Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "Why Not Offer Florida To Israelis For Settlement: Bassem On Piers Morgan Show | Dawn News English" video.

@WHU63 Palestinians have Canaanite DNA. That goes back to before any temple. If you want to go back to the first nation to rule over the region, that would be Egypt.
44
@Illumirage Nope. Wanting to put things back to the way they were in some ancient fairy tale, is objectively moronic.
21
@Surteronarto Your argument is that there are no natives anywhere, except a tiny region of Africa, where homo-sapiens first emerged? I'm pretty sure that's not how we use the term.
18
@edcarson3113 Why should natives have to give up anything, that they were promised by the British, to colonizers? Only an absolute racist, could possibly suggest ethnic cleansing, and colonialism, as a reasonable solution.
15
@Illumirage *Moronic rebuttal.
10
@ynwa3476 Most conquests in history involved mainly defeating the warriors, then ruling over the people that are there. They weren't genocide and ethnic cleansing. That's why, when those happen, it sticks out.
8
@nickcharles5891 Kinda like how Europe decided to go back to the stone age, after Western Rome fell?
4
@andym9571 “Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the independence of the Arabs in all the regions within the limits demanded by the Sherif of Mecca” ~ McMahon - Hussein correspondence, which included Palestine.
3
@timonsolus Were they native to it? Pretty sure the Germans conquered the Old Prussians, Bohemia was ruled from Prague, and Silesia was part of the Republic of Poland. Are you suggesting ethnically cleansing the Israelis?
2
@slewone4905 You're just plain lying. There was a massive land and peoples survey done in 1945. Jews only owned 5% of the land and were a majority in no region. Arabs owned the majority of land in all but 3 regions, a plurality in 2 of those, and the public only owned the majority in Beersheba.
2
@ashokafulcrum4795 Did you have a point, "dingus"? So, what ... those things are good? We should all keep doing them?
2
@andresrojas7924 There wasn't much of a mess, under the Ottomans, in Palestine. The mess came with planning to carve out a colonialist state, for people from Russia and Europe.
1
@myrnaa7107 I guess they had a right to "return" and conquer the region then, lol. They were just Zionists too, and the Jewish natives shouldn't have complained.
1
@@user-jj5mp7ib1f No. The vast majority of wars were conquer and rule, even then. When it happened, it was quite notable.
1
@@user-jj5mp7ib1f Nope. Most were conquer and rule, even simply subjugating leaders of those other cities/nations. Plenty of Egyptian, Assyrian, and Babylonian, documentation, in their dealings with subject "kings". Even the OT/Tanakh fairytale genocides aren't supported by archaeology.
1
@McKae00 Ah, so the rise of illiteracy shouldn't be counted as going backwards. Got it. The constant warring within, to fill the power vacuum, followed by waves of invasions from without, was an improvement ... for who exactly? The loss of any commoner legal citizenship rights, property rights, any voices in government, and the serfdom that came with feudalism, was an improvement for who exactly? Even the first steps towards something like a parliament wouldn't come around for many centuries. Trade routes collapsing, hygiene and sanitation decline, sickness rising, was an improvement for who exactly? Populations dropped. Was everyone so happy, they were just dropping dead with glee? Roads falling into disrepair, or ripped up to use the stones for something else, because there was no infrastructure to simply make more stones, was an improvement for who exactly? What were these grand improvements, between 500 and 800 CE?
1
@Illumirage I think you should give up half of whatever province/state you live in, to the Scientologists, so they can have their own nation. Tom Cruise can rule over them.
1