from vastly overestimating the benefits, he vastly underestimated the risks, claiming many Republican lawmakers would side with the left, and block Trump's agenda, and that Trump filling multiple scotus seats was as likely as the moon falling into Lake Michigan. He also didn't show an ounce of caring that a Trump (running on complete ACA repeal) presidency could possibly toss 10m of the poorest Americans off Medicaid expansion, or caring to add 40m Americans to Medicare (Clinton ran on lowering the age to 55), but has now crowned himself the one true champion of healthcare.
1
@eddieisfiction Do you have reading comprehension problems? I said he benefits Republicans.
1