Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Channel 4 News"
channel.
-
5
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@samuelross9884 Rofl. You sure typed out a lot, but were wrong, and no longer worth reading, in the first sentence. Palestinians have Canaanite DNA, dimwit. They're Arab and Muslim the same way indigenous peoples of Central America are Hispanic and Catholic. All these "Arab" countries weren't completely emptied of people and totally refilled by actual Arabians from a small desert country. You Zionists are complete and utter morons, if you actually believe that's what happened, or completely dishonest bullshit peddlers, all to try and justify colonizing and ethnic cleansing Palestinians.
Canaan was a land of independent city states, which shared a similar culture, mythology, and language. Do you morons want to go back to that? No. The first nation to rule over Canaan was Egypt. Do you morons want to give it back to them? No. You want to pick a very specific 500 year period in time, and return to that ... nothing before, nothing after. When Egypt was pushed out of the region, right beside the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, emerged Philistia, at the same time. Since then, all, or part, of the region has been called Peleset, Philistia, Philistine, Palestine, or Filastin, by the Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks (Aristotle wrote that the Dead Sea was "in Palestine"), Western Romans, Christian pilgrims, Eastern Romans, early Muslims, Christian crusaders, the Ottomans, the British, and even the first Zionist congress, that wanted to create a home "in Palestine".
You know what the region wasn't called, all or in part, since about 700 BCE? Israel. Even Israelite refugees to Judah stopped calling themselves that, and started calling themselves Judahites. Then, when they later created their religion in Babylon, that's why it became known as "Judaism", not "Israelism". Even when they gained some semi-autonomy, under the Greeks, they called it "Judea", not "Israelea".
But, even your garbage take on history wouldn't matter. Ancient history is irrelevant. I can't round up millions of people from the Americas, whose ancestors left England hundreds of years ago, "go back", claim half of England, and cleanse that half of its current inhabitants. If we did, we'd still be colonizers and ethnic cleansers. No part of the definition of "colonizer" says people "returning", after a long absence, can't be colonizers. All Europeans have ancient roots in Africa. They still colonized the f*ck out of it.
If you're simply ignorant, fix that. If you're a dishonest person, that lies to try and justify colonialism and ethnic cleansing, you're disgusting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@esw0y You also might want to take a good hard look at Jewish history. Whenever they've had enough power to take over, or even put up a strong rebellion, they've genocided everyone around them.
"Meanwhile the Jews in the region of Cyrene had put one Andreas at their head and were destroying both the Romans and the Greeks. They would cook their flesh, make belts for themselves of their entrails, anoint themselves with their blood, and wear their skins for clothing. Others they would give to wild beasts and force still others to fight as gladiators. In all, consequently, two hundred and twenty thousand perished. In Egypt, they also performed many similar deeds, and in Cyprus under the leadership of Artemio. There, likewise, two hundred and forty thousand perished. For this reason, no Jew may set foot in that land, but even if one of them is driven upon the island by the force of the wind, he is put to death. Various persons took part in subduing these Jews, one being Lusius, who was sent by Trajan."
By Israel standards, Rome should have annihilated all Jews, to root out the resistance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1