Comments by "👺samurai boi" (@samuraiboi2735) on "" video.

 @deliriouswhome1 oh simply the lib only cared about candace and not him? What kind of question is that really if you want to ask opinions of jews but its about candace and not the officer?.
2
 @deliriouswhome1 or simply like what he said what does he have to do with candace
1
 @deliriouswhome1 or simply that officer tatum said why are you asking me about candices opinion. The whole debate is about his opinion of jews.
1
@deliriouswhome1 i wont say much but definitely which ever the party system, both parties have their flaws regardless. But only its the president's way of leadership role is the only thing to prove if he can lead or not. I dont care about candace or ben because they have their own problems.
1
@deliriouswhome1 truth is literally something thats subjective. Whether it supports one cause or person or not is up to debate. They debate to see whom is right, factually that is. I believe he did well with the jewish land part where jews decide to make a state on their homeland. Ofc him saying that made the lib angry since he hated it.
1
 @deliriouswhome1 most of the time it is actually. Just that whether you likr it or not is up to you and it seems the lib doesn't like the truth because he is denial.
1
@deliriouswhome1 i wasn't referring to your comment actually. Not at all even. I only brought up the topic of why truth prevails in either good or bad but mostly bad and the dude which was the lib never liked the truth. Also not once did i contradict because my comment is about why truth is very subjective.
1
@deliriouswhome1 what two statements were wrong honestly? I only mentioned truth is subjective whether its good or bad which the lib obviously seems to not like about. Therefore the conclusion to this is honesty from officer tatum is negative to the lib side. My first comment was that truth is subjective whether the lib likes it or not, the second comment i posted is that since its subjective it has both good and bad viewership. Basically it means that the lib hated the truth from officer tatum about police brutality which by confirming(johns hopkins bloomberg school of public health) that cases of shootings mostly include people who hold lethal possesions like guns or knives, im able to confirm the officer was correct about his arguement. I probably assume you dont know how to read perspective or maybe we both have disagreements. Because the conclusion for my part is truth is unbiased. The liberal hated the truth from officer tatum that mentions police brutality is abyssmal because he himself works at the police department somewhere in the us(im not american so idk which department he works for) I never contradicted on the two comments actually. Eitherways Its more like you seem to hate that officer tatum talked about candace, because thats what i see you talk about. he for one was not interested in candace because he said his not candace himself and he said why ask me about candace's opinions to the liberal. The liberal assumed that officer tatum would agree on candace's vews on jews because both of whom support the same party republicans to my ubderstanding so he wanted to pressure him to say candace's views on jews which officer tatum and candace definitely do not have the exact same share of thought. Heck even the officer went to israel for himself to get an opinion on jews. So i think the liberal should had asked a direct question instead of those stupid trap questions. Oh right lasty which liberal took the time to research if you told me they were on the same page as officer tatum. Unless you showed me one website that they mentioned that disproves my research, ill shut my mouth because this is my last comment. My typing is not good since my fingers are fatty so i may suck at grammar alot on this.
1
@deliriouswhome1 ya i think you need to read my comment. Officer tatum talked about candace havijg different views with jews(ill have to watch the dailywire) but the lib asking about candace instead of officer tatum about views on jews makes it very less than obvious that he is simply dismissing officer tatum. Which is why i have to mention not once but twice as to why the lib asked officer tatum instead of candace because candace has nothing to do with this. Have to repeat this: why the lib never asked officer tatum on his own views instead of candace's. Concept? What kind of bs concept was that? Saying officer tatum mentioning candace as him evading defeat is like saying the US is a communist country because people are protesting? First and foremost you compared him to the lib and saying both sides never won. I alr mentioned one point which was the johns hopkins public school of health on police brutality which that im able to confirm. Ughh the point to the officer tatum drama is that he for one was being asked a question about candace's views and not HIS. His views were simply ignored because he wanted to see if he can answer candace's negative views on jews and her blaming ben for her getting fired.
1
@deliriouswhome1 ok? So the topic was candace? Candace wasn't in this topic honestly. Thats for her to solve because its her problem and not officer tatums?. Now the new question is why did the lib asked the officer about candace instead of his views on jews because the lib only wanted to ask what are jews all about. But it seems he wants to shift it to candace and ignore him which delibrately destroys the whole topic and more about candace. This is the third time i have to repeat because iv'e yet to get an answer on this.
1
 @deliriouswhome1 i guess its not a jewish problem but a candace problem indeed
1
@deliriouswhome1 And my comment wasn't about mrs owens getting fired. Its about you not knowing what truth is which officer tatum showcases. Idk whats with butthurt like thats the only insult you had ever thrown really?. Saying butthurt in a debate is not going to solve the problem. So my question is why the lib wasn't straight forward, infact it seems he himself was avoiding something there. (Edit) officer tatums did not infact minimise her but told the liberal he has no connection to her views. Infact he told the lib he has went to israel so you can just ask him about what jews are instead of some woman who initiated a debate on ben shapiro which officer tatums was not part of as he told the lib.
1
@deliriouswhome1 oh lol, ill take officer tatum because he literally shows evidence whilst i see non on the libs side thats all. Why take the libs who only cried and wander off into the unknown.
1
@deliriouswhome1 account for what? Was it that mrs owens and officer tatums are one person? At least good thing im a sane person to know officer tatums was direct rather than indirect when he was talking tk the libs who just spout nonsense when asked whats with the police brutality. Kinda going with officer tatums and not because his a republican but because his sane. Now i see why your the only person who spouts this kind of "concept" like was some el dorado discovery you made... Concept that mrs owen was having different views than officer tatum? Thats not him evading truth, he simply had no connection to that woman because she had different views to ben shapiro. Guess every lib sees officer tatum and mrs owen as instead a person who gender swaps for politican gain. Not just that but apparently officer tatums is not needed in this whole video as a whole because now we switch to mrs owens because she is the main target. Honestly you could had figured yourself why this video was not even necessary to watch because your point was from daily wire about candace and ben shapiro. You shpuld had asked the viewers there instead of here....
1