Comments by "" (@TheHuxleyAgnostic) on "WTF? Is the Online Left Tearing Itself Apart?" video.

@ramonalfaro3252 The grift is Dore making out like he's a leftist, while promoting Trump as the better option, running an attack ad campaign against Trump's only viable opponent, making friends with right wing MSM, making friends with far right Boogaloos ... weird that a "leftist" is most beneficial to Republicans.
27
@guitary OAC helping to add a few more M4A yes votes to congress and helping to remove a few more corporate Dems, is a failure?
15
@ramonalfaro3252 Was he right, that letting Trump win in 2016 would bring about a massive progressive wave that would "for sure" take the house and senate in 2018, and the presidency in 2020? Was he right that Republicans would join the left to vote against a Trump agenda, rather than join him in overt fascism? Was he right that Trump filling multiple scotus seats was as likely as the moon falling into Lake Michigan? Was he right that Stein had a chance of winning? Dore is hardly ever right.
13
@ramonalfaro3252 He's obnoxious and regularly wrong.
8
@waterkingdavid He outright promoted Trump as the better option, in 2016, dumb dumb. Sadly? You know what would happen if progressives voted third party? Republicans would win in most places. Every election be like a Dem primary vs a Republican general. You Dore knobs aren't very bright, or are his right wing fan base. The system needs to be changed, first, before third parties are viable, and you can't do that from the outside.
7
Eric Moore If you think he's great, the only options are you're dumb or a right winger. I gave you the benefit of the doubt.
7
Eric Moore You must be a right winger, because that's who Dore benefits most.
6
Eric Moore Watched for years. "Real" lefties promote Trump as the better option for progressives, not caring if 10m of the poorest Americans are thrown off Medicaid expansion, and not caring to add 40m Americans to Medicare expansion, in 2016? "Real" lefties back Tulsi and "Medicare choice" rather than Bernie and M4A? "Real" lefties run attack ad campaigns against Trump's only viable remaining opponent, in 2020? "Real" lefties slander progressives that have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime? "Real" lefties go on far right MSM, not to challenge them, but to agree with their right wing nonsense? "Real" lefties, after slandering other progressives for weeks, and making out like they're no longer allies, over a single tactic disagreement, turn around and promote making allies with far right ancap Boogaloos, who are the complete opposite on economics? "Real" lefties promote going the third party route that hasn't won the most popular third party a single seat in congress in its near 50 year existence and, at best, would peel away enough progressive votes to let Republicans rule for decades? Why does a "real" lefty seem to benefit the far right most?
6
There like the Trump cult, where they don't believe anything or anyone, if it contradicts their loudmouth cult leader.
5
@adriennetisme In 2016, he claimed that a Trump presidency would be better for progressives, vastly overestimating the benefits, claiming it would lead to a massive progressive wave that would "for sure" take the house and senate in 2018, and take the presidency in 2020. He vastly underestimated the risks, claiming Republicans would even join the left to vote against a Trump agenda, rather than follow a fascist, and claiming Trump filling multiple scotus seats was as likely as the moon falling into Lake Michigan. All while not giving a crap if that meant 10m of the poorest Americans were thrown off of Medicaid expansion, and not caring to add 40m older Americans to Medicare expansion, and yet somehow now passes himself off as the one true champion of healthcare.
4
@ramonalfaro3252 Oh, give me a break. He has been acting like he's the one true puritan leftist champion, and anyone who disagrees, even on a single tactic, is a fraud. All while somehow benefiting the right the most.
4
I only use this account when I get put in time out So, everyone Dore calls "sellouts", and shit, are you holding off judgement until there is actual evidence of them taking money from someone to change their opinions?
4
@mosslinden5058 Rofl. Google what a "supermajority" actually is, dumb dumb. You seem to have as good an understanding of how government works, as Dore.
3
@mosslinden5058 What threat? They got under 1% of the vote in 28. They got all of 1% of the vote in the 30 midterms. And they still ran candidates against FDR, that combined didn't get 3% of the vote. Those are the same kinds of numbers the Libertarians and Green get now. Who considers them a threat? The big get in the coalition was union backing, which barely exists anymore in the US, and factored more into the 20 point turn around than third parties, which took a higher percentage of the vote away from FDR than his predecessor. And it was unions dying off that led to the Dem decline and Reagan. It has taken the Green party 20 years to gain its still relatively shot level of popularity. It has taken the Libertarians almost 50 years. You're living in a fantasy. Hey, the $15 got a vote. Weren't you Dore knobs arguing that just getting a vote on something is a huge deal? Aren't you supposed to be doing something amazing with a list of no voters? Nah, just keep bitching about those who voted for it, rather than actually do anything productive.
3
I only use this account when I get put in time out Uh, sexual harrassment is grounds for a civil case. It's not a crime, that's going to get Jimmy arrested. Dore isn't calling corporate Dems "sellouts". He's calling progressives, like Bernie and AOC, "sellouts", and there's actually evidence they don't even take corporate donations, let alone change their opinions for them.
3
@mosslinden5058 It's asinine, because it all came from Jimmy Dore. Glad we agree.
2
@mosslinden5058 They literally backed the major party, to change things from the inside at the federal level, dimwit, and weren't at all viable at the federal level themselves.
2
@-NoneOfYourBusiness Dore knobs have proved that ftv was pure bullshit, and that they weren't actually going to do anything with a list of no voters. The $15 got a vote, and all they've done is kept whining about those who voted for it, rather than doing anything about those who voted against it. Just keep trashing those who have done more for M4A in a few years than Dore has in his entire lifetime. When the UN, UN inspectors taken from around the world, NGOs like doctors without borders, amnesty, HRW, independent investigators from various countries, hundreds of victim witnesses, dozens of healthcare witnesses, and various human rights legal groups representing victims, have hundreds of accounts of Syrian chemical weapons use, since 2013, and you try to portray a big conspiracy based on two "inspectors" (one wasn't an official inspector, and one never left the base because they didn't finish training) that were involved in a single inspection at a single site, but weren't involved in the last 7 months of the investigation ... all to defend Syria, along with Russia ... then what's the better answer? Are Dore and Aaron just stupid?
2
@HeadcheeseSmoothie Ummm, no. Jimmy relies on strawmen, slander, and bullshit. Jimmy is worse than Alex Jones. Alex Jones actually benefits the right wing agenda. Jimmy also benefits the right wing agenda, so he's not even a good Alex Jones for the left.
2
@nuoiptertermer4484 I don't give a crap what he fantasized would happen. Him vastly overestimating benefits, and vastly underestimating risks, benefits the far right. He outright does go on right wing talk shows, doesn't challenge them, and agrees with right wing nonsense. Only complete idiots would be shocked, and don't know that ancappers and Libertarians will agree with the non authoritarian left on some non authoritarian issues. That doesn't make them decent allies ... which Dore did promote even before the guy came on, after spending weeks trashing other progressives over a disagreement on a single tactic ... for anything other than some single issues. Dore has proven that he's a lazy pathetic hypocrite, that expects everything to be done for him. He trashes people who have done more for M4A in a few years than he has in his entire lifetime. He does absolutely nothing with the $15 vote, except continue bitching about those who voted for it, after spending weeks promoting the idea that just getting a vote on an important bill was a big accomplishment, that it would lead to big things, that having a list of no voters would be a big deal, ... all bullshit.
1
@PutinsMommyNeverHuggedHim What the ... Stein ran in 2016.
1
I only use this account when I get put in time out I guess that answers the question. You're a hypocrite. You also just made the argument that Dore is a sellout, because ... millionaire.
1
I only use this account when I get put in time out Didn't say you cared if they're millionaires, dumb dumb. You pointed at a couple million, as if its mere existence means Bernie got it from secret corporate bribes. The same "argument" should then apply Dore, unless you're even more of a hypocrite?
1
@Matt92Machine The right loves him, because all he does is bash Democrats and now progressives.
1