Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Status Coup News" channel.

A private property owners right to remove you from their private property has always trumped the non right to be on their private property saying stuff. People have been having their memberships revoked, or been removed from private property, since always. Argue for public ownership. Arguing free speech rights on someone else's private property is nonsense.
1
@TheRantingRooster The Tea Party was backed by the Koch brothers, who also applied their own pressure and funded Tea Party friendly candidates. If anything, it had more similarities to the Justice Dems trying to take over the Dem party, than it did any third party.
1
Or they, and the entire progressive caucus, got the $15 minimum wage to stay in the house bill. https://www.newsweek.com/progressives-hold-biden-account-15-minimum-wage-he-suggests-it-dealt-later-1568050
1
And if Pelosi just lets progressives paralyze the house, and uses it to blame them for no new covid relief, no new unemployment extensions, no new vaccine funding, etc., during a pandemic?
1
@timberdoodle6924 At this point, we're 1-0, because you didn't post a single one. Make this 2-0. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.31.20166116v1
1
You know the only way to ever actually pass M4A is to get enough votes in congress, right? Getting more pro-M4A candidates elected to congress, which she just helped do, is pretty much the most important thing you can do. Even if you have a failed vote, that would still be the main thing that would need doing.
1
@abelgonzalez158 Yeah, I just said that, vote or no vote, replacing corporate Dems, which she just helped do, is still the main thing that needs doing. The bill will be reintroduced in the next session, and you'll get a new list of people who won't sign onto it, during a pandemic, already. Almost 100 more people need replacing in the house alone. Finding 100 new pro-M4A candidates to run, and backing them, is more important than trying to ferret out a few fakes. All it took was one reporter's question to get Biden on the public record saying he'd veto M4A. It didn't take threatening to paralyze the house, and possibly having to go through with that.
1
@abelgonzalez158 That's what I said, threaten to paralyze the house for a vote. No, that wouldn't necessarily lose her the speakership. It would go back to the Dem caucus, where corporate Dems have the majority, and progressives have no power to block the majority, and they can keep picking her over and over and over, while letting you paralyze the house over and over and over, and then blame you for no new covid relief, no minimum wage increase, etc., to help ease people's suffering during a pandemic ... you know they, and the corporate media, would propagandize the shit out of it, making progressives look bad in many people's eyes. Dore and Kyle have even argued Pelosi would rather work with Republicans than progressives and that she's the queen of backroom deals. She could just cut a backroom deal with Republicans, in exchange for enough of them to say home, or abstain, to lower the threshold needed to win. It isn't risk free and the only possible outcomes pluses.
1
@armandodelossantos736 Which one don't you like? https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/11.htm
1