Youtube comments of John Brereton (@johnbrereton5229).
-
2400
-
1200
-
897
-
879
-
844
-
755
-
540
-
480
-
458
-
442
-
429
-
420
-
407
-
391
-
389
-
383
-
382
-
372
-
366
-
351
-
348
-
341
-
335
-
333
-
318
-
317
-
307
-
305
-
300
-
I've read a few books on Enoch Powell, and he was truly an intellectual, and a proud, exemplary Englishman.
To call him a racist is very crass, and so far from the truth, it can only be described as a malicious lie. When he repeated verbatim the concerns of his constituent, he was doing what every decent MP should be doing, he was addressing their concerns. And today, with rising knife crime and race baiters like David Olusogo and
Reni Eddo -Lodge, Dianne Abbott, David Lammy, Dawn Butler, all living here, yet intent on telling lies to stoke up racial tensions, Enoch Powells constituents concerns were well justified !
299
-
290
-
285
-
284
-
250
-
248
-
233
-
226
-
215
-
214
-
213
-
212
-
211
-
210
-
209
-
208
-
206
-
204
-
197
-
194
-
189
-
188
-
188
-
187
-
186
-
183
-
178
-
174
-
172
-
171
-
169
-
166
-
163
-
161
-
159
-
159
-
157
-
156
-
153
-
153
-
151
-
149
-
149
-
148
-
147
-
147
-
146
-
146
-
145
-
143
-
143
-
138
-
137
-
136
-
134
-
134
-
133
-
132
-
132
-
131
-
131
-
130
-
129
-
129
-
The problem is that the Britain our ancestors fought and died for, is no more. Endless uncontrolled immigration has put paid to that, so who or what would they lay down their lives for ?
When my grandfather fought in WW1 and my father in WW2 they both knew who, and what, they were fighting for.
They were fighting for their beloved country, their families their towns and villages, their way of life, one homogenous British nation united in a struggle for survival.
But now we are diverse, divided and fractured, so why would they lay down their lives for grooming gangs, for the knife wielding thugs and the people who are slowly taking over what previous generations built for us to enjoy, why ?
128
-
126
-
126
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
122
-
121
-
119
-
117
-
116
-
115
-
115
-
114
-
113
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
109
-
108
-
108
-
106
-
106
-
105
-
105
-
104
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
101
-
100
-
98
-
98
-
98
-
97
-
97
-
97
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
90
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
79
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
77
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
I was an ignorant voter in 1975, when we were asked to legitimise PM Heath's decision to take us in ilegally in 1972 without the approval of the Sovereign electorate. However, in the years that followed, I educated myself all about the EEC/EU, its foundation, and its antidemocratic nature. The more I learned, and the more I experienced, just convinced me of the enormous treachery and woeful disaster in joining. So I not only campaigned for Brexit I joined UKIP and became very active. As Edmund Burke said:
Society is a contract between the dead, the living and the yet unborn, so my contribution to society was honouring my decease fathers sacrifices for this country in WW2. And being able to leave a free , democratic and decent country for my children and their decendents .
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
There are a few mistakes in this video. Normandy wasn't the largest amphibious landing of WW2, Sicily was. Though nearly 133,000 landed in Normandy, 150,000 landed in Sicily from 3000 ships. Also Pattons behaviour there was not what you would expect from an officer, apart from attacking his own soldiers and ordering POWs to be shot in cold blood. Also later Montgomery wanted him to encircle the German troops he had pinning down but Patton ignored his messages and went in the opposite direction to take the capital city of Palermo which was of no tactical importance and so, poorly defended. Later with Montgomery still pushing the Germans up the coastal road he asked Patton to use the only other road on his side of the island to head for Messina and come in behind the Germans and again cut off their retreat . However, by the time he got there, in fact just before the British and despite them fighting their way along the destroyed costal road, the Germans had gone. Patton later claimed he had won the 'Race to Messina' but there was no race Montgomery had asked him to take it, though Patton thought it was a trick, but it wasnt . Eisenhower relieved Patton of his command after Sicily and awarded Monty the highest miltary award he could bestow on a foreign commander. Also Market Garden was actualy proposed by Eisenhower though based on a previous idea of Montys that he had rejected.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
When the Romans colonised Britain they destroyed our way of life and our ancient customs and religions, but they also did much good too. When Europeans colonised much of Africa it was still living in the stone age.
Many Africans had very hard lives, often with little to eat and no personal security as they could be captured by another tribe and sold into slavery at any moment.
Colonialism for all its faults, gave them that security, along with well paid employment and a full stomach, as their countries were transformed into modern, efficient economies. When the colonialist left, many returned to the stone age as they were taken over by Marxist thugs like Mugabwe. Now they have returned to poverty, lack of food and medical assistance, and their life span is now reduced. Many of these people now look back to Colonialism as their golden age. N reality, It's the duty of an advanced society to spread that advancement to others, and not to deny those less fortunate a far better and longer life.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@redaug4212
I think you greatly over exaggerate your own knowledge of this subject.
Pattons performance in Sicily was pretty abysmal, it was Montgomery's Eighth Amy that did all the hard fighting, fighting the Nazis crack troops, while Patton was engaged in his 'Triumphal Procession' .
This is what the Historian John Ellis wrote in:
'Allied Strategy And Tactics WW2'
Where he described Pattons march through Sicily as more of a "triumphal procession than an actualy military offensive" he also calls him:
"much overated"
US Government foreign affairs analyst, and Military Historian Harry Yeide was also highly critical of Pattons invented race to Messina as "risky and bloody" especially the unnecessary amphibious operation at Brolo which he described as Pattons thirst for personal glory. Writing in:
Fighting Patton, chapter 8 "Sicily Empty Glory". He wrote that : Leading elements of US troops entered Messina at 7am and escorted the Mayor to a nearby ridge where he official surrender to US General Trusscott ( who unlike Patton was actually a great US Commander). However, Trusscott was instructed to stop any other troops entering. This was just so that Patton could orchestrate his own triumphal entry into the Town later at 10am just as British troops were also arriving. However Omar Bradley who unlike Patton had actually fought all the way there was conspicuous by his absence, why ? Because he was incensed by Pattons un soldierly behaviour, more concerned with feeding his own over inflated ego than the safety of his subordinates. After Sicily, Patton was forced to appologise to the while US first Division, but tried to end it on a high note which fell flat. Colonel Dickson wrote later:
"Not a man applauded and the division was dismissed. It faded away in silence to the great embarrassment of its commander and the total chagrin of Patton"
Therefore, it seems to me you have watched George C Scott's portrayal in the film 'Patton' so many times you are now convinced that it's a documentary, rather than a very entertaining work of fiction, based loosely on facts.
5
-
@redaug4212
I haven't got the time to debunk all the points you have made, only the most glaring ones
However, British and US forces in Sicily were supposed to be allies, not fighting each other. Therefore it wasn't important whose troops arrived in Messina first, because the only race was to get there before the Germans evacuated and on this point it unfortunately failed. Because the fact is, Montgomery had already told Patton to take Messina himself, but Patton thought it was a trick and turned it into an imaginary race, that only ever existed in his head. Nevertheless, in reality it wasn't.
Monty was already busy making plans to invade Italy itself. Though in the end the Sicilian campaign 'Operation Husky' had been very successful because it was thought it would take months to achieve, yet it was done much quicker in only weeks and led to the fall of Mussilini and fascist Italy, Nazi Germany's main ally.
However, the original question asked was what's peoples ' Verdict on Patton' not Patton verses Montgomery, the two were not comparable. Montgomery was in a different league altogether, as he far higher ranking and was crucial to winning WW2, Patton wasn't.
Therefore, my verdict on Patton was that he is overrated, while you think differently. However, we are both entitled to our opinions. Though I believe the facts support mine, rather than yours and that's why I hold them.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@robertgiles9124
Perhaps you watch far too many fictional war films Robert, and base your opinion on them, rather than reality.
Montgomery defeated Rommel at the battle of Al Alemein in 1942. Forcing Axis forces to retreat who were then finally defeated In May 1943, 275, 000 Axis soldiers surrendered and were taken prisoner 400,000 had been killed. This is on the scale of Leningrad. After this, all Axis forces were now out of North Africa denying them access to any much needed oil supplies. Montgomery then planned and executed the largest sea borne assault in history, at Sicily which led to the fall of Hitlers greatest ally, Mussolini and fascist Italy. He then mounted the first invasion of mainland Europe onto the Italian mainland itself. After which he planned and led the equaly successful DDay landings which culminated in him taking the Germans unconditional surrender at Luneburg Heath, Hamburg on May 4th 1945. If you don't think Montgomery was successful, who comes any where close?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@arronax3319
No, I have never smoked crack, or anything else, come to that, do you ???????
Both Hitler and Mussilini were lapsed Marxists.
Fascism was invented by Mussilini who was brought up in a communist family, even his first three names were after famous communists. He later became a teacher and journalist writing in many Socialist journals like 'The Workers Future', and was later the editor of Avante, the official Socialist party newspaper. After WW1 the war radically changed his opinions and he founded the Fascist movement. Hitler's journey has also very similar, he also could quote whole passages of Marx but after WW1 he modified it into Nazism, which was similar to Fascism, but not identical. Even the name NAZI is formed of the German words for the,
National SOCIALIST Party of Germany.
5
-
@arronax3319
It's pointless to debate this, because if you don't know it by now, you never will.
Hitler himself stated on May 1st 1927,
'We are Socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalist system'. Do you know more than he did about what he believed?
Goebbels, in 1928 wrote: 'The worker in a capitalist state- that is his greatest misfortune- no longer a human being.
He has become a machine'. And the Nazi's didn't just propose these policies, they carried them out. The Nazis, as their name testifies were National Socialist.
Nationalism was one of the changes made to the Marxist social dogma that the Nazis followed. In his 1939 book 'Nazism Germany Rampart', Earnest Hambloch has an entire chapter on the different parties in Germany and the Nazis are listed alongside the Communists. Also the Communist killed far more people than the Nazis ever did and they are still doing it today, While Nazism itself is a dead ideology.
Hitler and the Nazis were undeniably of the Left, not the Right.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Monty was a great General, the Desert Lion who destroyed the Desert Fox !
Just look at the evidence:
After Monty first arrived in North Africa he fought Rommel at the battle of Alam Halfa. However, Monty had not been re-supplied, where as Rommel had. Therefore, when Rommel attacked he had 6 divisions to Monty's 4 but Monty still won. The reason he didn't immediately pursue Rommel was that after the battle he needed re-supplying even more than he did before it.
My father served with Monty both in 1939 and the Battle of France as well as North Africa, Sicily and Italy. He had nothing but praise for Monty's leadership, as did all who served under him, in fact his men worshipped him.
The American troops and officers arriving in North Africa were green with no combat experience. That's why they were so decisively beaten at the Kasserine pass and why Fredendall was replaced by Patton, who to be frank, wasn't that much better. Montgomery inspired his men, while the vulgar bellicose Patton just bullied them.
That's why in Sicily Montgomerys 8th Army did all the fighting against the experienced German defenders and Patton was tasked with defending their left flank. However, when Montgomery saw an opportunity for Patton to advance and encircle the enemy, Patton ignored his messages and instead left the field and retreating to the western coast to attack the lighty defended capital city Palermo, which was of no strategic value what so ever. In this move the possibility to encircle the enemy was lost, as was the possibility to stop their evacuation. Patton later claimed that he had won the 'race to Messina' the demarcation point to italy. However, there was never a race to Messina, there were only two roads and Montgomery was attacking the retreating Nazi's on the eastern coastal road and so he told Patton to take the virtually undefended Western coastal road to Messina. After the victory Montogomery was awarded the highest medal Eisenhower could give him, while Patton was relieved of his command.
You asked was Monty overrated ?
Not according to those who served with him or indeed his Nazi foes. General Major Von Mellenthin commander of the 9th Panzers Division wrote in his memoirs :
'Montogomerys conduct of the battle can be assessed as...... in the best traditions of British Generalship and strongly reminiscent of Wellingtons Victories'
Even Von Ribbentrops chief press spokesman and propagandist Paul Schmidt wrote:
'Rommel lost', above all to a new military commander, who, even as a newcomer was confident of Victory..... Montgomery.'
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@redaug4212
I'm sorry, but my opinion of Patton is based on his record as a soldier and as a human being. He was 2nd rate soldier and a 3rd human being. As a soldier he showed no talent except for self promotion and Eisenhower was aware of this, he even said Patton was ok in a minor role but no good in any major role, because he was just no good at seeing the bigger picture. That's why he relieved him of his command in Sicily and put him on humdrum duties where he wouldnt get in the way. When he did bring him back in Normandy he demoted him and put him under Omar Bradley's command, yet in Sicily he had been in command of Bradley. Also though he showed no compassion for the 2 soldiers he violently attacked in a Hospital which itself was unforgivable. However, he was also responsible for war crimes in Sicily where 19 POWs were murdered in cold blood including a 17 yr old Italian boy and his father. Later in Germany more unarmed POW were brutally murdered under his command. He was also anti -semetic and didn't treat the Jewish concentration camp victims under his care properly and called them vermin. Also l, as I said previously, if he hadn't died in a very suspicious car crash at the end of WW2 he could easily have been on trial for war crimes. And at the same War Crimes Court as the Nazis that he thought so much of. If you think any of this sort of behaviour is acceptable, even in a military genius, you are wrong, but Patton was far from that.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@gemmarhind5640
Yes, you are right Gemma, and I was never a great fan of Jackson, so no one could accuse me of being blinded to reality due to my fan worship.
However, as you say In your comment about the the 'Leaving Neverland show,'
It's the easiest thing in the world to make a convincing guilty programme if you only include the evidence that leads you to make that conclusion, but omit all the evidence that contradicts it. This is why in a court of law we have both sides represented, and as you said,the court found him innocent. Trial by TV programmes should be banned, as they are biast and manipulative of the real evidence just for entertainment purposes, yet can ruin a persons reputation in the process for ever, it's disgusting !
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Simon, have you read, "The Case of Colonialism" by Bruce Gilley? It was first published by the The World Quarterly, in 2017. Its now available free online.
In this paper he highlights the benefits of colonialism to those who were colonised. Now, some people might disagree with this, and claim there are no benefits to Colonialism. This sounds like a good subject for debate, but no !
Within minutes of its appearance, half the journals editorial board resigned in protest while The World Quarterly, was issued with death threats at its London office. This is yet another example of the attack on free speech in this country.
If anyone disagree with this paper, debate it, and prove the authour wrong. But the fact that it wasn't debated, but anyone associated threatened with death, just shows perhaps colonialism wasn't as bad as some claim and that Gilley has a point.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
For a start, their is no record of Churchill ever actually saying The 'Soft Underbelly of Europe'
Also General Clark was a desk general with no combat experience only organising logictics, but he was a friend of Eisenhower. During the North African campaign he tried to turn the French against the British but to his credit, once Eisenhower found out he removed him from the theatre. Sicily was then invaded and captured in record time, leading to Hitlers main ally Mussolini being deposed a great achievement in itself. Then italy was invaded by Montgomery and the Eighth army in the toe of Italy and he rapidly advanced up the adriatic coast capturing ports and airfields. Then Clarke who had been made Commander if the 5th army landed at Salerno. Unfortunately, Clark decided not to have the normal Naval bombardment and indtead land without one, therefore when the troops landed they were pinned onto the beach and at times it looked like it would fail. Eventually after more reinforcements he did manage to break free and head in land but at a high cost. The Rome debarcle was also Clarks fault, if he had followed Alexanders battle plan, the German 10th Army would have been captured. Instead, he diverted his troops to Rome just for his own personal glory, leaving the 10th Army to escape and live to fight the Eighth army later. He later claimed that he told Alexander he would shoot any 8th Army soldier who tried to enter Rome. This is rather rediculous as about half his 5th Army was made up of Eighth army troops and they actually entered Rome with him. Was he so removed from the actual battle field that he didn't even know what troops he was commanding ? At the end of the day , Italy was a British planned offensive but the troops and equipment were all taken at crucial times of the operation to be used in Normandy, so much so, that the British considers leaving the Americans to fight Normandy on their own and turn Italy into a completely British battle. However, in the end it was decided that it would sour Anglo American relations and so the plan was dropped. Nevertheless, if italy had been a totaly British battle and all the equipment had not been taken at crucial times it would have not only ended the war sooner, but it would have stopped the Russians from expanding their realm if influence so far across Europe and that was exactly why Churchill had planned it.
The Americans soon realised that he was right and had to resurrect the Nazis 'Eurospaisch Wirtschafts Gemeinschaft' proposal as a bulwark to contain the Soviets, you will know it better as the European Union.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Why do the BBC only seem to give a platform to so many ignorant black 'Historians' instead of the intelligent ones?
As well as not understanding the difference between an Army Corps and a corpse, she also states many lies as facts.
First/
The British army first recruited black regiment in WW1? Not true!
Eight black regiments were recruited in 1794, my ancestor recieved his first commission in one of them, the 8th West Indian regiment in 1798.
2nd/
She claims they were not highly regarded, another lie.
General Trigge the Commander in Chief of all West Indian forces, black and white said of the 8th West Indian Regiment:
"I have particular satisfaction in being able to add that the 8th West Indian Regiment formed within the last three years..... engaged with a degree of gallantry, and behaved in a manner, that would do honour to any troops"
High praise indeed ?
3rd/
She claimed they were not paid the same? Yet In fact, even way back in 1794 they recieved exactly the same wages, clothing and rations as their white counterparts.
4th/
She also claimed none recieved higher rank than Sergeant?
So what about Lieutenant Walter Tully of the Middlesex Regiment who was commended for his "gallantry and coolness" by Major General Lawford.
He was killed at Bapaume in 1918 and despite the efforts of a white soldier Private Billigham to recover his body, even while under fire, his body was lost.
His white commanding officer also wrote to his family a letter of condolence and said his name had been put forward for the Military Cross.
Why don't these black BBC 'historians' tell the true story of black history, instead of anti British racist propaganda?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@The Wandering Ronin
Yes, of course there were far more French soldiers defending France, it was after all their country they were fighting for. The British expeditionary force was only 390,00 strong sent to assist not only France, but Belgium and Holland too, yet all had far larger forces. The French regular army at the time was just under 1million strong with another 5million trained men in reserve. It was considered to be the best European army, and was the largest and best equipped. However, it was very badly run by officers who were either too old or just incompetent, trying to fight the WW2 using outdated WW1 principles. France also suffered from political activists who undermined armament manufacturing by purposefully leaving vital parts missing from equipment including planes and tanks. Therefore, the French were at a disadvantage before a single bullet was fired. I don't understand your accusation of inflating numbers though, I always quote the official figures? If I have used any that you dispute, please alert me to the correct ones. Also Churchill instructed those responsible for the evacuation not to favour British troops, but to take as many French as possible. And let's not forget the troops evacuated further south who were separated from their comrades in the BEF by the German advance. After fighting alongside the French a further 144 171 British, 18,246 French 24,352 Polish, 1,039 Czechs and 163 Belgians were evacuated from Cherbourge etc. However, 68,000 British soldiers died and over 40,000 were still taken prisoner.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Chitown Livingston
Montgomery never lost a battle on North Africa. In fact as soon as he took over the 8th Army he defeated Rommels Africa Corps at the battle of Al Alemein, with 14,000 Nazis and Italian casualties.
He then went on to defeat the reformed Axis forces at the battle of Tunisia where he completely wiped out the Africa Corps taking 300,000 prisoners. That's larger than after the Nazi surrender after the battle of Moscow where 120,000 were taken prisoner or the surrender at Stalingrad where 91,000 became Soviet prisoners. The battle for Caen was a top strategic goal. Because of this Hitler, reinforced it strongly with his best troops leaving his forces elsewhere in Normandy spread thinly and therefore weaker. However, Montgomery still beat the Germans here too, unlike Patton at Fort Driant where he could not defeat the German forces.
Patton of course also didn't bother with taking prisoners resulting in the Biscari massacre in Sicily. Patton was also a very disagreeable character, a racist and anti semite, American General Omar Bradley described Patton as: "Colourful, but impetuous full of temper, bluster, inclined to treat troops and subordinates as morons". Unlike Montgomery he never attained such high rank and died in controversial circumstances after making himself very objectionable in 1945. Some claimed it was an assassination, there has even been a book written with many revelations.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Nigel, I'm a Reform party member and an ex UKIP candidate and a great fan of yours. However, the TR convictions are all politically motivated to shut him up because he bravely exposes wrong doing. Just as Donald Trump has been himself, but you still support him. Also its not true he almost destroyed a grooming gang trial, nothing he said wasnt already in the public domain, so of he was guilty so were they.
Earlier today you also accused him of beating up women, which is also a complete lie . Even his exwife stepped forward to defend him. At no point has he shown any desire to join Reform, so why keep saying you wont allow it ? Please stop this persecution of him, he is a decent person and if you can't say anything good, don't say anything at all, especially when its all lies.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johnwoodley2034
Yes of course the Northern Irish fought for the crown, but so did the southern Irish from the republic. The study I posted in one of my comments above this, shows around 70,000 from the Irish republic also fought for the crown, some even deserting the Irish Army to sign up for Britain. In fact the Irish have fought for the British crown for centuries, my great great great Irish grandfather was a Colonel in the British army, as was his brothers, father and uncles, for generations. You can find racism in all countries against any people, but England is the least racist country on the planet. You could also make a sound claim that the Irish are racist against the English, it's just the English had more influence. However, it's better to talk about the far more things we have in common, rather than the few negatives.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Billy Pribbo
Cut out the childish insults, I know a lot about history, I've written books on it.
Nevertheless, yes, Churchil help set up the ECHR to bring Europe up to the standards of British justice, so that never again could Europe descend into the pit of vile depravity witnessed during WW2.
However, times change, and as I said, he would be absolutely appalled to realise foreign criminals were using it to not only enter his beloved Britain, but remain here after committing dreadful crimes.
You do realise too, that though the EU insists all member states sign up to it, they themselves refuse,Why ? Because it would supercede their own Court of Justice, just as it does the UKs and this is the exact reason we don't want to be signed up to it either.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I don't recognise these complaints about poor English food before immigrants arrived. When I was born in 1950 we still had rationing, and yet we ate well.
My mother was not a 5star chef like Aldo, but she cooked wholesome English food from scratch, a different dish every day. Not only Sunday roast, but in the winter the scraps and bones would go into the pot combined with vegetables and dumplings to make a delicious stew. Other dishes I remember, were egg and bacon tart, toad in the hole, liver and bacon, shepherds pies, Lancashire hot pot, various fish dishes, it certainly wasn't poor food, it was delicious.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Charles seems like a very nice, hard working devoted man, but unfortunately not very bright.
As King, Charles he is head of the Anglican Church and is therefore responsible for preserving and maintaining it. And as the whole ceremony is fundamentaly based on the Church of England and serving its people. Therefore, If Charles does this, he will destroy both the church he is supposed to be head of, as well as the ancient mystery and majesty of the Coronation service and with it the monarchy itself. In one sweep, he will turn it into a serves everyone, but no one in particular, modern King Cokey Wokey, WEF slapstick irrelevance of an institution.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@judewarner1536
I have answered your question continuously, and I will answer your latest ones as well.
1/ You can always find people in the past who have held all sorts of opinions. However, in a democracy it's the opinions of the majority that count.
2nd/ the SNP are supposed to be politicians and when politicians agree to abide by rules they can't then change those rules when the result wasn't the one they hoped for.
3/ SNP support is falling so they don't even represent the majority opinion.
4/ In Spain when the Catonians wanted a Referendum on independence it was refused by the Spanish government. The Catolonian Parliament held one anyway and they voted to Leave. The Spanish government then refused to accept the result and hunted down the officials who organised it and jailed them. How different to the way we do things in Britain.
5/ The reason Indepence Referendums are held so far apart it because the political and economic fallout takes decades or more to repair, so it's never a situation to be taken lightly. Especially when the country you want to separate from is so close in so many ways, by cultural, Kinship, economically and historically.
There are over 1million Scots living in England alone and many many more who have Scottish ancestry. So a change of Government is no where as much of a change as separating your self from not only your kith and kin, but also your largest trading partner.
6/ However, I believe in Democracy and if the Scots really wanted to leave and not just the SNP , I certainly wouldn't stop them. Though which ever way the vote went, there would still be around 50% of Scots who hated the result.
2
-
@judewarner1536
1/ what recent plebecite is this that you are referring to ?
2/ we were taken into the EU illegally by Tory PM Edward Heath in 1972 breaking both his word and our Constitution. We then had to wait 50 years for a vote. In Britian the electorate are the Sovereign power, no PM could refuse to act on their stated opinion.
3/ Yes it is, and in 2014 their opinion was to remain in the UK, so why do you not respect their opinion ?
4/ No, what happened in Biafra, the famine ?
5/ Scots didn't vote to remain in the EU?
If you are referring to the Brexit Referendum every single vote counted equaly from all over the UK and the over 1million Scots Brexit votes pushed Brexit over the line .
5/ It's based on the observation of countries that have been devided from their former partners. Ireland joined the EU at the same time as the UK and there flourishing GDP is down to their low business tax rate, which has attracted many huge multinationals to locate there. Nevertheless, it's not as rosy as it seems. First the EU is forcing Ireland to harmonise their rates, will these multinationals remain ?
Also Irelands GDP is very deceptive as it's all based on the income of these multinationals and though it does provide good jobs for a few, it also inflates property prices making them too expensive for the average Irish citizen.
If these companies were to leave , ireland would be back were it started as prosperity there is an illusion.
6/ the leave vote did not seperate anyone from any thing. Europe is still where it was and we are free to visit it anytime we want to. My own wife is French and often visits her family there. We also travel to many countries in Europe, those in, and those outside the EU dictatorship. Brexit hasn't separated us from our largest trading partner, our largest trading country is the US. However, since Brexit UK trade with the EU is now larger than at at anytime we were members.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cnlbenmc
The British equipped the Soviets with over 3,000 Hurricane fighters, 4,000 other planes, 27 Naval vessels, over 5,000 tanks , 5,000 anti tank guns, nearly 2,000 motorcycles over 4million tons of equipment and food was sent and unlike the later US aid it was all free.
Over 1,000 Matilda tanks were also sent which were crucial in the battle of Moscow.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mothers milk is produced for the benefit of their offspring whether they are cows, dogs or humans. In fact humans are one of the only animals that by practice can still consume milk after weaning, though not all humans, as some are still intolerant to it.
When any mother produces its young there is obviously, and undeniably, a strong bond between them. Therefore separating them after birth is bound to cause distress to any animal, just as it does in the human animal. Therefore, this dairy farmer is talking nonsense when he claims the cows don't feel remorse at the loss of theirs. However, though I'm completely against the vile dairy industry, I'm not sure I agree with the methods these protesters are employing, it's up to the individual to make their own moral judgement.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Chitown Livingston
Patton was a crude, vulgar and violent Nazi sympathiser. Even American General Omar Bradley accused Patton of this as well as "treating his subordinates like morons". But it wasn't just his own men who he treated with such contempt, he did the same with Jewish concentration camp victims who he claimed were sub human and preferred living together in filthy one room accommodation and defecating everywhere they are lower than animals he claimed. This is all revealed in "Patton, the man behind the legend" which was written by an admirer who was shocked by what he discovered.
Patton was also implemented in the Biscari massacre, when troops responsible told the court he had ordered them not to take prisoners, this was backed up by the soldiers commanding officer Colonel Cookson who agreed, and went into more detail as to what Patton had told the troops. There was also other cases where the soldier responsible made the same claims, but not against other officers, all against Patton.
As to Market Garden
Wars are won by the brave and the bold and daring decisions are often necessary and Market garden was a very bold and daring operation the largest airborne assault in history. If it had succeeded it would have ended the war earlier and prevented the Soviets taking Berlin and changing the course of history, saving many lives in the process. Unfortunately, everything that could go wrong, did go wrong. The troops were dropped in 3 stages instead of one due to lack of available planes. The weather was bad, the radios didnt work......
Yet Montgomery is well known for his detailed planning to protect his soldiers as far as possible, but he couldn't control fate. However, dispite this it still achieved 90% of its goals and liberated much of the Netherlands enabling it to be used in the final push to defeat Nazi Germany.
As I said previously, both men had bad parts to their character, but for me, Montgomery is by far the better of the two, both as a Commanding officer, and as a man.
2
-
@Chitown Livingston
Neither did Montgomery plan to kill his own men ? Monty cared deeply for the soldiers who served under him. My father included, who served under Monty in the battle of France, Dunkirk, Torch Landings, North Africa, Sicily and then Italy before Monty left to plan the Normandy landings. My father worshipped Monty, as did many of the soldiers who served under him. However, Market Garden planning was restricted because it had to fit Eisenhower's grand plan. Which Eisenhower admitted when he later said: "I not only approved of Market garden, I insisted upon it", so shouldn't Eisenhower also bear some blame?
No, I don't think either does, it was a bold plan that in the heat of conflict was designed to end the war earlier to our advantage. If it had succeeded both men would be applauded as military geniuses who saved the day. Unfortunately, it lacked the luck necessary to succeed as planned.
But it still showed that Monty unlike Patton was prepared to fight hard to win the war, not just his own personal glory by stunts like Palermo and Messina.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nickdanger3802
There are a lot of holes in what you have written here. Market Garden wasn't all Monty, it was a compromised plan to suit Eisenhower. Also many others made large contributions to it not working as well as it should, but Monty always gets the blame, unfairly. Also the US military personne were not involved in larger numbers than the British. You have to remember that at the time it was the British Empire which controlled 25% of the worlds population and 15million fought for Britain in WW2, compared to less than 12million for American. It was in industrial might that America triumphed, while much of Britains industry had been destroyed by bombing. At the end of WW2, which Britain had fought from 1939, not late in 1942 as America did, Britain was both broke and exhausted and owed a fortune to the rising American superpower. Britains war debt wasn't paid off untill December 2006. Monty was one of the greatest Generals of WW2 and without him, WW2 could have easily been lost, but with him, victory was assured.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nickdanger3802
It's true that the US economy was very strong and rising during WW2, just as Britains wealth and power were falling.
However, the worlds largest Navy in WW2 was still the Royal Navy as they had an Empire to serve. The US didn't, because it wasn't a a world power at the time. Therefore, their navy wasn't large untill the end of WW2. Even the US army was very small at the outbreak of WW2, in fact in 1939 it was ranked 17 in the world, smaller than Romanians. Even after it joined the war in late 42, Field Marshal Sir John Dill said that it was 'more unready for war as it was possible to imagine. This remarks was proved to be correct only a few months later at Kasserine. Also the UK naval Amanda that left Britain for the Torch landings in North Africa was twice the size of the US one from America. Even at the Normandy landings their were more British soldiers involved and the Naval cover and Air cover were all majority British. The American contribution to WW2 was great, but Britains was far greater. America emerged from WW2 a rich world power, while Britain emerged as a declining world power, bankrupt and toothless.
2
-
@nickdanger3802
In the battle of France the BEF was only playing a supporting role to the French and was the smallest army involved. Yet the Dutch, Belgiums and French were all defeated in rapid time despite all armies being far larger than Britain's small expeditionary force. In fact at the time, France was considered Europes finest and best equipped army, yet they collapsed in weeks. Yes Britains army was machanicalised but only by comandeering tradesmen lorries and other such vehicles. One newly conscripted soldier even found his bakery van in France being used by the Royal Engineers and it even had his delivery notes still hidden under the seat. However, though the British army had been starved of funds and equipment and even though many in France hadn't recieved much training the Germans were still impressed with their performance.
After Dunkirk and the planned invasion of Britain a report was drawn up by the IV corps in Bocks 6th Army who had fought the BEF from the Dyle to the coast, it manly concerns technical details and fighting methods but the general verdict it produced informed by it's own experience was that:
'The English soldier was in excellent physical condition. He bore his own wounds with stoical calm. The losses of his own troops he discussed with complete equanimity. He did not complain of hardships. In battle he was tough and dogged, his conviction that England would conquer in the end was unshakable. The English solder has always shown himself to be a fighter of high value. Certainly the Territorial divisions are inferior to the regular troops in training, but where morale is concerned they are their equal.
The Englishman took any punishment that came his way. During the fighting IV corps took relatively fewer English prisoners than in engagements with the French or Belgians. On the other hand, casualties on both sides were high.'
So the enemy certainly considered the British soldier a tough adversary though
when they talk about the 'English' soldier, they of course mean British. Which includes Scots, Welsh and Irish who also fought, though the English are by far the largest country, so made up the majority. As the war progressed the Empire was also involved and soldiers from around the world also joined the fighting .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gabbertje-rh7rw
I don't tell lies, it's pointless to do so, I only report the truth. However, the truth is often more difficult to find than the propaganda that we are fed through such sites as Wikipedia. Jean Marine le Pen was indeed a resistance fighter, and Francois Mitterand was not only a Nazi collaborator in the Vichy Government he even recieved an award "La Francisque" for his loyalty. Even that other pillar of French politics Jacques Delors was in the French Hitler youth. Of course, the EU itself was also founded by the Nazis.
They discussed it in Rome in 1938 with their Italian fascist allies. Later in 1941 they held a conference in Berlin where Nazi experts in their fields all gave a speeches. These were all published in a glossy book entitled "The Eurospaisch Wirtschafts Gemeinschaft" or European Economic Community in English. This book had a forward written by the Nazi economics minister and head of the Reichsbank Walter Funk. After the Nazis lost WW2, the EEC didn't die, it was resurrected and finally put into motion in Rome in 1957. The Nazi Walter Hallstein, Hitlers law man who had been in Rome with Hitler in 1938, returned to sign it and became the EUs first President. I doubt you will find any of this online as it's too embarrassing for those concerned, and particularly what we now know as the EU, but it's all true !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RealOGfikey
I can see the inconvenient truth has upset you. However, unlike you, I don't get all my information from Google.
This island was known as Britannia during the Roman period, not Cymru, that's a a much later term.
The English have been here far longer than people originally thought, certainly during the Roman occupation. They are also 90% Brythonic and only 10% 'Anglosaxon'. Just as the Southern Welsh and Southern Scots are, yet according to you, the English, Welsh and the Scots don't have enough Brythonic dna either ???? Yet their 90% dna is confirmed by the latest research and DNA, doesn't lie.
The 'Anglossaxons' never actually called them selves by that name. Interestingly the founder of the Anglosaxon kingdom of Wessex was called Cerdric that's a Brythonic name and his successor was called Cynric also a Brythonic name he was succeeded by Cealwyn yet another Brythonic name, yet all where later called 'Anglosaxons'.
While the leader of Alfred the Greats royal house thegns was a Welsh prince whose name escapes me at the moment. King Alfred actually referred to his people as the Anglecynn, not Anglo-Saxon, that's a far later name just like Welsh and Cymru. While the Welsh themselves originated from the region of modern day Germnany, Austria and Switzerland and they too had Viking Scandanavia blood intermixing just like the English.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pauljackson2409
Yes, it is very irresponsible spreading misinformation, so stop doing it !
What is your qualification for making such bold, unsubstantiated and easily disproved claims?
I have a lifetime of experience of being a Vegetarian/Vegan to hack up my claims. But then I eat a balanced diet so don't lack anything. Which in fact, my Doctor has constantly confirmed, telling me I am indeed very healthy.
You can get B12 from many natural sources, like Marmite, Tempah, Soya and Almond milk, plant based meats etc , I don't need to take any supplements.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@paulfenton7776
Yes we signed the GF agreement and that's why we are abiding to it. However, the EU didnt, in fact they had nothing to do with it. That's why they are intent on putting up a border somewhere, anywhere. But like I said, that's their problem, not ours, we don't need, or want a border. But you seem to be having a problem with democracy, no wonder you are an EU lover. Nevertheless, 5 years ago we voted for Brexit and Brexit is what we will have. So you can stamp your feet and throw your rattles out your pram, but us grownups will get what we voted for, whether you like it or not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nigelsynnott7344
You come across as a closed minded and rather lazy person. You keep asking me to provide information that I have already provided but are too lazy to trace it back to read it. However, I'm not going to constantly rewrite what I've already written, because I doubt that you would accept a 2nd time what you have obviously rejected the 1st time. Though you can't dispute what I have claimed, because it's TRUE, so you just deny you have even read it instead.
To answer your 2nd question, joining the EU was ilegal in 1972, first because Heath promised he would only take Britain if he had first had the 'Full consent of the electorate and Parliament' which is in fact also mandatory. However, due to public opinion being 3-1 against joining, he took us in without. This was not just in breach of a part of our Constitution, it was in breach of many rights enshrined in law. Including the Petition of Rights 1628, The Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 all require the consent of the Sovereign electorate before Constitution change.
1
-
@alltypesofvideos9902
No, wrong on all counts !
The UK is the worlds oldest Parlimentary democracy. All our politicians are elected, it's only civil servants who work under our elected governments who are unelected. Also the Queen, though unelected has no power and is not German. The reason she is on the British throne is because she is descended from Alfred the Great the greatest Anglo Saxon King, as well as William the Conqueror the first Norman King. I find it very amusing that Lefties call her German, despite her family only on the throne due to their descent and living here for centuries. Yet any immigrant with no connection here what so ever, who turns up illegally is instantly, and indisputably 'British' or so they claim. Also the Brexit Referendum was a nationwide election and every single vote from every single person in every single country in the UK counted equally in the result. Therefore, if northern Irish voters or Scottish voters had not voted Brexit, we would not have had a Brexit victory, English votes on their own could not have won. In fact, more Scots voted Brexit than voted for the Scottish Nationalist Party who claim Scots want independence from the democratic UK where they have elected representatives making our laws, to join the undemocratic EU where they have no voice or power. That's no doubt why the Scots voted in 2014 to Remain in the UK.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The dark forces of the EU have a history of intrigue and coercion to force Britain to join, and now again to rejoin.
In 1972 public opinion was 62% against joining, so Heath, took us in illegally and broke not only his word, but also our Constitution. Many believed Heath was blackmailed into this, due to being a paedophile. Yet only 3 years later in 1975 Harold Wilson held our first ever Referendum to legalise EU membership which was won on a 67% vote to remain. How did public opinion which was so anti EEC/EU in 72 change so far so quickly in only 3 years ?
Two reasons have been put forward, first that this massive reversal was only after a massive publicity campaign by all the News papers running pro EU campaigns. Secondly, that all the votes were unusually, not counted locally but centrally, so was their voter fraud to guarantee a yes victory? It would seem there was. We had to wait 50 years for another poll, though all Party's promised one to get votes, but never delivered. The Brexit Referendum was only delivered after the rise of UKIP and this was run democratically, and was the largest vote ever recorded and the result was Brexit ! This stunned the establishment and they did all they could to stop it being delivered, but finally it was, in part at least, but not fully. Now we hear that the dark EU forces are at it again ! Now again championed by many dubious politicians as well as the LBC employed EU stooge O'Bigot as well as our 'popular' anti British Mayor, they must not be allowed to succeed again !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Van Brighouse
Stop reading EU propoganda, no one in the UK wants to rejoin the EU dictatorship.
In fact, we didnt want to join it in the first place. That's why Edward Heath broke both his promise and the British Constitution to take us in ilegally in 1972, when opinion polls showed 3-1 against joining. Also Brexit is a perfect example of the democratic strength of UK democracy. Because, a majority of MPs didn't want Brexit, so they did their upmost to delay and deny its implementation. Yet, the British Sovereign electorate refused to be denied, and so they threw them all out of Parliament and replaced them with MPs who would obey their will. Only then was Brexit finally delivered, and now even remain voters, including PM candidate Lizz Truss, support Brexit. Especially after they witnessed all the scare stories were just EU sponsored bullshit.
1
-
@Van Brighouse
Its rediculous to compare the Netherlands with Britain ! The Netherlands is a tiny country, with a population of only 17 million. While the UK has a population of closer to 70million !
Also, whether I like the policies of the German greens is immaterial, as I'm not German.
What is more important, is how the greens are running Germany, and the answer to that is, very badly.
Due to rediculous Green policies, particularly regarding energy, the German economy is in hock to Russia, and they are now facing a crisis. They are even returning to coal, just to keep their lights on and industries running, so yet another poor example you have chosen.
In any case, Brexit Britain is forecast to overtake Germany by 2040.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
While Chancellor, Sunak and his non dom wife were not paying British income tax. Yet he gave away billions or taxpayers money away during his furlough schemes, including to his wife ??????? This is why the British economy has gone from the fastest growing in the G7, and now into a recession. Recently at Cop27 he promised he would spend more billions in Reparations for the Industrial Revolution, what ??????
The Industrial Revolution, rescued millions out of poverty and gave them a far healthy and longer life span. Also his recent budget under Hunt has killed growth ? Yet the only way out of a recession is actually through GROWTH !
And now Sunak is pledging millions to Ukraine, he certainly is very free with British tax payers money.
Which makes one wonder, are these two, who were rejected by their own party members, yet were still imposed on the British people in the two top jobs, actively trying to destroy our economy? It certainly seems like it !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@InfernalPasquale
Convictions are not the same as cases, and there were 595 cases. However, it can be extremely difficult to get convictions due to the nature of these Pakistani 'Biraderi' offences. Nevertheless, the Government is concerned enough to spend a lot of time and money introducing measures to stop voter fraud. In Peterborough election for instance, a previously convicted fraudster was engaged in the Labour campaign there, though they denied he was. Despite photographs showing him not only with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, but also in the counting room, which is illegal. 9,898 postal votes were cast out of a total of 33,998 which is an unusually large percentage and many fraud claims were made and investigated. The Electoral Commission investigated and wrote a report suggesting 50 procedures to combat fraud.
Labour won by a small majority and despite many accusations there were no convictions this time. The Government would not have spent time and money introducing measures to combat something that doesnt exist, nor would the electoral Commission suggest 50 measures to stop something that is not a problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@indogoUI
A dictatorship is where an unelected person or persons make up all the laws that citizens must obey. Therefore, the EU is most certainly a dictatorship. However it's not a military dictatorship, because it doesn't have an army........ yet!
Therefore, the EU exercises its power more subtlety by deception and subterfuge instead of by confrontation.
An example is the EU Constitution, rejected by the electorate but imposed on them nevertheless, by deceit. The UK on the other hand is the complete reverse of the EU, as our head of state, the Monarch, has no power and is merely a ceremonial relic of history. The Civil War of 1648 removed royal power. All Sovereignty is now held by the electorate, who lend it for 5years to their elected Parliament in order to govern.
Whereas in the EU the electorate can only elect an MEP who has no power what so ever, and is merely a democratic facade. All power lies with the unelected executive, hence it is undeniably a dictatorship...... dopey !😁
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And why, when discussing 'The Slave Trade' they only want to discuss the African transatlantic slave trade????
Yet Slavery is as old as mankind and all cultures practised it, and suffered it, but slavery didn't begin or end in Africa. The ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Vikings etc all practised slavery. While Islam is the worlds oldest and largest slave traders, and still operate TODAY, why doesn't anyone ask the Saudis for Repatriation ??????
Yet in England, slavery was banned in the 12th century, and when Britain banned the transatlantic slave trade in 1807 and Slavery altogether in 1837 it cost them a fortune, which wasn't paid off until 2014.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jennifermoriarty2188
Not Russia, the EU has been pushing it for years and now the Russians are responding. This is the same EU who claims to have preserved peace in Europe since the WW2. This is all nonsense of course, they are responsible for creating it, and not just on this occasion. Also out of a Ukrainian population of 41million over 8million are Russian. I'm not a fan of Russia, but we can see how allowing the EU and NATO to push on right up to the Russian borders swallowing up their former Soviet member states will alarm them, and cause them to respond. They are doing the same in Brexit Britain, dividing off Northern Ireland rom the rest of the UK in breach of the GF agreement and Britain's far older single market. The EU are also having secret talks with the National socialists in Scotland, Wales and interfering in Gibraltar.
Yes, diplomacy can settle disputes and stop wars, but expansionist diplomacy can also cause wars, as in this case.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mwd331
EU fanatics like you keep repeating the same false claims you made for remaining in the EU dictatorship in the first place, you learn nothing !
Yet we voted to leave 7 years ago and are still not fully out. NI is still under EU jurisdiction, EU laws and EU courts still rule over our own 'Supreme Court'. We are still paying billions into EU coffers and will be until at least 2060. That is 44 years after we voted to leave and almost as long as we were members, so how exactly have we left ?
Also any money the EU gave us was a small percentage of the money we paid them, it wasn't their money, the EU has no money. So called freedom of movement only worked for poor EU countries, it dodnt work for GB. We were told 3 million EU Citizens had moved here, but after Brexit 6million applied to stay.
Yet less than one million Brits moved to the EU, the majority of these were pensioners retiring to sunny Spain and greatly improving the Spanish economy. While the ones moving here were a drain on ours.
The Nazi founded EU dictatorship is very tenacious, it survived losing WW2 and survived Brexit, because their tentacles run deep and are helped by uneducated EU fanatics like you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ZaydDepaor
You are an idiot !
The population of Britain is over 67 million not 850, 000 ??????
The population of one city London, contains 9million that's far more than 850,000 ?????? Also the victims have been as young as 9. Just a quick Google search and I found a case reported in the Birmingham mail where it states that in the Black country Sandwell Council reported that the local victims were as young as 9 and she is not the only one. Though of course, many throughout Britain were young teenagers. Though the majority were below the age of 18 and are therefore still children under British law. Though you seem to have contempt for British law and think you don't have to abide by it, but you do !
However, many of these teenagers were also below the age of 16, the age of consent and therefore not old enough to consent to sex. Therefore, anyone having sex with them is a paedophile rapist. Many also had to be beaten drugged and raped before they 'consented'. So instead of disputing these easily found facts, why don't you help find a solution ?
Instead, all you want to do, is deny it, while these poor children continue to suffer. Shame on you !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenconway2468
No, but you are convincing me it's your problem.
It's the EU that wants a border, not the Republic of Ireland nor the United Kingdom, only the EU. But then, they had nothing to do with the GF agreement in the first place.
Also the UK voted to Leave, and therefore as an independent Sovereign nation again, we cannot still be controlled by a foreign power. The reason we are still discussing this five years later is that people like you, and the EU itself, wont except our democratic decision to Leave.
The EU doesn't like democracy, that's why it avoids, or ignores it. That's what makes it difficult for the UK democracy to negotiate with the EU dictatorship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billsmith3771
More nonsense!
Sovereignty lies with the electorate, just where Constitutional expert Proffessor Dicey declared in his Law of the British Constitution. In fact this can be easily proved, in 2016 the Sovereign electorate voted Brexit, yet the majority of Parliament were against it. They tried every trick in the book, including the law courts to stop it being delivered, but they could not deny the Sovereign electorate who kicked them all out of Parliament and replaced them with MPs who would deliver. The US definitely oversaw the GFA . However, the EU claim to have been a garantor of the GFA is as believable as their boast that they have maintained peace in Europe since WW2, both of course are plian bollocks !
Also your claim that the ECJ is respected throughout the world is also bollocks, it's not even respected inside the EU. Both Germany and Poland have declared that their courts are higher, and France only obeys it when it suits them.
Also the EU is well known for breaking International law, where as British courts and justice are respected and copied world wide!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The only problem with your analyst is that the UK hasn't really left the EU. The recent Windsor deal proves this, all Sunak did was capitulate to EU demands, thet have nothing.
Also interestingly the recent coup that put twice rejected Sunak in charge looks very much like the coup in Ukraine in 2014 where a democraticlly elected but anti EU President was also replaced by a pro EU one, in that case it caused a war, hopefully that wont also be repeated in the UK, but who knows. As to food shortages in British supermarkets, the only place I see them is on YouTube, never in our Supermarket. Though I have seen empty shelves in France and heard thet are more common across the EU than here in the UK. EU food shortages will only increase if they successfully close down 3,000 Dutch farms, Holland is the world's 2nd largest food exporter and when it was pointed out that closing so many farms down could cause a famine and people would die, the EU replied it's a price that 'we' have to pay to save the planet !!!!! Though I doubt any of the unelected EU Commission will go without, so it wont be 'we' it will only be us !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shy404usernotfound
Immigration to the USA from Europe was fueled by poverty and the crop failures that fueled a period known as the 'Hungry Forties' that raged across Europe during the 1840s, the Irish potato famine was a part of this. Total immigration in 1820 was only 8,385 but from 1840-1850 it had reached a staggering 1, 713,000 which included 781,000 Irish, 435,000 Germans, 267,000 British and 77,000 French. The remaining Members of my own family left Ireland during this time and emigrated to Canada.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@afrinaut3094
I suppose because you are a black American you only think in terms of black slavery, but all peoples have suffered slavery throughout history, not just black Africans
Though the Greeks, Roman's and Egyptions also had black slaves, they like all slave owners, didnt give a hoot what colour they were, as long as they worked hard.
Also all slave owners looked down on their slaves what ever their colour, they werent particularly 'anti black'. You could hardly have a slave who you considered to be your equal, even if they were. You would soon find a way to feel superior, just to justify enslaving them.
Slavery itself was banned in England in the 12th century. This is the reason that during the American Revolutionary war, black Americans fought on the British side. After the war was lost, these former slaves were taken to Sierra Leon and freed, in what is now the capital city, still called Freetown. Lieutenant Clarkson of the Royal Navy who was instrumental in this, is still today honoured as their Moses, who led them to freedom in the promised land.
In 1807 Britain banned the slave trade throughout their Empire. They even had the Royal Navy patrolling the Atlantic to free any slaves found onboard ships crossing from Africa. In the US you had to wait another 60 years, for abolition, though descrimination was still rife in the 1960s. Perhaps this is the reason that you consider slavery to begin and end primarily with black skinned people.
Though the white skinned Slavic people might think differently.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@haroldpotter5911
Oh dear Harold, another Remoaner who thinks Brexiteers are so stupid they have to be led and instructed how to vote.
However, my opinions on the EU are based on sound facts not hysterical propaganda like you have obviously swallowed.
The EU dictatorship was never just a Trading Block, it was designed as a pan European dictatorship by the Nazis in the 1930s. After WW2 and it was finally realised in 1957, we in Britain were told it was 'Common Market' and just a Trading Block, yet this is a provable lie.
If you read the Treaty of Rome that set the EEC/EU into motion you will soon realise it was never 'just a trading block'.
And though the traitor Heath lied through his teeth telling the electorate that he would never take Britain in against the will of the Sovereign electorate, and that joining would not dilute their Sovereignty, in both cases they were also a lies !
Nevertheless, at the time the electorate were 3 to 1 against joining, so Heath took us in without the approval of the Sovereign electorate and in breach of our Constitution. And after we joined prices rose, not fell because It's just another EU myth that food was cheaper, it most certainly was not. Also there are no food shortages in British supermarkets yet another EU lie. Though goods driver shortages are all over Europe not just in the UK. Do you know why this Is Harold ? It's because the EU makes HGV drivers sit a regular and expensive re- test that they have to pay for themselves. Many of the testers are not half as experienced as the HGV drivers themselves, so many dont bother and so have left the trade. Another example of EU rule making crippling a once thriving industry.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Farage was correct, the British army was ordered to destroy all the equipment that they had to abandon. My father was a driver in the Royal Engineers and had to destroy the Morris commercial truck that he had meticulously cared for by smashing it up with a sledge hammer and setting it alight. However, in the confusion of war it's not unusual that some remained serviceable or were repaired by the Germans. The same thing happened in North Africa when the Germans and the Italians were in retreat, many of their abandoned vehicles were re used by the British.
Also in North Africa in May 1943 250,000 Axis troops were captured including most of the AfrikaCorp along with all their equipment in. Later in their retreat from Sicily across the straights of Messina 12,000 German Troops and their equipment escaped in May. But in August around 125,000 Axis forces escaped to avoid the losses of North Africa. Which is a figure approaching the retreat from Dunkirk when 198,000 British and 140,000 French/Beligiums were evacuated. Unfortunately, Bidens evacuation from Afghanistan seemed ill conceived and planned, though many of the vehicles left there were those given to the Afghan army.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How Rediculous !
She is not even British, and yet the low life Labour party want her in the House of Lords, why ?????
So she can join their other over promoted Lords and Ladies like Baroness Lawrence who was promoted because her son was murdered ?????
As horrific and tragic as that was, is it really the grounds to be enobled ????
If so why wasn't Lee Rigby's mother also enobled ?? Oh yes, even though he was a soldier serving his country and beheaded on our streets in cold blood, he was actually English, and sin of sins, White !
The HOFL has become a joke, full of Left wing cronies who can't get elected, it needs to be drastically reformed, not stuffed further like an often used but never flushed toilet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fordnan
I've lived in Dartford, Hawley, Crayford, Horton Kirby, Yalding, Wateringbury, Sevenoaks, Otford, Four Elms and Edenbridge, which are all in Kent.
However, in both Swale and Thanet the NHS claim you can get an appointment on the day you ask.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Olusogo is not a historian, he is nothing more than a propagandist spreading racist misinformation, he is not educated enough, or honest enough, to write about such an intellectual titan as Powell.
For Powell on the other hand, was a child prodigy, who could speak ancient Greek by the age of 5 years old and went on to be the youngest Greek professor in the whole Empire. Powell was also a polyglot who could speak numerous languages, Olusogo struggles with one. Olusogo just repeats Maxist Woke nonsense claiming Powell was a racist, yet anyone who takes the trouble to study Powell's life soon realises the myth doesn't match the actual facts, Powell was far from being a racist. However, research and facts seem to be two elements sadly missing from any of Olusogos writings, his mission is to rewrite history and create racist propaganda, not to write factual history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@emcc8598
Mr Draper is not the only person to make these claims, there are others, including Simon Webb the well know author of historical books, who has also doubted the signs authenticity.
I explained in my last comment the difference between Provenance and Authenticity and therefore it seems it's you, not Mr Draper who still doesn't seem to know the difference. The London Metropolitan University confirmed it received the photograph in the 1980s, so whether the mocked up, allegation is right or not is irrelevant as there is still no proof it is a genuine photograph of an actual sign.
However, it can't be proved catagorically one way or the other its merely anecdotal. I can offer my own personal anecdotal evidence, I was born in London in 1950 and lived much of my life there and I never saw any such sign and so always disputed their existence. Therefore, my own personal experience is probably as valid as the anecdotal case you are pursuing, and its my first hand recollection. I'm am of course fully aware that the Race Equalty report isn't a photograph ????? What I said, is that they used it as part of their evidence, despite it not being proved as ever existing.
Also, it is impossible to deny that there are countless examples of people inventing stories to denigrate and destroy British culture and History. Because there are so many and unlike the photograph we are discussing, they are very easy to prove. King Offa is merely one example that can be catagorically proved, that he was not a black African.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@emcc8598
Life was brutal for everyone that wasn't rich in the past all over the world, including in Britain itself the worlds richest country in the world at the time. However, Irish officials destroyed the census data in order to protect privacy and hide personal details from prying eyes so the population for Ireland is not so easy to find. However, by using birth and death records a consensus of the population of Ireland can be gleaned and they do not support your claims.
The population of Ireland has remained pretty consistent for centuries. In the 17th century the population was around 3million. After that it rose to around 4.5 million in 1800 and has remained around that figure right up untill today. Though the claim is often made that the population has never recovered from the famine that raged across Europe in the 1840s. It is claimed that the population in 1844 was 8 million yet as I have said the figures are not reliable. Nevertheless, let's accept this figure for the pupose of this debate. If true, the 8million figure is an outlier which has never been achieved before or since. The claim is made that this is because of the brutal treatment by the British, yet after 50 years membership of the EU which many claim to be beneficial to Ireland this figure has never been equalled. So either the British were dreadful brutes, or under their control Irelands population doubled, a feat never to be repeated.
Add to this the fact that the Irish have always had the right to live and work in anywhere in Britain and still do to this day. If the British really hated them, would they really grant them such a privaledge ? In the 2011 British census over 6 million Brits claimed Irish descent, would Irish people really move to the country of their oppressor ?
You tried to compare the Brits to the Nazi's, but the Jews didn't rush to live in Germany after their brutal treatment, they ran the other way. Yet many Irish have sought refuge in Britain for centuries and are now proud Brits themselves. Therefore, the narrative you are trying to promote is not supported by the facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Adaman368
I don't claim to know more history than historians, I'm just repeating historical facts, not those that have been twisted by Irish nationalist to further their cause. The colonisation of Ireland started with the Normans who had already colonised England. The 'Irish Potatoe Famine' was in reality European wide. Its known as the Hungry Forties and affected all Europe, even Britain. I've seen videos here on YouTube thanking American indians for sending them grain during the crisis. Yet Britain gave far more help, both Government led and private charities, the biggest one raised £52million which they distributed to the Irish poor. Yet the British are never thanked, they are accused of purposefully starving the Irish instead, despite much evidence to the contrary.
Across the world many countries have suffered real abuses and far worse than the Irish, yet don't carry a grudge for centuries. So perhaps it's time this hostility was finally buried, and we learn to get on, we have far more in common than many will admit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@trevormcdonald385
Britain has always been a part of Europe for millions of years, so the fact that Britain ruled the Caribbean for 400 years, not the 600 you claimed, is therefore in comparison, of a very minor significance. In fact Britain enriched the people of the Caribbean, many of whom who were sold as slaves by fellow Africans and released from the slave trade by the British in 1807 and slavery altogether in 1837. If Carribeans are so like the British after being governed for 400 years why do they not act more like them ? Instead they upset the peace here by multiple acts of violence, murder, disorder and riots. Also, a descendant of a Nazi should not be condemned by the act of their ancestors. The EU was for instance, was founded by the Nazis and many politicians serving there are, or were, Nazis. Yet no one from the Left condemns any of them. In fact, they ignore this fact and instead pretend it's actually a democratic organisation full of love and peace. Rather than the reality of a Nazi quest to dominate Europe through a German run dictatorship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@petertrebilco9430
Here in the UK we elect a party, not a president, as they do in the USA. However, all Prime ministers have first to be elected by their constituents as an MP. As do all MPs, and those elected MPs elect a leader of their party. Therefore, if a party replaces its leader during its term (which is not common) it's of little consequence as it's the party we elect, not an individual.This system works very well and has been copied around the world. So, though not perfect, It's a democratic system that works and is not open to fraud like the US system, as demonstrated in their last election.
Also, the feudal class system you complain about ceased to exist in the last century, though all societies have some form of hierarchy.
1
-
@petertrebilco9430
In any democracy you will never get anywhere near 100% voting, or 100% voting on any one subject such as in any one question Referendum.
However, it's the majority opinion that wins which is far more democratic than when we joined the EU in 1972. Why? Because Edward Heath promised he would never take the UK into the EEC/EU
against the expressed will of the electorate. However, public opinion was 3 to 1 against joining and so the slimy Heath did take us in, against the will of the electorate and breaking our Constitution, he even lied to them about the purpose of the EEC/EU.
Claiming that it was only a trading block, a Common Market, and there was no threat to our Sovereignty, again he knowingly lied !
The EEC/EU was always planned to be a pan European dictatorship when it first come to light in 1930s Nazi Germany.
Hitler's official visit to Fascist Rome in 1938 contained a delegation who disgussed implementing it with their Italian Fascist counterparts, and back in Berlin in 1941 a conference of leading Nazi academics was established called the Eurospaisch Wirtschafts Gemeinschaft, or European Economic Community in English. Later a glossy booklet was published containing all the speeches and proposals with an enthusiastic forward by Nazi economics minister Walther Funk. Even losing the war did not stop its foundation, as in 1957 when the Treaty of Rome was officially signed to establish the EEC. One of the signatures of this treaty was non other that Nazi lawman Walter Hallstein, who was also at the 1938 Nazi - Fascist conference that first proposed it. Hallstein later went on to become its first President. What was established contained all the Nazi proposal of the 1941 conference and even kept the Nazi name, the EEC.
In the 2005 a Referendum was held to decide if the now EU could move on to the next stage of its development, with it's own Constitution, to be a state in it's own right. This Referendum was not held in all EEC countries but of those that did participate, France, Holland and Ireland rejected the treaty, Britain didn't vote. Was this finally a halt to an EU superstar? Oh no, the EU were never going to allow democracy to halt their dreams, so they shuffled the papers around and renamed it the Lisbon Treaty. For conveniently, a mere Treaty doesn't require the publics approval. And so it was finally signed in Rome in 2007, the British Priminister Gordon Brown turned up late hoping to sign it off camera but he was caught sheepishly signing it in a back room, the Nazi plans now seemed unstoppable. Nevertheless, eversince we had been taken in illegally by PM Heath in 1972, their had been a rising demand by the electorate to have a Referendum on our membership and with the rising influence of the anti EU party UKIP, PM David Cameron finally conceded and allowed a EU Referendum to take place.
The result was Brexit, though it took 5 years after the Referendum before it was implemented, with many MPs trying to stop it. This subtifuge was again blocked by the electorate, who elected Boris Johnson in 2019 and giving him a commanding majority to finally deliver in 2021 what we had voted for back in 2016. Therefore, you might sniff at our Democracy here in Britain, but at the end of the day, it's the will of the electorate that triumps, not traitorous MPs or lying politicians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@petertrebilco9430
Yes indeed Peter, 'Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely'
That's why we had a civil war and beheaded our king in 1648. However, we still needed a head, so his son was later allowed to return as King, but with greatly reduced powers. Professor Dicey a leading expert on the British Constitution declared that afterwards the electorate became Sovereign, not the King or Parliament, who are only lent Sovereignty by the electorate for five years to govern the Kingdom when it is then returned to the electorate to elect another to govern in their place. Therefore, the term the Crown versus X is merely a tradition term as the Crown is not really involved in the proceedings at all, it's in fact the state that is, and the Crown is only nominally the head of state. Also in England we don't have our own Parliament and haven't since the Scottish King James became King of England uniting the two Crowns in one in 1603 and later in 1707 his son Charles united the two Kingdoms into one state of Great Britain.
'Great' Britain just means the largest or greatest island of the 600 islands that make up the British isles. In fact one of the many problems created by our joining the EU dictatorship, has been devolution, which created seperate Parliaments in Scotland and Wales, but not in England. So we now have a United Kingdom Parliament in England with Scottish, Welsh and Northen Irish MPs all voting on UK wide issues and even some that only effect England. Yet they all have their own Parliament as well, where they have a completely seperate set of MPs exclusively from their own countries passing laws that only affect them. While the largest nation, the English, don't have their own Parliament, it's a crazy situation. In conclusion, though we still have a monarch, she is only a figure head, though a much loved and respected one. And if our Government hides behind her, perhaps it's time to sharpen our axe again and remind them who is really Sovereign, the Electorate!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FATHOLLYWOODB123
Unfortunately, your comment is very misleading. This is because Irish people themselves are not wealthy as you claim. Irish GDP is only high because you lowered your corporate tax rate and attracted many multinational companies to relocate to Ireland. So it is not owned by the Irish population, it's all in the hands of a few foreign multinationals. However, the EU has now forced the Irish government to harmonise their tax rates by next year, 2023. After which, will these multinationals even remain in Ireland ? Also the Irish language is only spoken regularly by 1.7% of the Irish Republic's population, compared to 99% speaking English. In Northern Ireland, the Irish language is recognised and is spoken by 0.2% of the population as well as 2% speaking Ulster Scots. Therefore none are not recognised as you claimed, in fact a bill to make both official languages on par with English was due to pass through the NI assembly but was held up due to it being suspended. The NI Secretary in Westminster said : if after the elections there was still no Assembly sitting, he would push the bill through the Westminster Parliament instead. Yet in the mainland UK, Gaelic is spoken by 0.5% of Scots in Scotland and even in Cornwall their are around 2,000 speakers of Kernewek and Welsh is spoken by a over 28% of the Welsh population far more than speak Irish in the Irish Republic itself. Yet you claim regional languages are not recognised in the UK where they are thriving, but recognised in Ireland where they are not ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nigelsynnott7344
The British Constitution says that the Sovereign electorate should be consulted and their permission gained before any constitutional change. Edward Heath knew this and promised that he would never take us in without it.
However, at the time opinion polls showed the electorate 3 to 1 against membership. Therefore, Heath used Parliaments temporary legal Sovereignty to deny the electorates permanent political Sovereignty and thereby diminished it. Heath was also advised by the Governments own legal expert Lord Kilmuir who told him:
'I must emphasise that in my view the loss of Sovereignty involved are serious ones'
This was contained in a famous letter from Lord Kilmuir that is available online.
Even James Copeland from the Governments department of Constitutional affairs wrote:
'When Britain signed the Treaty of Rome in 1972, the superiority of EU law was accepted and Parliament was not longer Sovereign.'
No doubt you think you know more than Britains top legal brains and Constitutional experts at the time.
Also, though the EU Parliament is elected, they have no power and are only there to convince naive people like yourself that the EU is democratic.
Whereas, in reality all power lies in the hands of the unelected commission, did you vote for Ursula Von der Leyon for example???
No, of course you didn't, and don't tell me the powerless elected EU parliament voted for her, because you do realise she was the only name on the ballott paper!!!!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@spindizzy64
My god !
I don't think I ever heard so much nonsense spoken by just one person ever before. But then you are obviously an fanatical EU Remoaner, and they are known to be rather thick and ill informed.
In Britain the Government actually told us that there were 3million EU citizens living in Britain, yet 6million applied for right to remain. So who are all these EU citizens who left and starved the NHS and our farmers of staff ? Are all these 6million unemployed ??????
In the real world, the staff of the NHS are over 85% British, only 13.1 % that's 190,000 are foreigners out of a staff of 1.35million and only 70,000 are EU citizens. In Britain we managed to harvest our own crops for centuries, yet after joining the EU, we no longer could without EU citizens help ?????? That's just more nonsense that's not supported by actual facts.
Therefore, what you claim doesn't fit the actual facts, but then as Remoaner you can't reveal the facts, because it makes your EU fanaticism look as stupid as it is.
1
-
1
-
@spindizzy64
By defending the indefensible EU you are quickly running out of road !
In 2016 Theresa May when Home secretary in David Cameron's Government. Said in a London speech in April, before the Brexit Referendum. That Britain should leave the ECHR, because it was the ECHR that was stopping the deportation of dangerous terrorists and criminals and only by leaving it could we reform our human rights laws.
And as I previously stated, though the corrupt EU is very closely associated and demands other countries must join the ECHR , it wont join itself as it would over ride their own Judiciary. This is exactly why the EU court judged in 2008 in the Kadi case, that its own judgements held primacy over UN law, the highest international court in the world. The EU recieved severe criticism after this judgement, that it was acting in a nationalistic fashion. However, the EU is not a nation, but the UK is, and we are experiencing around half a million immigrants every year, this cannot continue. Therefore, the EU holds primacy over both the ECHR and the UN, the highest international court. Therefore, if it's ok for such a corrupt organisation as the EU to hold supremacy, it's even more correct for a internationally respected judiciary as the UKs to do the same.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Neutral Viewer
I never claimed Pleyel taught Chopin to play ffs ! Pleyel was his mentor and developed his career by not only provided him with pianos and introducing him to eminent people, he also organised concerts for him to showcase his talent on Pleyel pianos. When Steinweg and his sons went to America they were not famous manufacturers they actually worked for many different American manufacturers before they stated making their own. This is where they learnt many new ideas and techniques that they would later incorporate in their own pianos.
The list of composers and musicians who played Broadwoods is unrivalled by any other manufacturer and is a very long and distinguished one. Including Handel, Haydon, Mozart, Beethoven,Chopin, Mendolsohn,Liszt, Wagner, Elgar, to name just a few.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@user-f5e9f
The British are no more mixed than any other ethnicity, the early migrations were when countries were being formed. In fact England is older than France, Spain and even Germany. Also the Germans were not the most common ancestry in the UK ever, let alone in the 19thcentury. The most common ancestry is still Celtic making up at least 60% of our dna in the east of the country and up to 90% elsewhere. However, If you are adopted here in the UK, I expect your parents were British too. However, even if they were not and whatever colour you might be, as long as you were brought up here and love the country, culture and history you are still British. Unfortunately David Lammy though brought up here, positively hates Britain, our culture and our history. Now he is in the powerful position of Foreign Secretary he will do his best to damage us. The surrender of the Chagos islands is his first swing of the wrecking ball, but we can expect much more, unless he is dismissed very soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Andrew-vx2ls
Yes, I agree with your definition of a recession, however I don't agree British figures are manipulated. If this was true, it would be front page news and other countries would also be doing it.
Secondly, your claim about British growth being the lowest in the G20 is completely wrong. This is based on an OECD forecast that only Russian growth will be worse than Britains, not that Britains will be worse than Russia. Nevertheless, this is just a forecast, not a fact, what is a fact, is that all of there previous dire forecast about the British economy have been wrong.
Thirdly, British exports are Up after Brexit and the gas we export has been processed here in Britain at the largest gas processing plant in Europe. It would be much use if it hadn't been processed here and that processing has added extra value to it.
So yes, it is very important to question all these 'facts' .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Unfortunately, the Islamic community here In Britain are increasingly demanding that it must police's it's own people. Previously British governments have been complicit in this, by allowing the setting up of Sharia Courts who announce their judgments, not based on British law, but Islamic law. 'Diversity is our Strength' crows the Government, but as Cameron rightly states, strength comes only from unity, and that includes unity of law and justice. One country, one community, one law, united in strength, not weakened and divided by diversity !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnnyRotten-uf6xw
The British built 34,000 miles of railway and supplied India with the latest British invented railways and engines even before much of Europe had them. Yes of course India had crude ancient sewage systems previously, but that's why the British built far better and up to date ones. It goes with out saying that India was an ancient and magnificent culture but it wasn't up to date with the latest technologies that Britain introduced. Interestingly, you scoff that my education is poor, yet by your utterances reveal that it's not mine, but yours that is lacking. I suggest you read ;
The Economic History of India, 1857-1947 (3rd edn) By Tirthankar Roy
There you will learn how the British left behind a modern infrastructure as the most tangible legacy of its colonial rule. This included ports, railways, canal irrigation, sanitation and medical care, the telegraph, universities, the courts of law, information-gathering systems, a postal system, and scientific research laboratories.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brianterence3211
No I haven't read Malthuse, do you recommend it ?
Though I do know about the situation in Japan. Yet no one calls the Japanese racist for protecting their own community. Though the island of Japan is far larger than the British isles where immigration since the end of WW2 has been relentless. The British are predicted to be a minority in their own country by 2050. So though unlike Japan, our population is increasing at an alarming rate, but it's all from outsiders who will change this country into something unrecognisable. I have noticed this rapid change happening in my own lifetime, where parts of Britain are populated by other cultures, all dressing and behaving in the ways of their own country. Yes, I agree that often Science is used to create panic to control the masses, as in recently with Covid. However, there must be some sort of limit to the population that the earth can sustain, and I do think that our population explosion is far more damaging than the Science created panic of, Man Made Climate Change, though no one mentions it ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bigwoody4704
You've been watching too many Hollywood films Woody !
That's where the Patton myth was made, not on the battlefield, where the reality was far different. Palermo was of no strategic importance at all and Patton was supposed to be protecting Montys Left flank. But instead he was off on a romp to Palermo and when Monty saw an opportunity for Patton to trap the retreating Germans he was fighting, Patton ignored the message and went in the opposite direction instead, setting him self up in the Norman palace in Palermo and the opportunity was lost. As to Messina Patton forces were on the east coast where the only open road to Messina ran.
While Monty was on the opposite coast fighting the crack German troops who were destroying the Bridges and roads as they retreated. So again, Monty told Patton to take the clear road and get to Messina quickly which the Americans did, but Patton halted them outside the town and told them not to enter untill he got there, he then arrived and made his triumphant entry and proclaimed he had had 'won the race to Messina'. However, there was no race, Monty had told him to take it, because he had the only clear road with no opposition and yet despite that he only entered Messina 20mins before the Brits who had fought a hard fight all up the coast against the crack German troops. Pattons fame is built on a myth that doesn't fit the actualy facts, Truscott was a far better American General, but then no one made a Hollywood film about him. At the end of the Sicily campaign Eisenhower awarded Montgomery the highest American military award that can be stowed upon a foreign soldier, while Patton was relieved of duty and sent back behind the lines in disgrace.
Therefore, the actual facts paint a far different story than Hollywood. George. C. Scott was a far better actor than Patton was a General.
1
-
@bigwoody4704
Instead of disputing any of my valid points Woody, you just attack the British. However, Dunkirk was a successful withdrawal after the Dutch, Belgiums and French were all beaten.
In 1943 the Germans were not so lucky in Tunisia where 275,000 couldn't escape and so were forced to surrendered to the British. Thats more than the 90,000 who surrendered to the Russians at Stalingrad. Or the 1million who were forced to surrender to Alexander in Italy. Yet in Italy they were on land, which makes the retreat from Dunkirk across the 20miles of English channel all the more remarkable. If the British had not been successful they could not have gone on to beat the Luftwaffe at the Battle of Britain and then stand alone against the Nazis for 3 years.
Instead, if they had been invaded in 1940, the Nazis could have easily won WW2 because there would have been no one to stop them. There were far better American generals like Bradley and Truscott, however Patton was not one of them and I notice you have given up trying to defend him, because the facts speak for themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oskarh5060
The British people voted for Brexit and Boris has implemented it as instructed by the British voters. The Irish Republic doesnt want a border and the United Kingdom doesn't want a border only the EU wants a border. However, the GF agreement doesnt allow a border between NI and the IR and as the EU insisted there must be one, a border in the sea separating two parts of the UK was tried, but it doesnt work. So Lord Frost has suggested a dozen other solutions, but all were rejected by the EU. The EU is only interested in protecting its internal borders, but it doesnt cate about the UKs internal borders or the tension its intransigence is creating in NI. Therefore, as this solution doesnt work a new sustainable one needs to be found, being in mind at all times the GF agreement. The EU needs to move its position , its called diplomacy, agreement are often renegotiated if they arent working. However, it's always difficult when a democracy tries to negotiate with a dictatorship.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oskarh5060
Oh dear Oskar, a rather silly comparison I must say, surely you can do better than that, but judging by your posts it seems that is as good as it gets.
However, NASA of course had nothing to do with the Nazis, Von Braun was a scientist who just worked there after WW2. Whereas the EU was planned, implemented, and staffed by Nazi's. And even today it still rigorously follows Funks original goals, even if Nazism is itself long dead.
Because, it's not the survival Nazism that is important, that is immaterial. The goal was always for a 4th German reich and that continues unabated towards its realisation whether you realise it or not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Claiming that people have always been coming to Britain and therefore we are all immigrants is just nonsense. It's a trope repeated by the Left in an effort to destroy us.
However, hunter gatherers like Cheddar man came 12,500 years ago, followed by Celts in the Iron age and then Anglosaxon around the year 400 AD. However, all these people were Indo Europeans and therefore related, we still carry their dna. Also it is claimed the Anglosaxons came after the collapse of the Roman Empire in what is known as the migration period when many European countries were formed. Even if you accept this, England is actually one of the oldest. Would anyone claim the French, German or Maoiris are all immigrants and arent the native peoples of their countries ? Yet arguably England was formed before any of them. The Maoiris have only been in NZ for 800 years, the English at least 1,500 and probably far longer.
Modern mass uncontrolled immigration is different, because these peoples have come here not over thousands of years but decades and have absolutely no connection to us here in Britain genetically or culturally and so they are in fact incompatible !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You claim to like talking about politics, but all you do is criticise Brexit Britain. Yet since Brexit the British economy has overtaken France, and despite Covid, Brexit and the Ukraine war, Britain is not in recession unlike the EU and its two leading economies Germany and Holland. The EU is also under yet another massive fraud investigation, where billions have gone missing. No surprise really when the President of their Central bank is a convicted Frauddter.
Also perhaps the Dutch economy is in trouble because the EU dictatorship is demanding that 3,000 Dutch farmers must move from their farms after their compulsory purchase. This is why political opposition to the EU is rising there, will we soon have a Dutexit ? Also the EU dictatorship is about to fine Germany billions of euros for not meeting their rediculous emissions targets. Perhaps thats why the German Afd party is rising in the polls with a manifesto pledge to leave the EU. The EU response in Germany is to threaten to ban the party, didn't the Nazis that first founded the EU also do that in the 1930s ? A leopard never changes its spots, but you never talk about these real politics, Philthy.
I wonder why !🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PVMe1967
Yes, you are right, they are not "comparable", because they are in fact identical !
European integration, monetary intergration, the rejection of the Sovereign nation state are all amongst the Nazi ideals now peddled by the EU, in fact they are identical.
'I am convinced, in 50 years time, people will no longer think in terms of countries'
Joseph Goebbels in 1940.
The UK never begged to join the EU, in fact Edward Heath promised he would never take the UK in without the authority of the UK electorate, he lied!
He took us in ilegally in 1972 because polling showed the electorate were 3 to 1 against joining. So no one was begging to join, we didn't want to join at ALL !!!!!!
Wake up Patrick !
1
-
1
-
@PVMe1967
UK Politicians applied 3 times for EU membership, not the British electorate. The Referendum in 1975 was only won after a large EU funded propoganda campaign of lies.
The British electorate had to wait nearly 50 years for Referendum on EU membership, despite it being the desired will of the electorate, and all UK parties offering one in their manifestos, yet they denied it once elected. This led to the rise of UKIP and it was only when they were snapping at the Tory heels that Cameron finally gave in, and the result was Brexit!
Also the similarities between the Nazi Eurospaisch Wirtschafts Gemeinschaft are not just in the same name, it far far deeper, as anyone who cares to look will admit. From its inception after WW2 when Colonel Harry Beckhough found out from Konrad Adenauer, through proffessor of politics John Laughton and even the British Ambassador to Germany from 2004 to 2010 Paul Lever in his book 'Berlin Rules'. They all discovered that the EU is a realisation of the NAZI dream of a pan European German dictatorship. If you want to bury your head in the sand and convince yourself its unrelated fine, but the rest of us will not be blinded to the truth. Also you claim the 'right' wing is rising again ????
The Nazi's were not right wing, they were Socialists, National Socialists, it's even in their name ffs !
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@emcc8598
Typical anti British nonsense !
As I said, this famine didn't start in England as this video claimed, it started in Belgium and destroyed 90% of the crop there and killed 40% of the population, so was Britain to blame there too ? In fact, and as I stated before, it was all across Europe and many people died. It created widespread rioting across the continent and because it was the god fearing 19th century they all thought that it was the will of god. Also, I notice the Americans claimed they saved the Irish immigrants from the nasty British. Yet in reality, the Irish were not welcomed in America at the time at all, they were attacked, killed and even refused accommodation. But hey, while you're rewriting history you might as well paint as favourable to those you want to as possible. However, the truth is far more nuance and the Brits were not the devils in carnage that you are trying to paint them. And I speak as a person whose family left Ireland in the EUROPEAN HUNGRY FORTIES, never to return.
1
-
@UCxDy_sKBWsPGjW2PaB7EdCA
Perhaps you should take your own advice and not base you own view of history all on the song:
'The Fields of Athenry,' as good a song as it may be.
Sir Charles Trevelyan was a cornish man therefore from the same stock as the Irish themselves, so it's hard to judge him as an anti Irish racist, and there is no evidence to suggest he was. He was also the son of a clergyman. Therefore, in a time of god fearing reverence a clergymans son would attribute many natural phenomena to 'Gods Will'. However, Trevelyan was not a politician he was a civil servant who saw his role as reducing corruption from those claiming famine relief. These rules had been instigated by Trevelyan after he had uncovered corruption amongst his superiors in India while serving there. Therefore he felt it was his duty to observe his new procedures very rigidly so that this sort of corruption could not be be repeated.
However, once he realised the severity of the situation he showed impressive leadership organising soup kitchens that fed up to 3million people and was rightly praised at the time. Especially for his impressive work ethic, working from very early in the morning, conducting not only his regular duties but devoting much more time dealing with what he called and was aware was an 'Irish crisis' . Therefore, as a civil servant Trevelyan can't be held totally responsible for the measures instigated by the Whig government and what he did do to help the starving was certainly praiseworthy, but unfortunately, it wasn't enough. However, the famine was unprecedented and the British Government just like their European counterparts who all lacked an adequate response, particularly in the early days.
Nevertheless, all this is forgotten, and it becomes solely an Irish famine, no doubt so that the British can be held responsible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Steve Bray is a Liberal Democrat, which is a party that is neither Liberal nor Democratic, so he certainly fits in there well.
After Brexit he fell out with all his friends because they were all Brexiteers and no longer speaks to them. This was due to his arrogant intolerance to any opinion but his own, so he is a typical Lib Dem.
However, he is obviously being paid to do this, he can't be funding it by selling coins as he is always there, never at work. His home is in Wales, so how can he afford to travel down every day to London and stand around being a nuisance? In 2018 he paid £8,500 for a float with a large head of Marget Thatcher with a pistol in her mouth. In 2019 he rented a very expensive property opposite Jacob Reece- Moggs house for £12,000, so yet another indication that he is being funded by some mysterious person, or persons.
He can't be paying this himself when he obviously doesnt work.
Therefore, who is the real Steve Bray and where does he get his funding from ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aaronfire359
Sorry Aaron, but that's just not the case.
The Government is bound by the Constitution, if it could write it's own and ammend it, we would already be living in a dictatorship. Also just because Parliament claims something, it doesn't make it true. Parliaments online website boldly claims that they are the Supreme Sovereign power, they are not !
Though I agree, over the years they have taken power from the people using various statues, however statues can be overturned.
In Britain, the people are still the Supreme Sovereign power, but we need to work fast to preserve it, before we lose it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nigelsynnott7344 .
The EEC/EU was a Nazi planned pan European dictatorship discussed in the 1930 and 40s and realised in 1957 after the signing of the Treaty of Rome, by the Nazi Walter Hallstein.
Hallstein also became the EECs first president and in his 1973 book, 'Europe in the Making', he complains of a few vestiges of democracy still remaining in its framework, but predicts these will soon be removed.. Also just like in Nazi Germany all EEC/EU Laws are introduced as Directives. These directives can of course be debated in both the Brussels parliament as well as our own Westminster Parliament but they cannot be stopped or altered, only introduced.
We here in the UK didnt accept the EUs laws as paramount over our own, because we were not asked, we were taken in ilegally by the traitor Heath, in breach of both his own assurances and our Constitution. You, like most EU fanatics, just swallow their propaganda, but never research or believe the real facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Richard Harrold
I've already written the actual facts of Rover and Honda's relationship, but you prefer your own fictinal version of events. However, If you read any books written about Rover or even what's available online, they all confirm what I have said, not you. You started off by claiming Honda had taken over Rover, but when I corrected this and told you Rover was actually owned by BAe at the time and Rover and Honda had a 20% stake in each others companies and the cars developed were joint designs, you then dropped your claim, but continue to claim all Rovers were rebadged Honda's but as I pointed out this was not always the case. The Rover 800 for instance was not a rebadged Honda as you claim, it was Rovers version of a joint design, just as the Legend was Honda's version. This can also be confirmed online if you care to look, but again you prefer your own version of history.
You even disagree with BMW CEO Bern Pitschetrieder who stated that BMW provided the cash, while Rover provided their own designs. So if you are even disagreeing with their own CEO, what more can I say.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yermanoffthetelly
Unionist parties have by far the largest share of the votes in NI, and they are all against the protocol. Therefore, you would have thought that the anti democratic EU zealots there, would have got that memo by now.
Treason May first negotiated the backstop as part of the EU Withdrawal Treaty but it was rejected three times by our elected Parliament.
When Boris became MP in July 2019 he tried to address the main concerns of MPs and remove the controversial Backstop, however the EU refused. In October 2019 he put forward yet another solution but this was also rejected by the EU. Later in October Boris opened discussions with Irish PM Leo Varadkar to solve the problems which resulted in the talks resuming with the EU. These new talks with the EU finally led to an agreement and Britain was finally able to implement the wishes of their Sovereign electorate and leave the EU. Therefore, this protocol was more about the EU getting it's own way than Boris.
Nevertheless, it is also subject to the continued acceptance of the NI electorate and this can only be obtained by the votes of the NI Assemble. Unfortunately, the largest parties, the Unionists will not reconvene the Assembly with the protocol in place. Therefore, it is our new Government under Lizz Truss to sort out the problem before the Assembly can sit and proper democracy can resume there, and the MPs can vote. When this EU imposed protocol is finally voted on, it looks very likely it will be rejected by NI MPs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1